Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Blogs  |  Newsletter Store
TENNIS.com - The Pro Shop by Bill Gray - The Swing Of It
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   Fitness
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   String Theory
   The Healthy Player
   The Pro Shop
   Backcourt: Framed
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
« The New Breed Racquet Attack »
The Swing Of It
Posted 02/27/2009 @ 6 :17 PM

2009_02_10_swingweightI’m a weight snob. I like my racquets chubby. Unless it’s around the 12-ounce mark I won’t play with it. I prefer the stability and control I get from a heavier frame, and, for the moment, I don’t have any problems handling the extra mass. (Five years from now it could be a different story.) A racquet’s weight is a huge consideration when buying a frame. And how the weight is distributed throughout the frame has a significant impact on its playability. Heavier racquets tend to be head-light so they have adequate maneuverability, while lighter frames usually have more weight in the head to maintain stability on off-center hits.

What’s the best weight and balance for a racquet? How heavy is too heavy?

Readers send me these types of questions quite frequently. I find them difficult to answer because a racquet is a pretty personal thing. What feels solid and comfortable to one player can feel exactly opposite to another. In the March issue of TENNIS I wrote a piece that started out with the goal of explaining the differences in balance points and how that can impact a player’s perception of a racquet. But during my research it became apparent that players may be better off paying more attention to a racquet’s swingweight.

In scientific terms, swingweight is a measurement of how heavy a racquet feels when its rotated around an axis that is four inches from the butt cap (basically where you hold the racquet). In simpler terms, it’s how difficult a racquet is to swing. It takes an expensive piece of equipment to measure, which many pro shops possess, or, the more industrious types can do it themselves (see here). It’s measured in kilogram centimeter squared, but it’s more commonly referred to as swingweight units. The higher the number, the more challenging the racquet is to swing.

According to the United States Racquet Stringers Association most frames fall between 310 to 315 on the swingweight scale. The new Big Bubba, which is 29 inches long, and has a 137 square-inch head (both as big as you can legally get) is a robust 377. On the opposite end, the Head CrossBow 4 is a very maneuverable 299. And just because a racquet weighs more than another, doesn’t mean it will have the higher swingweight. The new Yonex RQiS 1 Tour XL 95 comes in two versions: G and HG. The HG is almost an ounce heavier, yet actually has a lower swingweight (306 vs. 316).

What makes swingweight such a valuable measurement is you don’t need to know any of the other specs of the racquet to get an impression of how the frame will handle. Plus, it’s incredibly precise. Two racquets with identical weight and balance points can actually have differing swingweights due to slight variances in the positioning of the weight throughout the frame.

Obviously swingweight won’t tell how a racquet feels at contact or whether it has a big enough sweet spot. But once you become familiar with the swingweight you prefer, it can certainly give you a indication of whether a frame is right for you. Perhaps more so than knowing the weight or balance. If you’re not already using the number as a barometer for trying out racquets, give it a shot. It may change the way you look at frames.

| | Send to a Friend
Comments

first

second

...

As a physical therapist, I have been asked literally thousands of times by patients and players what rackets (as well as racket strings and tension) they should use to avoid arm injuries such as tennis elbow (as well as wrist & shoulder injuries). Tennis elbow is often caused by the impact on the arm (wrist extensor muscles) which takes place when the ball makes contact with the racket strings when hitting a one-handed backhand or backhand volley. Racket weight, or MASS, can be an important factor. In physics, FORCE = MASS x ACCELERATION. Hitting a ball with a heavier racket (more MASS) will produce more 'power' and result in less impact on the arm. A player can compensate for a lighter racket (Rafa Nadal uses a relatively light racket) by increasing 'racket head speed' (acceleration), but that is difficult to do when hitting a volley (conventional - not a swing volley), or when blocking a hard serve hit right at your midsection. So, using a heavier racket can be an advantage. What can you do to strengthen your arm to be able to use a heavier racket? - you can exercise your wrist, forearm, and shoulder muscles with small weights, 2-5 pounds, and simulate tennis strokes (serve, ground strokes, volley) holding a small weight, or using a wall-pulley.

Joseph Zohar
PT, USPTA certified

"The new Big Bubba, which is 29 inches long, and has a 137 square-inch head (both as big as you can legally get) is a robust 377"


wow that is huge. i could not even imagine playing with that. i once played with a 112 square-inch head and it felt huge!

I have always been knowledgable on swing weights and i notice that certain racket brands tend to have a preferred range of swing weights. Wilson rackets in general have high swing weights while Dunlop and Yonex have low swing weights. Head and Prince tend to fall in between.
Net rushers tend to use rackets with low SW while baseliners normally use rackets with high SW.

hey jon levey the new boris becker racquet also has SW of 377! and it's 12 oz.+ just like you prefer!

Hi Jon,

I've been playing with Steffi Graf's old Wilson Pro Staff 7.1 mid size (the one she used to win the 1999 French Open) and I am happy with its flexibility & "heavy" feel; it actually makes my down the line forehand a better shot (even though I hit it off my back foot). Now that the racquet is getting old, I'd like to replace it with a similar frame as Wilson discontinued that model. What racquet brand has the same flexibility & heaviness of Steffi's Wilson Pro Staff 7.1? Thanks.

Carl, closest racket I can find to those specs is the Babolat Pure Storm Limited.

Even if your racket is no longer siutable for playing, that is a collector's item an you can probably offset about half the price of buying a new racket by selling your old one.

Thanks Ty. I'll definitely check the Babolat Pure Storm.

I thought that the swing weight of a tennis racquet is different from the weight of a tennis racquet. A heavy tennis racquet does not necessarily mean that it also has a heavy swing weight. Am I right?

Joseph Zohar, besides wall-pulley, would you recommend extensor cords?

Against tennis elbow and shoulder problems, natural gut strings help as well, correct ?

Sel, that's what he said, did you read the full article?

Marian - a wall pulley provides constant resistance through the entire movement, in any direction (horizontal, diagonally up or down, etc.), a weight provides resistance when you move it upward (against gravity), and elastic cords or bands provide increased resistance as they are stretched.

Small weights are most effective for exercising individual muscles/muscle groups (wrist, forearm, and shoulder), and for simulating strokes (serve, volley, ground strokes). Wall pullies can be used for resisted shoulder movements (as well as some strokes) , and so can elastic cords/bands, which are light and therefore practical for people who travel.

I don't know Joseph, I've preferred elastic cords(extensors) since I had my shoulder pulled out of its socket by a beast during junior basketball.

Somehow I feel that it can strengthen more muscles.

Marian - you are absolutely right that elastic cords/bands (and pullies) exercise MORE muscles at the same time. However, with shoulder rotator cuff injuries or instability it is VERY IMPORTANT to exercise the rotator cuff muscles SEPARATELY from the big shoulder muscles - deltoid, pectoralis, and latissimus dorsi (usually referred to as LATS), otherwise the big muscles will compensate for the weaker rotator cuff muscles, leaving them relatively weak. The same thing is true when treating tennis elbow - individual wrist and forearm muscles/muscle groups need to be exercised, rather than the entire arm.

very nice post... thanks!

Post a Comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In


  * Only required field   

  (Optional)

  (Optional)

« The New Breed Racquet Attack »

More from TennisWorld
Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor

More from Concrete Elbow
TENNIS Magazine is published 10 times per year.




Save 75% off of the annual newsstand price.
Categories
Bill Gray
Jon Levey
Racquets
Shoes
Recent Entries
The Life Expectancy of Your Racquet
'Revelations' We Can Use
Player Types: Your Feedback
Tips for the 10 Player Types
The Persnickety Pros
Racquets, Strings for Sore Wings
Cinderella's Neon Slippers
The Zing In The Pros' String
On to the Open (Gear) Season
The Racquet That Changed My Life
Statistics
This blog currently has 43 entries and 907 comments.