Peter Bodo's TennisWorld - The Silk Shirt
Home       About Peter Bodo       Contact        RSS       Follow on Twitter Categories       Archive
The Silk Shirt 11/17/2009 - 12:42 PM

92896493
by Pete Bodo

You gotta love The Mighty Fed. Just about the time that everyone is trying to adjust to a world in which Roger Federer doesn't - or maybe, no longer can - win everything in sight, he comes out with this (in an interview with Paul Kimmage of The Times of London):

"I'm midway [through my career]. It feels like the second part of my career right now, although I am trying to avoid saying that because the second part sounds like ‘neehhhhrrrrr' [motions straight down]. You can definitely play your greatest tennis until 32 or 33, it's just a matter of how you look at it. I've always been a big believer in looking at the big picture. It's not about, ‘What will we do tomorrow?', it's about, ‘How will my life and tennis look in the next five years?' And I still have the same vision, so that's going to help me."

I had laugh out loud when I read that - especially the "neehhhrrr" bit. Anybody want to talk about handling pressure with grace? Actually, the entire piece is a good read; you could call it TMF's Sermon on the Mount - a discourse on how to handle being the guy with the target on his back in perpetuity, a meditation on the importance of taking joy and pleasure out of even a stressful life, an exposition of the workings of the mind of a confident, imperturbable genius. This guy needs a coach! It may be the dumbest thing I've ever said (but stick around, there's always tomorrow).

If you want to understand Federer, you really need to start with the fact that despite his resemblance to a regular if very nicely-dressed guy, he really is different; you have to throw out everything you known about other guys who have walked in similar shoes.

For example, look at the contrast between the way Federer and his pal Pete Sampras drove on to greatness. Having written Pete's book, A Champion's Mind,  with him a couple of years ago, I feel pretty qualified to make this comparison. Pete took his mission to make the most of his God-given talent as a challenge, and decided a few years into his pro career that he was willing to make the sacrifices required to fulfill his destiny. His drive to secure that sixth-consecutive year-end number 1 ranking (a first-order record that is now safe even from Federer,which makes it hard to imagine anyone every toppling it) almost wrecked him; the day he won his record, 14th singles title, he was ready to quit. Sampras had as deep and abiding a love for the game as any player who ever laced them up, but he grew tired of having to wear the hair shirt.

Federer's shirt, by contrast, is made from silk. And you can't help but notice how much, well, easier, it all seems for him. In the interview, he even mentions how he decided to take pleasure out of the things that drive so many pros batty - the travel, the itinerant lifestyle, the 24/7 bugle-call of competition. Once Federer decided that winning majors and making a run at the record established by Sampras was a worthwhile goal, he essentially shrugged and decided: Well, it's going to be a bear, but I may as well have fun doing it. . . 

And that's a conclusion that escaped most of our other, recent male tennis icons. Bjorn Borg, Ivan Lend and Sampras were all about the discipline of greatness (anyone else notice that the word "discipline" just doesn't appear to be part of Federer's vocabulary, and probably won't be, until his twins, Wimby and Rolanda (sic) start school?). Jimmy Connors was all about bringing the poor schmo across the net to his knees, begging for mercy. John McEnroe's schtick was, as that successful but cheesy reprise of the famous James Dean Rebel Without a Cause poster (on behalf of Nike) demonstrated, mostly about being the misunderstood, alienated genius. And what is Roger Federer about? Try enjoying life; having fun. Nike probably rejected the idea of a poster: We can't dress Roger up like Cyndi freakin' Lauper!

Andy Roddick, 16-14 in the fifth in the Wimbledon final? Hahahahaa! Isn't this great! Rafael Nadal, beating him to a pulp on the red clay?  Man, this is going to hurt in the morning, but it's kind of cool seeing all those Spanish princes and stuff here . . . Juan Martin del Potro at the US Open? Alright, I had him, but you can't win 'em all and did you catch that serve of his, pretty awesome, huh?

I can think of only one aspect of Federer's legacy that may be negative. It's going to make you wonder why all those other guys seemed so tortured, why everything had to be so danged dramatic, like in some stupid Ken Russell flick.  No matter what Andre Agassi might say, it's possible to love this game, from beginning to end. The "sacrifice" narrative is a gripping, honorable one, great fodder for hero-worshippers, role-model seekers, and amateur psychologists.

But what about the "fun" narrative?

Federer has made his life in pro tennis seem a little like the story of a a teen-ager who got to go snowboarding instead of back to school for the entire month of January. Sure he wiped out a bunch and got a little tired as Februrary bore down, but it sure beat struggling with geometry.

It turns out that even that tearful, post-Australian Open final moment earlier this year wasn't nearly as traumatic as some wanted, or hoped, it was. When Federer, wiping way a tear, said,  "God, this is killing me. . .", he was referring to having to make a speech while in the grip of turbulent emotions, not the actual, emotional pain of losing. It was more like having to talk to your mother on the phone while sitting in the dentist's chair, having a cavity drilled, than having to address the mourners at your best friend's funeral. 

I thought this nugget from the interview especially telling:

He (Federer) begins with a story about a script he received for a commercial for Nike with Tiger Woods in 2007. "We had these different lines," he explains, "and I was reading through it and said" ' I’d like to take the text where it says, ‘I love winning’. And they said, ‘Well, that works perfectly because Tiger says he hates losing’. So that’s a part of it, I suppose. I feel I’m the ‘love winning’ rather than the ‘hate losing’ type.” 

This is a pretty radical confession, given what we know about most great players, who fall almost exclusively into the Woods camp on the subject. And it's easy to underestimate how difficult it is to take the Federer stance on this, either naturally (which almost never happens) or through a lot of hard work on the mental aspects of competition. For you risk a lot more when you hitch your wagon to the idea of winning instead of the fear of losing, in roughly the same way that it's a lot easier to avoid doing bad than it is to actively do good.

The desire to win is driven by hope and optimism; the hatred of losing draws to a greater degree on fear, a constant looking over your shoulder. The guy who hates losing stands in danger of becoming a hoarder, a miser. The guy who loves winning stands a chance to become rich and make others wonder how come he's so "lucky."

And let's be frank about this: haven't we all thought, at one time or another, that Federer is lucky? That he's got that "easy" game, that rational, even-tempered nature, all those cupcake draws, all those unworthy Grand Slam final opponents, greasing the skids for his slide to tennis immortality. If Nadal wouldn't have come up lame at Roland Garros, Federer would still be chasing Sampras! Yeah. Cry me a river, begrudging his success. Then try opening your eyes, unclencing your fists, and relaxing that frown on your face.

As Roger well knows, life can be fun. And so can tennis.

PS - This is also your Watercooler post for today.


745
Comments
Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
<<      1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8      >>

Posted by zenggi 11/17/2009 at 05:12 PM

My admiration for Fernando (mostly because I exchange some nice words with him across the aisle during a flight Madrid-Amsterdam two years ago) has gone ‘neehhhhrrrrr' [motions straight down] big way.

Did Ana treated him so badly? It doesn't bode well for his future relationships.

Mr. X, I understand perfectly the expression used by Fernando about Brooke and it's vulgar of the first order. And he said that on radio? Yikes

Posted by jewell - Just say no to Fedal wars... 11/17/2009 at 05:15 PM

I like that Verdasco wants to stick up for his friend; I'm not sure I like the way he seems to have chosen to do it, though.

Tired...goodnight, everyone. :)

Posted by Annie (Vamos Heavenly Creature) 11/17/2009 at 05:16 PM

Mr.X: oh sooo good (on your dad pushing you to be a source..) you guys are quick.

I knew agassi's marriage was going to be a bummer when she made him re-propose the 'right' way. good grief.

Posted by mina (meanie ignoring the Trifecta) 11/17/2009 at 05:17 PM

Mr X Blahroline isn't giving me much to work with in the off season. meh.

i'll give you your RDA of meanie me once the break is over. careful what you ask for...

Posted by Benny 11/17/2009 at 05:19 PM

My favorite Federer line from the article (I am not so sure he also doesn't have an edge to him).

I’ve never played Rafa at the US Open but I’ve been there the past six times in the final, so it’s not my mistake, you know?

Posted by Annie (Vamos Heavenly Creature) 11/17/2009 at 05:21 PM

programming note for nalby fans: TTC showing 2005 YEC final between fed and nalby at 7pm tonight. since alot of us were saying nalby is the best player to have never won a major, thought it might be of interest.

Posted by arbiter 11/17/2009 at 05:22 PM

Mr.X - I can almost picture them :)

Posted by mina (meanie ignoring the Trifecta) 11/17/2009 at 05:23 PM

that was some major snark fr Fed, Benny. just the way i like Fed. i want none of the elder statesman bit. hehe

Posted by Master Ace 11/17/2009 at 05:24 PM

Annie,
Roger won the first 2 sets in TB then David blew him away the next 2 as Roger was coming back from injury. Rafael w/d from Shanghai due to injury and Andre played only one match and the TD was not happy. Roger saved Shanghai in 2005 even though he did not win the title. David was on a fishing trip when he got the call to play.

Posted by BlueDog 11/17/2009 at 05:25 PM

Thanks Nando, for ruining my "Blue Lagoon" fantasy. Grrr...

Posted by FedFan 11/17/2009 at 05:25 PM

Not sure why you think we need your interpretation of the interview. BTW, I really enjoyed Agassi's book. I used to favor Sampras over Agassi, but I did not enjoy Sampras' book nearly as much.

Posted by mina (meanie ignoring the Trifecta) 11/17/2009 at 05:25 PM

"she made him re-propose the 'right' way."

whaattt? heh. i woulda said it's prolly expected fr a hollywood type, but then i'll be making a sweeping generalization.

oh wait...

Posted by Peg 11/17/2009 at 05:26 PM

"... some pieces on some other players like Gonzo, Sod, and Cilic, to name three who don't get a lot of word space."

+ 1

(I do enjoy reading about Fed's greatness/happiness, but I'm with Corrie on wanting more discussion about Other Players.)

Posted by MN Guy 11/17/2009 at 05:27 PM

Roger is a true champion and has done great things for out sport. Even his detractors, which there are many have to admit that

Posted by Tfactor 11/17/2009 at 05:27 PM

LOL! Mr. X,
We're counting on you guys :)))

On the weight issue, I have heard Rafa deny (in Spanish and English interviews) that he's lost any weight. He says he is the same 86 Kgs he was.

Posted by Mr. X 11/17/2009 at 05:30 PM

Well, zenggi, it's there in the link i posted in the last page. If your Spanish is good, you'll get it. To be fair, that kind of expression is not extremely weird in the Spanish radio. I'm not saying it's said often, but it's not something incredibly strange to hear.
Well, mina, you know i'll have an appropiate answer ready. Key word starts with "X":)

Posted by aussiemarg [Madame President in Comma Rehab for 2009] 11/17/2009 at 05:30 PM

Mina Us girls like a man to propose the right way ok

Makes for a easier passage to tying the final knot so to speak

Posted by Corrie 11/17/2009 at 05:31 PM

Glad you agree Peg. I'm a great admirer of Fed's character as well as his game, especially what he does behind the scenes, but it would be nice to read more about lesser known players who we don't get the chance to know so much about. Pieces on Fed just bring out the ignorant detractors.

Posted by aussiemarg [Madame President in Comma Rehab for 2009] 11/17/2009 at 05:32 PM

Tfactor Thanks for that,either had I.Then there was some discussion he had lost weight and muscle.I know in the past he had lost weight due to the knee problem which makes sense.Though cant still lose weight without losing muscle.

Posted by Master Ace 11/17/2009 at 05:36 PM

Corrie and Peg,
Hope you get your wish once London is over and done as far as getting coverage on the other ATP players that are not mainstream media. Mikhail(yes, the one who hit himself with a racquet at Key Biscayne against Nicolas) played well in the fall season which may give him momentum going into 2010.

Posted by Zech 11/17/2009 at 05:37 PM

I never comment on these sort of blogs but I think its worth commenting.
While I'm no Federer fan, I have complete respect for Roger and his achievements. Never once have I ever deduced his slams into being luck of the draw or anything resembling all that garbage. I admire his innate confidence to believe so strongly and deeply in himself and his game that he feels no need to have a coach or ever look for outside support. Much the same way my favorite players, Venus and Serena, do. I have never mistaken this for "arrogance" because it's not; plain simple. Just complete confidence, albeit the almost delusional type. I absolutely love that in champions.

Posted by Alexis 11/17/2009 at 05:40 PM

Benny, that quote from Federer is in response to once again people bringing up whether a title is tarnished based on who you play. Fed is always defending that stupid thinking. In tennis, you can only play who is on the other side of the net. Just because #1 doesn't always play #2 doesn't detract from the accomplishment.

I remember at Wimbledon, someone asked him if not playing Nadal somehow diminished the win. He said NO because that is the way of tennis. Plus it totally takes away from how well Andy played and how he deserved to be in the final.

See arbit... Roger was praising Andy and sticking up for him. What a creep!

Posted by manuelsantanafan 11/17/2009 at 05:50 PM

Mr. X:

Your translation of the Verdasco interview struck me as fine.

(Note: it has been a long time since I was proficient in Spanish beyond the basic level.)

And yes, Verdasco got crude during the interview. But, madrilenos often are crude, so no big surprise there.

Posted by Corrie 11/17/2009 at 05:53 PM

I've just seen the CNN interview with Roger. He had some very fair and balanced things to say about Agassi and drugs and he emphasised yet again the respect and friendship he has with Rafael, as Rafael himself has also said.

They work closely together on the Player's Council and, Roger said "WE'RE FRIENDS OFF COURT". It's ridiculous to say that either Rafael or Roger are disgruntled losers and poor sports and Fedal wars are therefore, simply a reflection of how some fans don't live up to the players themselves.

Posted by JohnC 11/17/2009 at 05:53 PM

Benny, that's why the only reasonable way of doing a h2h when you have two players who have been 1 and 2 consistently for so many years is to count wins for tournaments they both entered.

This gives Fed 30, Rafa 20, neither 25.

I have yet to hear a sensible argument against this conclusion, which is rather more in accord with how tennis is actually played.

Posted by Samantha Elin, supporter of all things Scandinavian 11/17/2009 at 05:54 PM

For me, the three biggest highlights for 09 have been the emergence of Caro and Robin's great year and Justine's announcement. What an amazing year for Scandinavian tennis, both Caro and Robin reached the top ten and made it to a GS final. Kom igen, Robin! Kom sa, Caro! Allez Justine!

Posted by Samantha Elin, supporter of all things Scandinavian 11/17/2009 at 05:54 PM

For me, the three biggest highlights for 09 have been the emergence of Caro and Robin's great year and Justine's announcement. What an amazing year for Scandinavian tennis, both Caro and Robin reached the top ten and made it to a GS final. Kom igen, Robin! Kom sa, Caro! Allez Justine!

Posted by Rahim 11/17/2009 at 05:57 PM

What a well written and constructed article

Posted by Peg 11/17/2009 at 05:59 PM

MA, agree on Youzhny. Would love to get a gander at him live, but I gather he usually plays Marseilles and Rotterdam instead of Memphis.

Posted by Peg 11/17/2009 at 05:59 PM

MA, agree on Youzhny. Would love to get a gander at him live, but I gather he usually plays Marseilles and Rotterdam instead of Memphis.

Posted by wilson75 11/17/2009 at 05:59 PM

Just finishing watching Roger's interview on CNN. He's such a great guy and before anybody jumps down my throat, the same goes for Rafa. Tennis is truly blessed to have them at the top of the sport. I hope they will both be there at the end of the WTF. Tennis is going to suffer when the two them go, I'm not looking forward to that day. My wish for next year is that both will be healthy and at the top of their games so that they can meet at more finals. Two (maybe three times) in 2009 wasn't enough.

Posted by CL 11/17/2009 at 06:03 PM

Very nice - though I can certainly see other people getting bored with the Fedal merry-go-round. There ARE several other horses out there, including the guy who just won 2 tournaments in a row. Though Pete has done articles on the Djoker in the past. I think it is high time for a nice Youzny update.

Very nice pic of Fed too...looks like it was taken in Basel(?) Maybe applauding the Djoker's win.? Of course we all know how Fed LOVES to just PRETEND he has respect for his opponents but in fact he just thinks they are all doormats beneath his feet who are only LUCKY because anybody can trip over a doormat occasionally. (Sorry - just read the first 2 pages of the thread...lol.)

I too think the biggest question is what will happen to Fed when and if his ranking starts to slip. This may happen sooner or it may happen later, but at that point WILL he be content just to make a run in a slam or a major every once in a while? It is all very well, and relatively easy, to talk 'big picture' when the picture looks so good, but should a few holes appear, it may not seem quite to rosy. However, that's ME and not him and Fed does indeed seem to have a unique internal gyroscope that may keep him blanced...and happy...on his course for longer than most can imagine.

Posted by Annie (Vamos Heavenly Creature) 11/17/2009 at 06:04 PM

MA: thanks for the background on the YEC 05. makes it more intersting!

Posted by Mr. X 11/17/2009 at 06:04 PM

Well, waiting to see if things will go as they should tomorrow in the draw, it's time for me to go get some sleep.
See you tomorrow, everyone.

Posted by Tigress 11/17/2009 at 06:07 PM

One of the best Bodo articles in quite a while. I'm printing it out to keep in my tennis folder with other classics like "The Shadow Federer", "Sprezzatura", and "Federer as Religious Experience" by Wallace.

Roger Federer: The Silky Warrior. Allez! (how does one say that in Swiss-German?).

Posted by Annie (Vamos Heavenly Creature) 11/17/2009 at 06:08 PM

goodnight Mr.X :)

Posted by aussiemarg [Madame President in Comma Rehab for 2009] 11/17/2009 at 06:15 PM

I think Roger is a fairly balanced person,well thats how he comes across to me anyway.I think he will play the game for as long as he enjoys playing it.Regardless if his ranking slips.To me his love of the game out strips his ranking.

Posted by greenhopper 11/17/2009 at 06:16 PM

lololol, Mr. X. I'm saving that telephone chat mockery in my 'TW makes me laugh' file.

Brooke did make Andre propose again, because she "couldn't hear him properly through the sound of the waves" etc. It's been a very interesting read so far.

Posted by Samantha Elin, supporter of all things Scandinavian 11/17/2009 at 06:17 PM

Caro really set herself apart as the best young player to emerge in 09 and how did she do it? Amazing talent, and a great game. The same for Robin. My prediction for 2010, both Caro and Robin will win a slam. Robin practically had the FO won and was the best player besides Roger.

Posted by crazyone 11/17/2009 at 06:22 PM

hey everyone.

Pete, loved the article. I think Fed is pretty unique in the extent that he loves tennis, not just the on court competition aspect of it, but the sport as a whole, and the things in life (travel, etc.) that tennis forces players to do. He's one of the few ATP players who talks positively about watching WTA tennis, for example.

Posted by aussiemarg [Madame President in Comma Rehab for 2009] 11/17/2009 at 06:22 PM

GH Phew,thanks for that.Dont tell me too much,cause I am buying the book today.Cant wait.

Note to all future men thinking about proposing

Dont go near a beach,waterfall,or any noisy place ok

Us girls need to hear those romantic words,whatever they may be.

Posted by Diane(Atlanta) 11/17/2009 at 06:27 PM

Aussiemarg I agree with you about Roger seeming to be a balanced person. Of course I have never spent a day with him or enjoyed a few glasses of wine over dinner with him( wouldn't that be wonderful).
This summer he faced so much stress, The French Open, beating Pete's grand slam record and most of all the birth of his twin girls. He didn't fold under the pressure, so I think he is amazing.

Posted by sblily (Wheeeeeeeeee!) 11/17/2009 at 06:28 PM

"Robin practically had the FO won..."
~~~~~
*blank look*
*Beyonce trying to read a book face*

Well, why not? If a 7-5, 7-5 victory constitutes a "crushing," then sure, a 1–6, 6–7), 4–6 defeat is practically winning.

Don't ever leave, Samantha. :)

Posted by Annie (Vamos Heavenly Creature) 11/17/2009 at 06:34 PM

CL: I liked your 6:03 and happen to think it would be hard for fed to keep playing after his ranking drops. I heard stories of his not liking being announced as the #2 at the AO. Bothered enough that he asked the TD not to introduce him that way. I thought that was telling.

Posted by Grant 11/17/2009 at 06:34 PM

sblily: I think the idea is that beating Rafa at the FO is practically winning the thing, not that Robin was totally in command in the final.

Also, "*Beyonce trying to read a book face*" is awesome.

Posted by Corleone 11/17/2009 at 06:35 PM

Federer is a great champion on and off the court. Tennis wouldn’t be the same with out him. I probably wouldn’t be watching as much if he wasn’t playing. He’s just a class act.
Once he gave Nadal a ride on his private jet, from a tournament in Canada to the next tournament in the US, so “arbiter” you’re being pathetic with those negative comments about Roger.

Posted by SHIRLEY M. PERKINS 11/17/2009 at 06:42 PM

"ALL" OF YOU NEED A LIFE AND LEAVE ROGER FEDERER ALONE. ROGER IS AN EXCELLENT TENNIS PLAYER AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN. YOU HAVE TO UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS HIS PROFESSION...JUST LIKE EMPLOYMENT WE HAVE TO DO BASICALLY FIVE DAYS PER/WEEK. THE ONLY THING...OUR JOBS DO NOT PAY WHAT THE TENNIS PLAYERS MAKE. IF ROGER DESIRES TO WEAR "SILK" THAT IS FINE...I HAVE A FEW SILK ITEMS MYSELF. GET A LIFE AND WORRY ABOUT YOUR OWN LIVES.
S.M.PERKINS

Posted by GRANT 11/17/2009 at 06:43 PM

IF YOU WOULD LOOK TO THE SIDE OF YOUR KEYBOARD SHIRLEY YOU WILL NOTICE A KEY THAT SAYS CAPS LOCK PLEASE PRESS IT THANK YOU.

Posted by aussiemarg [Madame President in Comma Rehab for 2009] 11/17/2009 at 06:44 PM

Wow I need to readjust my Chanel reading glasses after that post

Posted by sblily (Wheeeeeeeeee!) 11/17/2009 at 06:44 PM

Grant - Didn't know that Samantha Whispering was among your many talents, but I guess you make sense... sort of.

Posted by Annie (Vamos Heavenly Creature) 11/17/2009 at 06:46 PM

*where's the volume button on this thing...?*

Posted by Ryota 11/17/2009 at 06:46 PM

I think it's not just Federer who has adopted this attitude. Having followed tennis for close to 3 decades now, I find the current crop of players having a "tennis-is-just-a-game-there-are-more-important-things-outside-the-sport" mindset whereas previous decades had players consumed by the game.

I wonder though if Federer hadn't had the success that he's had, will he still have the same demeanor and outlook that he has now? Federer wasn't much fun when he was losing back in his early days as a pro.

Posted by Annie (Vamos Heavenly Creature) 11/17/2009 at 06:50 PM

well, yeah, of course it's much easier to be a nice guy when you've had his kind of success and have his kind of money. but i guess we're saying he could be a complete prima donna pita and he isn't.

Posted by aussiemarg [Madame President in Comma Rehab for 2009] 11/17/2009 at 06:50 PM

Hey noone likes losing ever!

Posted by mina (meanie ignoring the Trifecta) 11/17/2009 at 06:59 PM

is this thing on?

first of all i'd like to congratulate Samantha for announcing the most ludicrous thing EVER by saying that my sometimes bf Sod nearly won the FO. heh.

i'm getting a plaque made for that. gold star!

Posted by wilson75 11/17/2009 at 07:00 PM

Money changes some people but it's usually for the worst. According to James Blake, success hasn't changed him that he's the same as when he didn't have all that money. Another thing I like about him is that he doesn't flaunt his money around. I'm sure he's being paid mega bucks by his sponsors but we never hear how much his contracts are worth like other athletes. Plus he always seems embarassed at the USO trophy ceremony when they announce the prize money.

Posted by crazyone 11/17/2009 at 07:05 PM

in a totally OT note, I've recently discovered that I'm a total sucker for large blue eyes in a handsome German face...hah, reminds me of part of the reason I like PEHK (even though he's not nearly as good looking as the guy occupying way too much of my brain right now).

Posted by mina (meanie ignoring the Trifecta) 11/17/2009 at 07:09 PM

LOL C1. what a welcome change of topic. for me anyway...

Fed has the GOAT hair. no ifs ands or buts about it.

Posted by manuelsantanafan 11/17/2009 at 07:13 PM

Shame that Caro didn't decide to team up with A. Radwanska in doubles.

They would have made/would make a true Polish Powerhouse team.

Posted by crazyone 11/17/2009 at 07:16 PM

attractive men are always a good way to change the topic, mina.

msf, them's fighting words :)

Posted by aussiemarg [Madame President in Comma Rehab for 2009] 11/17/2009 at 07:18 PM

Manuel LOL!

Posted by sally 11/17/2009 at 07:18 PM

i don't think i know better at all.
i just don't see how a person can be
the GOAT with a losing record against
his main rival.
but it is just my opinion.

Posted by aussiemarg [Madame President in Comma Rehab for 2009] 11/17/2009 at 07:22 PM

Sally You always welcome to your opinion

Posted by aussiemarg [Madame President in Comma Rehab for 2009] 11/17/2009 at 07:23 PM

Mina We may both get a chance to get uo close and personal with Caro next year

Ok you win,I will pass.I have my eyes on other people.

Posted by Annie (Vamos Heavenly Creature) 11/17/2009 at 07:26 PM

c1: who who is it? tommy haas?

Posted by GRANT 11/17/2009 at 07:26 PM

You are also welcome to make it the basis of every comment you make.

Posted by aussiemarg [Madame President in Comma Rehab for 2009] 11/17/2009 at 07:28 PM

Grant Stop it,I just split coffee over my lap top

Care to wipe it up.

Posted by marge 11/17/2009 at 07:28 PM

BREAKING NEWS guys:

Djoker is getting married with lovely Jelena Ristic!
Felicitations!

Posted by Annie (Vamos Heavenly Creature) 11/17/2009 at 07:31 PM

Nole's getting married? when? that is good news.
he's a little young though.

Posted by Grant 11/17/2009 at 07:31 PM

"Djoker is getting married with lovely Jelena Ristic!"

His celebration of her acceptance went too far!! I'm angry!

[p.s. congrats to him]

Posted by Annie (Vamos Heavenly Creature) 11/17/2009 at 07:32 PM

I've got skinny nalby and fed, TMF circa 2005 on my telly right now.

Posted by rudy3 (Proud Rafaelite since 2005) 11/17/2009 at 07:32 PM

"You gotta love The Mighty Fed"

Um, no you don't. I get along just nicely, thankyouverymuch.

Posted by Jenn 11/17/2009 at 07:33 PM

Awww. I'm not a big Fed fan but I just loved this piece. What a great attitude the guy has. He does have a great approach to the game and, seemingly, to life. I think that's why he can (mostly) get away with stuff like the wimbledon outfits. Even though they pretty much look ridiculous, he does it in good fun. Certainly beats the "all work and no play ever" approach that Sampras took.

Posted by Annie (Vamos Heavenly Creature) 11/17/2009 at 07:35 PM

Are the WTF matches best of five or best of three?

Posted by Grant 11/17/2009 at 07:35 PM

"Um, no you don't. I get along just nicely, thankyouverymuch."

You should pay more attention to the news, rudy3. Thanks to the passing of Prop 77, you really are required by law to love The Mighty Fed.

Posted by aussiemarg [Madame President in Comma Rehab for 2009] 11/17/2009 at 07:37 PM

Rudy3 Glad to see you posting again,been some time

Posted by BlueDog 11/17/2009 at 07:37 PM

"You gotta love The Mighty Fed"

I'm pretty sure that Pete meant this literally, and that anyone not loving TMF will be banned from posting.

Posted by aussiemarg [Madame President in Comma Rehab for 2009] 11/17/2009 at 07:38 PM

Is that news official?

Having visions of Nole proposing,ponders.

Posted by BlueDog 11/17/2009 at 07:40 PM

Idle minds think alike, eh Grant?

Posted by aussiemarg [Madame President in Comma Rehab for 2009] 11/17/2009 at 07:40 PM

Blue Dog People dont read between the lines with Pete sometimes

I agree with you

Posted by jhurwi 11/17/2009 at 07:42 PM

Annie: round robin matches and semifinals are best-of-three, but the final is best-of-five (or at least that's what it was in the past)

Posted by CL 11/17/2009 at 07:42 PM

Annie - yeah...it will be interesting - will he start breaking his racket and making a racket if he starts to lose more, or will he develop the more zen side oh his personality? A sort of Swiss zen...chocolates AND archery. I think MOST professional athletes who have been at the very top of there game are not satisfied when things begin to slide. But then, Fed is not MOST people, as he has proved often.

Aw- the 2005 match...gimpy Fed vs Skinny Nalby. le sigh...

AND COULD YOU PEOPLE PLEASE SPEAK UP!!! I CAN HARDLY HEAR YOU OUT HERE IN CYBERSPACE!!!!

Posted by mina (meanie ignoring the Trifecta) 11/17/2009 at 07:42 PM

Nole getting hitched? like CNote said in her Tipsy post: another one bites the dust.

congrats and all that.

AM: suffice it to say that if a Woz/ReRe Final happens, you know which side i will be on :D

Posted by Tigress 11/17/2009 at 07:44 PM

Thanks to everyone yesterday, especially imjimmy, for contributing their ideas about Nadal's recent loss of weight and muscle mass. I found it very educational. Intentional weight loss to reduce stress on his knees seems a much more likely and plausible explanation than drug use. Twibe members helped increase my understanding of this perplexing issue.

If this is the case, it seems to me that Rafa's knee problems have placed him in an insoluble dilemma. If he keeps the added weight and mass of recent years, he'll probably ruin his knees in the near future. But losing the weight robs him of power and defensive range, making him non-competitive against top-tier and probably even power-hitting second-tier players.

It seems that in the future Nadal will be competitive only on clay, and he will no longer dominate on that surface as in the past. He will probably fall to 3rd behind Djokovic very early next year, and below Del Potro and possibly even punchless Murray shortly thereafter as the HC season progresses.

Next spring's clay season will be a huge opportunity for Federer and Djokovic to dominate. It will be very fascinating to see whether Rafa can hang with them competitively. The results at Madrid and Paris against Fed, Sod and Nole half a year ago (when he was still physically sound) do not bode well for Nadal's success next spring.

I hope that Roger is hungry next Spring, because he could have his best clay season ever. The door, closed for years, should now be wide open. Rome beckons, he can take his first Masters title there. Madrid and RG repeats would make this a clay season for the ages for Fed.

Posted by CL 11/17/2009 at 07:45 PM

Grant - I think that is Prop '15', actually. Sez so on all the jackets.

Posted by BlueDog 11/17/2009 at 07:47 PM

True AM, and then there are others that only read between the lines. Of course I'm guilty of these things too, on occasion.

Posted by Grant 11/17/2009 at 07:47 PM

"Idle minds think alike, eh Grant?"

Why can't you be here all the time, BlueDog?

Posted by sblily (Wheeeeeeeeee!) 11/17/2009 at 07:48 PM

Heads up (SF)Bay Area Agassi fans: Andre will be doing book signings this Thursday and Friday in Corte Madera and SF, respectively. Details: http://tinyurl.com/ylxl8eb

Posted by aussiemarg [Madame President in Comma Rehab for 2009] 11/17/2009 at 07:55 PM

Regarding Rafa and his so called weight loss.Rafa has lost weight in the past which I feel was a good idea and so did his doctors apparently.He did not however lose "muscle".Athletes can lose weight and retain muscle.He however has not lost any power in his shots at all.I asked Mr X regarding this new found revealation and Tfactor said there was nothing in Spainish press to the like.

There are also a number of other players with knee problems that could also lose weight,especially that they play a lot on h/court surface which isnt knee friendly.

Posted by BlueDog 11/17/2009 at 07:55 PM

"Why can't you be here all the time, BlueDog?"

It would get in the way of pretending I had a life outside of this blog.

Posted by Annie (Vamos Heavenly Creature) 11/17/2009 at 07:56 PM

Rafa is the favorite to win the clay Masters series tournies followed by Nole and then federer.

Posted by aussiemarg [Madame President in Comma Rehab for 2009] 11/17/2009 at 07:57 PM

I will also ask imjimmy where he got this "new found imofration from".Lets see when Rafa takes to the clay in DC final before declaring him a lost cause on the clay hey?

Posted by Lynne (Rafalite) 11/17/2009 at 07:57 PM

I do actually have Andre's autograph which a got in 1993. I don't have anyone elses, though.

Posted by Grant 11/17/2009 at 07:57 PM

Speaking of pretending to have a life, I have to go.


Posted by manuelsantanafan 11/17/2009 at 07:57 PM

Attempting to do justice to the magnitude of Samantha's pronouncements; I believe she used the term, "crush" regarding a Caro three-set victory over Azarenka, where Azarenka won the first set 6-1 and held a match point later in the match.

A Samantha hilite that ranked up with the Caro-Cirstea match in Carson, CA, where Caro was up a set and at least one break in the second set. Samantha proceeded to advise Cirstea to prepare her luggage for the trip back to Romania. So, Cirstea, insisting on not following the script, then came back and won the match.

Posted by Annie (Vamos Heavenly Creature) 11/17/2009 at 07:58 PM

CL: john barrett is the commie for this fed/nalby match and he is very difficult to listen to. right out of masterpiece theAter. sounds just like alistair cooke. really makes tennis seems stuffy.

Posted by aussiemarg [Madame President in Comma Rehab for 2009] 11/17/2009 at 08:02 PM

Though I will add,Rafa needs to drop a clay tournament next year,or he could be facing the same thing that happended this year with his knees.

To me he is the greatest player on clay,I havent as yet seen anyone to match him.Just look at his records on clay.

Posted by Lynne (Rafalite) 11/17/2009 at 08:02 PM

Annie,

I'm surprised. John Barrett one of my favourites.

Posted by BlueDog 11/17/2009 at 08:04 PM

Have fun pretending Grant!

Annie- The first time I heard John Barret, I thought it was just John Cleese doing a bit of parody.

Posted by Annie (Vamos Heavenly Creature) 11/17/2009 at 08:05 PM

BlueDog: hee hee. exactly. is he for real? gah. sorry Lynne, not for me. Prefer Jason and Robbie.

<<      1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8      >>

We are no longer accepting comments for this entry.

<<  Pole Position Misson: (Nearly) Impossible  >>




Wild Women of the U.S. Open
Wild Men of the U.S. Open
Roddick's Imperfect World
"It's Kind of a Dance"
Nadal's Kneeds
The Racquet Scientist: Canadian Tennis
The Long and Short of It
This blog has 3693 entries and 1646147 comments.
More
More Video
Daily Spin