Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Newsletter Subscribe  |  Store
TENNIS.com - Peter Bodo's TennisWorld - Old Dog, No Trick
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   College Tennis
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   Champions' Perspective
   Backcourt: Framed
   Ready, Set, Goal: Kellie
   Ready, Set, Goal: Joe
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
« Special K Youz Your Daddy? »
Old Dog, No Trick
Posted 09/06/2006 @ 8 :16 PM

2006_09_05_safin Big day, Tribe: Lindsay, the brother-sister team of Marat and Dinara, Rafael, all gone. Call it bloody Wednesday - or the day the tournament recovered from the loss of Andre Agassi and decided it really was time to move on. I'll be posting later tonight, from home, on the Nadal/Youzhny match (pressers yet to come),  most of which I watched with good buddy Chris Clarey of The International Herald Tribune and the New York Times.

Meanwhile, here's yet another chapter from Marat Safin's Book of Hours, which I think some of you may find relevant to our ongoing discussion here at TW about whether Big Time tennis has more to do with the external appendages (the arm, and how reliably it executes technical and strategic mandates) or the internal organs (the heart and guts and how they respond to the challenge of competition):

Q. Can you talk about, when you go out to compete, how much of how you perform is mental, how you're thinking, where your head is. Or, is it a matter of training and how you've been doing and how you wake up that day?

MARAT SAFIN: No, is just not like that. We already in a ‑‑ at a high performance. Professionals, we basically dedicate ourselves, all our lives, to become what we are right now. So everything, it becomes mental after a while. Once you become pro and you become a pretty good pro, it just is not anymore the technique. It's not anymore the serve. It's not anymore the forehand, backhand, or serve and volley, something like that. It's just a mental thing to keep yourself cool sometimes, and sometimes to push yourself to risk it at important moments, or try to stay back and make the right decisions at the right moment.

Because everybody can play backhand and forehand. There's no problem. I think who is tougher mentally is winning basically. So this is just ‑‑ it's already ‑‑ who is better mentally prepared is basically top 10 players. It's unbelievable. They just focused throughout the match. No ups and downs. They know exactly what to do in important moments. That's why it makes such a big difference. Because tennis, everybody has.

Safin, who invariably is most articulate and soulful when he loses, also had some interesting things to say about his fellow Russians, as well as his sister Dinara. Among other things, he alluded to some advice he gave Dinara that apparently helped her come knocking at the door of the Top 10. A reporter, citing Dinara's frank admission that in classic kid sister fashion, she once was a racquet breaker par excellence, asked Marat if he had helped her "calm down." He replied:

Well, not exactly. She just put it in a different way. But I had some issues with her that doesn't ‑‑ I'm not gonna go into details. But some things I didn't really like, and I really told her, you know, because it's just ‑‑ it's unacceptable from her side to do some things on the court what she was doing before. Right now, she stopped doing that, looks like that. Look at her right now. She was top 50, 50, 60, 40, 30, jumping all around. Right now, she's basically cracking top 10. So it really worked. So it was pretty good advice, I guess (smiling).

I assume the pep talk Marat provided had to do with learning to fight, and to cease looking like she had just traveled 10 miles of bad emotional road each time she whacked a forehand into the windscreen.

Ever notice that nobody, but nobody, is better at playing the pot who called the kettle black than a big brother? This, in my sweeping and profund grasp of human psychology, is the reason most women (at least those who have older brothers) are so good (or is it bad?) at dealing with the knuckleheads they choose to date or marry, and, come to think of it, it may even by why they choose them: Please God, give me a good,old-fashioned know-it-all, do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do, it's my world kind of guy. . . and bingo, God dispatches Darwin to find them the Missing Link.

The follow up question was astute: "Is it advice you would follow for yourself?"

No, when you're 26, it's difficult to change. You can't teach the old dog to sit, huh?

Coy much, big guy? Remind us when to chime, in unison, "Oh. Of course. How silly of us to ask! Meanwhile, we'll all just tread water until you decide to break our hearts again.  . ."

It's a pity the big lug is out, though, isn't it?

Check out the transcripts; they're a good read. Jet Boy is due in the press room at 7:45, so talk amongst yourselves while I go take care of some business, okay?

| | Send to a Friend
Comments

so predictions on Hewitt-Roddick?

Im going with the Aussie, who's too steady and returns well enough to bother Roddick, who isnt loooking that good in my opinion anymore ... but Hewitt is a good opponent for Roddick, I expect them to have good points ...lets face it, theyre extra pumped now that Nadal is out.. this is for the Open final, basically

Thought #1: The feminist weirdos are gonna eat you alive for that little slice of truth, Pete.

Thought #2: Hewitt over Roddick, given enough sets. It'll be a late night, I think.

I'am going with Roddick,It seems like his time.

Wow, I'm really disappointed, being a Haas-disliker, that the Cap'n didn't come through. Credit to Haas and discredit to Marat for playing a lackluster fourth set and stoning the easy volley in the fifth set breaker. Dems da breaks, but sad he's gone.

D-Wiz, eat a good dinner and your lunch tomorrow, please!

And I feel for Rafa too - I've never seen him quite concede defeat like that (with a look of acceptance). That and his poor movement made me think something was wrong. I'm not making excuses for lil Rafito, but I don't think he was quite the same.

I'll take Hewitt over Roddick in 4. He's a better player, IMO.

Agree with Steggy.

I'm scared of Matt Zemek, it seems like he has a MAJOR overdose of Nadal KA. That little episode there was just out-of-this-world...I just have to say. Just must. Because I'm just a tiny bit shocked.
Anyway, Timmy, I have absoutely nooo idea who will win that match, but I'd say Hewitt.

Gee Matt, why don't you and Steggy throw a little gas on the fire?

Someone needs to shove a ball gag into Austin's mouth. "Amazing". What was so amazing about Sharapova nearly falling butt over breasts to reach for a wide ball?

Pete: We prefer tactical nukes.

what is golovin doing.

pepole always get on sharpova case- what is golving doing- not acsptable- in the rule but gamsnship.

Pete:

I should have been clear about my statement: it applied only to thought number two.

I have no comment at press time on comment No. 1.

*smacks forehead*

thats whaat i was thinking, Stegs! what was amazing about a bad lob that Golovan butchered??

Matt: Wuss.

Ted's now seeing black helicopters over Blistergate.

Sharapovas grunting is AWFUL, just imagine you playing an opponent that screams sooo loud that it hurts and you simply cannot concentrate well...I feel great sympathy for Golovin.

do femnisits even exist anymore? arent they probably just Democrats? lol

though I bet martina navratilova falls into that category you were chiding, Petie Boy, so watch out!

temes: You know who I feel sorry for, if the rumors are true? Roddick. Dude must have to wear earplugs to bed down with the Pig Slayer.

Wow, Steggy.

One person's scared of me, one thinks I'm a wuss, and a legendary tennis writer thinks I'm carrying around gasoline.

And I haven't written a single college football article today, either...

Ray Stonada,

nothing nothing was worng with the movement, he was running scarmbeling like he always does.

he lost tonight because he met a real hard court player how used the right tactics.

look at past post, moya showed 2 everyone how the rellys with nadal should be and if you have great bh it will only help.

she his running in the last match and toinght- you want 2 belive but it isnt true.

Matt: I was joking. Sorta. ;)

Steggy OMG! HAHAHHAHAHHEHEHHEHEHEHEHEH You almost killed me with that one.

Sharapova has 3 shots... no more, no less ... every volley is a forehand or backhand, and she can serve ... hate this kind of tennis, hate it hate it hate it... Sharpie is a competitor, and thank God she won the set, so we're not here 3 hours lol

for once i'm glad i'm not in front of a tv. you poor guys, the shrieking banshee must be outdoing herself. go tati!!! lol

sadly, i'll have to say roddick will prevail. you can see the hunger in his eyes. at least if he gets to the final with fed, it'll be less of a snoozefest. hewitt has a tendency of allowing fed to bagel him.

Amazing, that a player could develop such a blister. All that tennis should give you very tough feet. Hell of a time for an injury time-out. I can only imagine if Justine tried that, even if the blood was soaking through her socks.

This was quite a bit of gamesmanship. She's had this blister for a few games, if it's already broken. Yet she didn't want treatment since she had broken Sharpova and was serving for the set. She waited until the momentum had shifted. And it's worked. I hope Sharapova takes the set. I mainly hope this only goes two sets, whoever wins the first. Golovin does not belong in a slam semi, with this kind of tennis. Will pure luck on a net cord decide this set?

Hopefully the second set will go a bit quicker. Golovin is pong, but can't handle the hard shots to her backhand corner. Pretty lousy tennis from Sharapova. Perhaps it will be another Amelie-Justine final.

Now people you can feel superiority over me because I find jokes that relate to sexual things very amusing but I do. hehehahahhahah

Hey, we had a point in that Sharapova-Golovin tiebreak that fit in perfectly with Pete's post, and specifically, the quote excerpt from Marat about knowing when to be aggressive and when to stay back.

At 4-all in the tiebreak, Golovin clocked a forehand to get Maria on the defensive. But instead of hammering her follow-up shot and/or coming in on it, she hit a bland mid-court ball that enabled Maria to get back to neutral position on the point. That Maria got a lucky net-cord was a wise judgment on the part of the tennis gods. They punished Golovin for lacking Mats Wilander's favorite bodily organ.

Sharapova--as much as I don't care much for her game aesthetically--deserved that tiebreak, and the set that went with it.

Steggy:

Is there an Improv in your community? Get thee to a mic.

steggy, I cant belive you worte that about sharpove.

what do you say when nadal does this noice, he is the laudest from the man.

and the wilames sisters.

last year wimbeldon sami VEE WILIAMES V SHARPOVA, couldnt belive the noice from both players, both so loued, but every 2 talking about maria only why because she is pretty and makes a lot of momeny pepole want 2 pot her down.

now tell me what pepole would say if maria did what tati just doen- she will never hear the end of it.

her game is not my fevoriet, but for me that was un called for

Matt: your assignment, since you're clearly in football withdrawal, is to create a starting offensive and/or defensive unit out of the clay of tennis players (safin is the one who's playing without the helmet)

I don't understand how Sharapova never gets a sore throat.
Doesn't she need her tonsils out??

mici: Oh, quit stirring the Nadal pot and therefor his fans. It's like tarring and feathering an already drawn and quartered corpse.

If we do get a Sharapova-Justine final, that will certainly be a bloodbath of aggression. I do like Sharapova's aggression, but she needs something delivered to her, to take control. She doesn't have as much of a transition game as for example Justine.

Well well well, what do you know. Marat Safin, Captain of the All-Headcase Allstars, technical genius, tennis talent par excellence, and total nutjob, comes down in favour of head/heart in the Great TennisWorld Debate. Who woulda thought? He is a total knucklehead, and I love him to bits and miss him already.

BTW I consider myself a feminist of sorts, and I wasn't offended by this post.

I numb to all other forms of aggression on a tennis court after all those all-Williams finals, Bob.

steggy , 2 get away from my point.

what you said of maria was un-called for.

I just heat doubell standert.

maria screms- but the wilems sister dont and nadal doesnt.

maria celbriet Ufe- and henin doesnt

hewitt celbret Ufe and does his comeon in your face way- and nadal doesnt.

I just want that when players do the same thing time and time again- pepole will speak about it the same way.

what do you think about what tati has doen in the tie-break????

and for the record:
I like watching tati more that sharpove.

Oh gosh,Sharpie is sooooo annoying with her screaming....arghhh..
Tati is so quiet and cute. Why can't Sharpie keep her mouth shut?

steggy, love it, please.... write more about that pig slayer. I am very sorry, guy...

mici, it's really not just about the level of loudness that Sharapova made, it's much more than that...

temes: They were certainly aggressive. They both have backed off, since they can't hit those shots consistently now. Serena was very passive against Amelie. That's why they need to play the other events, so they can start to hit those shots.

Mici, get a sense of humor. Being so serious all the time is un-called for. But it was super-amusing, especially when Steggy wrote it!!! HAHAHAHHSheheheheheheh.

I'll miss Marat. He is so gorgeously and gloriously unpredictable. (By the way, why is it that the European men wear more jewelry than the women?) But, it does seem he moved well and didn't go completely nutso. Maybe we can look forward to next year.

mici: Boo-hoo, it was uncalled for, my heart bleeds sympathy for Maria, the Pig Slayer. Uncalled-for things are a fact of life, as are double-standards and hypocrisy. So I don't waste my time worrying about 'em.

Don't care about the blister timeout. The thing was a big as a quarter, she needed it broken and taped. Not a big deal, as far as I'm concerned.

completely agree!, kiwibee

You have to like Amelie's chances quite a bit after watching the Sharpova match. Frankly, the tennis hasn't been very good on the women's side, especially in the top half. Justine's match today was the only match I've seen which had great tennis from both players.

Well, without blinking, Rafa's my nose guard/interior defensive run stopper. Philippoussis would be the other defensive tackle. (No one's really fat in tennis, so it's not as though one can choose really meaty players to fill out these positions...)

Safin's a defensive end just because he can't be a tackle. Philippoussis does not have the speed needed to be an end. My other defensive end is Ivo Karlovic. The "Too Tall Jones" of tennis.

Linebackers: Nalbandian as middle linebacker. A good steerer of the ball, a good steerer of a defense. Outside linebackers: Tursunov and Berdych: ferocious hitters. You need outside LBs to have that quality.

Safeties: Monfils and Gonzo. Maniacal energy, can cover a lot of ground, and also have hitting ability.

Shutdown cornerbacks: Federer and Blake. Two guys who will run forever in the open field.

Punter? Nadal. His uncle played soccer. Unconventional? Yeah.

So was this request...

Matt: Kafelnikov. There's your def. tackle right there.

Poor Rafa, I was hoping he would get to the final. Oh well.

Well, I was going for active players only.

Boy, what would a team from all of tennis history look like?

That's fascinating.

Connors at middle linebacker. The Dick Butkus of tennis.

Ah, the possibilities...

Well, on that note, I have to officiate four basketball games. Enjoy Hewitt-Roddick. If it's close to the 2001 quarterfinal, we're in for something good.

I was so sad Marat lost today, I heat haas, he looks like crazy man in a bad way sometimes on court i almost get scard, what he might do, ponch someone.

IN spite of the lose, this us open was good for safin, could have been beter, but was good.


now marat take the momantom 2 the indoor court, he loves them.

i dont think fed will be in madrid and matbe not in paris and if marat is playing good i dont see who will stop him.

he just have to worry about the ranking so he will be easyer in the aus open next year, where i belive we will se his best again.

I just wonder whether Roger shaves his legs...I must stare closely next time he plays. I'm really interested.

temes:you are one scary person....

Pete, please tell every tiny little thing about rafa's presser, ok? please please please? how did he look and act and is his ankle hurt and all the stuff....i gotta know. steggy, that was a good metaphor for my state of being at present, how astute of you.

matt, you're the sweetest ever.

Wow. Sharpova is really choking. Amazing. Golovin isn't playing too well, but Maria is one error after another. Her serve is terrible.

temes, no he doesnt.

you havent heard of the hot lags post in rf.com

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!
I just came home from chem lab lecture, *totally* wiped out, to the news that my precious Raffito lost! Omg if I have to sit through another Fed-Hewitt bagelfest (I'm picking Hewitt to win against RoboRod tonight) I'll scream. This can't be happening. This can't be happening. Is it???

And now homework to do..crap crap crap (steggy don't delete me). I might need to watch Amelie's match again to cheer myself up. *Wahhh*

Lily, we need to start a Rafa/Amelie support group for kooks like me.

Oh no Mici, I forgot, Feds a grizzly. A true man. Not a metrosexual. Fool proof then.

All righty then, now that my little mind starts to wonder from one strange place to another, I think I must quit your agony. Nighty night to all.

daylily, I remember feeling like you are after the 2002 Sampras-Agassi USO final. Ack. It didn't go away for weeks. The great thing, if there is one, about Rafa losing is that he has literally a decade to go.

I feel a littl deflated tonight after the end of the delicious possibility of Fed-Safin and Rafa-Roddick semifinals. If Roger plays Roddick or Hewitt in the final, it's gonna be a bloodbath. Probably the same for Youzhny.

Matt, amazing job on the tennis-football team. Can't wait for offense. I nominate Gasquet for QB.

daylily: How late can ya stay up? Pete just mentioned on the phone that he's gonna do an extensive post sometime tonight about the press conference/match (and was quite complimentary about how Nadal handled himself).

yes temes, I seen worse.

He is the only man I gave pass, on this issue.

Fed = Chewbacca
Roddick = Saguaro

Tatiana Golovin: Isn't She Lovely

Maria Sharapova: Walk Like An Egyptian

Finally Maria served, and she can break for the win, which wouldn't be surprising in this match. I mainly want to start watching the men's match, so this will probably go three.

And now that Marat has confirmed that it's all about the heart/mind, what punishment do we have for today's losers? (degree of punishment correlates to degree of mental/emotional failing)

For Rafa: Mats Wilander observing Rafa has only two, normal sized onions
For Lindsay: no movies in the middle of the day for a month
For Dinara: the gulag
For Marat: crucifixion

(kidding, of course)

Ray: I've fed myself

Matt: Marat is TOTALLY a DB in the vein of Ronnie Lott, that's why he doesn't wear a helmet.

this match is giving womens tennis a bad name, what a disaster, there is NO strategy whatsoever here, just bashing and running and screaming ... now hewitt and Roddick are gonna have a classic, just you watch ... please Sharpie, end our misery ..

Dadddy has to tell maria when to eat! hold up that banana, Yuri! that is the grossest, dumbest thing I have ever seen ... can the girl go to the bathroom by herself?

D-Wiz, I actually laughed out loud at your punishment for Rafa.

Hey, did y'all know this?

[From Tennis-X] Nikolay Davydenko is now dating Marcos Bagdhatis' ex-girlfriend Camille Neviere.

Not a bad effort for a soft top tenner...

Tim, you are my long-lost twin. ALLEZ AMELIE. Soooo glad I'm going to dinner and *not* watching this (NOISY) bashing.

I agree with Ray. I see Hewitt winning in 4. I don't see Roddick winning unless he serves lights out.

Matt - love your tennis-football team so far.

When every shot's a power shot, I guess every shot has to be accompanied by a scream. But I don't understand those folk who, apparently, who can't tell the difference between a player who just screams on EVERY shot -- perhaps to distract or annoy his/her opponent -- and the other hundreds of both male and female players who SOMETIMES make loud sounds when they are very tired or expelling breath after playing many games in a strenuous match. I can't wait for this match to end so that I can resume watching AND listening to tennis.

"For Rafa: Mats Wilander observing Rafa has only two, normal sized onions"

Thanks for the laugh, D-Wiz.

I agree, Ruth. I need a Sharapova shreik filter for my TV ...

Poor Tati, lost the tiebreakers...

Now, it's Allez Amelie!!!!!!

Its clear that Safin is so ridiculously hard on himself out there, that he certainly needs the opposite of punishment.

Its one of the non-physical things which make him so likeable.

However, the best was when I read Ivanisevich's quote on how "when Marat throws a racket, he breaks it for sure, he throws with real intent" or something like that, it cracked me up.

lets all send out a thank you to maria for ending this in two painful tiebreak sets! Yuri, stock up on those bananas, papa, and be sure to spoon feed Maria her pasta tonight while youre at it... I officially am over Shreikie, and those stupid hats she wears to every presser... send her home, Amelie!

I am picking Roddick to win, Hewitt ain't what he use to be. The crowd will pump Roddick up!

I had to turn down my TV's volume so I'm not disturbing my neigbors...lol

"...[Safin] certainly needs the opposite of punishment."

I'm putting up my hand to volunteer for whatever this entails.

Burying him alive, huh? nevermind.

momofan, please.... count me in for that Rafa/Amelie support group!!!

Well, the best player won, and that's appropriate. I don't expect to see this poor quality from Sharapova in the semis. This was a very mediocre match.

Now for the match I've been wanting to see. I'm for Hewitt, and think he should win the match, but the "new" Roddick is an unknown quantity/quality. We'll see what happens.

Well Lucy, I'm not sure he doesn't get enough of that, but maybe the six blondes at the AO didn't provide the right level of "tennis analysis."

i guess rafa's gigantic balls shrunk a bit today, mats? or at least he's back down to a pair, huh? just goes to show how hard it is to keep winning in men's tennis, and how Fed's record is nothing short of phenomenal ... ugh, now i have to prepare for that idiotic J Block and obnoxious fans cheering Fed's doouoble faults .. i wonder, do you think the crowd will harass Fed, or not? I cant imagine anyone openly getting on his case...

Tim: I totally agree with you about Papa Yuri. He is like a puppet master who controls Sharpie's life. Now it's obvious that he controls what she eats and drinks...lol
I love it when Tracy Austin was laughing at papa Yuri holding up a banana, then the next shot is MSharpie eating the banana...muahahahaha

Dunlop, thanks for answering my questions last night.

cant wait to hear Pete's take on the banana issue ... lol

Oh god, they're here. (I have my psychotic tennis group here tonight by virtue of the fact that I have the biggest TV and food)

Pray for me. And my couch.

D-Wiz: sorry if I was being paternalistic...

Despite the warmth of this piece, I was left with a strange feeling that I watched a different match from Peter.

Apart from the er, hiccup in the 4th, nothing in today's match made me pull out my hair and reprise "Marat's Greatest Implosions" in my head. If we're to talk of heart/mind/man-bits, Tommy Haas' performance early in the match invites more criticism.

It all came down to the last couple of points in the 5th set TB.
And it was all over so quickly that I blinked and went "whaaa?"
We didn't have the faintest indication of who'd win until the very last minute, and it left me desperately unsatisfied.

I've said this about the Bandy/Marat match but it just seems like such a travesty to have TBs in the 5th set of a slam.

I was glad Marat beat Bandy, but Bandy had battled back from 1-5 down in that tie-break to level with Marat -- before the last couple of points decided it. It honestly could have gone either way. I believe Marat was the better player that day, and would have preferred to see him eventually win by a clear 2 games.

Today, I don't know what would have happened if the 5th set had been played out as @other slams. Haas looked the more chipper towards the end, and he may have won, but that would have been a more satisfying and convincing result for me, as a tennis-fan.

I love the Headcase Club concept, but sometimes it can be like a ball and chain for our minds. Other players, even Roger and Rafa, have visited the Clubhouse too. Often, I read critiques/analyses on Safin, and feel all his matches (bar the Aussie semi) are but one blur in the writer's mind.

*pulls Lucy's hand down and puts up own* No no, me. ME!!! For whatever that entails.

Dunlop: I was so completely kidding, especially on Marat. Sometimes I think others don't see how hard he is on himself. I *do* see it, which is why I cut him a LOT of slack. Honestly, I'm just happy he's still out there trying at all.

that's why it's called tiebreak. It can tie you or break you...lol
Steggy:good luck watching tennis with your mates. say hi to your couch...lol

"Dadddy has to tell maria when to eat! hold up that banana, Yuri! that is the grossest, dumbest thing I have ever seen ... can the girl go to the bathroom by herself?"

I'd hate to see what Yuri's signal to her would be, to tell her to take a dump.

I'm sick of Yuri's coaching! I'm also sick of Justine's coach always getting away with coaching. Time for the WTA to crack down on these cheats!

re. Hewitt vs. Roddick: It depends on who get's the first set. Roddick needs to get some momentum going early or else Hewitt will be too confident. The only retriever more dangerous than confident Hewitt is Nadal any day of the week. Hewitt's going to need the first set because odds are he won't be able to break Roddick more than once a set, and if we get sharp Roddick tonight, Hewitt's serve is going to be jumped on.

Note on Hewitt: for a player who's been running all over the court for around 7 years, he's stayed incredibly fresh. Compared with Safin in particular. Hewitt's definitely not as speedy as he was, say, in '01-'02, but he's definitely still able to fight like the best of them. Safin's is DEFINITELY a step or two slower than he was in his hey day.

Rafa's loss was painful, but I could kind of tell from the start that he was in trouble. He had a lot of trouble holding serve and was sending errors all over the place. He didn't really look like he was moving badly to me but I was surprised to see that look of defeat on his face. Never saw that before.

The good thing is that he's only just beginning. I feel like he'll learn a lot from this loss and improve even more next year.

Now I think I'll go root against Roddick. It'll make me feel better.

Youzhny is still playing doubles right now... He'll never be fit enough for his semi.

Oh lol, D-Wiz.
You made your point with such finesse.
We must have *interesting* punishments for Berdy, Gasquet, and Djoko too.

Lucy wrote : From Tennis-X - Nikolay Davydenko is now dating Marcos Bagdhatis' ex-girlfriend Camille Neviere

Whaa?
Parallel universe alert!

Lanty, I hear ya. Even Safin has his moments of sanity. Incidentally, he has a very good record in five-setters, so it's not like he's incapable of toughing it out. It's more that he can go from outstanding to nightmarish in a matter of, oh, seconds. That and his engaging habit of comparing himself to animals in his press conferences. And his aforementioned player's box full of "cousins".

Hewitt-Roddick on serve... I'm picking Lleyton, don't believe the "marriage will calm you down" hype. That only works if you marry someone interesting...

Great line, Lucy. . . also, Lanty, I didn't think Safin's loss was a head-case loss. It was a good match, he hit some dumb shots at bad times. I've been convinced by some recent posters (inc you) that he isn't really a first-class meltdown job (he's second, maybe third class), but I hate to let go of the conceit because it's more fun to hold it and he cuts a better figure as a doomed genius. . .gotta post, see you all later.

Rafa should go back to wearing capri pants. These board shorts are just not doing it for him - since the change he hasn't won anything.

WTF is going on with Mikhail Youzhny? Scalping Rafa and the Bryan brothers in the same day - wow.

Wow, Roddick is playing some damn fine tennis. Aggressive when he needs to be. Low number of unforced errors. Interesting. And Youzhny (SP) & whoever his partner is just upset the Bryan brothers. Someone please test Youzhny's gatorade immediately.

steggs, i'm going to bed right now. as much as i'd love to stay up for pete's article, getting up before five puts a real damper on one's night life, let me tell you. and if you think you could face 180 high schoolers on 4 hours of sleep, think again...of course, i'm old, too, and that doesn't help. nor does rafa losing....omg, i feel like i'm going to cry again.

momito, i don't get the problem. don't you think amelie will win tomorrow? i just bet she will, chica, you wait and see.....but yes, if you would like to start a support group, i need it desperately, i'm feeling a lot more than dejected, let me tell ya. thank god for football this weekend, there's no way i can face another fed/roddick final. xoxox nitey nite

This might be heresy here, but I like the way Roddick plays. He makes the game appear so uncomplicated, just as Federer does.

Mikhail Youzhny was the flavour of the week about 18 months ago. How quickly we forget. He's a very accomplished doubles player and an integral part of the redoubtable Team Russia in Davis Cup. Also he can play like a mofo.

Ah Lucy, quicksilver mood-changes, surprisingly robust record in 5-setters, the whole blonde side of the family in boxes... all that and hippos.

I'd happily join you and D in meting out Marat's punishment.

Peter wrote : "...but I hate to let go of the conceit because it's more fun to hold it"

*head-desks*

Roddick is serving the way god intended tonight. 2/3 first serve, I'd guess. Winning his first serve points handily. Not a lot of stupid play. It's nice to see the stereotypical big serve, big forehand machine playing intelligently to his strengths.

On another note, Hewitt actually looks slower. Either: there goes any grain of truth from my last post, or: Gasquet took a lot out of him. Just a question, who did he win the '00 doubles title with?

Virtually every guy in the top 50 has been flavor of the month some time of the other... But conceding just 3 games to Robredo? That's seriously weird, if Robredo was healthy.

Plus Youzhny has a win-loss ratio of 1:2 in doubles over his career...

Yes but he's had some good wins in doubles as well as singles, and he plays doubs a lot more often than your typical singles player. Beating the Bryans was an upset, but he can play.

The Robredo scoreline was seriously weird, as you say. I pointed that out at the time.

Hewitt won the 00 doubles with Max "The Beast" Mirnyi, which should answer a lot of questions.

DM - Nice to see that Ivanisevic is still coming up with great quotes. Didn't he have to default a match once because he broke all his racquets?

I'm far from being a Roddick fan but I must say he's playing some pretty good tennis out there. Oh how sweet it would have been to see a sf match with rafa roddick. Have to root for Youzny now.

This is a pretty good match and a good test of the new Roddick. I never worry when Hewitt gets down. He's as mentally tough as any player on the tour. Even two sets down means nothing to him mentally. Roddick is in lots of rallies, and is doing pretty well in them, but Hewitt is also playing better than at the start of the match. He hit some really loose stuff in that opening set.

If Roddick can win this, he's certainly a top player again, since he wont' win it solely on his serve, and HEwitt is hard to overpower. You need to play the points and get the ball to put away, which Hewitt is pretty stingy with giving you.

That Roddick serve is something else. Whew. Just having Connors there in the box seems to energize Roddick a bit. He's hitting some winner backhands, and also is pretty aggressive on the forehand, but he's already afraid to come in on Hewitt. That's already been taken out of this match, and we probably won't see it unless Roddick gets behind and needs to change tactics.

Tomorrow I'll go to the office for several hours. I really don't care about the afternoon matches. I wonder if the women's semis will both be at night. Daytime would be better, since they play the final the next night, but I remember the Capriati-Justine final being played at night. I don't remember when Kim played. In my view the matches should be back to back, no matter when they play, to give both winners the same relative amount of rest.

Roddick is playing intelligently from the baseline, staying in the point with slice and setting up the backhand down-the-line. If only he'd stop trying to volley..

Roddick breaks for 6-5 in the second...

Daylily, I'll start the support group with you. I can't bear the thought of another Roddick-Federer final, stop the madness! Rafa, I expect to see you as the 2007 AO Champion along with Serena!!!

Three great points by Roddick to go up 40-0 on serve, getting the crowd fired up. And then the service winner, 2nd set. This is going to be straight-sets.

Hewitt coming in at set game is indicative that he doesn't think he can win from the baseline; which says quite a bit for Roddick's quality of play during the points tonight. If Hewitt continues to do that, we'll know he's in trouble. That was a crucial couple of games. Hewitt had set point. One shot the other way on a single point and we'd have a totally different match.

Guys, I know you're all worried sick about the Death of Tennis As We Know It, but fear not: Eric Kay has SOLVED THE PROBLEM. And guess what - the solution is right in front of our eyes!

http://www.sportsline.com/spin/story/9640635

I can't even begin to take issue with this column. I don't know where to start.

"There's many ways tennis can come back to the forefront -- umpire dunk tank, flaming service lines, topless ball girls -- but one serious, albeit little-talked-about solution is having an outsider rock the tennis world."

Someone better tell this fool he angered the wrong girl...as my roommate says, "Chauvinist pig!" I'm gonna kick his ay ess ess!!!

Please, please, please tell me that Kay article isn't serious!

Lucy, thanks. That was frigging hilarious, it made my day.

OMG it finally happened, I had to turn the sound off during a match, and not b ecause of Maria's grunts, but because of Ted and Tracy's blathering idiocy. Those two cannot shut up, they talk about baseball, other matches, trivia, and whatever during points, and freaking Ted had the nerve to complain about the length of the women's match, as if a women's match is not supposed to ever go over two hours. The guy had incredible nerve to keep complaining about how long the match was taking and saying it was "unfair" to the men, that the men were "agonizing" ab out how long it was taking. Give me a break, those men sometimes have to wait five hours for a men's five setter to end, I doubt that the 2+ hour women's match was that long to wait for them. Ted gets paid to commentate, so if he can't be a professional and try to entertain us during the match, instead of blabbering about nonsense and whining about how long a match is taking, he should stop commentating, they ruined the match for me tonight. And somebody needs to stick a big sock in Tracy's mouth, that woman talks incessantly during matches. End of rant.

Spontaneous reader poll!

Which of the following assertions is more ridiculous? (Hint: any answer is correct)

a) Rafael Nadal, with his Wimbledon final and his multiple Masters titles on hard, can't play on anything but clay
b) Pete Sampras had a sexy, star quality that Roger Federer can't hope to emulate
c) Donald Young, who has won all of ONE SET on the pro tour, is tennis's only hope
d) Tennis is "a paycheck" to Rafael Nadal, who treats each match as if it were the opportunity of a lifetime

My notes on Roddick v Hewitt, at 1/1 in the 3rd:

Hewitt does appear to be moving less well to his right, his forehand, than usual. Tiredness, ankle injury? Regardless, this is making Roddick's new backhand down the line more effective than ever.

Roddick is cleverly using the slice backhand crosscourt to Hewitt's backhand, knowing (I think) that Hewitt doesn't have the weight of shot to crack winners regularly from his backhand corner off no pace balls, whether he uses his inside out forehand or a backhand. Of course if Roddick doesn't hit the slice deep enough, or if it floats too much, Hewitt will exploit the mediocre execution.

To his credit, and quietly, Hewitt is serving almost as effectively as Roddick. Less dramatically, maybe, but almost as effectively.

Roddick is coming in often enough to keep Hewitt unsure of the when and why of the tactic, including the occasional serve and volley. Bully for Roddick.

For whatever reason (doctoral thesis time again) Roddick appears to have taken to Connors' strategic and tatical advice, especially about crafting points, in a way that he couldn't with Gilbert. Witness Roddick's 90 mph 1st serve kicker to the outside at set point out in the 2nd, successfully taking Hewitt by surprise. This isn't a knock against Gilbert, only a comment on how some pairings work and others don't.

Tanya, I agree. You know what Tracy said about Maria vs. Amelie in terms of endorsements? She said Maria has "model-type looks" and "since Maria's so pretty, she can earn all these endorsements, but someone like Amelie, even though she's No. 1, she won't get these kinds of endorsements." You can have a fave, even if you're a commentator, but you can't spout this kind of crap. US commentators really suck, I wish there was some way to mute them (and Sharpie's shrieking) without losing the lovely sound of the ball hitting the racket.

I was *really* shocked to hear Tracy say that, though. That is wayyyyyy out of line.

Lucy, Lucy, where's your sense of irony?

The article is written at an angle to reality, and demands to be read the same way.

Bob, Hewitt has tendinitis in his knee & from what I've heard of his energy level tonight, that may be driving his net approaches. He may be aching from Gasquet 5-setter.

Hewitt has none of the fire or accuracy he had against Gasquet... he's flat and subdued...i wonder why? this is the Open, what about come cmons? someone should ask him that...

Hmm. I'm not given to overly literal interpretation. Some of it is ironic. The underlying premise - tennis needs a star - is serious, and misguided. So are some of the examples. "Spaniards can't win on anything but clay" isn't ironic. It's wrong, and insidiously so, because it plays into a commonly held stereotype.

Roddick breaks in the third.

I had a feeling Hewitt would stink tonight, he played so well vs. gasquet... he's just thrown this away the last few minutes...

momofan said:

Tanya, I agree. You know what Tracy said about Maria vs. Amelie in terms of endorsements? She said Maria has "model-type looks" and "since Maria's so pretty, she can earn all these endorsements, but someone like Amelie, even though she's No. 1, she won't get these kinds of endorsements." You can have a fave, even if you're a commentator, but you can't spout this kind of crap. US commentators really suck, I wish there was some way to mute them (and Sharpie's shrieking) without losing the lovely sound of the ball hitting the racket.

I was *really* shocked to hear Tracy say that, though. That is wayyyyyy out of line.


Well, momofan, what tracy said about Mauresmo is true, but she probably shouldn't have said it, it wasn't necessary. Much of what Ted and Tracy said tonight WAS NOT NECESSARY, they were like buffoons this evening. And the attitude that the women shouldn't "take so long" to play a match becuase the MEN were waiting, absolutely infuriated me.

Great retrieving by Roddick sets up the break. His defense is under-rated.

This is going to be over in a couple of minutes.

Wow. Federer vs. RoboRod in the finals? Who woulda thunk?

Hewitt, Hewitt, Hewitt...at one point in time he owned Robo.

Roddick over Hewitt in straight sets. Wow. Is there a full moon today?

I do think Hewitt is fatigued, perhaps mentally, from the Gasquet match. He's really netted some easy stuff. Still, Roddick played and rallied with him very well. When Hewitt failed to break on those two points after he'd returned the serve, I knew it was over, and I think Hewitt knew it, too. You would think two days is enough to recover physically, but for whatever reason he was making lots of uncharacteristic errors.

That was singularly drama-free. "I guess I can play tennis a little bit again" - it's a great effort, Roddick's confidence must have taken a huge hit in the past year.

Lucy, yeah, that's the Spin column but it's still going to be read semi-seriously by most people. I get the feeling columnists of this ilk don't really believe in what they say. Eric Kay is something like the Maureen Dowd of tennis writers...

ok gang, im burned out lol

already dreading the Blake Roddick extravaganza over the next few days and probably weekend, need my rest lol

Lucy: That tennis article was ludicrous. What an idiot. Federer is the best thing ever to happen to tennis. Anyone who is a tennis fan certainly realizes that; and Nadal is also incredibly talented. This writer is a person who has no idea what she is talking about. It's amazing she gets paid when she has a brain like that.

Great day of tennis. I watched it from 11 AM till midnight, saw my favorites win in straight sets; saw an exciting five set tiebreak, and saw that Roddick is a different player on the court since Connors started coaching him even under slam pressure and against a great counterpuncher, though Hewitt was off his game. I was pretty bored with the Sharapova match, but expect both her and Amelie to play better tennis in the semifinal. They will raise the quality of their play by necessity, and will push each other.

Here's an odd thought: what do you think Federer's response will be to Roddick at the net? He's still no Pat Cash (nor will he ever be) but he's definitely looking confident coming in for once! And Federer does occassionally get frustrated by serve-volley players (note how Henman has pushed him even since the Federer Renaissance, or Gasquet that time in Monte Carlo).

Furthermore, since Roddick is playing a lot of unconventional net points (sure he wins the points, but seriously, where did he learn to hit a ball like that?) will that throw off Federer? He's so used to playing players with crisp net games (Henman etc.) that a funky volleyer is bound to have some success.

Thoughts?

Oh I say bring on the Blake/Roddick extravaganza. Blake is one of the most decent guys in tennis, any success he enjoys I enjoy. And it's fascinating watching Roddick battle with the demons in his game and try to get his career back on track. And if these two players excite the fans, well, I think excited fans is probably a good thing for tennis (or any sport for that matter).

Roddick played a very good match today, he served pretty well, was aggresive, played that backhand down the line. In apite of that, hewitt coulda done a little more in the 2nd and 3rd sets he was broken after holding break points, his concentration kinda slipped.

Marat lost :( I was hoping for a showdon against fed but that's life, at least he showed signs of life in ny.

And nadal lost!!!!!!!!!!!!!! YAY!!!! :D:D:D Now maybe the hype will take a step down...

About Youzhny, he;s always been a good player but with a lot of up and downs. I haven't seen him this week but as a lot of people have mentioned his Robredo demolition was a sign of things to come today.
Has anybody been following his progress this fortnight? Is he reallyh playing out of his mind or what's going on?
I mean from the offset he beat Hrbaty, which can play really well if he's on, and although it seems he beat all the clay courters consecutively (massu, ferrer, robredo, nadal...yes he is a clay courter like it or not) he may have more than a chance against roddick.

Fed-Blake tomorrow should be a good one.

Assuming we get a Federer-Roddick final, which I don't necessarily assume, I think you have to break it down. Roddick will get a fair amount of service winners and aces, if he keeps going. Question is, can he do that often enough and/or hold the rest of the time against Federer? Because I think Federer should be able to hold against him, though it'll be tougher than it would have been six months ago.

But really well done tonight from Andy. He's playing so extremely well.

Will be nervous tomorrow night, but I like both players, so it's OK, even with all