Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Blogs  |  Newsletter Store
TENNIS.com - String Theory by Tom Perrotta- Let It Ride
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   Fitness
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   String Theory
   The Healthy Player
   The Pro Shop
   Backcourt: Framed
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
« Wimbledon: Week 1 Report Card Charged Up »
Let It Ride
Posted 06/30/2008 @ 3 :26 PM

Lopez Court 18, my favorite court at Wimbledon (other than Centre Court), is a short walk from the press center here on the grounds. What's so splendid about it? First and foremost, it's cozy (capacity 782, a more than a third of Court 2). It also has a lot of perches that other courts do not have. You can sit high up in the bleachers in the rear. You can sit at court level, where you'll find yourself a few feet from the players. If you have a press credential, you can watch from the roof deck of the broadcast center, which overlooks the court from the opposite side of the bleachers, or from the large glass window inside the ESPN studio, which gives you the feeling that you are hanging over the side of the court near the service line (though you're not).

As Marcos Baghdatis and Feliciano Lopez finished the fourth set of their fourth round match yesterday, I took in a few points from the roof and then found a seat in the corner near Baghdatis' new coach, Peter Lundgren, the former coach of Roger Federer and Marat Safin and (more significantly, at least for me) the man who lost the first live tennis match I saw in my life (the 1989 final at the Tennis Hall of Fame in Newport, courtesy of my older brother Mike; in case you're wondering, Jim Pugh won the title).

In the afternoon, the left side of the court (picture the chair umpire on your left) is draped in shade, perfect for the fans but not very good for the left-handed Lopez, who had trouble with the sun when serving from that side of the net (he kept checking it and occasionally practiced his toss). Anytime Lopez plays, a disruption to his serve could be fatal (he hit 25 aces in all, including four in the fourth set tiebreak). It's far and away the best stroke he has.

Lopez cruised along in the fifth set until he served at 4-5; this is where he showed me a side I haven't seen before, and one I wish I would see form him more often. Baghdatis put Lopez in a 0-40 hole with a few fine shots. There Lopez stood, facing triple match point, serving into the sun, and up against the conclusion of the tournament best suited to his game. Lopez served two bombs to bring him within a point of deuce, but then missed his first serve. His tournament on the line, Lopez did what no one--least of all Baghdatis and Lundgren--expected him to do. The Spaniard tossed up the ball for a second serve and just let it ride. Thwack! A 117 mph slice ace into the backhand corner. Lopez smashed a forehand approach shot on the next point and ended the game with 138 mph service winner up the middle, punctuated by a booming "Vamos!" Lundgren slowly bowed his head and after sitting silently for about ten seconds, said to himself, "Unbelievable."

Gutsy, too. It's one thing for Lopez to go for broke against Federer at the U.S. Open (he won a set last year) when he has nothing to lose, but to do it in a match that he knows he can win, in a fifth set, after saving two match points--well, that's something else entirely. Logically, it was the best choice: his serve is his weapon, so he might as well try to win with it (and accept losing because of it). But this was the time in a match where one's body often doesn't do what's logical, even when asked. Three games later, when Baghdatis faced double break point on his serve, he played a tentative rally. This time, Lopez wisely looped the ball to the baseline. He had everything to gain and nothing to lose, so why bet it all? Baghdatis hit a tentative forehand wide to give Lopez the lead. The Spaniard surprised Baghdatis with another second serve ace at 30-15 in the next game (perfect time for that 116 mph flat bomb down the middle) and ended the match with another thumper (a service winner 123 mph). When he fell to the court (see above) he collapsed limply, as if someone had just unplugged him from an electrical outlet (is Feliciano Lopez a robot? Sounds like an investigation for the folks at The Onion, the worldwide leader in news about Spanish tennis players).

Lundgren consoled Baghdatis' mother after the match.

"He can serve an ace on his second serve as hard as he can hit it?" Lundgren said. "What can you do? [Marcos] got unlucky."

I can see Lundgren's point, but Baghdatis' bad luck arose only because Lopez had the courage to gamble more. Perhaps he was emboldened by Spain's Euro Cup victory and the dream that this is Spain's year. There are, after all, two Spaniards in the quarterfinals, along with perhaps two Frenchman (shock of shocks, Arnaud Clement, and maybe Richard Gasquet, unless Andy Murray continues to wave the magic wand he waived in the third set) and a German (31-year-old Rainer Schuettler, shock of shocks of shocks of shocks, ad infinitum). Will they be mere foils for Federer and Nadal, or real threats?

| | Send to a Friend
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

First!

I can't believe the Gasquet-Murray match is still on. Gasquet should have ended it an hour ago. Kudos to Murray for coming back though!
And Safin needs to smile more: he's going to the quarterfinals for crying out loud!

Gasquet blew this match. He should've won in 3 straight sets, up 2 sets and serving for the match up 5-4 and a break in the 3rd. Now whoever wins this match in 5 sets between 9 and 10 pm (just before dark) is going to be both physically and mentally exhausted, fatigued, spent, etc. on Wednesday in the quarterfinals, giving Rafa a free and easy path to the final after he beats an unseeded player (Schuettler or Clement)in the Wimbledon semis.

Game, set and match!

You're right, June!
Gasquet choked and Murray is going to be too drained physically and mentally against Nadal.

I wouldn't assume Murray will be adversely affected by this. It is just as likely he will be exhilerated by his amazing comeback, and will go into the quarterfinals with tremendous confidence. It's not like he has to play tomorrow.

I really can't stand Murray, so I was pleasently surprised when I heard he faces Rafa next! Anyways I'm so glad Lopez won, he's finally winning! Unfortuntely Janko and Marian lost =(

Yes; Gasquet choked it away.

Kay, can't stand Murray either, I hope Rafa really takes it to him.

It's great reading posts from on-site experiences. The "unbelievable" from Lundgren expresses the reaction to Lopez's gutsy serve and abundant reward. Thanks Tom!

Hmm..i'm not a fan of andy murray either but he and nadal played a great match at the AO 07 so it could be close if murray's not bagged from today's match. i think andy's game will match up well with nadal on grass.

poor gasquet...he should have won that in three.

how about safin? i'd love to see him and fed in the semis. no bookie would have predicted that one....

Gasquet did choke but that was because of Murray putting pressure on him and winning that tiebreak.

Mentality is 90% of tennis and some people forget , as in Gasquets case, that in the end thats what counts.

Murray just took one hell of step IMO in maturing as threat for a slam and possibly giving Nadal a run for his money.

I like Murrays all court game and being Sottish and proud of what he achieved today.

Gasquet just doesnt have it ..

Murray-Nadal. The place will be rocking over that one. If Murray has anything left, that should be an interesting quaterfinal. Murray will have the crowd, but Nadal appears to have the shots.

Looking like Fed-Nadal 3, but at this year's Wimbledon, who knows. Some wild, but fun tennis.

**Someone please get tennis officials to cut down on the loud shrieking and shouting by the Williams sisters and Sharapova. The little tennis ball is not so large that you have to scream to hit it!!!

Thanks for this account Tom. This match was largely lost today in the hubub over the other matches, and I was only able to see tiny bits of it.

While I always hope for good things with Baggy, I am one of those rare folks who likes Lopez. Such a dismal shot (backhand) combined with such a weapon in his serve. When he is on- like he was in the first set againt Roger at the USO and for parts at his last run to the Wimbledon quarters, he can be a real pleasure to watch.

Lopez has had an interesting year, but his runs to the Dubai finals and to the quarters here have been impressive. I think Costa has been good for him as he seems to be showing a bit more heart right now.

Women's Quarterfinals tomorrow. Men's on Wednesday, weather permitting.

Roger will have a tougher semifinal than Rafa, if they both win on Wednesday in the quarterfinals.

Murray vs. Gasquet-fantastic emotional match. Maybe Federer could learn something that emotions can help you if he plays Nadal.

Gasquet should have won it when serving for the match at 5-4. Murray fought well in the last two sets and deserved to win. However, the Gasquet of the first two sets will have a chance to beat Nadal but the Murray of the last two sets won't. Safin is the only one who can stop Nadal from winning this tournament now... if it is up to me, I'll choose Ancic to be the new champ. That kid has heart. Too much to ask though, I know.

i have to admit - the 2 of the big stories for me this tourney so far are the fact that safin is playing STEADY tennis. shocking as hail actually, on his least fav surface. And also that Flo seems to finally have conquered some of his mental demons and forgotten to be afraid to lose; so he can stay tough and just go for it. Nice to see him gut out a win like today's.

SAFIN IS BACK!!!! IT MADE MY YEAR SO FAR!!!

Hey Tom
Maybe this is how Feli always plays and it just payed off today?

payed?????

paid.

This was posted:

"Posted by aceman 06/30/2008 @ 7:37 PM
Murray vs. Gasquet-fantastic emotional match. Maybe Federer could learn something that emotions can help you if he plays Nadal."

Uh..say what??! You think Roger won those 12 slams in a robot suit? *scastic icon insert here*! And it's not like Roger has not beaten Nadal before... I guess those don't count? Did you see the Wimbledon final last year? There was plenty of emotion. But I don't think Roger needs to watch either Murray or Gasquet for any help. *wink*

I'm really hoping for Nadal-Fed III. I'm a huge Nadal fan, but i'd be disappointed if he lost to anybody but Federer, and I think Federer would be disappointed to play anybody but Nadal. As far as Murray-Gasquet went, when I saw Gasquet choke the opportunity for serving out the match, I knew it was over. He mentally collapsed.

Nadal-Murray worries me because of the crowd. If he's not injured he should win. Fed should go straight to the finals. Marat is playing an awesome tourney, but he'll really have to pull some magic and hold his head together to beat Fed. Fed's game is just so perfect on grass, and Nadal only challenges him because he's so mentally and physically strong.

By the way, I've been reading around here the past few weeks and all this crap about Federer fading is nonsense. He lost in the semis to Djokovic, and to Nadal in the French final. In the majors he continues to prove that the only people that can beat him are top 5 players, and usually they can't even do that. Even if he loses in the Wimbledon final, I still think Federer is not losing his game.

Sigh, these breaks between days of men's tennis is gonna kill me. I mean I can watch women's but its not nearly as good or as exciting.

"By the way, I've been reading around here the past few weeks and all this crap about Federer fading is nonsense. He lost in the semis to Djokovic, and to Nadal in the French final. In the majors he continues to prove that the only people that can beat him are top 5 players, and usually they can't even do that. Even if he loses in the Wimbledon final, I still think Federer is not losing his game".


Moose, a person with reason speaks. Well said.

To Wilrich:

No shouting, shrilling? Why don't you just forbid players from breathing. Let them do what they think they have to do. If they shout, they try to combat fear and anxiety and cast away their own demons. That's extra energy spent actually, to the advantage of the player on the other side of the court.

It is unfair to single out players on this matter.

No. Tennis is all about excitement, wild shouts, wild cheers, and and everything. We don't pay tickets just to watch sleep-walking players. All sounds should be part of the overall game.

Haven't you tried to watch those games of the 60s with players so poised.... so boring!

To make tennis a relevant sport in the 21st Century, grimaces, shouts, uproars, and everything are quite essential elements of the modern game.

aceman;
Yeah,sometimes I wonder if Roger were to use his emotions to his advantage;to channel anger into his play it would really help him match Nadal's intensity.
Like others here I would have preferred to see Gasquet win.
Im British but I did not like the way the Brits treated gasquet,I thought it was quite a bit over the top.
F.Lo's win was fun to watch;love the way he just keeled over on match point.

The comments to this entry are closed.

« Wimbledon: Week 1 Report Card Charged Up »

More from TennisWorld
Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor

More from Concrete Elbow
TENNIS Magazine is published 10 times per year.




Save 75% off of the annual newsstand price.
Categories
Australian Open 2008
Australian Open 2009
Miami 2008
Shanghai 2007
Wimbeldon 2008
Recent Entries
- Showtime
- High Stakes
- Wide Ball
- Old Times
- The Yips
- Forehand Madness
- Wet Bulb Globe
- Your Answers
- Headlights and Shadows
- Butterfly Feet
Statistics
This blog currently has 98 entries and 4639 comments.