Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Blogs  |  Newsletter Store
TENNIS.com - Peter Bodo's TennisWorld - Career Hotel
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   Fitness
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   String Theory
   The Healthy Player
   The Pro Shop
   Backcourt: Framed
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
« PacLife CC/Scouting Report - Day 8 Great Shoes »
Career Hotel
Posted 03/18/2008 @ 6 :00 PM

Linds Howdy, everyone. I won't bore you with the details of my trip. Suffice it to say that I'm present in Indian Wells and eager to get rolling with coverage. I did manage to catch a good bit of Lindsay Davenport's match last night, and you can read my thoughts on the importance of this event to Lindsay over at ESPN.

Altough Lindsay struggled against Yung-Jan Chang, in her presser she was in a fine mood, but discouraged about one particular thing. She's playing Marion Bartoli, last year's Wimbledon finalist, in the second match on the Indian Wells Tennis Garden's Stadium 1 Court tonight. This means that she won't be able to watch her long-time tennis friend and rival - and retired Grand Slam scourge -  Monica Seles make her debut on the popular television show,  Dancing With the Stars.

"I am so bummed," Lindsay said last night. "I play second after 7:00 p.m.  I'm like, what are the odds that that happens?  But I'm so excited for her.  I'm hoping someone in this area TiVos it for me so I can watch it after my match.  I sent her an e mail today wishing her good luck, and there's signs in the locker room for all the players to vote for her and watch. I swear, she's so great, she's so courageous I can't wait to see her."

That Lindsay was so worked up about missing a television show when seemingly more important things loomed was telling. Here she is, in as close to a "must win" tournament as she has played in many years. But instead of talking about Bartoli's forehand, or her game nature, she's talking about Seles chances on Dancing with the Stars. . .about her infant son Jagger's first unplanned visit to a doctor (it happened here on Sunday, when Jagger had a low-grade fever). . .about how she's working less on her game, enjoying it more, and. . .next thing, she'll be weighing in on Generation Obama.

Of course, the press is always more interested in personal tidbits than X's and O's, but still. . .

Although Lindsay still must put up a few good wins over top player to convince us that she's as good as her results in small-ish tournaments at the end of 2007 and thus far in 2008 suggest, it's pretty clear that she has come to a startling but not entirely lunatic conclusion - that playing at a high level on the pro tour doesn't necessarily require donning a hair shirt, checking into the Career Hotel under an assumed name, and drawing the curtains on life outside.

Oh, that may have worked for the Pete Sampras's and Steffi Grafs of this world, but nobody has ever confused Lindsay with Sampras or Graf. Throughout her career, she has had a Top 5 game married to Second 10 issues of confidence and focus, ensuring that she lived in the worst of both worlds: she sacrificed large chunks of her life for tennis without reaping the same rewards as others who went that route. As she said, "I still dedicate as much time as I can to my career.  It's certainly not as much as I did for about an eight year stretch between '98 and 2006 or something."

She talked further about her transformation from one-trick tennis player into multi-tasking supermom: "It's better now.  I enjoy being busy.  I enjoy having things to do.  A lot of what makes the tour life so boring is when you're not playing and not practicing there's a lot of down time. Especially with my husband not traveling there was a lot of down time in foreign countries.  Kind of drives you crazy.  Now I feel like I'm more fulfilled than ever on the road.  Just trying to get as much time in the day when I'm at home to do everything I need to do."

This was an interesting confession that pulls back the curtain on a subject you won't hear most ATP or WTA pros address directly and honestly. The reality is that for all the time, energy, emotion and money they've invested in themselves, those who are good and/or lucky enough to make it on the tour end up with an awful lot of down time on their hands.

By then, though, they've been conditioned to do as little as possible beyond practicing and playing tennis. And the further afield a potential activity is from the profession, the more it's perceived as a threat. Most tennis pros lead lives that are both sheltered and blinkered. They've been told, over and over, that it must be that way, and they're afraid to test the validity of the trope. They become captives of a unique "lifestyle" that's basically hostile to every other lifestyle, as well as toward the raw value of new experience. This diminishes them, and I've always suspected that it makes many of them less successful.

There's no point trashing players for that. In fact, if you've ever been jealous of the money, the fame, the lifestyle of a typical pro, you can console yourself with the fact that a hidden cost of that life is the basic isolation it demands from some of the joys and wonders that the rest of us are free to experience. Even if a tennis player does set out, with the most sincere of ambitions, to scale Everest, chances are he'll be forced to turn back before he hits base camp.

A little of what many players frequently, longingly and sometimes wistfully call "normal life" goes a long way for a tennis pro. It's just the way it is, which is why it's so refreshing to see someone like Lindsay revel in her ability finally to do what many, many of us pull off every day: accomplish our work at a high level, come hell or high water - or  crying babies, jerk supervisors, grocery lists, bumper-to-bumper traffic, health issues, tax season, fending off those cold callers, hellbent on selling us replacement windows.

In fact, Lindsay has not just come to appreciate the well - or at least better - rounded life, she's realized that having obligations and responsibilities to fill that "down time" when she's not practicing or playing is tonic for her spirit and may even benefit her game: "Sometimes it's a nice relief and break to go on court and know you have 90 minutes to focus on something else.  A lot of times he (son Jagger) comes with me. I have really, really great people that watch him, so every time I leave him I'm never ever concerned about his well being. But for you know, it's challenging.  For here it's a first time he's been sick and we had to take him to the doctor, so yesterday I was stressed out of my mind like yelling at my husband, all because, you know, my son has a fever and he's not sleeping. But for the most part we juggle it pretty well."

Having joined the legions of diaper-changing, sitter-collecting, sleepless, where-did-my-life-go? parents out there, Lindsay now sings in their choir: Hey, I can do this! I can juggle and tap-dance and multi-task with the best of them, and you know what? I'm still me! It's the most basic lesson of parenthood and, not coincidentally, the antithesis of the code by which the typical tennis player lives. The fact is, you really don't know what you're capable of until you try pushing some boundaries.

For that, among other reasons, I'd love to see Lindsay have a good year. It's not to show up the players who feel they absolutely, positively cannot perform at their best unless they ignore that call from an old college pal,  stick to turkey on whole grain (hold the mayo), or sleep on sheets with a thread count of at least 450. It's more because it's pretty cool to see people refuse to become timid souls, or bow to oppressive conventions. In tennis, the mandate to slam to door on "normal life" is not just a formula for making all-time champions, it's also a straight-jacket for players who have neither the talent nor temperament to win multiple Grand Slams. It's a scare tactic, inviting players to leads smaller rather than larger lives. It often has nothing whatsoever to do with winning or losing matches.

This is an important tournament for Lindsay. These next three weeks (with Miami coming up next) will reveal a lot about how realistic it is for her to target Grand Slam events and the toughest players. If she does well in March and early April, Lindsay will show that while we admire the kind of fidelity the greatest of players show to the game, not everyone must be a slave to his profession to prosper and flourish in it.

Multi-tasking - it's the way of today's world, isn't it?

| | Send to a Friend
Comments

God bless ya Pete! Fabulous entry:)
Of course, Lindsay is my favorite player!

I think it is so cool how Lindsay can do it all, be a mother and tennis player. I miss Kimmie C, so I hope she comes back. Great post Pete. Go Justine, world's #1!

Geez Pete - you really hit the ground running with this one! Glad you made it ok.

Really interesting to think about whether all work and no play really makes jack/jill a better player. Roddick giving up his cheetos (horrors!), players not taking advantage of touring around the cities they're at, does that really make them more effective? I know when I come back from a break, or spend an evening drinking wine and laughing with my pals, I'm definately fresher. I'm simply better at my job.

I wonder - do you have any feel for whether the mid ranks seem to have more 'fun'? Are they equally focused or do they see their tennis as more of an opportunity that can open doors for them? If so, I wonder if that's the type of thing that keeps them going, since for many, the promise of a slam title or 2 simply isn't realistic.

Pete: I really enjoyed this piece. I found the following passage poignant - " Throughout her career, she has had a Top 5 game married to a Second 10 issues of confidence and focus, ensuring that she lived in the worst of both worlds: she sacrificed large chunks of her life for tennis without reaping the same rewards as others who went that route. "

Thank you for this great piece on Lindsey!!

She was always my favourite female player. I suspect if she's able to consistently play at a high standard over the course of the year, she'll serve as inspiration for many others.


Pulls back the curtain, indeed. A bit further behind the curtain is what I believe is the reason why the WTA struggles with some depth and committment issues from time to time.

Even if Roger Federer occassionally admits that its "good to get out of the hotel room," at least he's got his Mirka in that room.

GOAT multi-multi-multi millionaires aside, I think, say, the Mardi Fish's of the ATP tour also have a decent shot at, at least, a well rounded enough life which would include a steady girlfriend.

Not so on the WTA tour. I would submit the Williams sisters as exhibit A. Basically, they decided that a well rounded 20-something female life was inconsistent with a full time committment to the tour. As with many decisions made by this family, who has made a host of very intelligent ones over the years, its hard to argue with the logic.

Unfortunately, like many issues relating to the structure of tennis, this is a tough one. Unless the prize money is increased substantially for the 12, 13, or whatever tournaments each tour decides is their "tour" -- all but the top players will need to play more like 20 to 25 tournaments to make a living, and, or, guarantee enough good results over a year's time to make a living.

I added it up once, and, considering that about six of those 25 tournaments are two week events, and considering travel time, an almost 40 week a year travelling schedule is mandatory.

Fun for a year, after that, not so much.

If the WTA represents the number one professional sport for women world wide (O.K. golfers, have at me!), what an irony that to participate in this number one professional sport requires a commitment to a lifestlye that a very high percentage of young women would find unattractive.

Perhaps the ATP players make due, but ask them and I don't think it would be a difference in attitude, mererly in degree.

Meant to write"Lindsay"
Being my favourite player, the least I can do is spell her name properly ;)

A finely crafted and timely watercolour sketch, Pete.

I have often wondered why Lindsay couldn't give it up and move on into her "real" life. She has long since past her prime and winning one last major is highly unlikely. Maybe she is weaning herself or earning a college degree for her son.

At any rate the choices, sacrifices and disciplines involved in a Top 5 tennis career are symptoms of the human condition and interesting to probe.

Go Roger!!!

New Alert: Seles is going to be on access Hollywood right now. She said the stabbing "definetly put an end to her career." Sorry to go OT.

I meant to say education not "degree."

Hi Pete - I really liked this post and really identified with it. It is interesting that the very thing that players seem to think is required of them (shutting out all else but tennis) might be the very thing that holds them back. I wonder what Sampras would think of that theory, since he was the poster boy for that. Andre Agassi always talked about how he just was not willing to sacrifice every single other thing, and as a result he had to take the up with the downs in his career.

Very sorry that I missed you in IW. Hope you enjoy your week, and we look forward to more posts. Hope you brought your NY clothes - its been COLD in the desert!!

Pete - great piece
and it is good to see that Lindsay is enjoying her new life on tour

Dunlop - sorry I missed seeing you this time around
interesting take on the men 's vs women's tour
It does seem that there is a great deal of camaraderie on the men's tour that is missing for the women. we have discussed it before
I will use the French guys as my example
The whole French entourage was staying at our hotel . They ate every meal together - breakfast and dinner . They sat in the lobby bar and watched the girls go by together . They sat out at the pool together . Although I could not understand what they were saying - their conversations were filled with laughter and they all seemed to be having a great time . Almost like a bunch of guys on a spring break trip .( Well except for no excess drinking and a few more chaperones than I think they would have liked. )
The women players we saw were alone or with a coach/trainer. Fun did not seem to be in the plan .

Anyone know how to get the ATP screen to work on a Mac?

"Multi-tasking - it's the way of today's world, isn't it?"
It sounds to me as though you're just trying to justify that DSL installation, Pete. As for me, I had my last ski day of the season, and didn't turn on the cellphone until I finished.

I love Lindsay's comeback and I am so happy for her. Here's a thought, though: How do you draw the distinction between healthy, happy distractions like little Jagger and "bad" distractions like so many people often pointed to with the Williamses or Maria? This is a real question for me, which I've pondered often. (For that matter, regardless of life full of endorsements and so forth, you rarely hear people call Federer distracted, or Roddick either.) I don't think you can tell from the outside. It seems to be so much a matter of personal focus and work ethic.

Jenn - hey! you know, Sampras would scoff at the theory, but as I wrote in the post, if you're not Sampras, embracing that life may be a lose-lose proposition. . .

What a thoughtful analysis. Thanks Pete. Looking forward to more of your dispatches.

There is another facet to the differences between the tours that contributes to the women's difficulty in having a life off the court: for good or ill society still sees a male athlete and the girlfriend who travels with him quite differently than a female athlete who travels with a boyfriend. Both the athletes and the companions are viewed differently in each scenario. The female athlete/male boyfriend model still generates enough societal disapproval to make it a tougher path to follow for both the individuals.

How much tougher I can't say. But it's not as easy as the male athlete/female companion arrangement, that's for sure. (Which is not to say that some guys' girlfriends don't get saddled wit the bimbo tag.)

Then, too, I'd guess the average age of WTA players is younger than ATP players on tour, and questions regarding the age of consent (both legal and imagined) come into play here, too.

beth - dunlap's post made me wonder about that very difference in the mens / womens tour. You hear about the guys being friends, playing golf, playstation tourney's and just hanging out. the women, really not so much.

is it also linked to the conversations we've had of hte men being able to compete fearcely (that doesn't look right, but hail, i just woke up here) and yet go out for a beer after. its not personal, like the women seem to make it.

I'm sorry but I am really cynical. I don't have kids nor a partner but I find the fact that LD back on court a bit I don't know. Big deal she is juggling motherhood and working with the help of other people like a nanny, money etc. For most working mothers they don't get this luxury. If normal mothers want to go to the gym they have to fit it in with their partners or see if the gym have a creche. LD can leave the baby with the nanny and off she goes. It's great that she can play tennis and be a mum also. Woopee Do.

Who know if the top 20 players have bf (Elena D) as you never see them. I can't see them going out and having a meal together a letting their hair down. I could see players outside the top 20 doing it. Also I think at smaller tournaments the girls prolly do. Look I work with a lot of females and the majority of them are bitchy. And I work in an engineering company. If somebody else is prettier or has better clothes the claws come out.

I agree the men seem to be able to separate competition from friendship but that seems to be the case in the normal working environment as well. Oh to be on the blokes side and playing video games.

I love sports and find athletes heroic, but I do so because of their accomplishments in their profession. They're getting paid millions to chase and whack fuzzy green balls. I find the mid-career professional working mother, or the working-class, apron-wearing working mother who manages to balance work and personal life to be much more worthy of my respect and admiration than someone who could easily afford to turn into a recreational player and be a millionaire mother as her day-job.

Pete, I think you're a good writer and tennis analyst, but lately you've written a series of posts dripping of over-the-top sentimentality (refer to your post on the Madison Square Garden exhibition between Sampras and Federer; you waxed poetic epic over what was largely just a marketing and fundraising stunt). This is more the kind of article I'd expect to find in Cosmopolitan, Hello!, or Vanity Fair (hell what do I know?). Well written, but given that we're here for tennis analysis, this borders on being intellectually insulting for your readership. I come here because I wish I could watch more tennis, I'm an amateur at analyzing the sport and I don't write well; I come here to read your posts because you're a professional at all of the above. Steve Tignor's post on the athlete's schedule certainly about extra-tennis material, but it cast insight into the playing of tennis as a sport.

Hope you enjoyed your vacation.

Is it hot for March or what? Temeratures in the 70s and 80s every day in March. That's hot. In July, it'll probably be 115. That's absurdly hot, like Mercury or Venus, not Earth.

Articles analysing the Fed vs Sampras exhibitions are useless in my opinion. It's an EXHIBITION for "Pete's" sake. You can't analyse the heck out of something done for show.

Wow! Great article on a great person! Thanks, Pete. I relished every word.

**You can't analyse the heck out of something done for show.**

Kim, well said. Short and sweet.

Gotta say I've enjoyed the emotionally rich tenor of these recent pieces,Pete, along with the more analytical material. I guess as individuals we all react differently when faced with what we do (or don't) expect to see in a blog devoted to tennis...

I've wondered lately what would happen if Amelie would simply decide to take a sabbatical from tennis (voluntary as opposed to imposed by injury) and do something entirely different (babies seem to be in vogue!) and then try returning if she decides she misses it enough. Although she's near the end of her logical career she's a great athlete and she might find she's much better off if she ceases what is clearly a struggle for her now. Lindsay is a great example of someone who was struggling physically and somewhat emotionally before she took the break and "got a life."

I, too, am not that impressed with LD's comeback. Yes, it must be incredibly challenging with a child, but it reminds me a bit of Oprah.....I know it's difficult for ANYONE to lose weight, but please, a personal trainer and chef does help.

I want to add my strong agreement with the thoughts expressed by Dunlop Maxply and skip1515 in their comments.

I have always felt that, were it not for the amount of transcontinental and international traveling involved, the life of a professional tennis player might be something that even I might envy.

An established woman player like Lindsay, who can afford the luxury of a traveling nanny etc, is in a far different position from a mid-level player (needing to play many events and not making great sums at those events) or a player whose husband wants his child at home near him as he pursues a regular job which requires that he be in the office 5 days a week, 48 to 50 weeks a year.

I see that everyone is now jumping on the Richard Williams bandwagon - you know that one that says you can have tennis and something else ... - yes that Richard Williams. The maverick that raised 2 wonderful young ladies, turned them into well spoken champions, who now have decided that regardless of the fact that they did not win a gazillion grand slam titles, they have an education (hey guess what I can do something after I leave this tennis thing), thriving business (in the case of Venus) and guess what I still get to play this little thing called tennis (and win some matches and tournaments). It is good to see LD playing well and it is good to see her doing what so many of us mothers have been doing for a long time. It is not only the women's tour where you have working women, but I believe on the ATP tour as well you have wives who travel with their husbands and the children. I guess in this day and age, all working parents can take the kids to work

Welcome to the grand illusion, Come on in and see whats happening
Pay the price, get your tickets for the show....

But dont be fooled by the radio, The tv or the magazines, They show you photographs of how your life should be, But theyre just someone elses fantasy, So if you think your life is complete confusion, Because you never win the game, Just remember that its a grand illusion, And deep inside were all the same.
Were all the same...Styx

Only a man could have written this story.

I think Lindsey Davenport is a great player and I’m glad she has rejoined the tour. It’s great for tennis and a great story.

However, as many people above have said, with all money and priviledge at her disposal, her life is actually much easier than most women with children. Most women would be salivating to have the financial resources to have a full time nanny who travels and to get away from it all for a few weeks or hours and to have the ‘distraction’ of playing a tennis match, for yourself, after being with screaming crying children all day. Most women with children are desperate for adult interaction after awhile. Why not write a story about Sybile Bammer and her issues. She is a mid-level player who has a young child. Her story would be more enlightening about the challenges of being a tennis player and a mother without Lindsey Davenport resources.

What is this thing about a tennis player needing a ‘real life’. We are assuming they have chose of their free will (however, the free will issue may be the problem as most tennis players are encouraged if not pushed at a young age into the life before they have a chance to choose for themselves but again if they were not pushed at a young age they probably would have the great opportunity they have been given and would be like me, wishing my parents would have push or encouraged me a little so I possibly could have had a chance at such a life, but that is another story) to be tennis players because they love tennis and it offers them opportunities they could probably not have otherwise, travel, money, fame, and most important the challenge of playing the best and testing yourself against the best on the big stage. This is their real life.

If they have a lot of down time, there are many things they could do with that time. Educate themselves. Read. Get to know the other players. Learn, grow. And now with computers and internet there is no excuse to be board.

I do conceed that constant travel is a hard life and the pressures of being a tennis player can be difficult. Having to be nice to everyone constantly, fans, ball boys, media, sponsors. However, every life has it pluses and minuses and we know the pluses must outway the minuses in tennis.

One more item for the soap box. I though there was equal pay now in tennis. But there is not. The male champion at IW is being paid $500K and the female only $322K. That is a huge disparity. And the old argument of men play 5 sets cannot be used here. (I’d like to see women play 5 sets at slams though) Isn’t Chris Evert an owner of the tournament? I would think that she would insist on equal pay, or maybe not because she is the owner, more for her. Where is Billie Jean when you need her? Why does it take a man, Larry Scott, to get equal pay at the slams? Where are all the female tennis players? This is what they could be doing in their downtime, organizing a campaign for equal and more prize money at all tornaments and insist on it for all women in all walks of life and in all countries. How about equal rights for women in all the third world countires they visit? There’s a real life that would make a real difference in all women’s lives. They would be fulfilled then, ah but their would be a price to pay criticism, loss of sponsors, loss of appearance fees.

Welcome to the Grand Illusion.

>You can't analyse the heck out of something done for show

Yeah.

Ruth I'm in agreement. And I'd also like to hear more about Bammer, as requested above.

I am really very happy for Lindsay . Of all the players on tour, she always seemed to have the most "normal " life. At least for a tennis player. She went to her prom . She finished high school . She is now married and a mother. Yes, she is privileged enough to have a nanny and a supportive husband. So , her life is different from other working moms.
But ,this life she leads is not so different from many other women in Newport Beach in her economic range. At least she has a job . Unlike some of those other spoiled divas in that region who have no job outside the home and still feel the need to have a nanny , housekeeper and full time help. ( trust me , I know some of these people )
So, I will not judge her for that .
As for the unequal prize money , the ATP event is mandatory - and a higher "level" tournament than the WTA counterpart. The women are not required to attend. If this discrepancy were to exist at the Miami tournament , where both men and women have mandatory entrance, then I would say your argument about equal prize money is a valid one.

I believe LD realizes the unique situation she's in and does not compare herself to the typical working mom. As a matter of fact, she's always commenting about how grateful she is to her support group and that she'll only play as long as it works for the entire family.

Tennis Fan: Actually, the WTA and UNESCO are working together with a plan exactly like the one you described in the last long paragraph of your comment. The program was established about a year or two ago. Venus apparently suggested the idea to Larry Scott after reading an article somewhere. I've seen panel discussions and public announcements about the program featuring Venus, Golovin, and Petrova who are all very active in the program.

After the Bangalore tourney, the WTA fund that was developed to support the projects that are part of the program presented a $100,000 check to a group in India that is working on gender equality issues there.

You said a mouthful, YPFR! :) If more players used the down time that they have (in airports, planes, hotels etc) to develop interests outside of tennis, they might find the tennis years more enjoyable and the thought of retiring, which comes all too soon when compared with other careers, less frightening.

I remember Venus talking about working on essays for her freshman English classes, reading various books for certain courses, working on designs and patterns and so on. I doubt that she had any time to be bored on tour.

Ruth, so true in your 2 posts and hello as I have not "spoken" to you in quite some time. Women need to realise that they will need to have a rounded life and I have to say that quite a few of the female players on tour (and some of the male ones as well) are still in college or are pursuing college courses, even while they are on the road. Clearly, some of these players have realised that at some point in time you will need a fall back position.

And I am glad that you pointed out to TennisFan that it was actually Venus who had approached Larry Scott and UNESCO in relation to the whole equal prize money and the gender equality issues.

Here's a link to an article about the program on the WTA site, if you're interested:

http://www.sonyericssonwtatour.com/1/newsroom/stories/?ContentID=2115

I should add that Jie Zheng is another of the actively involved players and that the $100,000 donation from the WTA fund came via a gift from the sponsors of the Bangalore tourney.

YPF/Karen: Yes, there was a funny article a long time ago in which Larry Scott said that he'd called Venus to talk about some routine tennis business but she wouldn't let him get a word in until he listened to her thoughts about having the WTA get involved with gender equality issues.

BTW On the topic of developing other interests and skills, I remember reading that Amy Frazier was studying to be a math teacher while on Tour. Does anyone know if she has officially retired and, if she has, whether she has pursued her plans to teach?

Thanks for the info on UNESCO. Venus is exceptional in using her name to gain equal prize money and for women's rights. She should win a prize, Nobel maybe. But where are the other players? At least on the equal prize money issue. This is something that should unite them.

I looked on the ATP website about prize money. I don't know about mandatory issues, however if that is what it takes then the women tournaments should be mandatory. It is hard to compare the tours side by side as they do not use the same terminology nor are most of the tourments joint. I think the Master Series is equivalent to Tier I in WTA, International Gold as Tier II and Internal as III. In almost all events the men are playing for siginficantly more prise money. I don't think all of them are mandatory and the men do not play five sets at tournaments other than slams. I don't think the men's game is any more compelling than the women's and in a lot of cases it is even less compelling. Therefore, the prize money disparity in the 21st Century is unconscionable.

P.S. I hope no one thinks I was saying anything disparaging of LD. I know she did not write this story and the story writer is looking for an angle and they need to use an angle to draw us in. However, the Williams are critized for having a life outside of tennis yet this story is imply that players need to get a life outside tennis. Damed if you do, damed if you don't.

About the French guys - There French. This is what the French do. Have any of them won a Slam? Are any in the top ten? What are they sitting around shooting the breeze about in French? Possibly chasing women and the latest conquest? Women don't do that (mostly).

"Are any in the top ten? "

Actually, Gasquet is #8.

Copied from day 9 scouting report

I see what the problem is with WTA, the women's game and the prize money disparity. There are no female reporters, nor a reporter dedicated to the women's game. Look above, there are 12 paragraphs about the men's game and a two sentence paragraph almost at the end about the women's game. And it does not even mention any of the compelling women's matches of yesterday.

I think Tennis Magazine needs at least two female reporters paid the same or more than the male reports that focus on the women's game and only give the men's game a two sentence paragraph at the end about the men's game.

This is the biggest problem with the women's game.

Copied from day 9 scouting report

I see what the problem is with WTA, the women's game and the prize money disparity. There are no female reporters, nor a reporter dedicated to the women's game. Look above, there are 12 paragraphs about the men's game and a two sentence paragraph almost at the end about the women's game. And it does not even mention any of the compelling women's matches of yesterday.

I think Tennis Magazine needs at least two female reporters paid the same or more than the male reports that focus on the women's game and only give the men's game a two sentence paragraph at the end about the men's game.

This is the biggest problem with the women's game.

YPF I agree with your comments about players using their downtime to better use. I have noticed a few of the girls are studying various subjects like Elena D and Chaka Khan. Psychology I think now that is ironic.

I also wasn't meaning to be mean against LD as I have always found her to be really pleasant and friendly.

The comments to this entry are closed.

« PacLife CC/Scouting Report - Day 8 Great Shoes »

More from TennisWorld
Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor

More from Concrete Elbow
TENNIS Magazine is published 10 times per year.




Save 75% off of the annual newsstand price.
Categories
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
ATP Championships 06
ATPchamps07
Australian Open 2005
Australian Open 2006
Australian Open 2007
Australian Open 2009
Battlefield Reports
Big Winners, Big Losers
Blogging Advisory
Books
Books, DVDs, etc.
Breaking News
By The Letters
Clay Game
Coaches
Contests
Controversy/Scandal
Corrections
Crisis Center
Davis Cup
Dispatch From the Front
Fed Cup
Friday Features
Guest Contributors
In Memoriam
IndianWells2009
Injury Report
Interviews
Junior Game
KeyBiscayne2008
Miscellaneous
Monday Net Post
Nasdaq100 2005
Nasdaq100 2006
NCAA Tennis
New to TennisWorld?
Off Topic
Olympics
On Vacation
Other Sports
PacLife Open 2005
PacLife Open 2006
PacLife Open 2007
PacLife Open 2008
Players - Female Pros
Players - Juniors
Players - Male Pros
Players - Other
Pressroom
Recap 2006
Roland Garros 2005
Roland Garros 2006
Roland Garros 2007
Roland Garros 2008
Roland Garros 2009
Senior Game
Sony-Ericsson 2007
SonyEricsson2009
State of the Game
Statistics
Steggy
Sunday Brunch
TennisWorld FAQs
The Deuce Club
The Locker Room
The OTher Thread
The Watercooler
Tournaments
Tribe
TW Site Rules
US Open 2005
US Open 2006
US Open 2007
US Open 2008
Wednesday Racket
Wimbledon 2005
Wimbledon 2006
Wimbledon 2007
Wimbledon 2008
Wimbledon2009
World Team Tennis
WTA Championships 06
Your Call
Recent Entries
Your Call 7.16
A Babe in the Woods
Wimbledon SP Results
Speak, Warrior
Your Call 7.14
A Letter to Dick Ebersol of NBC
Monday Net Post
Davis Cup Crisis Center, Day 3
Davis Cup Crisis Center, Day 2
The Deuce Club, 7.10
Lumping and Splitting
Davis Cup QF Day 1, Your Call
The S Train
Your Call: Davis Cup
A Charmed Life
Statistics
This blog currently has 2351 entries and 825757 comments.