Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Blogs  |  Newsletter Store
TENNIS.com - String Theory by Tom Perrotta- Charged Up
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   Fitness
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   String Theory
   The Healthy Player
   The Pro Shop
   Backcourt: Framed
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
« Let It Ride Titans of Tiny »
Charged Up
Posted 07/01/2008 @ 9 :11 AM

As you would expect, Andy Murray is the talk of London today. The Daily Mail calls him "King Andy." Metro (and others) call him "Braveheart." "Mighty Murray," says The Sun; "Incredible Hulk," shouts the "Daily Mirror." There are innumerable photos of a charged up Murray standing at the edge of the crowd after his dramatic running backhand to win the third set, and of his flexed bicep (a bit too choreographed for my taste, you?) in darkness after he sent Richard Gasquet to perhaps the worst of his many awful defeats.Murray_2

I feel a bit of sympathy for Gasquet. He did choke, just as Andy Roddick choked against Gasquet last year when he, too, led by two sets and a break of serve. But if you're looking for hope--and if you are a Gasquet fan, you'll probably latch onto anything at this point--remember the two points he played when serving to stay in the match at 30-40 with Murray leading 5-3. It was 9:25 p.m. at that point, and Centre Court was dark, certainly dark enough to suspend the match under normal circumstances. (I'm glad the tournament let play continue, because the darkness affected both men equally and because momentum--that ever-important component of every tennis match--is a force that players work hard to turn in their favor. It's an earned advantage, just as much as a good approach shot.)

But back to the match. Gasquet played serve and volley (especially risky in the dark) and hit a good first volley and then a soft forehand volley off a weak reply (just the sort of shot a player feeling the pressure might miss, for the simple reason there is too time to think about not missing). At deuce, he charged the net again. When Murray threw up a good topspin lob, Gasquet backpedaled, leaped, and snapped an overhead winner. The ball was behind him and he had to hit it over his left shoulder. Under the best of circumstances--an opening set on a bright day with no sun in your eyes--it would have been a magnificent shot. Under these circumstances, it could have been career defining. That is, if he had come back to win. Maybe next time?

With that, I'll catalogue some adventures from around the grounds (and in the interview rooms):

Fatherhood: Lleyton Hewitt and his wife, the actress Bec Cartwright, are expecting their second child. Here's what Hewitt had to say:

Q: "How does it feel becoming a dad for the second time?"
Hewitt: "Yeah, good. Thanks."
Q: "Is the baby due in January?"
Hewitt: "I'm not sure."

I saw Hewitt in the village this morning, talking to Tony Roche and John Newcombe outside of a coffee shop. He seemed to have all his limbs.

New Queen of Fault? Elena Dementieva double faulted once in her 6-2, 6-1 fourth-round victory over Shahar Peer (Dementieva, incredibly, is the highest seeded player remaining). Alisa Kleybanova double faulted seven times in her first four service games against Venus Williams. Perhaps the cursed baton has been passed from one Russian to another?

Throwing darts: That's what I'm reminded of when I watch Tamarine Tanasugarn serve (she also goes by Tammy and TT). She doesn't bend her knees and swings so hard that her head snaps forward as she falls into the court. Amazing that her shoulder has survived all these years on the tour (she's 31).

Three Cheers for Minnesota: I was impressed with Minnesota native Bethanie Mattek this week. Point after point against Serena Williams, she hustled and tried every shot she could think of. Mattek kept up the effort until the last point, when Serena ran her around the court with angles and a drop volley. Players often tell the press that they are working harder off the court, that they are in better shape, etc., etc. Mattek said as much this week, but proved it on the court, too. Here's hoping good results continue to come her way.

Jeers for Spain? Fernando Verdasco could not follow Rafael Nadal and Feliciano Lopez into the quarterfinals despite leading Mario Ancic two sets to one and 4-1 in the fourth set. Credit to Ancic, but a bad loss for Verdasco.

Too Much Tennis? I wouldn't have expected Zheng Jie and Yan Zi, the 2006 Wimbledon doubles champions, to lose their third-round match to Ekaterina Makarova and Selima Sfar. Less likely, though, was Zheng's advancement to the singles quarterfinals. Perhaps success at both has been too taxing?

Dispatches: Here's some additional reading for you.

Jelena Jankovic lost on Court 18 and then gave the local papers a lot to write about.

Times tennis correspondent Neil Harman gives us this fine piece on Justine Henin, whom he visited in Belgium…

…and here's his take on Murray's muscles.

If you were scared by Rafael Nadal's slip early in his match against Mikhail Youzhny, you'll find this article from Richard Evans, in The Observer, interesting.

The latest book by Bud Collins, "The Bud Collins History of Tennis," can be found here.

| | Send to a Friend
Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I agree with T. Perrota: those points from Richard Gasquet, down 3-5 in the match to Andy Murray in the fifth set, were definitely moments to hold onto. He could have easily quit and accepted the loss.

But he marched on! That to me was awesome. I think a lot of the match showed me how much playing just 5% better means to players - it's the difference between escaping a match in three sets vs. losing by a hair in five sets.

Gasquet plays the doomed foil well. Remember those final few points when he was cramping against Hewitt at the US Open a couple of years ago? Great stuff, but not good enough in the end.

yeh i agree with that article about rafa's knee..... for sure he wont last for too long, but I preferer he gives everything now and become no1, than manage to be no2 or 3 for many years.... beacause, you know, History will not remember the no2 "4,5 or 6 years old" Rafael Nadal, but for sure, will rember the no1 "1 month old" Rafael Nadal (aka king of clay *)

Nobody knows how long anybody's body will hold out. People keep talking about Nadal's body giving out, but he may pull and Agassi and be out there until he's 35 (with all the attendant aches and pains that Agassi had at that age). And someone else could go down with a career-ending injury at any moment.

Hey Brandon, we appreciate you stopping by to read, but the comments section isn't a place for personal advertisements. Thanks.

Andy Murray is so obnoxious.

I despise Andy Murray.
Atleast we can watch Rafa demolish him tomorrow!

Lleyton's going to be a daddy again, congrats! They must make beautiful children.

I can see why Jelena was angry, I would be too. Andy Murray needs to seriously get over himself. However the comeback he made yesterday was phenominal. I got a little freaked out yesterday when I saw Nadal slip, but I think he proved in his match that it wasn't anything to be concerned about.

Oh goodness, first Murray has a book out, now Bud! I'm not too sure if I'm going to check that one out.

Richard might've beaten Rafael tomorrow if he beat Andy in 3 sets like he should've last night.
However, with Richard blowing it in 5 sets, now Andy will have no energy, legs or game to even challenge Rafa tomorrow, probably losing in similar fashion to Youzhny yesterday, 3 3 and 1 or close to it.

Hey Tom, that Gasquet over-the-shoulder overhead was so good I immediately called my dad in one of those, "Did you see THAT?" moments. That was as good a piece of pure shotmaking ability as anything you'll ever see. Glad you reminded us of it.

Very nice comeback from Murray, but I let's not get too excited. It's one match, and from where I'm sitting, Murray's got a ways to go to beat Nadal on this surface.

i don't like that knee surgery article, but it's scary and yes very true....yikes!

Go JJ, you tell those bias officials what's up?
i don't like how all of murray's matches have been on CC.
that little bicep flex, which someone wrote was somewhat of a subliminal message to nadal was a little sad to say the least.

I don't like how all of murray's matches have been on CC.

lol that is one of the most ridiculous posts I've ever read on this site. Where else do you think they were going to be? Court 18?
American tennis fans don't realise how lucky they are. For decades they have had their players competing in the latter stages and winning the US open, their home Grand Slam all for the delectation of the TV networks, their advertisers and viewers.

The BBC provides blanket coverage of Wimbledon. The TV coverage is wonderful and I'm sure it pays a pretty penny for the privilege. It needs to get something back. They've been waiting 2 years for Murray to play at Wimbledon, the only British singles player with the hope of doing anything, it's a miracle his practice sessions weren't on centre court.

As the journalist from Sports Illustrated said on theBBC today, American papers don't cover Wimbledon much unless there's an American doing well. Britain needs that national interest too. If only to get the ratings to justify the license fee expense that is outlayed for Wimbledon. There are no commercials! It is shown for 10 hours a day over two channels. McEnroe and Becker and Henman and countless others have to be paid. Last night 10.5 million Brits watched the tennis match. That is 15% of the population. That helps to justify the cost of showing Wimbledon.

I agree, I dont exactly what the intention of those remarks about Murray were but I will tell you YES YOU and any one here that to come from where he did and make it as far as he has is hell of an achievement .

He may not have the biggest shots , or the flashiest gamest but he had heart and plays an interesting / smart game unlike some other players i can think of .

As for obnxious , Id be interested to know in what way , if you count others like the likes of Connnors , MacEnroe and Roddick to name a few and even Courier or Agassi himself at times.

Didnt Connors always get the crowd vocal ?

Didnt MacEnroe smash racquets and sulk when lendl smacked him the chest for being crybaby ?

Or Roddick act like the big american wise cracking jock until Federer and Nadal kicked his ass ?

As the last poster said there is no harm for us to endorse our own AS YOU DO at the US open ,and as Im sure happens in ther other 2 slams too.

I used loved to watch Agassi and Courier but if you think that todays US players deserves no 1 attention then they surely mistaken, most of the top players from Europe dont even attend most of the hardcourt runup to the Open unless its a masters - nuff said.


Please not another book from Bud Collins on tennis...........does that now make about 50!!! I remember vacationing down in Florida in Long Boat Key and this guy walking the beach with a stack of books............yes Bud hawking another tennis book. I bought one but that didn't stop him from trying to sell me the same book a few days later outside a deli!

The comments to this entry are closed.

« Let It Ride Titans of Tiny »

More from TennisWorld
Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor

More from Concrete Elbow
TENNIS Magazine is published 10 times per year.




Save 75% off of the annual newsstand price.
Categories
Australian Open 2008
Australian Open 2009
Miami 2008
Shanghai 2007
Wimbeldon 2008
Recent Entries
- Showtime
- High Stakes
- Wide Ball
- Old Times
- The Yips
- Forehand Madness
- Wet Bulb Globe
- Your Answers
- Headlights and Shadows
- Butterfly Feet
Statistics
This blog currently has 98 entries and 4639 comments.