Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Blogs  |  Newsletter Store
TENNIS.com - Peter Bodo's TennisWorld - Monday Net Post
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   Fitness
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   String Theory
   The Healthy Player
   The Pro Shop
   Backcourt: Framed
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
« Monte Carlo Day 7 - Aftermath The Unintended 3 »
Monday Net Post
Posted 04/28/2008 @ 9 :57 AM

By TW Contributing Editor, Ed McGrogan

Last Week's Tournaments

Masters Series Monte Carlo (ATP - Clay - Monte Carlo, Monaco)

- Singles Final: Rafael Nadal def. Roger Federer 7-5, 7-5.
    - Singles Semifinal: Roger Federer def. Novak Djokovic 6-3, 3-2 (retired).
    - Singles Semifinal: Rafael Nadal def. Nikolay Davydenko 6-3, 6-2.

- Singles Bracket

- Doubles Final: Rafael Nadal/Tommy Robredo def. Mahesh Bhupathi/Mark Knowles 6-3, 6-3.
     - Doubles Semifinal: Mahesh Bhupathi/Mark Knowles def. Jeff Coetzee/Wesley Moodie 6-0, 7-5.
     - Doubles Semifinal: Rafael Nadal/Tommy Robredo def. Jonas Bjorkman/Kevin Ullyett 5-7, 7-6, 10-7.

- Doubles Bracket

Fed Cup (WTA - Various)

- First Rubber: Anna Chakvetadze (RUS) def. Vania King (USA) 6-4, 7-5.
- Second Rubber: Svetlana Kuznetsova (RUS) def. Ahsha Rolle (USA) 6-2, 6-1.
- Third Rubber: Vera Zvonareva (RUS) def. Vania King (USA) 4-6, 6-3, 6-2.
- Fourth Rubber (dead): Ahsha Rolle (USA) def. Elena Vesnina (RUS) 6-3, 6-4.
- Fifth Rubber (dead): Liezel Huber/Vania King (USA) def. Svetlana Kuznetsova/Elena Vesnina (RUS) 7-6, 6-4.

- Russia vs. USA

- First Rubber: Carla Suarez-Navarro (ESP) def. Shuai Peng (CHN) 6-3, 7-6.
- Second Rubber: Nuria Llagostera Vives (ESP) def. Jie Zheng (CHN) 6-3, 6-4.
- Third Rubber: Nuria Llagostera Vives (ESP) def. Shaui Peng (CHN) 6-4, 6-4.
- Fourth Rubber (dead): Jie Zheng (CHN) def. Carla Suarez-Navarro (ESP) 7-6, 6-3.
- Fifth Rubber (dead): Nuria Llagostera Vives/Maria-Jose Martinez Sanchez (ESP) def. Shuai Peng/Tian-Tian Sun (CHN) 6-2, 6-1.

- China vs. Spain

By the Letter

T...ommy Robredo and Rafael Nadal's doubles title at Monte Carlo gave Nadal the distinction of being only the second player to ever win the singles and doubles tournaments at a Masters Series event (the last was Jim Courier at Indian Wells '91).
E...bay finds of the week (again, those Heritage shorts I told you about): Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Exhibit C.
N...ice result (men): Gael Monfils was one of the few Frenchman to have success in Monte Carlo this past week, upsetting Fernando Verdasco and Ivo Karlovic before losing to Roger Federer in the third round.
N...ice result (women): Vera Zvonareva has played well so far this season, and continued her strong play by taking the deciding rubber for the hometown Russians, beating Vania King in a close three set match.
I...ndividual tournaments they are not - but even when the ATP and WTA combine for a "joint" Rogers Cup in 2011, Montreal and Toronto will still alternate between the men and women each year.
S...hamil Tarpishchev, captain of the Russian Fed Cup team, will play Maria Sharapova in September's final due to a "prior agreement" between the two.
W...TATour.com took a closer look at the career of Clarisa Fernandez, a French Open semifinalist six years ago, after she announced her retirement earlier this month.
O...pen tennis' 40th anniversary coincides with the release of The Bud Collins History of Tennis - due out this spring.
R...oland Garros will be the next - and last - tournament that Gustavo Kuerten will play in.  Guga withdrew from Barcelona this week due to a muscle injury.
L...osing streak of 54 matches (and even more amazingly, 108 sets) was ended earlier this week after Robert Dee defeated Arzhang Derakhshani in a Futures tournament in Spain.
D...ocumentary film Unstrung, which takes a closer look at the lives of dedicated tennis youths, will be shown on Saturday, May 3, on ESPN Classic.  The film is co-produced by Jim Courier.

McGrogan's Heroes

ATP – Rafael NadalClayman

It’s the safe pick, but it’s the right one. 

Somewhat lost in the Djokovic is rising/Federer is falling early months of 2008 is that Nadal hasn’t won a tournament since July of last year.  He’s had plenty of good results since then – finals of the Paris Masters and Miami Masters, for example – but like the long ball, chicks dig titles.  Rafa finally got the monkey off his back with a convincing win at Monte Carlo.  It couldn’t have come at a better time, because even though clay is Nadal’s preferred battleground, it also brings along added pressure to fend off and piles of points to defend.

Nadal is now an unprecedented four-time defending champion of Monte Carlo (Ille Nastase was champion in three consecutive years, from 1971-73).  He can make similar history at both Barcelona and Rome, should he earn the four-peat at these upcoming events.  And even though winning the French Open four straight years wouldn’t give him the best run at Roland Garros outright (Bjorn Borg can also tout that, winning from 1978-1981), we won’t think any less of the achievement.

Last year, Nadal accomplished what I called the “Quadruple Trifecta” – he won four different clay tournaments for three consecutive years.  If he can defend his titles at Monte Carlo, Barcelona, Rome, and Roland Garros this year, do I then call it the “Quadruple Superfecta?”  I’m not sure I like how that sounds.  I’m instead thinking of dubbing it the “Perfect Square,” since Nadal will have 16 titles if he can win four tournaments for four consecutive years.

(On a related note, see the if… question below.)

WTA – Nuria Llagostera VivesSpainfedcup_2 

Both the American and Spanish Fed Cup teams faced significant challenges this past week in the semifinal round.  Clearly, the United States drew the shortest straw of the two sides.  They not only had to face an All-Star Russian lineup in Moscow, but also had to do so with a squad that wasn’t even close to their best potential outfit. 

Spain also faced an away crowd, but dodged both Na Li and Zi Yan, China’s two highest ranked singles players.  Throw in the fact that this was only the second year in the World Group for China, and the outcome of this tie was not as easy to predict. 

It was over by the third rubber – just as it was in Moscow – but not in favor of the home side.  Spain marched on to the finals, thanks in great part to the contributions of Nuria Llagostera Vives.  The Fed Cup veteran dispatched both Chinese threats, beating Jie Zheng and Shaui Peng, each in straight sets.

Llagostera Vives’ year in Fed Cup has been a memorable one, dating back to February when Spain faced Italy in the opening round.  Also in enemy territory, Spain faced a tough test against an Italian side led by the accomplished and battle-tested Francesca Schiavone.  Llagostera Vives faced a tall order, but ended up winning in three sets, 7-6, 3-6, 6-2.  Thereafter, Anabel Medina Garrigues won the next two rubbers, and Spain advanced with an insurmountable 3-0 lead.

This time around, Llagostera Vives did the bulk of the work, after Carla Suarez-Navarro won the opening rubber against Peng.  She’s sure to be a fixture for Spain in September’s final, which will be their first tie of the year played on home soil.

Tennis Theatre

I typed "spain china fed cup" into the YouTube search engine to see if I could find any highlights from this past weekend's tie.  Only one video came up, and it was this:

I enjoyed watching this clip.  Since the shuttlecock stays airbone longer than a tennis ball, there's more time to plan your next move, leading to some very creative shotmaking.  Although tennis, ping-pong, and squash are the top three on my list of favorite racquet sports, I still love to play badminton when I can (unfortunately, almost never).

This clip illustrates the speed of the game pretty well:

Finally, some deception:

Next Week's Tournaments

***TELEVISION SCHEDULE***

BMW Open (ATP - Clay - Munich, Germany)

- Singles Bracket
- Doubles Bracket
- Website

Open Sabadell Atlantico (ATP - Clay - Barcelona, Spain)

- Singles Bracket
- Doubles Bracket
- Website

ECM Prague Open (WTA - Clay - Prague, Czech Republic)

- Singles & Doubles Bracket
- Website

Grand Prix de SAR La Princesse Lalla Meryem (WTA - Clay - Fes, Morocco)

- Singles & Doubles Bracket
- Website

Beyond the Bracket

The road to Roland Garros is a long one, paved with a mixture of crushed brick and plenty of sweat.  It’s been said that clay is the most forgiving surface to play on from a physical standpoint, but try telling that to the many players who are playing three challenging Masters Series events in a span of four weeks.  And if you’re Rafael Nadal, the three-time defending champion of [insert name of clay tournament here] four consecutive weeks of play are required (in order to fit Barcelona into his calendar).

Nadal, among others, has aired his thoughts about the compacted nature of this year’s clay season.  But as they say, the show must go on.  And in Monte Carlo, the usual dynamos of the dirt didn’t skip a beat.  The seeds played out perfectly in the last two rounds, with the “real” number one on the surface, Nadal, capping things off by again stifling his closest rival, Roger Federer.  To reach this final match, Nadal brushed away the fourth seed, Nikolay Davydenko, while Federer garnered some revenge for his loss at the Australian Open against third-seeded Novak Djokovic, after the Serb abruptly retired in the second set.

While seeing the top four seeds reach the final four of a tournament isn’t that uncommon, having the top eight reach the quarters is definitely a rare occurrence.  It almost happened in Monaco this week, with the top six seeds advancing to the elite eight, along with party crashers Sam Querrey and Igor Andreev.

Normally, I wouldn’t make too much out of this.  But for a number of reasons, I think there’s a very good chance that what we saw unfold in Monte Carlo is what will also happen at the French Open.  The top six seeds (David Ferrer is No. 5, and David Nalbandian is No. 6) are all spectacular players on clay – their lowest clay title count amongst them is four, aside from the still-youthful Djokovic, who has two.  As for Andreev and Querrey, they could find their way deep into the second week of Roland Garros, but they represent a specific type of player who will do well in Paris.  Andreev symbolizes the (are you ready) clay-court specialist, while Querrey’s presence is emblematic of a wild card candidate who can make waves from time to time (Carlos Moya ’07, Julien Benneteau ’06, Victor Hanescu ’05).

In addition, look at the box scores of Thursday’s matches that sent the top six into the quarters.  Except for Davydenko’s three set tussle with Philipp Kohlschreiber, the remainder of the top six seeds crushed their competition – five of the ten sets in these matches either ended 6-0 or 6-1.  And even though these matches were in a best of three format, all of these top six seeds have proven they can handle best of five set action.  Last year, their combined records in Grand Slam matches were 104-20 (80.7%).

This is the beginning of the arduous clay season, where players – in theory – should be at their freshest.  These eight emerged from this playing field, and while they may not all duplicate this result at Rome or Hamburg (due to the congested calendar), I think the same eight will prove their worth at Roland Garros, after everyone has had their fill of clay.  I don’t have a crystal ball, although I did get a very clear view of this past week’s proceedings in my cousin’s home theatre, equipped with a stunning 92” high definition projector screen.  Will I be able to watch tennis the same again?  Like my predictions above, only time will tell.

Before I go, a few words about these competitors:

Nadal – see McGrogan’s Heroes above.

Federer – The start to his clay campaign has gone as well as he could have expected.  Retirements by two of his toughest opponents help, but he looked right in form against Nalbandian in the Monte Carlo quarters.

Djokovic – Novak has significant points to defend at the next three Grand Slams, but he also reached the quarters at Rome and Hamburg last year.  If there’s one equalizing factor in this three horse race atop the rankings, it’s that Federer, Nadal, and Djokovic were so dominant last year that they each always have points to defend somewhere, so an early loss may not be as punishing as it first seems.

Davydenko – He’s looked a lot more threatening since last year’s U.S. Open (did you know he didn’t lose a set at Flushing Meadows until his semifinal match against Federer?), and his win at Miami should do wonders for his confidence.

Ferrer – It’s going to be a stiff test for anyone to upend Nadal on clay this spring, but in spite of the 6-1, 7-5 defeat he suffered to Rafa, David probably has just as good a chance as Roger, Novak, or Nikolay does of slaying the clay Goliath.

Nalbandian – Steve Tignor had a great description of Richard Gasquet in a recent ESPN.com blog post, where he called him “The Microwave” – as in, he can get hot at any moment.  Thinking back to how Nalbandian played at last year’s Madrid and Paris Masters, and then, how mortal he can look at other times, David could likewise be compared to this kitchen appliance.  But to give him some credit, he’s a microwave from Williams-Sonoma (he won’t break down as quickly).

Andreev – Ever since Tignor (not picking on you Steve – seriously!) pegged Igor to shine bright in Indian Wells (he ended up losing to Mardy Fish in his first match), he’s been on a tear, reaching the quarterfinals at both Miami and Monte Carlo.  Reaching those heights at Roland Garros is not out of the question, but if it’s not him, I could easily see Juan Monaco or Nicolas Almagro taking his place.

Querrey – Sam’s play was a great story this week.  Just getting by Carlos Moya in the first round was an achievement, not to mention his subsequent wins over Andreas Seppi and Richard Gasquet.  But what I take most out of Querrey’s success is that I can’t help but think about what James Blake or Andy Roddick could do on clay, on a good day.

if...

Rafael Nadal ends up winning Monte Carlo, Barcelona, Rome, and Roland Garros for four consecutive years each, what name would you invent for this achievement?

(I have suggested "Perfect Square" as per above; best response in the comments below wins a prize.)

| | Send to a Friend
Comments

1 2 3 Next »

El tetRAFAntastico

I have played badminton and the game is miserably fast.
True the shuttle stays airborne longer, but quite often you don't have a lot of time to react to attacking shots and droppers and such.

El tetRAFAntastico! Very nice, ptenisnet. But are the "t's" silent? ;)

el erafanasico. has a nice ring to it.

"We should have both Sharapova and Kuznetsova in the lineup. I might even have them play doubles together," Tarpishchev said."

OK, the first words that come to mind with this quote are: That'll be the day. But wouldn't THAT be a doubles partnership to see? If both Kuzzie and Maria are named to the squad AND are playing, it would entice me to fly off to Spain...

(Has Maria ever PLAYED doubles? Does she understand that sometimes, two people can play on the same side of the court?)

Second, couple of thoughts on the Austria/Switzerland Fed Cup matchup that I saw over the weekend. Stefanie Voegle (Swiss) is 18 years old, and played arguably the biggest match of her life against Tamira Pazsek to keep the Swiss in the tie (they were down 2-1 going into Voegle's match, so Pazsek could have wrapped it up). In watching the match, I found it hard to figure out why people keep expecting huge things from Pazsek. Her strokes are OK, her serve is middling, and her movement around the court really isn't that great. In fact, it looked pretty terrible on Sunday.
(Voegle, for her part, defended really, really well and kept her cool in the third set when a lot of other kids would have crumbled. Kudos to her.)

Second, why didn't the Austrians send out Bammer for their doubles match? This decision mystified me. Schnyder and seasoned Fed Cup vet Gagliardi went for the Swiss; the Austrians sent out Yvonne Meusburger and some poor 17 year old kid (Klaffner). I thought, as I watched the warm up, "Just keep hitting it at the poor 17 year old and watch..." And sure enough, the Swiss did that, and steamrolled the Austrians 0 and 1. It was painful to watch.

But apparently not as painful as the Belgian/Colombian tie: the Colombians got exactly zero sets off the mighty Henin-less Belgians. Ouch.

Not to beat a dead horse, but interesting that Djoko retired in his Fed match over a sore throat and fatigue the past 3 days when he had blitzed 2 quality opponents 6-0, 6-0 in sets.

Wish I had breathing problems like that. Also, interesting that Fed completed his semi AO match with mono yet he's been getting blitzed by the press that his no 1 spot is at risk - interesting...

Ed McGrogan:

you forgot to mention rafa's Double achievment ???

Tetra comes from the greek language and it means "four", "Cuatro".

Any time a team let us say in soccer (Nadal´s second favourite sport)wins a tournament 4 times in a row it is called "tetra campeon". Brazil for example has already surpassed that achievement in World Cups.

Therefore, if Nadal reaches his 4th consecutive Montecarlo, Barcelona, Rome and R. Garros crowns: he will be the "Quadruple-Tetra Clay King" or the "Cuádruple-Tetra Rey del polvo de ladrillo" (in spanish).

Ed - I'd call the achievement the "Sweet Sixteen."

I actually like Quadruple Superfecta, but only if you pronounce Superfecta with a Spanish accent in honor of Nadal.

Ali C I think Paszek's movement might improve with fitness a la Ivanovic. Middling on the other hand is being way too charitable about her serve. That thing is frightening. I don't see huge potential either.

Ripon-- Rafa's doubles achievement is the first thing Ed mentioned in "By the letter."

Hiya!
"Rafas spring Concenrto for a quartet of strings"

The Lambda 4

Thanks for the positive badminton references. Most people I meet in the States think it's a kids' back yard game.

I was a pretty good club player for years when I lived in the UK. Became a big tennis fan because there's not that much badminton on tele.

Badminton is a terrific game. Do watch the Youtube clips. You need to be super fit, have quick reflexes, and be fast around the court. Preferred it to squash or tennis for the rush I got ending points with the early smash.

I think Sonderling's wife (it may be another player whose name begins with S) is a international level badminton player. Anyone know her name?

The Dirty 4X4

(I thought it had kind of a provincial ring to it.)

MrsSanta, hmmm. "Maybe" on Paszek's fitness. The difference is - Ankles has the game already, and her improved fitness has allowed her to use her weapons more effectively.

Paszek, on the other hand, seems to kinda be lacking weapons. So improved fitness might get her to the balls she was just watching on Sunday, but...then what? She doesn't have an Ivanovic-forehand to send back at her opponent (at least, not as far as I've seen). The girl seems to thrive on coming close but never actually winning the big match.

I mean, Patty Schnyder does the same thing (as far as never quite winning the big one), but at least she's entertaining to watch.

"The Dirty 4X4"


Indeed. Sounds like it should have a gun rack in the back. And maybe some longhorns on the front.

Can you see Rafa as one of the Dukes of Hazard? Heh heh.

If? You mean when. I like "Sweet Sixteen"

I'd call it "the 4 x 4", like that secret burger at In-n-Out that nobody can really finish. Similarly, when Federer won Halle and Wimbledon four times each, that was "the 2 x 4".

Yes Pierre for sure Montecarlo, Barcelona, Rome and Paris, four sophisticated, cosmopolitan and beautiful places, are very provincial ... These are four of the oldest tournaments tennis has to offer ... The old continent, the name is for a reason.

I guess Rafa´s warrior image in places as elegant as the Montecarlo Country club, as royal as the Conde the Godo tournament, as historical as the Foro Italico, and as glamourous as Paris is a perfect picture, and an appealing one for the tennis public.

Well Paszek has a nice backhand. But yeah I was thinking more the fitness would help her not suck so badly on returns. I don't think she is destined for Ivanovic like middle-management greatness. More the next Dominika Cibulkova.

SueB,

I remember hearing during a broadcast that Jarko Niemenen's (sp?)wife is an international caliber badminton player - maybe that's it?

It's a great game, I took it up in college when I had (believe it or not) compulsory phys ed. It's much faster , more demanding, and way more fun than you'd think!

"I don't think she is destined for Ivanovic like middle-management greatness."

MrsSanta, tell us how you REALLY feel about Ankles.

Paszek's backhand...yes. Not sucking so much would be good. Especially on returns. I hear it's an important part of tennis, the returning.

Thanks Martha! I'll try googling Niemenen and see what I find.

And ta for the badminton endorsement. People just don't believe me when I tell them what a competitive game it is. And the athleticism required to be really, really good.

I'm older now and walking the dogs (albeit many miles per week) is about my level. All three of us are pretty fit for our age group!

I love badminton - both the back-yard garden variety and the professional game. It's too bad we in the U.S. don't have many opportunities to see it live or on TV. It's so fast, and the players so extraordianrily fit, fast and flexible. And who can NOT like all those smashes?! I especially loved the clip of the Indonesin gal -- I can't think of anyone who moves better, except maybe Steffi Graf. Pure grace and power as she appears to glide to every shot. Thanks, Ed.

Ivanovic will probably win 2 slams this year and then I will cry.

Ali C send a note to Paszek reminding her of the importance of the returns (which sadly for her involves moving) especially when your serve is less than great. I don't think she knows. Dementieva should become her mentor.

Did Passos quit or was he fired?

it would be a

Feat of Clay

I think Paszek has set the serve back about 30 years.

Ed,
thanks for the post. I think two pints are not mentioned.

After winning the singles, Rafa also won the doubles final with Robredo. Last person doing that on ATP was Courier 17 years ago. I think it is worth mentioning. I think if Novak or Fed did that it would have been all over the news, but somehow it has been brushed aside.

I also think Novak's retirement worth a short comment too. How did you feel about that? does it go in the "lack of efforts" category or not?

As for the name, I think I want to wait and see first. It is a long , hard road for RAfa to finish. With the compact ATPcalendar, it is almost an impossible task for him. So, I want to wait for a name, until it is done!

I love badminton!

[And even though these matches were in a best of three format, all of these top six seeds have proven they can handle best of five set action.]

I don't know about that: we did have a lot of discussion about Djokovic retiring in the semifinal of Wimbledon, retiring in the semifinal of French Open...maybe he can, maybe he can't, but we haven't been proven anything yet.

Mrs Santa,
Think Passos resigned(quit) because he wants to spend more time with family at home. Passos' wife just delivered a new child a few months ago.

I've got nothing for the hypothetical Rafa sweep title. *sigh* Could be an emotional block, lol...

But I love badminton, too! Anything with a net...I love volleyball as well. I can play that until I can't move anymore...just love it. I love that the parks near here are adding volleyball nets, and people just show up to play. If you build it... :)

"I think Paszek has set the serve back about 30 years."

Sam,
Why do you think Tamira done that? Know that she could not close out Jelena at AO.

If Ivanovic wins two slams this year, I'll cry too, because there are only three slams left, and Justine's defending two of them.

Pazsek looked a bit like Bartoli in her service motion. The Old Bartoli service motion, that is.

(Oh, Amelie, when are you coming back to be the French Number One?)

Master Ace: Have you watched her serve? She might as well throw the ball over the net.

Tari: LOL about the emotional block.

Why don't we call it "I Win Lots of Clay, No?"

Thanks Master Ace.

There's a new Bartoli service motion?

"Master Ace: Have you watched her serve? She might as well throw the ball over the net."

sam, lol. that was mean in the totally hilarious way.

"I don't know about that: we did have a lot of discussion about Djokovic retiring in the semifinal of Wimbledon, retiring in the semifinal of French Open..."

He did have one 5-set match at the US Open, and another that went for 4 on the way to the final...guess he didn't have a blister those days? One thing I hate about those retirements is that even people who like him have question marks about whether he'll finish a match. Not good.

"She might as well throw the ball over the net."

Nicely done. And an additional joy in reading this is that the Whippersnapper did this the other day when I played him. I laughed. :) Yep, he got crabby again...but no, I didn't win the set this time. Lost 5-7, which is like a victory for me these days. :)

No mention that LLagostera Vives is, just like Nadal, Moya and I (I always wanted to be on the same sentence as those 2) from that cute island of MALLORCA????? (and from "Cala Millor", 15 minutes away from "Manacor")

Mallorca can win Davis cup + Fed cup!!! go go go!!!

Never seen doubles get as much publicity on the MNP as it is today! zolarafa (and ripon): look at letter "T" for the acknowledgement of Rafa's double. It did not go unnoticed.

>>Djokovic retiring in the semifinal of Wimbledon, retiring in the semifinal of French Open..."
>He did have one 5-set match at the US Open, and another that went for 4 on the way to the final...

My point is that his 5-setters are cancelled out by his retirements, so we do not know one way or the other, does that make sense?

"My point is that his 5-setters are cancelled out by his retirements, so we do not know one way or the other, does that make sense?"

Yeah, it is hard to know from tournament to tournament. *sighs* I'm hoping now that the guy's won a slam he'll have a bit more reason to NOT retire in future ones...it's annoying that there's even a question, though.

Mrs. Santa,

I was watching Marion at IW (I think it was) and she was making some adjustments on her serve motion - not every time, and not comfortably either. She wasn't standing on her toes with her feet together to start, and was putting her right foot back a little bit from the service line, and actually bending her knees a bit, more like other players do. I find her game interesting. . .because it's so weird! Wish she'd get fitter, though - I mean, if you're a professional athlete, lose that belly!

los 4 fantasticos !!! no ??? at least in spanish it sounds good !!

i'm baaaaaackkk form monte carlo and Nice !!!
extatic is the word i was feeling yesturday.. and this morning too ;)

if rafa pulls of the sweet 16, i'd peg him down as the greatest clay court player.

bjorg obviously had his 6 french opens but a 4x4 would be spectacular especially due to the congested schedule this year.

SueB,

My badminton playing days are long behind me, too. But watching the clips puts me in a mind to try to find a game somewhere, it's so great for flexibility and reflexes. . .something I think I need to recover. Here I was ragging on Marion in my earlier post for being out of shape, should take myself to task too! :)

"If Ivanovic wins two slams this year, I'll cry too, because there are only three slams left, and Justine's defending two of them."

What Ali said.

The only doubles I remember Sharapova playing was the mixed with Alex Bogdanovic (of all people) at Wimbledon the year before she won there.

Seems like a really good plan to get someone who hasn't played doubles in five years to pair up in Fed Cup. Shamil must have been blown away by her scintillating net play, or he's playing mind games. Mm, I wonder which is more likely.

mariej,.....................................................

You must have had the greatest time. Did you see the doubles final too?

Report, Report, Report, pleassssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssse..............................

Is it only me that thinks this is funny:

"S...hamil Tarpishchev, captain of the Russian Fed Cup team, will play Maria Sharapova in September's final due to a "prior agreement" between the two."

Sounds almost like Tarpischchev will play maria in a match!


It would be hard for Sharapova to find a doubles partner. They'll end up with hearing problems.

Thanks Martha. I missed that. It doesn't appear to be more effective based on her recent results though.

"that was mean in the totally hilarious way."

fifteenlove: You know my motto - sarcasm with a smile.

More badminton:

Anu Nieminen, married to Jarkko Nieminem (Finnish ATP player) is a world class badminton player who played for Finland in the 2004 Olympics. They spend a lot of time in Copenhagen because of the great badminton training facilities.

So where did I get the "wife of a tennis player" whose name begins with S? Brain cramp?

Thanks for the help, Martha.

sam,
yep, hence liking that snarky statement! :)

mariej...report!!!

Congrats to Nadal for a great tournament and win. And congrats to Federer for coming back so far so fast, What a great dominating win for Roger in the SF. He took Djoker’s best shots, took control, started breaking Djoker’s serve and then broke his spirit. Fed seems all the way back now. It’s an even more complete win than if Djoker had showed some class and played it out. We'll see now if he's psycologically blitzed like after Fed beat him at USO.

And now after considering “No Mas Novak’s” mysterious surrender for over awhile to get some perspective, I’ll make the following points. [No thanks - Moderator edited]

Sam - mean - but oh so true!
:)

Christin: you're free to hold strong views on a number of topics, and to express them here. But there comes a point where you're inciting others, and the 1:09pm post crossed the line. Back off.

How come Federer extended his lead at rankings...and the result at monte carlo was the same like last year

"It would be hard for Sharapova to find a doubles partner. They'll end up with hearing problems. "

Sam, you're on a roll, baby!

Maria Sharapova' shrieks as the equivalent of a Who concert back in their heyday. Say what? Speak up!

"It would be hard for Sharapova to find a doubles partner. They'll end up with hearing problems."

LOL, Sam.

Mariej,
Report on Rafa double wins, please in your view.

Mirko337,
2 reasons Roger extended his lead over Rafa:
(1) Roger won Estoril the previous week (added 175 points)
(2) Monte Carlo and Barcelona was played a week later in the schedule; therefore, Rafa points from Barcelona dropped but if he wins this week, he cuts the lead by 275 points (300 for Barcelona win minus 25 Rotterdam points)

Mirko337 re rankings lead: probably due to the differences in schedule between 2007 and 2008 since rankings are based on the past 52 weeks.Tournaments beginning with Indian Wells have been played one week later this year than they were last year.

Sam LOL

"Maria Sharapova' shrieks as the equivalent of a Who concert back in their heyday. Say what? Speak up!"

Good one, Slice-n-Dice!

aha...i get it..thx

I am somewhat consoled that the Djoko retirement story was apparently not picked up by the ESPN and other sports "journalists." I had dreaded that, especially when I watched 3 of the Spurs starters sitting on the bench at the end of their game with huge ice packs on their knees.

No worries, SueB. Hail, if I had a dollar for all the times I've gotten my facts mixed up, just on this blob, I could practically retire. Well, okay, a pre-pre-recession dollar.....

I have a student who is Finnish. A 4.5 player with just the cleanest ground strokes and the nicest demeanor. Great guy. We do a 30-minute lesson every Wednesday at noon. I wish I could talk him into going 60 or 90, it's such a great workout.

I also ran into a Finnish player in college, too. Very tough opponent. Great serve, superb groundies, good hands at the net. I can't remember who won that one, but I do recall the score.

7-5, 7-5.

Sorta spooky......

Roger onto to Rome FTW!

"you're on a roll, baby!"

Slice-n-Dice: That reminded me of the old Virginia Slims slogan, "you've come a long way, baby!"

sorry guys, girls, i send a report to rosia, so she can post a new thread on our trip to monte carlo... be patient !!!

what i can say :
terrifico : nadal !
extatic : me !!
tired : me and rosia ! rafa is exhausting to follow up ;)
very very happy : rafa, tommy, me and rosia ;p...

i had such a great time, fantastic weather, place, the only bad thing is that we could no see any view of monaco since there was no time left after the doubles... you can't have it all, no ?
but food, you do ! i went to eat italian last night which is my favorite food !

rafa is just great to watch live, in the doubles match, we where seated lower in the stands so we really did apreciate every bit of it so much better !

If anyone can tear themselves away from happily bashing their unfavorite players for a moment, the ATP Race is beginning to take shape. We're about a quarter of the way into the season (1GS, 3 MS):

http://www.atptennis.com/3/en/rankings/championsrace/default.asp

Federer is a full MS off the top, with now Djokovic and Nadal to contend with. Ones to watch: Tsonga, Almagro, Murray, Fish, Llodrahhhhh! (where is Snoo?), Querrey and Kohlmykingdomforahorse.

marie j - ok - I will be patient for your report
just like you had to be for mine from IW
but sounds like you had a great day !
do you get to go to Barcelona this week , too ?

thanks, Andrew
any word from the French when Tsonga will be back
I know he had surgery - so he is probably missing most of the clay season

although I don't think that was his best surface anyway

Andrew,
Players mentioned in your post expected to drop places during the year:
(1)Tsonga - Knees are an issue
(2)Almagro - Can not produce in Masters play
(3)Fish - Majority of pts will come from HC
(4)Llodra - Same reason as Fish
(5)Querrey - Even though he did well at MC, not consistent enough yet
(6) Kohlschreiber - 2nd half of season will be exhausting for him

i can't believe that rafa is playing in barcelona. to think that after this is the rome masters and then hamburg. i'm not sure that is a wise decision considering that he has just one week to rest for roland garros.

well, i guess i have to cross my fingers and say my prayers :)

here's to the rafa kads!

"Kohlmykingdomforahorse"

Andrew: Good one, but I still like your Kohlminersdaughter moniker the best.

Aww. I think, for some reason, the sensitivity to Djoko bashing is particularly high. As for Fed and Rafa fans, I think we have seen some tough stuff written here over the years (and left there for all to see btw... not deleted), and come through it just fine.

On the other hand, having said that, I know how hard it is to read that stuff about your favorite player. It ain't easy.

HIGUERAS:

"This is a game of errors," says Higueras. "That's as true for the pros as it is for weekend players. So what you've got to do is understand how to minimize yours and force the opponent to miss. I think in America, for example, there's too much emphasis on pure offense over the ability to play intelligent defense."

Higueras sees a yin-yang relationship between the two [defense and offense], a mind-set that may certainly value patience but also views the game as far more subtle than it's often taught. As Higueras recently said, "You need to able to adjust the ball, and that requires a lot of work and repetition. In tennis you must learn how to give to the ball and take from the ball."

http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/tennis/news/story?id=3361454

Tari - I agree it is not easy to read criticism
and there is no need for any real meanness
but even Djoko's fans have got to have noticed that he is guilty of retiring from matches in big tournaments with more regularity than some of the other highly ranked players

That is simply a reality
and it is an area where he can improve if he wants to continue to stay at the top of the game


Peter Bodo:

Roger is 12-0, undefeated, perfect against Davydenko, and he was winning this match factually and undisputably and outplaying Nikolay anyway, and would've beaten him again had Nikolay not retired.

Roger is also 6-2 against Novak and with a legitimate form of mononucleosis, still lost a close match (2 breaks total in 3 sets), and was winning the first set, could've closed it out serving up a break, but had a bad service game. He might've won the match anyway if he won that first set.

Roger was beating Novak factually and undisputably, and outplaying him too and would've won anyway, had Novak not retired, and Novak's huge ego couldn't deal with it, so he retired with his typical immature, classless excuses before Roger would've finished him off.

Roger lost 7-5, 7-5 to Rafa (if that's convincing, then what's 6-0, 6-0 or even 6-3, 6-3) after outplaying him in the 1st and second sets, being up and giving away with many easy, makeable UNforced errors 2 separate 1 break leads that he earned in the 1st set, and embarrassingly blew a well-earned 4-0 lead in the 2nd set, 2 full breaks. He committed 44 UNforced errors, and easily could've if he held serve after he broke, won in straight sets, instead of losing in straight sets.

Mono can last 6-12 months, not in 2011, as you said before, but Roger got it in December, so he could still not be fully recovered, healthy and fit until June to December of this year. This is still April, so honestly, although not what you want to hear, he could be still very easily and legitimately feeling some weasknesses and lingering effects from it now from time to time (it's only 4 months), not in 2011, as you said sarcastically and absurdly in a previous post of yours.

Tari: I agree. While some of the criticism of Djokovic has been over the top, I think some players on the womens side (Serena, Venus, Sharapova, Henin) have received criticism that's at least as bad, if not worse.

Peter, you also biasedly and inaccurately said in your post that Roger was surely helped by two of his toughest opponents retiring against him. Roger is 18-2, pretty dominant, against those 2 and was clearly winning those matches as well, before they both retired. so he would've won again anyway, which you, of course, being as anti-Roger as you are, failed to ever mention that fact. You only implied that he got lucky in those 2 matches when in actuality and reality, he has a 90 % combined winning percentage against those 2 guys, and was deservedly winning those 2 matches anyway (even you can't honestly dispute that, the scores of the match prove it true))and earning those 2 wins.
You also inaccurately and biasedly said that Rafa convincingly won this match and stifled Roger. What match, games, breaks of serve, scoreline, and results were you watching, I wonder? To you, when a player you dislike loses 7-5, 7-5, you call it convincing and stifling, and when a player you dislike wins 7-5, 7-5, you call it nailbiting. So that's your way. Roger committed 44 gift, freebie, easy UNforced errors in 2 sets, blew 2 separate 1 break leads to lose the first set, and a commanding and dominating and well-earned 4-0, 2 full break lead in the 2nd set, he blew before falling apart, choking, and losing that one too. To you, since you don't like Roger, you say that's convincing and he was stifled, when in reality, the opposite is more accurate. That's your way.
As Roger accurately pointed out, he's now finally figured out how to beat Rafa on clay, unlike in years past. If he can play well and use the strategy that broke Rafa 4 times, and maintain that good level for the entire match, hold serve and not ckoke it away, he could beat him in Monte Carlo, Rome and the French Open. He just has to play him the right way, which he only did for half this match, the other half cost him dearly. He was still close to winning in straights, even though too many mistakes, especially on his own serve, caused him to lose in straights instead at the end. Roger did give Rafa credit for playing great, which Rafa did, and desrving to win, which is halfway right, but he also properly blamed himself for his own many missed chances to win and put Rafa away, and was disappointed not to take advantage of all those opportunites, especially in the 2nd set. As Roger said, now he has a working, strategizing gameplan of how to beat Rafa on clay. He just has to execute it for a whole match, not just the half match he did yesterday and was still close to winning. Then once Roger figures that out, he will be the real, "true #1" on 'every' surface, including clay. That's not what Peter Bodo wants to think or hear, but like everyone else, he should know it's true. REALITY.

Is there an echo in here?

Sam,
What do you mean is there an echo?:) By the way, that "Be quiet" rapping is still in my head today so I will listen to it again when I get home. By the way, did you like the Eagles draft this weekend? My focus this past weekend was on Monte Carlo.

Higueras statements are interesting, Wilanders also said that a player like Hingis has always been good because she manages to pull unforced errors and lousy play from her opponents. If repeatedly a lot of players play less than their best against a same opponent it could be for a reason ...

There must also be a way to force errors from Nadal but that answer was not found in clay. Especially because one of his main feautres is to keep unforced errors low.

Roger's been working on a strategy to beat Nadal on clay for the past 4 years. Not to say he can't do it, but really, Roger, even when he was up 4-2 in the second, never gave the impression that he was in control. Nadal is just relentlessly relentless.

You almost get the impression that Roger doesn't believe in himself on clay against Nadal. He definitely has an inferiority complex.

And don't use Unforced errors as the excuse. When a guy consistently hits more UEs against a particular opponent time and again, one comes to the realization that those UEs have nothing to do with form of the day, and everything to do with mental process.

But overall, Fed should still feel good about where he's at. The goal isn't to win MC or Rome, its the French. All Fed needs is a good day at the right moment.

"He just has to execute it for a whole match, not just the half match he did yesterday and was still close to winning. Then once Roger figures that out, he will be the real, "true #1" on 'every' surface, including clay."

I think Rafa is 7-1 vs. Federer on clay, so in order to be considered the best in this surface Roger would have to defeat Nadal seven straight times. Maybe a bit difficult...

Exactly, omar. But very few here believe that (the good day at the right moment), if you have been reading the last few days. But then again, they didn't believe Roger would defeat Nalbandian or Djokovic, either. And...I love this...Djokovic was put ahead of Roger as far as chances on clay! Based on...I still don't know what. :) So, I'm still hopeful. But that's no surpise. ;-)

Sam and Tari:

http://www.zshare.net/video/1113310258851c46/

I have this on repeat play...

anon, there is an email link to the dear gentleman for such love letters...

linex,

You just echoed ;-) what I said yesterday "There must also be a way to force errors from Nadal but that answer was not found in clay." I mentioned yesterday that "While many of us think that having a high number of winners to earn your point is gifted, talented etc, having less winners and being able to minimize your UFEs (Nadal) while playing tactically enough for an opponents to pour UFEs to me is not only gifted and talented but it also shows a player who adapts and subtly and gradually dictates the tone of a match". This exactly is what players don't have an answer for and unfortunately the means by which he does this is sublimely esoteric and will continue to be impenetrable for most if not all players.

I love and respect Federer and would not take anything away fro his awesome play yesterday. However, many keep saying he gifted Nadal with UFEs. Have many stopped to ask why the UFEs were coming especially since going back to stats of most their clay matches ( I read that from a link posted yesterday) the pattern has been more or less the same with Roger having more winners than Nadal and but Nadal much lower UFEs and that translates to victory for Nadal. That in itself is a technique

To unsigned post at 3:12:

Excellent points and very well put. I couldn't agree more, both about Roger's thrashing of NoMas Djokovic and Roger's excellent and at times dominating play against Nadal. Rafa on clay is virtually unbeatable by every player except one. That player is TMF.

I watched the match again on tape, and was impressed how Roger just overwhelmed Rafa in the games where he played his A game (Break games in Set 1 and Games 1-4 in Set 2). Fed was playing as TMF, dominating at the net, overpowing serving, tactical brilliance in moving Rafa around and hitting outright winners. Then he unfortunately reverted to his B game (passive baseline rallies that Rafa invariably wins 55-70% of the time), and then his C or D game (same as "B game" plus oodles of UFE's and blown easy winners). Nevertheless, the match was competitive, much more so than M.C. last year. With 2 more weeks to work with Jose and to get fitter, I think Roger has a great chance to finally beat Rafa at Rome (not to mention win Hamburg with no Rafa).

Fed seems to play at three distinct levels against Rafa on clay:

1. TMF (Fed's A game). At this level Federer can dominate Rafa and even blow him away on clay, as in the first four Set 2 games yesterday and certain previous winning sets at Rome ('06), Hamburg ('07) and RG ('06). Fed seems potentially more able to achieve this level in '08. I don't think Rafa's consistent game can rise enough to compete with TMF on this level.

2. Roger's B game (reversion to passive long GS baseline rallies). Rafa has and will always win these matches.

3. C-D game (same as B game plus poor serving and many UFE. Like games 5-12 of Set 2 yesterday.) Rafa will blow Roger away.

The trick for Federer and Higueros is to bring TMF to the entire match, or at least to the majority of sets in the match. If he can do this, I'm convinced that Federer can finally solve the Rafa Riddle and actally win a large majority of their matches on clay, including of course the elusive RG Holy Grail. Can't wait to see their Rome final (if they both make it there). It could be the turn of the tide.

An embarrassed part of me really wants to make "Be quiet, O.K.?" my ring tone.

And unsigned, it's Ed's post, not Pete's. And chill.

Nadal won 55% of the points yesterday - same as he won last year. Clean kill.

That's convincing for me. Sometimes stats help. This is one occasion.

We may not be pleased by the result. But let's describe it for what it was.

If you don't like convincing, you could try decisive. Either works for me. (Still haven't seen set 2!).

not to put a wrench in your game plan, but Jose is going home to reappear in time for Paris. Fed said their work has mostly centered around talking rather than the practice court. If that is true perhaps they can get some meaningful work done over the phone and internet. It just will not be in person.

what i can say, is that rafa did not play his best consistenly in the match... normaly he focuses from the first point to the last, it has been a patern of his matches all week... everytime he was down, he found ways to play better, deeper, without making anymore errors... he made the other guy earn the point, which is very hard to do against him when he's there not giving up anything.
i though he was very focus all week to make a good start and make the other guys go uphill against him which his the best tactic... and make the other guy think how in hell i do win the next 2 sets ??? some are keeping wondering about it !

all in all, it's been a good week for roger... picturing roger as the winner yesturday when he was slowly coming from post mono effects still in his first match was a bit out of the blue... of course the way he beated nalby was very encouraging for the rest of the tournament, but nalby doesn't spin any ball, maybe he should ! but fed did not get any true clay courter who spins consistenly to his bh to make improvements appart the scary RRH one, but his over all game on clay is back at a good level enough to put away nalbys or djokos, but simply not enough to beat rafa...

the problem of facing someone like rafa is that he plays so unique, nobody matches his intensity, his spin, his never die attitude and the way he plays his game on clay. that's the big challenge for fed : try to find another way to beat rafa, when his close to best game beats everyone else. i think it's really harder to do than one can think, imo.
rafa allways plays the same against everyone else, he doesn't adjust that much to any oponent on clay... and if you saw his agressive game in doubles, he has margin to make anyones life harder against him if he plays more agressive.

i need to rewatch the match tonight... to see who was better in those 4 games of the second set... honestly from memory rafa was giving UE and short balls like candy on halloween's night... but i could be wrong...

Q. Are you going to be taking Jose to Rome?
ROGER FEDERER: No. He's going to go back home. I told you already. He's going to go back home and then come back for Paris.

Well, the thing is we haven't spent much time on the practice courts, you know, which is normally a thing you're not supposed to do. But there's no rules obviously to it. But just this is where he you could maybe change a few things in your game. This has been more of a talking experience for the last couple of weeks, you know, because I've been on the match courts, you know, every day. So it's been interesting, you know. A lot of information.

And also with Severin, like I said, he's also part of the whole thing. He's going to come to Rome and Hamburg with me. Jose's going to go back, and then we'll get together again in Paris.

1 2 3 Next »
The comments to this entry are closed.

« Monte Carlo Day 7 - Aftermath The Unintended 3 »

More from TennisWorld
Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor

More from Concrete Elbow
TENNIS Magazine is published 10 times per year.




Save 75% off of the annual newsstand price.
Categories
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
ATP Championships 06
ATPchamps07
Australian Open 2005
Australian Open 2006
Australian Open 2007
Australian Open 2009
Battlefield Reports
Big Winners, Big Losers
Blogging Advisory
Books
Books, DVDs, etc.
Breaking News
By The Letters
Clay Game
Coaches
Contests
Controversy/Scandal
Corrections
Crisis Center
Davis Cup
Dispatch From the Front
Fed Cup
Friday Features
Guest Contributors
In Memoriam
IndianWells2009
Injury Report
Interviews
Junior Game
KeyBiscayne2008
Miscellaneous
Monday Net Post
Nasdaq100 2005
Nasdaq100 2006
NCAA Tennis
New to TennisWorld?
Off Topic
Olympics
On Vacation
Other Sports
PacLife Open 2005
PacLife Open 2006
PacLife Open 2007
PacLife Open 2008
Players - Female Pros
Players - Juniors
Players - Male Pros
Players - Other
Pressroom
Recap 2006
Roland Garros 2005
Roland Garros 2006
Roland Garros 2007
Roland Garros 2008
Roland Garros 2009
Senior Game
Sony-Ericsson 2007
SonyEricsson2009
State of the Game
Statistics
Steggy
Sunday Brunch
TennisWorld FAQs
The Deuce Club
The Locker Room
The OTher Thread
The Watercooler
Tournaments
Tribe
TW Site Rules
US Open 2005
US Open 2006
US Open 2007
US Open 2008
Wednesday Racket
Wimbledon 2005
Wimbledon 2006
Wimbledon 2007
Wimbledon 2008
Wimbledon2009
World Team Tennis
WTA Championships 06
Your Call
Recent Entries
Davis Cup Crisis Center, Day 3
Davis Cup Crisis Center, Day 2
The Deuce Club, 7.10
Lumping and Splitting
Davis Cup QF Day 1, Your Call
The S Train
Your Call: Davis Cup
A Charmed Life
Dressed to Kill: the Poem (YC)
Tuesday Net Post
Your Photo Call, 7.6
15
Wimbledon Crisis Center, Day 14
Village of the Damned (Lucky)
Look at Those Titles!
Statistics
This blog currently has 2343 entries and 822426 comments.