Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Newsletter Subscribe  |  Store
TENNIS.com - Peter Bodo's TennisWorld
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   College Tennis
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   Champions' Perspective
   Backcourt: Framed
   Ready, Set, Goal: Kellie
   Ready, Set, Goal: Joe
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
21st Century Girl
Posted 08/21/2008 @ 10 :00 AM

Sesil1

By Pete Bodo

I was expecting a light, fun day out at the BJKUSTANTC yesterday. I'd pick up my credentials and all-important parking pass, get my locker and desk assignment, maybe cruise around a little with Tennis colleagues Tom Perrotta and Jon Levey, checking out some of the qualifying matches. But when I heard the match-assignment desk call for Olga Puchkova and Sesil Karatantcheva, I decided a little more formal work might be in order.

Many of you already know why: Karatantcheva, a native of Bulgaria, started this year fresh off a two-year doping suspension, following what amounted to as searing and painful a cautionary tale tennis has recently produced. And this is a game with a long and unfortunate history of precocity misplaced, abused, squandered or shattered. And in Karantantcheva's case it, it all played out publicly in a way that sometimes made you want to avert your eyes, stopper your ears, and pray that nobody you cared about would ever subject his or her child to this sport.

Here's the quick run-through: At 14, Karatantcheva, a highly regarded Nick Bollettieri protege, made an eye-opening breakthrough, winning two rounds at Indian Wells in 2004. This produced a tragicomic incident that has haunted her ever since: contemplating her next opponent, rising star Maria Sharapova, she predicted that she would "kick her ass off" - the waif from Bulgaria was ready to rock, even if she didn't get the terminology down pat. Mortified, the WTA tried to rein her in; the press successfully goaded her into repeating herself until all parties seemed guilty of (nothing more than) behaving like first-graders reveling in the instant attention they can get from using potty words.  Karatantcheva at least made her trash talking credible if not tasteful, playing with impressive poise and focus before losing to La Sharapova in three sets.

Some people, myself included, found the combination of Karatantcheva's wild boasts and clueless demeanor more suggestive of inadequately socialized exuberance than arrogance, and a welcome, nascent fighting spirit. But then I was a staunch apologist for Andrea Jaeger and the young Andre Agassi, too.  Here was a kid who, on one hand, evoked all things Bulgarian of that time, including plastic shoes, bad haircuts and ill-fitting clothing, yet had the spunk and air of entitlement befitting a gum-snapping, backhand-whacking, tennis bracelet-wearing California tennis princess. It was almost a moral imperative to cut her a break because she also was saddled with an intensely hands-on daddymonster, former rowing champ Radoslav Karatantchev.

Karatantcheva improved through 2004 and had a breakthrough 2005. Her best result was at Roland Garros, where she took out Venus Williams and at just 15 became the youngest French Open quarterfinalist since Martina Hingis in 1996. In November of that year, her ranking hit a career-high no. 35, and in December her world came tumbling down as the French sporting newspaper, L'Equipe, reported that she had failed a drug test at Roland Garros, testing positive for the steroid, Nandrolone.

The paper also reported that she blamed the failed drug test on chemical changes related to having been pregnant at the time the drug tests (for there were two positive test results) were administered. Facts relating to the pregnancy and its termination through abortion are excised from the ITF's Independent Anti-Doping Tribunal's decision, and I suppose it's just as well; the critical thing is that the ITF rejected her multiple defenses and embraced the simple explanation that she had, wittingly or not, ingested the banned substance and suspended her for two years, ending this past January.

What is that, the equivalent of a decade in the life of a developing player? It hardly seemed so, though, when Karatantcheva returned to the pro tour at the minor WTA event at Surprise, Az. in late January, and won two Grand Slams's worth of matches as she slashed her way from pre-qualifying right through to the title.

She made headlines then, and broke back into the top 10,000 (that's no typo), entering her next event (La Quinta) with a ranking of 9,999. Although she won that one, too, she's  hit a few speed bumps on her way back to the elite Top 100, crushing opponents one week, flaming out the next. She's presently ranked no. 174.

When I wandered out to Court 15 yesterday afternoon and plopped down in the bleachers, it soon became apparent that the one thing Karatantcheva hasn't lost or let fall into disrepair is her poise - that ease with which really good players wear the heavy mantle of competition. This girl is made to play and win tennis matches like a coyote is made to kill bunnies. I arrived at that match right after Karatantcheva had been broken to go down, 0-2, but she battled back and secured an easy, key break to take the first set, 6-4. Not that she didn't have help - Puchkova served so badly that even Elena Dementieva might have felt a pang of sympathy for the poor girl.

Karatantcheva wore a pretty, salmon-colored tennis dress layered over a white tank top. On changeovers, she sat erect, gazing into the middle distance. She used her towel with great purpose, meticulously tamping perspiration away from the corners of her eyes and sides of her noses, as well as between each of her fingers. It was the kind of ritual of relaxation you expect of someone happily adjusted to a work routine. All that betrayed her status as a struggling qualifier was the slightly worn and scuffed look of her Adidas shoes.

Was this struggle going to be resolved on form of the day? I didn't think. Because just watching the way each girl carried herself, and how she reacted to moments of greater or lesser pressure, was telling. I sensed that Puchkova experienced some sort of telepathic warning, like prey often does, that made her wary and inhibited. I've always felt that there's a sure way to recognize that communication during a tennis match: It's when the apprehensive one plays well, except when it really counts, while the bold one not only lets it rip when the pressure is on, but also shows no sign of remorse when pulling the trigger produces a wild or errant shot.

Karatantcheva played like she couldn't care less, Puchkova played like she was busy trying to disguise the fact that she couldn't care more. Puchkova has a glowing game: she hits a clean ball, with classis strokes, and seems to like points that are set pieces. Karatantcheva was a little more interested in mayhem and, in general, risk-taking. She's a good mover who likes to turn up the heat during rallies, and her two-handed backhand is a versatile thing of beauty. She sometimes crowds her forehand, and doesn't make quite as much pace on that side. Her serve always seemed the weak link, and it remains so today.

After Karatantcheva closed out the match, 6-4, 6-3, I approached her and introduced myself, asked if she was interested in having a chat. Her pale blue and green eyes  - beautiful eyes, really - lit up and she said she really liked Tennis magazine. It was a nice gesture. A middle-aged Bulgarian couple came over, kissed and congratulated her. Then she fell into an embrace with an elderly American gent in old-fashioned tennis clothes, comically exclaiming, "Mike, dude, it's so good to see you here!"

I moved off a little to let them chat, and after a few moments Sesil came over to me and apologized. We started walking to the player lounge but were interrupted by a number of fans who said things like, "It's good to see you back!" Or, "We missed you." She also exchanged a big hug with Jennifer Elie, a long-lost friend from Karantatcheva's days at the Nick Bollettieri Tennis Academy.

As we walked along I asked if many people had wished her well and she said yes, and unexpectedly added, in a tone of wonder: "People. . . they can be so weird sometimes, you know?"

Karatantcheva tossed her racquet bag against a wall on the way to the dining area, and I asked if she thought her bag would be safe there. She said, laughing, "Trust me, the last thing anyone in here would want to steal is a tennis racket." She speaks English extremely well and has a sharp sense of humor, her words tumbling out in a breathless rush. But she looks you in the eye and has that attractive ability to connect - to make you feel like the conversation matters. Whatever else she is -  or isn't -  Karatantcheva is an aware girl with a keen mind, the kind of young woman that some would describe as having an "old soul."

When I asked how the trip back to the game has been she said, "Long and bumpy, but it's good to be back."

I'd always been curious about that incident involving Sharapova at Indian Wells. Many people thought the stunt was orchestrated to get the emerging player attention. The backstory is more innocent; Bollittieri, eager to see Karatantcheva to be better understood and appreciated, encouraged her to tell the story of how Sharapova had haughtily turned down Karatantcheva as a hitting-session partner.  "I'm an emotional person, and back then I was emotional and just 14." Karatantcheva explained. "I would say anything. Once I started going into that story, the rest just came out. It  was a pattern, though. I'm always getting in trouble, kind of like the bad kid on the block."

Sesil When I asked Sesil what it was like to find herself suspended, she said that her first reaction was denial - This isn't happening to me. Then, after she spent three days crying, she abruptly decided:  "I have nothing else to do but play tennis, I've done that and nothing else for 10 years. So I never really even thought about coming back to the tour. I just worked on the court (mostly at a spa in a town near Sofia), and then one day it was December, 2007 and I realized - I can go back."

Karatantcheva said she never got discouraged, never wondered if she could recapture her Top 35 form. She went day-by-day, largely alone, abandoned by friends and acquaintances from her brief days on the tour. Bollettieri publicly said he would welcome Karatantcheva back, but privately he encouraged her to break with her father, contending that he was a "bad infuence" (Karatantcheva's words). This put her in an uncomfortable position. She explained: "My family was the only ones beside me in those two years - not a single player came to me in two years and said, Keep playing, come back. I realized that my family was all I had, and I can't just leave behind the father who did so much for me. It's okay with Nick, though, I told him I appreciate his advice. We talk. But for me this is a good situation. I grew up with my dad. He took care of everything. I'm still my daddy's girl."

When I asked her if any elements in her original story, or the facts pertaining to her case, had changed, she said no. She characterized herself at 15 as "pretty crazy." She suddenly had a modicum of fame, and money as well. She had, by her own measure, "a big mouth." She stopped listening to anything that anybody might offer in the way of advice.. "I'm not really sorry about all that," she said. "It was just me. But I guess I just used those two years away to get my head together, to stop flying in the sky and start walking on the ground." Her voice cracked slightly as she added, "I had a pretty tough puberty."

Karatantcheva likes to point to the fact that Jamie Lee Spears, pop train-wreck Britney's sister, had a child at 16, and characterized unwanted pregnancy and drugs as the two major problems confronting youngsters in this new century. She just rolls her eyes when people wonder how she could have done such a thing - and at 15, no less - and she's grown hardened to the judgments made by others. And you have to wonder, how could she not? 

Sometimes, she said, she wishes she were a male player, able to partake of the camaraderie she sees on the men's tour. "The women's tour,  you know, it's more like . . . what do you call that, where bees live? A beehive. Yes - that's how it feels. They're really not very nice to each other. Everyone has her own clique. But don't get me wrong, I have my own friends, too."

I wondered if she believed in forgiveness, perhaps even redemption. Did she expect that anyone would take the position that whatever she did or didn't do, she's paid her price and now has a right to start with a clean slate?

"Personally, I believe that everybody deserves a second chance. But if someone thinks I did it, that I'm guilty and should continue to pay, then whatever. . . But it's the 21st century. This is a multi-million dollar industry, and people expect  you to go out and run 100 kilometers an hour, and do other unbelievable stuff. Who's going to hold up under that pressure. What body is strong enough?"

She left her thought unfinished, and I felt it was time to change the subject. I asked about her poise, the suggestion of entitlement, albeit without arrogance, that seeemed so striking to me.

"I'm a pretty calm player," she said. "I rarely smash rackets or scream. Actually, I laugh a lot on court  - and I loved Agassi and now Federer for being like that, for being so. .  gentle . . . on the court. I guess it's just my character; people say,'how can you be so hyper and wound up, and then go on the court and be so calm?' and I don't know the answer to that."

I wondered what she felt she might have lost, being off the tour for two years, and what she might have gained. She answered Part A swiftly and clearly: "I lost my ranking, that hurt the most. Starting at zero is very, very hard, because now everybody can play. The bottom of the rankings is overcrowded with good players and you can be a good player and still spend your entire career there."

Part B was a little more complicated. She said, "Maybe I grew up, realized what is important and what is not. I also learned to live one day at a time, and to enjoy every day, because maybe tomorrow I'm not here. It's good to understand that. I started thinking more, too, which I don't like. Honestly. I mean that.This growing up took away a lot - at 14, 15, I was uncaring. Am I gonna lose? Big deal! Who cares? Being brave, that's easy when you're not thinking."

Yesterday, for long stretches in two solid sets, Karatantcheva forgot to think. She played uncaring tennis, and bumped one step closer to a main-draw slot at the U.S. Open. It was, in some ways, like old times once again for a 19-year old - despite the fact that these days, she said, she would rather stay in most nights and curl up with a good book. She recently finished La Dame Aux Camilas, by Alexandre Dumas, and was heartbroken by the tragic end. You'd think she'd know by now that only the good die young - or should those nouns be reversed?

| | Send to a Friend | Comments (27)
Your Call, Aug. 21
Posted 08/21/2008 @ 9 :40 AM

Smallyourcall Well, the countdown to the US Open continues; today, I'll be attending the draw. I think I have to shoot some kind of video spot on the implications of the draw, with my Tennis magazine compadre Jon Levey. As many of you already know, I loathe exercises in bracketology, and making predictions in general. But I'm glad Jon and I will form a two-headed talking-head monster, because those stand-up monologues are a lot less fun to do, and always seem less natural every step of the way. Danged video. I'm a writer, not a TV guy but it looks like after  all these years on the run, the posse in the new Internet age finally has me surrounded.

I had to laugh when I saw the recap of the Pilot Pen this morning - Daniela Hantuchova survived two match points in her clash with Olga Govortsova, whle Amelie Mauresmo had to go to 8-6 in the third-set tiebreaker in order to subdue Patty Schnyder. I guess it was a good day for two of the great head cases in tennis. I'm not sure Mauresmo and Hantuchova are on opposite sides of the draw, but you can imagine the scoreline if they are, and play the final? I'll be posting a lengthy piece on Sesil Karatantcheva in about an hour, based on a conversation I had with her yesteday.

Meanwhile, talk amongst yourselves, call the matches of the day, and for those of you who enjoy the drill, get ready to conduct some serious bracketology in a couple of hours!

- Pete

| | Send to a Friend | Comments (350)
Your Call, Aug. 20
Posted 08/20/2008 @ 10 :52 AM

Smallyourcall_5 Mornin', everyone. I'm going out to the US Open qualies today, to pick up my credentials and poke around a little. Not much more to add for now, except to say that I'll be posting later in the day, and expect to bump into some of you out at the BJKNTC this afternoon. Tomorrow, we have the US Open official draw ceremony, and then Friday I'll be back out at Flushing Meadow. Enjoy today's tennis action and comment on it here. Also, keep your eyes open for Thursday's Deuce Club posts, where I'm going to ask those of you who will be attending the US Open, and may want to hook up with fellow TWibe membere, to make yourselves know.

| | Send to a Friend | Comments (1075)
Farewell, Beijing
Posted 08/19/2008 @ 3 :26 PM

Beijing By Pete Bodo

Hi, everyone. I'll start turning my attention to the US Open tomorrow, and on Thursday, Heidi and I will represent the TWibe at the official US Open draw ceremony. On Sunday, I wrote an exclusive post for Sina.com, one of China’s premier websites, and as it will be translated into Chinese, I won’t just link to it. So here’s the English version, containing a few tweaks to eliminate content I’ve covered before and other not-entirely relevant material.

The Olympic tennis event did not, in the end, belong to the Chinese women. The squad secured the bronze medal in women’s doubles, and narrowly missed adding one in singles as well when Na Li fell to Vera Zvonareva in a tight third-place match. But the Chinese women fared well, coming up with a performance that would have done them just as proud if it had taken place at a Grand Slam event. This is no small feat, because they were performing on a far larger, more significant stage, and facing as intense a degree of pressure as any athlete might encounter.

In fact, it occurred to me at one point that the timing of the Beijing Olympics was just a little off; if the Games had been in 2012, we might have seen more Chinese on the medal platform, because the Chinese tennis arc is still developing at a bracing pace.

The Bejing tennis event was dominated by Rafael Nadal and the Russian women, and it would have taken nothing less than a few gold and/or silver medals by the Chinese to change that. Even that might have been insufficient, when you consider the way Nadal left his imprint on the event, and not entirely through on-the-ground events in Beijing. The games belonged to Rafa for three interrelated reasons:

1 – Nadal managed to impose order on an event that is, more often than not, a crap shoot, filled with improbable and surprising results. This is usually because the Olympics is a different kind of beast than a typical tournament. It’s most comparable to Davis and Fed Cup, and we’ve seen how often the established order crumbles when players must play not just for themselves, within the comfort zone of a neutral tournament site, but for their nations. Although the home court advantage, and the pressures it brings to bear, could have influenced only the Chinese, the weight of national representation is one equally borne by all the Beijing competitors.

2 – Nadal’s two-plus year drive to overtake Roger Federer happened to reach critical mass right before the Olympic Games, putting him under an even harsher than usual spotlight. The world eagerly held it’s breath, hoping for a final-round clash of the two titans. Nadal withstood the pressure – as well as the temptation to just kick back and enjoy Olympic participation - and showed up at the appointed hour. Federer couldn’t make the date; it was disappointing, but not critically so.

3 – Nadal’s performance gave Olympic tennis a degree of credibility it has, at some times in the past, lacked. Tennis players often rationalize that Olympic tennis is an oddity, a strange interlude rather than part and parcel of the entity we think of as the pro tour. Remember, Andy Roddick chose to skip the Olympics altogether, in order to concentrate on the US Open, and very few people criticized his decision.

But Nadal made a big statement that tennis fans ought to welcome in Beijing, because it probably enhanced the status of the game in the eyes of many sports fans who ordinarily don’t follow tennis. I was near Helena, Montana, at the start of the Games, and when I picked up the local newspaper, the lead sports story – taking up fully half of the entire front-page of the sports section -  was devoted to tennis. It featured giant photos of the Top Three players. Suddenly, I felt very good about our sport.

These elements all sent out the signal that tennis ranks high in pecking order of international sports that matter. You can argue about whether or not tennis should be in the Olympics until the cows come home, and my own feelings on the subject have changed. I think it ought to be in, less because of its relative heft as a fixture on the world sports scene than because it is, by nature, so intrinsically and gloriously international.

With all due respect to Nicolas Massu and Mardy Fish, if those two players had contested this final, tennis would not featured so high on the public's radar. But Nadal's efforts seemed to captivate everyone. And let's face it, compared to the Olympic Games audience, the viewership numbers for Wimbledon and/or the US Open are a drop in the bucket. Nadal also demonstrated that the Olympics are as important for tennis players as any other athletes. Having such a competitive, exciting, satisfying tennis event did wonders for the game – especially among sports fans who still consider tennis a niche sport.

When it comes to the Russian women, their Olympics performance as a group may have lacked the sheer sex appeal of Nadal’s feat. But their sweep of the singles medals finally made good on the unrealized promise posted when the horde of Russian players followed Anna Kournikova’s footsteps onto the tour. While the Russians have been a powerful force in Grand Slam tennis, this was their most striking, significant and clear demonstration of the ancient principle, A rising tide lifts all boats.

Na But let’s also acknowledge the Chinese women. Psychologically, playing for bronze may be the most daunting challenge in Olympics tennis. Start with this: the finalists are assured medals, and the worst either of them can do is silver. The finalists are playing with house money. And let’s face it, the Olympic silver medal is a far more cherished object than a runner-up trophy, even at a Grand Slam. In fact, I can’t really recall anyone winning a silver medal at the Olympics and choosing to give it back (now when it comes to Swedish wrestlers and bronze medals, that’s a whole other story!).

Bronze medal combatants - and China had to fight for bronze in both women's events - face a feast or famine situation that simply doesn’t exist in everyday tennis. They are coming off painful and emotionally draining losses in the semifinals, but overnight they have to rally the courage and confidence to bring full focus and energy to a match that may, in the end, be even more critical than the semifinals. For if they win, they’ve earned a coveted Olympic games medal; if they lose, they go home with no greater acclaim than has been accorded the first-round losers, or thousands of other Olympic competitors who failed to earn a medal.

All Olympic competitors have earned our profound respect, but in no other athletic contest is the dividing line between failure and success as clearly and bombastically drawn as in the Olympics. There are Olympic competitors and Olympic medalists – two different classes of athlete. I almost wish they would award bronze medals to both losing semifinalists in tennis, but I’ll be the first to admit that the nature of tennis is such that it’s obviously sensible to have a third-place match - even if playing one goes against all of a player’s instincts, and presents a rare and uncomfortable challenge.

For those reason, my heart went out to Na li in the singles. She played Safina tough in the semis, and Safina has been one of the great success stories of 2008 in tennis. Singles is the lonely game, and Na’s doomed effort was made even more poignant by the success of Zi Yan and Jie Zheng in the doubles. I wondered during the bronze medal doubles match if Na didn’t wish, just for a moment, that she could be out there playing doubles instead – doubles, where you have the emotional comfort and sheer physical help offered by a partner. Na is a tough, purposeful and focused competitor though – I expect more good things from her in the future.

Here’s another thing: while gold is better than silver and silver better than bronze, it’s less about the color of the medals than the medals themselves. So just look at the nations who did not earn a single medal in tennis in Beijing: they include powerhouses like France, Argentina, Australia and the Czech Republic. The Serbian women came up short, and the "it" nation in tennis finished with the same number of medals as Switzerland – home of Martina Hingis, Federer, Patty Schnyder and former gold medalist Rosset - and the newcomer, China.

The Chinese have much to be proud about, but then so do the Swiss. Federer is an Olympic gold medalist – just like Bolt and Phelps, Venus and Serena, Kai and all the others. Just like Rafa. Nobody gives a hang whether it’s in double or singles, and that’s one way in which I think the Olympics is genuinely different from tour tennis. It's refreshing, just like Davis Cup doubles is refreshing. I’m going to leave my thoughts on Beijing with a prediction: China will win the Fed Cup before the next Olympics rolls around.

| | Send to a Friend | Comments (182)
Your Call, August 19th
Posted 08/19/2008 @ 10 :16 AM

Couch_potato

Good morning. This is your regular space for discussing the day's tennis. This week the combined WTA and ATP event in New Haven is being played; today's Order of Play can be found on this link. Juan Martin Del Potro, the winner of a record-breaking first four tournaments in a row, culminating in Washington on Sunday, has pulled out, to be replaced by Jesse Levine.

Today, the draws for the US Open qualifying tournaments have been published; here, for draw geeks, are the men's singles and women's singles draws. The US Open main draws will be made on Thursday of this week.

-- Rosangel Valenti

Note: As always, "Your Call" is the daily thread specifically for the purpose of getting together on the cyber-sofa to discuss or call ongoing matches, or hot tennis topics of the day; it's the "Crisis Center" thread for those weeks when there are no Grand Slams, Masters, or Fed or Davis Cup in progress. You can go off-topic here if you like as well. This makes it easier for you to stay on-topic at "premium" posts. For going off-topic, you also have Monday Net Posts and Deuce Club on a regular basis.

| | Send to a Friend | Comments (867)

More from TennisWorld
Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor

More from Concrete Elbow
TENNIS Magazine is published 10 times per year.




Save 75% off of the annual newsstand price.
Categories
2005
2006
2007
2008
ATP Championships 06
ATPchamps07
Australian Open 2005
Australian Open 2006
Australian Open 2007
Australian Open 2008
Battlefield Reports
Big Winners, Big Losers
Blogging Advisory
Books, DVDs, etc.
Breaking News
By The Letters
Clay Game
Coaches
Contests
Controversy/Scandal
Corrections
Davis Cup
Dispatch From the Front
Fed Cup
Friday Features
Guest Contributors
In Memoriam
Injury Report
Interviews
Junior Game
KeyBiscayne2008
Miscellaneous
Monday Net Post
Nasdaq100 2005
Nasdaq100 2006
NCAA Tennis
New to TennisWorld?
Off Topic
Olympics
On Vacation
Other Sports
PacLife Open 2005
PacLife Open 2006
PacLife Open 2007
PacLife Open 2008
Players - Female Pros
Players - Juniors
Players - Male Pros
Players - Other
Pressroom
Recap 2006
Roland Garros 2005
Roland Garros 2006
Roland Garros 2007
Roland Garros 2008
Senior Game
Sony-Ericsson 2007
State of the Game
Statistics
Sunday Brunch
TennisWorld FAQs
The Deuce Club
The Locker Room
The OTher Thread
The Watercooler
Tournaments
Tribe
TW Site Rules
US Open 2005
US Open 2006
USOpen2007
Wednesday Racket
Wimbledon 2005
Wimbledon 2006
Wimbledon 2007
Wimbledon2008
World Team Tennis
WTA Championships 06
Your Call
Recent Entries
21st Century Girl
Your Call, Aug. 21
Your Call, Aug. 20
Farewell, Beijing
Your Call, August 19th
Monday Net Post
Men of Iron
Olympic CC, Sunday
OCC Saturday, Resumed
The OCC: Saturday
Champs or Chumps?
OCC Over-overflow?
OCC Friday, Prefaced
The Deuce Club, 8.14
The OCC: Thursday
Search
Statistics
This blog currently has 1751 entries and 462435 comments.