Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Newsletter Subscribe  |  Store
TENNIS.com - The Pro Shop by Jon Levey - Calling All Junkies
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   College Tennis
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   Champions' Perspective
   Backcourt: Framed
   Ready, Set, Goal: Kellie
   Ready, Set, Goal: Joe
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
Internet Gambling »
Calling All Junkies
Posted 04/08/2008 @ 11 :51 AM

19200043

“It’s not the tool, it’s the carpenter.”
- Noted philosopher, Dr. Mark Levey, circa 1985

When I was about 12, I asked my father why I was still playing with an old-school wood racquet while all my friends at summer camp had upgraded to the seemingly superior graphite models. He claimed that if a match was lost, it wasn’t the equipment (Jack Kramer Autograph), but the player (me) swinging it that determined the outcome. Perhaps he was right. Perhaps my Wilson was a helluva stick. It did the trick for Johnny Mac. Still, it looked terribly impotent next to a mighty Prince Graphite and even the most skilled carpenter will doubt his abilities if he thinks his hammer can’t crack an egg.

For whatever reason, most likely because he wanted one himself, my father eventually softened his stance. We went to Herman’s Sporting Goods and he bought me my first non-wooden racquet: the Pro Kennex Bronze Ace ($50 strung). And while I can’t say for certain that my performance improved, I am positive about one thing – I loved that tinny sounding piece of junk. You always remember your first, right?

Many have followed since. I’ve always been a bit of a flirt when it comes to my racquets. And now, as gear editor for TENNIS, I’ve become completely promiscuous. With dozens of new models passing through my office each year, I can’t help but become infatuated with the latest trends. So much so I’ve been guilty of starting and finishing the same match with two entirely different racquets. I’m not much better when it comes to my strings or shoes, either. It’s hell on your game, but a lot of fun.
Maybe you’re like me. Maybe you enjoy tinkering and experimenting with your equipment in search of the perfect complements to your game. Or perhaps you’re somebody with staunch loyalty to what’s currently in your bag but wants to know more about what’s in your opponent’s. Either way, this blog is aimed directly at you – the gear junkie.

If it has to do with tennis equipment, and it matters to you, we want to be talking about it. I’ll be posting items at least once a week discussing what’s new and noteworthy, and what’s not for consumption. There will also be guest bloggers, interviews with people in the industry, mailbags, and other forums to help spread the gospel. I may be driving this bus, but I don’t mind sharing the wheel. Most of all, it should be fun. We all share a common love of the sport and a belief in a fundamental principle:

The tool matters.

| | Send to a Friend
Comments

I've heard that the racquet is a big reason why players improve. Maybe you can share more about why this is ? Does a player on tour have an advantage because he's using better equipment ?

HA I took lessons when I was 7, and I had a wooden racquet, and everyone else had nicer ones. Ugh.

Now I love my Yonex RDS-001 Midplus!

I heard that rackets don't necessarily improve your game but you should have one that fits your style of play. I mean you don't want to some big powerful dude with a racket with just as much power you'll never be able to keep the ball in.

I probably should be in the same line of work as the author.

I started playing tennis a little later than the juniors of my era, but I was fortunate enough to take this route :

>>> The Wood Era

i) as a 10 year old, my Dad would occaisonally let me borrow his David TAD Hi-Point.
ii) the next year, while at a summer camp - they purchased a basic Slazenger Woody (can't remember the exact model).
iii) by then - I was a confirmed tennis nut, when the Slaz cracked - I rushed out to get myself my 1st (bought alone) Dunlop Maxply Fort.
iv) Soon followed the Maxply McEnroe (which I'll admit was not that great - but Johnny_Mac swung it .. need I say more).
v) I then attempted to look more mature - and got myself the Wilson Jack Kramer ProStaff (look at the picture here ;-)
vi) finally broke free with my last wooden frame : Wilson Jack Kramer autograph (actually re-acquired one 3 months ago from a nickel&dime shop).

>>> The Graphite Era

vii) Of course, I regressed, and followed John P. McEnroe again - since 1984 was such a year for him, and drove from my little town in quebec to Montreal to get my hands on that new stuff, the Max200G .. ouf ! I did do more than my previous ones.

viii) I then gave in to the logic that I wasn't as good as I would've liked, swallowed my pride and got a (ugh!) big stick - the Prince 110 ... but my serves (even today) were never better, the spin one could put on the ball with that puppy - without the risk of framing it like with the current wider beam sticks.

ix) Then decided to go more conservatively - and chose a racquet based on the logic that more equal length strings meant more consistency (not) - the Rossignol F200 Carbon. Mats was my new hero, and he was positively inspiring with it : I mean let's face it, from an extreme western forehand grip to a flip-around 2-hander, no pace on the serve to a competent grass-player !
But the only thing I did consistently with it was lose ;-(

x) And my current weapon of choice : the Head LiquidMetal Heat .. for me, strangely enough - it reminds me of the Prince 110, so I'm playing pretty decently again....

What would one do without fashion, star-power and technology ?!

Wood racquets produced some great tennis, but obviously they are a relic now. At this point, a player who brought a wood racquet to a "serious" league or tournament would be considered a little eccentric (and I'm defining "serious" very liberally, let's say 3.0 and up). When do you think this happened? I remember that wood and graphite racquets coexisted on the courts in the mid 80s, but they disappeared quickly thereafter. Has anyone done some research on this? When, for instance, was the last match played with a wood racquet in the main draw at the US Open?

What's interesting here is that you never see wood racquets, but other old models are still popular. The Wilson Pro Staff, the Prince Graphite come to mind (though I can't actually think of any active pros who use these anymore).


I tried to buy 2 Prince 03 Speedport tours from Tennis Warehouse last month and they asked me to fax them a copy of my passport, proof of my address, a photo of my credit card (front and back) and so on. I read the list of requirements and was like 'why no blood sample?'Their reason was that I'm a new customer and I live in Ireland, which they must think is the third world or something. Memo to all: If you live outside the US do NOT attempt to buy from Tennis Warehouse. I got my rackets in the end from the racquet guys in Canada and must say they have really good feel.

I got my Wilson K-Six one Team from Tennis Warehouse shipped to NZ with no drama's at all via credit card. Only took 4 days to ship from the US to NZ too.
Im loving the control of the 18 string Team racquet, have to generate alot of your own power though.

I must say that I am an equipment junkie. I bounce from stick to stick looking for that extra something. I have used heavy sticks and find at the ripe age of 55, they are really taking a toll on my shoulder. Never fear, there is a new stick out that might do everything I want. The new Prince O3 Hybrid at 11 ounces is a dream so far. Who knows, maybe next week I will be back using either my Liquidmetal OS or Wilson K Blade team.

Re: Current pros who use Prince Graphite -- Vince Spadea (and he ain't afraid a ya..) I used the Prince Graphite myself in the mid-late 1980s and have even thought about going back to it recently.

What is the best type of racquet for a 16 year old 5'5" advanced beginner? I currently have a Wilson Nano Carbon Pro Tennis Racquet.

Wood racquets might be considered old relics, but like other 'old' things like vintage cars, there are things about them that modern racquets cannot duplicate. Racquet 'feel' from a wood racquet is something that seems to be missing from the high tech racquets of today. It's too bad none are commercially available today for the general public to continue to experience.
I do love the new technologically advanced racquets. However, I have disdain for devious manufacturers who cleverly replace models about every six months. Does planned obsolescence ring a bell? Like Pavlov's dogs, we salivate at the latest offerings, neglecting the fact that maybe a bit more dedicated practice might improve our game more than a new stick.

My last racket, before I stopped playing tennis, was a Wilson Advantage. Strung with gut, it had a sound and feel that made playing tennis a real joy. So, wood rackets no longer available, prices going up on composites, hard to find tennis courts or anyone that wanted to play on a regular basis, brought about my switch to golf. Tennis as a solo sport is pretty boring, and I've been playing golf with the same set of clubs since 1978. Only the ball changes.

LOL understatement of the year :) of course Tennis as a solo sport is "pretty boring".

I've played Tennis using my friend's Donnay Mid 25 agaisnt them using Prince 03 and Microgel Radical without a problem. The Donnay was a good racquet to practice with as you have to not be lazy when you use it.

But I gotta say, nothing comes close to my favorite: the nCode nBlade 98. Wilson really made a good midplus with this racquet: soft feel, great control, perfect weight and balance, dense string pattern, and the paintjob is absolutely cool. The new [K]Factor Blades looks horrible compared to the original in my opinion: too much black, not enough gold and white.

I started playing tennis when I was 11, the year 1980. My first racket ws a wood spalding Pancho Gonzalez (k-mart special). After a couple of months my parents could see I was serious about the game and I was given a Dunlop Maxply Junior, it looked just like the maxply fort but was shorter. After about a 1/2 years time I talked my parents into my first real racket, the Wilson Jack Kramer Pro Staff. I loved the racket and the fundamentals of my game were honed with that stick, but it was the end of an era and my coach also sold rackets so the next thing I knew I was using a "Durbin" graphite racket. A little known brand that didn't last more than a year or so but it wasn't a bad frame. When they quit making that racket I started using the Wilson Sting 2, they quit making that racket so I had to switch to the Wilson Jack Kramer Staff, they quit making that so I switched to the Wilson Prostaff, wich I still use. I have Prostaff frames that date from 1987-early 2000'. four or five years ago I came across my old Jack Kramer Pro Staff and when I picked it up I couldn't belive how good the balance of the frame felt and I got to thinking and thinking soon turned to stringing. I put Luxilon 17 gage ti-mo in the racket at 50lbs. My first opponant was someone I have played thousands of times and never beaten. ye old back board and true to form he got evrything back. It had been over 20 years since I had hit with that racket and I made some interesting discoveries: A)wood rackets won't let you get away with bad form. B)If your technique is sound the feel and control you have when you hit the ball is unlike any modern racket. C) It is still possible to generate good power with a wood racket! Although I "used to use wooden rackets". This was the first time I had used one as an adult! Big difference.
I had signed up for a 4.5 tournament in Las Vegas previous to restringing the racket and made the decision to show up swinging wood! Long story short I made it to the finals. People were in disbelief, young kids (14-18 year olds) had only heard about wood rackets. If you played with wood as a youngster and still have one laying around that isn't warped I recomend giving it a try. beware! My racket cracked after paying with it 15-20 times as it was brittle from travling from storage unit to storage unit.

Now if I may vent a little about modern equipment. I have spent a couple thousand dollars trying to find a replacement for my prostaffs. If you find a raquet you think you might like you have to buy 2, tinker with string tension, a little lead tape here and there and then after a couple of months I always come to the same conclusion. The new racket offers me no advantage over the old one and it is actully lacking in a couple areas, usually manuverability and finesse. Rackets I tried and really hoped I would fall in love with include. Head prestige, Head I-prestige, Babolat Pure drive, Volkel C-10 Pro. Wilson nCode six one 90, and Wilson KSixone tour 90. What I want to know really really bad, is why the demise of the 85 square inch wilson line?!!!! The Prostaff 6.0 has won more Grandslams than any other racket! (I don't know this for sure) Chrs Evert used it to win a few,Steffi Graff? Stefan Edberg, Jim Courier, some guy named Sampras, and Federer still uses the 85 square inch model. Wilson may give it a new paint job and tell you it is a 90 square inch model but I am willing to eat a bucket of s#@t if it actually is. Here is the pickle on the terd sandwich, that racket has a cult following. I know I would gladly buy a Wilson Ksixone tour 85 with the fancy new paint job if they made it. How about this, pay tribute to one of the greatest players of all time and make a frame called the Pete Sampras retro 85 or something of that nature. Am I Alone on this subject?

addout, you're not alone. I have been looking forever for a genuinely "new" (one that hasn't been used or strung all this time) ProStaff 85. (lol I know, I know. Doesn't exist...)

As far racquets go, the old woods are still right up there with the best of the new age models. But the setup of having a guy play with wood vs a guy with modern sticks only works with the non-pros. If Nadal shows up in Roland Garros with a Donnay Borg Pro he'll be outed in the first round.

How are these Donnay Wood-Graphite composites constructed anyway? Wood inside with a bit of Graphite coating on the outside? The chips on the paint of my friend's Mid 25 show the inside as all Wood, so the extent of the Graphite "composite" is limited to the outer surface?

Ive always played with babolat rackets since i was about 12 yaers old (im now 22), and up untill about 3 years ago i was always a scrappy baseliner. For the past three yaers ive been practicing with wooden rackets the majority of time, and then switching to my k factor when tournaments come up, and ive gotta say playing with the wood has made me a much better player. It forces me to produce strict, perfect strokes and since theyre brilliant with volleys, i always find my way to the net when i use the wood. Since practicing with wood ive become physically stronger, my strokes have become far more consistent and ive become very much an all court player, constatly moving forward. Since using wood ive gone from outside the top 1000 to around 200 in the open rankings in australia. Sounds pretty strnage.... but works for me

The players have changed, the courts have changed, and so did the game.
When you look to an old match (Bjorn Borg vs Mc Enroe,...), you can see that the speed of the game has dramatically increased. I see two main reasons :
a. The players. The physical aspects of the game have been emphasized and players have dedicated trainers for it. They play much faster and stronger now. The phenomenon appears in all sports. Johnny Weismuller was the first to get under the minute at 100m, and now the record is far under 48s (+25% speed).
Players are moving faster.
b. The gear.
If you can't overspeed your opponent, the rallies will be during too long. And wooden racquets do not allow you to do it (too small, too flexible, too much frame vibrations).
New racquets allow today's players to put this extra power and speed on the ball.
It's the same thing with cars : engines have become more powerful, so chassis had to be adapted to these new conditions, and the possible speed has increased.
Last but not least : consider the fact that most modern surfaces are slow compared to grass.

I dont think its true at all that new rackets allow players to put on 'extra' speed and power on the ball, it just allows them to do it far more consistently. A few years ago mark philippousis was given a wooden racket at the aus open to hit a few serves and he clocked over 200km several times, and hit the same speeds as when using his normal racket. He just didnt do it every serve with the wooden one. He said that he felt he could produce the same speed with the wood, but the wood was alot less forgiving if he didnt get the timing right. Did anyone see that youtube clip of conners playing laver? I think anyone who saw that would agree theyre hitting just as hard as they do today. Roscoe Tanner and Gonzalez both hit serves over 200km with wooden rackets. Wooden rackets are less forgiving and less maneuverable that modern rackets, but they are certainly capable of producing the same power and control when wielded by someone with technically brilliant strokes and a strong arm.

about time!!! i have been waiting for this feature in tennis.com. yeyz!

i used to have a prince tour diablo mid-plus. great control and so accurate with the volleys. but low power, it and I don't stand against power players. so i got this diablo xp version. problem solved! i don't know if i'll go back to the midplus version someday. maybe, but for now the oversize version is the tool for me.

if i have extra cash, i might try the wilson kblade. must save...:D

Donal, who are the Canadian tennis guys?

I live in Canada and just bought some string from TW. The original price was good, but then there's shipping and when the delivery guy got to the front door, a brokerage fee.

People are talking about new racquets. How about strings? The package I mentioned in the previous paragraph contained some Signum and Wilson Sensation strings. I strung a hybrid job with my little drop-weight stringer and look forward to trying it out tomorrow night. Will my game improve? I wonder. It will probably change slightly--a little more topspin perhaps.

Hey Nick,

I'd really like to know what type of strings/gauge/tension you were using on your wood rackets.

I've always wondered if training with a wood racket could be effective. I'm using the O3 Tour, which can give even more leeway than typical graphite. And after hearing your recommendation, I think I'll get one myself. I've got a few wild cards I plan on playing this summer and this might give my training a kick in the butt.

Who played with a Head Vilas Experimental???? Prince Woodie?? or the Le Coq Sportif racquet Noah used?? My first racquet was a Chemold my mom got at Morsans in NJ!! Broke 2 just serving with em they were about $20 each back in 1974 ahhhhhhhhhhh the good old days indeed....

My dad had a Prince Woodie that I think he bought solely for the novelty of it. It was a wood frame with flat graphite lacquered on the front and back to the frame maintains its shape and doesn't warp.

I love the idea of this blog! I play with flexpoint prestiges, and I've started thinking recently about picking up a pc600. I've heard from several different sources that the pc600 and the pro staff 6.0 85 are two of the best racquets ever made; makes me wonder why head and wilson don't make them anymore. At the very least they would have enthuisiasts lining up months in advance to get one.

does anyone know where you can buy the original CC feather adidas shoes

does anyone know where you can buy the original CC feather adidas shoes

When you have a new racket, it just gives you an illusion that you're playing better maybe because the racket fits the person's play style or whatever. That's all there is to it. Sampras or Federer will own you whether they have a wooden racket or a graphite racket. : )

Donal - if you want to buy from Tennis Warehouse again, just pay through Paypal and you don't have to go through all that hassle with passports, etc. I had the same problem and didn't want to go through the hassle so I asked if I can just redo the order and pay through Paypal and they were ok with that.

Francis - you make a very good point about the wood racquets. I've read similar things about the old wood racquets - that they can actually generate a tremendous amount of pace. While the modern racquets do add a bit more power, it's really the spin and control combined with power that changed the game.

I've seen some interesting technology changes in my life. I'm young enough to have used computers in elementary school, but old enough to have thought that erasable ink pens were the greatest invention ever.

Same thing with tennis. The modern racquets came around early enough for me to adjust to heavy topspin, but I learned old school strokes with wood racquets until I was about 12 years old (ie., I was taught how to hit flat, keeping the racquet head above my wrist).


Ive been using 16 guage babolat pro hurricane stings at 47pounds. Ive broken a few rackets while trying to string them though... mostly because theyre old and havent been used for years, but good quality wood frames dont go for much anyways. I find i can volley and hit a single handed backhand much better with wood than with ANY other racket. Period. Serving is much more difficult, as is hitting western forehands.

thanks nick!

After reading the review of the Wilson (K)Factor Six.One, It got me to thinking. The review stated that it's not whether the racquet is good enough for you, but are you good enough for the racquet. So, I pose this question: Should you get a racquet that is good for your level of game, or should you get a racquet that forces you to improve your game? My personal answer is this: Rec players (non-pros) play to have fun and get a workout. Stiffer racquets provide their own power, whereas, thinner racquets provide more control and YOU provide the power. Therefore, your body (and subsiquently your game) improves just by the fact that you are doing more work. So, I'll stick to the tour-type frames, just because you get a better workout from them.

Post a Comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In


  * Only required field   

  (Optional)

  (Optional)

Internet Gambling »

More from TennisWorld
Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor

More from Concrete Elbow
TENNIS Magazine is published 10 times per year.




Save 75% off of the annual newsstand price.
Categories
2008 Entries
Recent Entries
Racquet Reviews
Appraising Apparel
Statistics
This blog currently has 11 entries and 196 comments.