Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Blogs  |  Newsletter Store
TENNIS.com - The Pro Shop by Bill Gray - What A Croc
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   Fitness
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   String Theory
   The Healthy Player
   The Pro Shop
   Backcourt: Framed
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
« Racquet Attack Mail's In »
What A Croc
Posted 03/13/2009 @ 9 :00 AM

From time to time at The Pro Shop we’ve had guest bloggers stop by to offer their assessments of some of the newest gear on the market. Ed McGrogan is no stranger to frequent visitors of this website, but this is his first time contributing to this space. Welcome, Ed. Besides being well-versed in the pro game, Ed is an avid recreational player. Recently, he took the Lacoste Repel shoes out for a test run and came back with the following review:

Repel
For nearly a century now, French clothing company Lacoste has been closely linked to tennis. The company’s founder, Rene Lacoste, won 10 major singles titles, and was part of the “Four Musketeers,” a French foursome that dominated the sport during the 1920s. Lacoste-branded shirts, identifiable by their green crocodile logo, have been worn by some of the world’s most famous tennis players, including Guy Forget, Henri Leconte, and Andy Roddick. And the company has created two of the most unique tennis racquets of their time: In 1963, Lacoste designed the first steel racquet (which was distributed in the U.S. by Wilson); 25 years later, Lacoste patented the “Equijet” racquet, whose head resembles the look of a guitar.

Lacoste’s history of tennis shoes isn’t quite as memorable. Footwear is scarcely mentioned in the company’s exhaustive timeline, and many of today’s prominent Lacoste’s athletes – Roddick, Richard Gasquet, Alize Cornet, to name a few – wear other brands of shoes. That may be why I was struck when I saw Michael Llodra, a fine serve-and-volleyer consistently ranked in the ATP’s Top 40, wearing a pair of Lacoste Repels at a French Davis Cup tie last year.

Visually, I liked what I saw. The Repel has honeycomb-shaped sidewalls on its upper, similar to the Nike Air Max Breathe Cage II, and an oversized croc stamped on the lower part of the shoe. No doubt, it is an attractive piece of footwear. But from a practical point of view, I had some questions. Foremost was the shoe’s support. The Repel appeared very low to the ground without much cushioning, and looked more like a casual, walking shoe. Was it truly fit for tennis?
Llodra
I’d needed a new pair of tennis shoes for some time, so I decided to give the Repel a try, especially when I saw their newest color schemes for 2009. (Call me crazy, but I really liked how the green and black pair looked.) They looked even sharper in person.

Before I took the shoes for a ride on my local clay court, Jon Levey, TENNIS Senior Editor and shoe savant, got his hands on them. He immediately raised an eyebrow when checking their flex point. The Repel folds right in half, confirming my earlier suspicions about their arch support.

While arch support is not ideal, there is ample support throughout the rest of the Repel. The midfoot is adequately cushioned (note the French “Absorption de Shock” on the heel), and the forefoot benefits from even weight distribution. This made for a shoe that felt both secure on the court and light on my feet.

The Repel is also a very breathable shoe, with vents near the toe and aerated sides (which are supported by the honeycomb-shaped cage). It’s also very true to its size – after playing just one match, the shoes were completely broken-in. These features made for a very comfortable shoe that I’ve enjoyed playing with.

Of great importance to tennis shoes is their stability on the court. In my case, I tested the Repels on an indoor clay court, which can bog down some shoes. But the Repel did a nice job on quick turns and slides – I never felt like I lost control with them at any point. If I could only say the same about my racquet.

So is the Repel truly fit for tennis? I’m still holding out on a long-term answer, because of the Repel’s minimal arch support. Time will tell. But in the short term, I’ve been pleased with Lacoste’s newest offering. The Repel is one of the more comfortable shoes I’ve played in, and performance hasn’t been sacrificed for appearance, despite its stylish look. And I’m not just saying that: On my second go-around with the Repel, my league opponent stopped to ask me where he could get a pair of his own.

| | Send to a Friend
Comments

FIRST!! :D... I have no life :'(

2nd

life please

Great post, Ed. Very stylish shoes, and they sound functional, too. But why do manufacturer's enlarge the brand's image to the point it seems, well, garrish?

Polo lost me as a customer when it debuted the 3-inch embroidered polo pony and rider at the USO a couple years back.

Lacoste has also gone in for a bigger-is-better trademark visual.

Nike has several sizes of its "check," which they lay out in the back of the quarterly catalogs.

The obvious intrusion a large trademark/logomark makes on consumers' awareness would be the obvious reason a company goes one up on its competitors. However, diminutive accents have a place for users, too. Quality of a product isn't always announced through size.

I don't want to wear a shirt with a polo pony so big that it distracts from the garment and its style. I've always thought the manufacturer should pay me to wear those brash embellishments, or, at least, discount the products substantially as I become a walking talking billboard for their products.

Conspicuous consumption could very well be on its way out, as the economy encourages - yes, that's right - us to re-evaluate our desires and needs for more, bigger, and louder pronouncements of material possessions. Perhaps it's not so important that passersby acknowledge my propensity for expensive shirts - that'd be Lacoste branded shirts.

Humility could get a big boost from these economic times. Maybe the first manufacturer to producer smaller, tone-on-tone logomarks will stride into the forefront of consumers closets with barely a whisper of embellishment to its credit.

By the way... these shoes are awesome looking. I must have a dozen pairs of tennis shoes because I'm lucky enough to be in a position to get them on trial, etc. But these... well, I don't have an in with Lacoste because it has a lock-tight channel of distribution that I cannot penetrate.

Low profile shoes, though, are good for better players. However, they usually don't sell will to the average tennis player who looks for comfort.

Maybe we will now get labeled as gluttons, like the financial

Geez.. please disregard the last line of my comment "maybe... " gotta get better at self-editing. Sorry.

Cibulkova is wearing too.

Ooh.. nice looking shoes but OMG those racquets Lacoste made are weird.

Nice shoes!

I disagree supergoob, that guitar racquet is coolio.

I tried these shoes on my clay courts - not bad but not ideal either. There is not much arch support - the shoe literally folds in half. Also not shoes you'd want to wear outside of the tennis court as comfort was not really a priority. They really do feel great for setting my feet for shots though... I felt really confident on my forehands as I planted for a shot. Nice performance for running around the court too. GREAT for sliding, so if you're that kind of player go for it.

Tried the shoes on hard courts too - they perform poorly, to say the least. If you don't play on clay your feet get beat up pretty badly, not to mention the shoes.

Okay shoes, expensive though. They also look really nice:) However, I'd go with the Babolat Propulse, the Nike Air Max Cage, or the Wilson Open for serious players. Remember, looks SHOULD NOT be a priority in tennis shoes.. performance is.

I am a 14 year old level 4.5 player.

I LOVE that green and black combo! OMG!

I'm a huge Lacoste buyer and have been for years and years. Especially the Lacoste Sport (tennis line). So, when these shoes came out quite some time ago in Paris (why they're just being reviewed now, I'm not sure) I went to go buy a pair at a local tennis discount place. Much to my surprise, they discouraged me from in them. They were selling them for $75 (but the list price was over $120, if I remember right) so I really wanted them but they claimed that many, many pairs of them had been returned after players developed foot pain and blisters from playing with them. This place (which shall remain nameless) has a HUGE account with Lacoste but they said that due to complaints about this one particular shoe, they decided not to carry it in the future. I was disappointed. So bear in mind that some people have had problems with this shoe.

I should mention that I have four pairs of other Lacoste shoes (tennis shoes for streetwear) and have never had problems with any of them. They're all comfortable.

BTW, the size of the Croc on the shoe is designed to closely match the size of the Croc on the Lacoste Sport tennis wear, not regular Lacoste.

the best shoe is the lotto clay by far, requires no break in, looks good and is light, good allround shoe

They look good, but the performance doesn't match up to its price. Out of its league against the Federer and Nadal shoes from Nike, Adidas Barricade, or Asics Gel Resolution.

what a great shoe. i am going to buy them for my kid.

very nice post.. thanks!

hello

Excellent article! It’s just what i needed to understand. Happy Day’s

Lacoste sneakers really arnt that hard to get. I've seen the Repels and the other tennis sneaks at a bunch of different stores in South FL.

Out of curiosity, I tried on the white Repels and passed. They wernt that comfortable and felt kinda cheap for a higher end shoe.

I purchased 2 pairs of Nike Breathe Free II's at the Nike outlet of $29.99 each. Breathe Free's poop all over the Repels and I could have purchased 5 pairs of those for the price of one pair of Repels.

Post a Comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In


  * Only required field   

  (Optional)

  (Optional)

« Racquet Attack Mail's In »

More from TennisWorld
Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor

More from Concrete Elbow
TENNIS Magazine is published 10 times per year.




Save 75% off of the annual newsstand price.
Categories
Bill Gray
Jon Levey
Racquets
Shoes
Recent Entries
The Life Expectancy of Your Racquet
'Revelations' We Can Use
Player Types: Your Feedback
Tips for the 10 Player Types
The Persnickety Pros
Racquets, Strings for Sore Wings
Cinderella's Neon Slippers
The Zing In The Pros' String
On to the Open (Gear) Season
The Racquet That Changed My Life
Statistics
This blog currently has 43 entries and 907 comments.