Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Newsletter Subscribe  |  Store
TENNIS.com - Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   College Tennis
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   Champions' Perspective
   Backcourt: Framed
   Ready, Set, Goal: Kellie
   Ready, Set, Goal: Joe
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
« Opening Remarks The Aussie Suicide Pool »
Aussie Bracketology
Posted 01/12/2007 @ 4 :02 PM

2007_01_12_fed_2 Don’t you love to see an unspoiled draw? For this brief moment, no one has been upset, torn a muscle, had a brain cramp, suffered heat stroke, or otherwise let us down. Everything is potential. We're free to look at names and play out upcoming matches in our heads. Blake-Moya, Safin-Roddick, Gasquet-Baghdatis, Mauresmo-Vaidisova: sounds like a fun couple of weeks, doesn’t it?

All that will be ruined by Monday morning, of course, when the first results come in and bring the inevitable bad news. Safin lost to who? Jankovic tripped over what? But for this weekend, anyway, we can imagine whatever we want and keep our dream match-ups alive.

The Men

First Quarter
The problem with Roger Federer is that there are few dream matches that involve him—he’s so good right now that I can’t imagine, hard as I might try, anyone giving him a serious run for his money. Even the three young guns in his quarter, Gasquet, Baghdatis, and Djokovic, will be hard-pressed to do any damage if they face him. It’s not impossible, certainly, but just getting a set—forget three—from Federer will be an achievement. Djokovic would get the first shot at him in the round of 16, then the winner of Gasquet-Baghdatis (we can dream, right?) would play him in the quarters. You’d think this would be a nice surface for Gasquet to make a breakthrough on, but I’d take Baghdatis in their match based on his confidence from last year and continued enthusiasm for the Aussie courts.

Sleeper: Juan Carlos Ferrero. He’s been to the semis here and showed signs of life in 2006.

Semifinalist: Roger Federer

Second Quarter
Ivan Ljubicic is the big dog in this section (he’s the No. 4 seed in the tournament), but he’s got a test right off the bat against Mardy Fish, who has played some decent tennis Down Under this year and is never an easy guy to break. The match to hope for, of course, is a third-rounder between Roddick and Safin. Roddick showed up ready to play in Kooyong this week. He must sense a good chance to make his second straight Slam semi; this may be the softest section of the draw, and he has a winning record against Ljubicic. We all know Safin can play on Rebound Ace, and he finished 2006 on his first high note in two years by clinching the Davis Cup. Which means he’ll go down in straights to Benjamin Becker in the first round. No, he won’t. I hope.

Sleeper: Joachim Johannson. He hit a world-record 51 aces in a loss to Andre Agassi down here one year. He’ll probably win if he does that again.

Semifinalist: Andy Roddick

Third Quarter
This is the aficionado’s section, where Nikolay Davydenko and David Nalbandian have been set up for a quiet quarterfinal showdown. In between are a few landmines, however. Nalbandian may have to face down two former Melbourne semifinalists, Sebastien Grosjean and Tommy Haas. If the German is ever going to reach another Slam semi, it’s probably right here, right now. On Davydenko’s side, there’s a shorn Xavier Malisse, who already has a tournament win in 2007, as well as two monster hitters in Dmitry Tursunov and Tomas Berdych, whose likely third-round encounter will be blast-and-mope tennis at its finest. Tough call here: Both Davydenko and Nalbandian have been hurt recently, but nobody else seems like a good bet to step up his mental game at the right moment.

Sleeper: Luis Horna. He won two rounds last year. (I would give this honor to Chris Guccione, the giant left-handed Australian, but he’s got a tough match-up in the first round against the veteran Olivier Rochus.)

Semifinalist: David Nalbandian

Fourth Quarter
The bottom of the draw will hopefully end in a duel between second seed Rafael Nadal and fifth seed James Blake, who has upset Nadal all three times they’ve played. But we’re a long way from there right now. First Nadal has to get past American Robert Kendrick, who led the Spaniard two sets to love at Wimbledon in 2006 (it was one of the best matches of the year). Blake has an even tougher opener with Carlos Moya, who he’s also playing in the final in Sydney (brutal!). In between there’s Fernando Gonzalez, Lleyton Hewitt, Andy Murray, and a curious and completely unpredictable first-round encounter between Robby Ginepri and Nicolas Almagro.

Sleeper: Kristof Vliegen. The tall, smooth-hitting Belgian could be a tough second-round test for Nadal.

Semifinalist: Rafael Nadal

2007_01_12_clijsters_2 The Women

First Quarter
With Henin-Hardenne out, Maria Sharapova has moved to the pole position in the draw. Her first interesting match may come in the fourth round, against the talented but inconsistent teenager Ana Ivanovic. But I’ll be curious to see the Serb’s first-rounder, against diminutive American youngster Vania King, who showed a surprising amount of game late last year. Also lurking in that vicinity is a third skilled teen, Poland’s Agnieszka Radwanska. Sharapova’s quarterfinal match is scheduled to be against Patty Schynder, who has had her best Slam results Down Under; she’s 26-10 overall in Melbourne and has reached at least the quarters the last three years.

Sleeper: Alicia Molik. Home-country favorite and wild card will try to start a comeback.

Semifinalist: Maria Sharapova

Second Quarter
Kim Clijsters and Martina Hingis are the top seeds here, though Hingis may have to get past Dinara Safina, who beat her last week, in the fourth round. This may be Clijsters' last best shot at a second Grand Slam. She should be match tough after pulling out three-setters in the semis and final in Sydney this week, and she must be loving the absence of Henin-Hardenne, who beat her in two majors last year. There’s really no one here to challenge Clijsters until the quarters, and Hingis has already been overpowered twice in 2007 by players who don’t hit as big as the Belgian. Clijsters' likely showdown with Sharapova in the semis is looking like the match of the tournament.

Sleeper: Li Na. The top Chinese player is constantly improving and had chances to beat Clijsters in Sydney.

Semifinalist: Kim Clijsters

Third Quarter
On paper, Russians Nadia Petrova and Svetlana Kuznetsova are set to duke it out in the quarters. The trendy pick here is Jelena Jankovic, who won her opening tournament of 2007, then beat Hingis and Mauresmo and had a match point against Clijsters in Sydney. I think losing that final may have helped her, though; now the expectations won’t be quite as sky high (just high). Remember how Petrova came into the French Open last year on a long winning streak and went out in about 45 minutes in the first round? Jankovic has already had the reality check. Still, while Kuznetsova has been injured recently, she beat Jankovic twice at the close of 2006.

Sleeper: Serena Williams. Remember her? If the two-time Aussie champ can navigate her way past Italy’s bizarre Mara Santangelo in the first round, she’ll probably get Petrova in the third, and she’s 5-1 against the Russian.

Semifinalist: Jelena Jankovic

Fourth Quarter
This section features a potentially intriguing quarterfinal, between second seed and defending champ Amelie Mauresmo and long-limbed Czech teen Nicole Vaidisova, who ousted Mauresmo at the French Open in 2006. Vaidisova looked good despite losing to Jankovic in Sydney; she dictated the action and had chances to win. This could be a second breakout major for her, if she can keep her temper in check and get past Elena Dementieva in the round of 16 (the Russian won their only encounter). Mauresmo was bageled in the second set by Jankovic last week, which is not an auspicious way to go into a title defense. But the nice thing about the women’s draw is that she should have a couple rounds to play her way into the tournament. That’s what she did at the year-end championships in Madrid last November, and that’s what I think she’ll do to make it to the semis here. Being the defending champion will give her extra motivation.

Sleeper: Francesca Schiavone. The Italian has beaten Mauresmo the last two times they’ve played. They’re scheduled to face off in the fourth round.

Semifinalist: Amelie Mauresmo

Enjoy the tennis; it starts Sunday evening on ESPN. But remember to fit in some sleep this week (time to get a DVR!). I’ll try to post every other day or so; in between, check out our friend Kamakshi Tandon’s blog from Melbourne on TENNIS.com. Pete Bodo joins her there for the second week.

I played it pretty straight with the picks. Anybody willing to go out on a few limbs?

| | Send to a Friend
Comments

Does anyone think Serena has a chance at Petrova in the 3rd round? Or Jankovic in the 4th?
The thing im most surprised about is that Vaidisova could yet again make it to the semi's of a major. I think she will beat Mauresmo to get there. As much as I like mauresmo.

I like Brengle's chances against Schnyder. Madison into the third round, baby!
Harkleroad finally broke her string of drawing single-digit seeds in the first round at Slams (I think it was all four in 2006). I see her taking out Groenfeld in the 2nd round and meeting Clijsters in the 4th round.
*branch creaks*

Look out below!

I wouldn't be too quick to call Haas's draw simple. He's got a third rounder against Soderling (who's doing well right now) or Mayer (another German slam quarterfinalist), and Haas is too inconsistent for me to imagine him getting through that match easily, if at all. I'd say the winner of that 3rd round match up will be the quarterfinalist. Nalbandian just looks out of it since 2005.

Quick note: when was the last time a slam semifinal played out in the 2nd round two slams later? Federer-Bjorkman.

Serena will beat petrova and jankovic i mean she took a set 6-0 to mauresmo at the us open last year...if she's determined she can beat any of the women including the top seeds i mean it is still Serena were talking about.

Serena will beat petrova and jankovic i mean she took a set 6-0 to mauresmo at the us open last year...if she's determined she can beat any of the women including the top seeds i mean it is still Serena were talking about.

Hey Steve and everybody...i was wondering if anyone watched the serena match agaist bammer in hobart? was it on tv? i read serena was up a break in the 2nd and on her way to victory- could it be that she sort of tanked or gave up to get to melbourne with some rest? she said after the safarova match that she wanted to get at least one more match in in hobart, but never said she wanted to win the tourney- something she almost always says in interviews. regardless, i think that serena will take out petrova in the 3rd. i am very curious to see a jankovic/serena 4R matchup...jankovic may get nervous, or not, but serena will probably peak the first weekend....
regardless, good breakdown of the brackets...
cheers

brengle, eh? ok, i'll be watching that one. not that it'll be on tv or anything.

i didn't see serena's match with bammer; i suppose she could have tanked, but she struggled in her earlier match, too. would also like to see jankovic/williams. they had a pretty wild one last summer in cali.

bjorkman/federer—should they even play it?

as far as going on the limb with the predictions, i think sam stosur is going to upset chakvetadze in the 3rd round and schnyder in the 4R. she has an attacking style and took out chakvetadze last fall (indoors) while anna was on a hot streak, and took schnyder to 7-5 in the 3rd at gold coast last year. stosur looks to be playing better this year too...
i also think na li will take out safina in the 3R...
and if kuz is not back to full health, i see peer getting through that quarter to play jankovic/petrova/williams...
lots of great opportunities at this years tournament...haven't been this excited for a slam in years...

Thanks you all for answering my questions! much appreciated! When i printed out my draw and was working on it in study hall today in school, and i came to that Serena/Jankovic matchup. I stopped working on it, then and there and I started to wonder. I do believe Serena could do it. and im also thinking that jankovic could win it so i still have not finished that quarter of the draw.

Also, chuck-ster, i was wondering about that too...i dont really think she was in the tourney to win it. but itt woould have been very good if she would have.

jake

as for bjorkman/federer, should they play it? sure, but they shouldn't bother to air it...
but they will, at the expense of a good match probably!

Yes yes. im very excited about it this year. Maybe its because JHH is out? I dont know.

chuck-ster, i dont even see schnyder getting that far. She is facing Peng Shuai in the first round, and i see an upset special right there.

i don't know about winning a tourney before a slam is a good thing, at least not for serena these days...that would have been 5 matches in 5 days...something she couldn't get through last summer... i think 3 matches- 2 going the distance- is good prep for her heading into a slam. if she has worked as hard as andy roddick made it sound since last fall, i think serena is going to take out petrova and jankovic and whoever the QF opponent will be as long as she gets a day between matches each time. i have a feeling that jelena played a bit much before the open and may tire by the first weekend.

also, i do have sam stosur making a mighty run to the quarters.

i don't know about the peng upset...schnyder is the 8th seed for a reason...peng is up and down, hit or miss- pun intended. if she's healthy, then she has a chance to outhit patty, but we'll just have to see...i still think stosur will get through...have a feeling the aussie's are going to will her through...

does anyone else think zvonareva can take out ivanovic in round 3? set up a round 4 russian rumble with sharapova?

Goood point, serena definetly has a much better chance if she is playing every otther day. Often times in tthe womens game, doing what jankovic did is good thoughh. gettting matches under her belt ssure will help her. but i hope she stalls!
GO VAIDISOVA AND SERENA!

as for the men, question to all concerned...does anyone recall the wimbledon final,
i believe it was the 3rd set, and rafa was serving, either for the set, or to go up a break, or something, but the match was basically in his hands to go up 2 sets to 1 on roger, and he hiccuped. i feel like since THEN he hasn't been the same player. it was as if he was about to embark on this potential greatness, thought about it a second too long and just hiccuped. and then it was gone. i feel like that was the first wind taken out of his sails.
i hope i'm wrong and he rips through the field to a QF with blake, but i got a feeling he's going to fall early- be it an injury from overcompensating, or just a loss...but i hope i'm wrong...
what do u all think?

Steve, good analysis of the draws. One question: Why did you call Santangelo bizarre? Is it her game or her personality? I laughed at the one.

Steve, how many chances are you going to give Nalbandian to dissappoint you - again?! I thought you would have learned your lesson by now... (5 career titles for Nalby, 25 years old - injury prone - out-of-shape- has done nothing in the last year - must I go on?

I pick Benneteau over Nadal in the 3rd. But anytime time before that. Its a W under his column i think. unless he is still injured.

Steve - are you going to host the "suicide" picks again? I think that is what it was called. Whereby you pick a single player to win in each round, but once you have used that player, you may not choose them again for the duration of the tournament. If you are wrong, then your done as well.

Steve wrote:
"We all know Safin can play on Rebound Ace, and he finished 2006 on his first high note in two years by clinching the Davis Cup. Which means he’ll go down in straights to Benjamin Becker in the first round."

---

LOL. Actually, I'm seeing a dramatic five-set battle with Safin eventually either expiring from the effort or emerging from the smoke an extremely worn-out victor. LOL. Then again, I can also see Safin destroying Becker in straight sets. As the cliche goes, it all depends on which Safin shows up. Same with Malisse and all the rest of those All-Headcase Allstars.

I'm looking forward to this tournament also. Chakvetadze's only loss in months was to Stosur, she's won every other match. So that rematch will be interesting. Zvonareva-Ivanovic will be good too.
There's going to be a lot of interesting matches that ESPN won't show at all.

nice picks, steve.

personally, i like gasquet over baghdatis and still remember the jaw-dropping shot-making in toronto v. fed. id love to see that match up.

also, id pick kolya over nalbandian. we are just back from the holidays and methinks fat dave's belly might need a little more time to unload than the ao affords.

one question has been nagging me: has any top player ever been bageled so much as amelia mauresmo? its the strangest thing seeing a two time grand slam champ and world number one get stuffed full of bagels last year. i hope i wont see that again this year.

I would really like to see that Almagro-Ginepri match(if both of them are mentally ready to play as well as they know) but I know that won't happen. Difficult person Almagro, since juniors he has had problems with other players, ballboys, crowd, tournament directors...it's a pity he has such a nice game so it's not easy to hate him but more than once I have surprised myself wanting him to lose because of his behaviour (and I'm a spaniard...).
And I would like Vliegen's chances against Nadal if it was a best of three sets match, but the guy looks so tall and skinny... five sets under the australian sun has to favour Nadal.

ok, let's see, just back from dinner (it's still pretty warm in nyc. go global warming!)

ok, santangelo: from what i remember, her game looks totally rudimentary in that italian way, with soft hitting and no backswing. but she's tricky and took momo to three at the us open last year

nalbandian: he's just got too good a record at the aussie open to ignore. i think four straight quarterfinals, with one semi (which he should have won)

ivanovic: you have to think she's a vulnerable seed no matter who she plays

federer/bjorkman: good point on televising that. i hope an american is playing at the same time

nadal at wimbledon: i remember the moment chuckster. but didn't he come back to winn the next set after choking that one. the crucial moment for me with nadal was him blowing the third set against youzhny at the open. he simply choked, and admitted it afterward. kind of thing that could stick with you

stosur: is she playing better? haven't seen her this year. she's always at her best down there, but i'd take schnyder

suicide pool sounds good. last time i think everyone failed at wimbledon. i'll be back with picks or will do a post


I'd bet that Stosur doesn't get to Schnyder. Chakvetadze will come through that section.
I'm looking forward to Roddick's R3 match.

i don't know about the chakvetadze/stosur match...i have a feeling the aussie will come through on the home court, despite chakvetadze's recent record...perhaps it's just wishful thinking...

chuck_ster, i feel like it would be unfair to give Nadal less than a semifinal prognosis--of course that's only what I'm saying, not necessarily thinking.

Funny Emmett, I always considered Haas to be the dangerous player no seed wants to face--don't read much into the beating Roddick gave him at Kooyong.

don't get me wrong, eddy, i originally had picked rafa to win melbourne a few weeks ago, but after the injury and subsequent withdrawal, i have fears that he's not going to make it...though i salivate at the idea of a rafa/blake quarter...that match would carry much behind it- blake's breakthrough to a slam semi/rafa's continuing proof at being an all court- all slam player...it would deserve to go 5 sets...

and for the aussie fans out there, a dream fourth round match is possible between stosur/molik...but that would take a lot of luck and a couple of upsets on molik's part, and don't know if she's quite back to that level...would love to see it though...

I think if looks weren't so important in women's tennis, Chakvetadze would be a star. She's right behind Vaidisova, and ahead of Ivanovic in the rankings. If she passes Nicole, Anna will be the second highest ranked teen.

Inviting some criticism and going out on a limb: Federer, if he beats Roddick on Saturday, will lose in the Australian Open. WHY: Skipping the tournament he usually wins will throw off his rhythm - especially that habit of taking at least 1 week off before any grand slam, which he tends to do but did not do this time around (despite Kooyang being all fun and games, it seems like it's not). Word on the street: some rust is in Federer's game at the moment, which means he's vulnerable. Last-he is playing with a different colored racquet. He will probably get distracted by it. I am just sensing an upset here. I have a 50% chance of being right!

Just saw news of Monfils in the draw. Hopefully he doesn't become just the next Malisse, despite the injuries.

p.s. Random: I used to like Hewitt when he was an elite player despite all the incidents and the "c'mon!"s (big reason why I liked him--he played with a fiery will a la Roddick), but I can no longer ignore the building resume. He stirs trouble wherever he goes, not just with the Argentinians and Blake. The coach argument was the last straw for me; Hewitt has one less fan (not to say that I dislike him).

I liked how you picked Li as the sleeper for the 2nd quarter, I really liked how she played those last two sets against Clijsters in Sydney. She really could've won if some points went the other way, very impressive.

'Blast and mope tennis' - great phrase for those guys, dammit wish I'd thought of it...

I'm with Stephanie on the Li Na pick - this is kind of like the Asian Open and a chance for the Chinese players to step up to the plate ahead of the 08 Olympics.

i see roddick beat federer in kooyong. anyone think it means anything? (it's an exhibition tournament,not quite as meaningless as, say, the fed-nadal exo in hong kong) i don't think it will mean a thing to federer, but i think it will help roddick in his early matches in melbourne.

if they meet again in the semis, though, it may hurt roddick because federer will come with everything (not that he wouldn't anyway, but still...)

Steve: I think you're right on with your take on Roddick/Federer.

Regarding Nadal at Wimbledon, he was broken when serving for the second set, and lost it in a tiebreaker to go down 2 sets to none, then bounced back to win the 3rd set breaker.

thanks, sam, but more importantly, what about tonight? i'm thinking garcia may thrive in the dome. eagles 28, saints, 21.

going to try to watch it at a philly bar in the west village in manhattan, if i can get in

Re Kooyong - I read some of the comment at Chez Pete and it seems that Fed was coming into the net a whole lot more than normal. Coming in on first and second serve. So maybe he was trying out some shots.

I know it doesn't 'count' because Kooyong is only classed as exhibition but I hope that Roddick uses this as good prep to go really deep into the Aussie Open. I have a soft spot for the big lug and reckon the guy is trying to find the formula for getting back on top.

Contrast Roddick's approach with that of Hewitt, for example - the Aussie tennis elite don't seem to keen on helping Lleyton recapture his form now that Rasheed has walked away.

Steve: I think it will be a tough one, but the Eagles pull it out 28-24. I expect Garcia to play better this week, and Westbrook to have another big game, and the Eagles to have enough long drives to keep the dangerous Saints offense off the field just enough. And a key late int by Dawkins to seal it.

Good luck getting in - sounds like fun. I'm having a few friends over for the game ... and keeping my fingers crossed.

Okay- I'm going out on a high reaching limb, but what the hell, it's all just fun anyways.

Agnieska Radwanska beat Ivanovic in the 2nd round then loses to Zvonereva in the 3rd. Chakvetadze beats Stoser and Schnyder to face Sharipova in the 1/4s. With Stoser, this time Chaki gets her and a measure of revenge despite the home town crowd. I think she was still hung over from winning the Kremlin Cup when Stoser beat her last the summer. Na Li beats Safina in the 3rd, which isn't such an upset, then beats Hingis to reach the quarters. Petrova beats Williams if Williams get that far. Vesnina beats Dementieva in the 2nd round in three tough sets for the battle of the blond, young vs. old Elena's. And here's my huge upset of the first week, and sorry Momo and the rest of the Amelie contingency. Mauresmo goes down in the 2nd round against Olga Poutchkova. Eddy- looking forward to hear you tear into my picks.

I've been a bit "outa the loop," but when I saw Stosur play last year (New Haven?), she looked pretty talented, and I think the commentators were saying as much. I'd love to see her make a run, and would definitely love to see Molik get it back.

Hi all,

I didn't get to see either of the latest matches between Roddick and Federer--the one where Roddick had a match point against Federer in Shanghai or the exhibition match recently where he beat TMF. Roddick's win seemed pretty convincing at the exhibition match (at least the score was): 6-2, 3-6, 6-3.

That being said, I'm still skeptical that Roddick can raise and sustain his level of play to beat the Fed in a best of 5-setter in a Slam. But if he's going to do it this year, the Australian and the U.S. Open are his best shots.

I think this year is going to be an exciting one. In my mind, it's this year that will really confirm whether Federer is going to break Sampras' Grand Slam record. My prediction is that he will hiccup this year, in part because of his preoccupation with winning the French, which I think he will win. (He's my favorite anyway.) He has gotten the best of Nadal recently, so his confidence is high.

My prediction is that he will win two Slams--the French and Wimbledon.

I just don't think that physically and mentally Federer can repeat last year's feat of making it to all four finals. If he does, and wins the majority of the Slams, it will confirm in my mind that he is the greatest tennis player of all time.

People like to compare Federer to Sampras and vice versa. They say Federer has a slight edge on overall mastery of the game but that Sampras was more willful and a more so-called clutch player. (I happen to go back and forth over which player would get the best of the other if they played in their primes.)

Here's what really interests me. How will Federer endure over the longhaul--as he gets a little older, and the aches and pains of having been hammered by players like Roddick, Nadal, Safin and Gonzalez over and over again begin to grow, and the demands of the tennis life--living out of suitcases and on room service--and all the stress that puts on one's personal life, will he be able to maintain the drive over the longhaul like Pete did? If you recall, players like McEnroe, Borg, Hingis, the Williams' sisters and even Agassi couldn't stay the course (excuse me for using the ugly Bush phrase). Agassi, of course, refocused his efforts after dropping out for awhile.

Thereotically, Federer could break Sampras' record of 14 slams in two years, if he wins 6 slams total in 2007 and 2008. That is an awesome feat, which I don't think he will do. And if he doesn't, then he will have to show some of the grit and determination later in his career that Sampras did to place himself without debate at the pinnacle of the tennis greats.

I'm looking forward to watching it unfold.

steve, what do u think of that sharapova-clijsters semi? Who will win that tussle? I think we have the winner of the tournament between those two.

Steve- I don't see either Nalbandian nor Nadal making it to the semis. But I tell you what, that third quarter semifinalist spot is up for grab. By far this is the easiest quarter and it's a golden opportunity for Haas, Nalbandian, Kolay, Berdych and Tursunov to grab the spot. If we are to expect one surprise semifinalit, it will be from this quarter.

I don't see Nalbandian nor Kolay making it. Kolay is too negative with himself. He may say what he thinks, but what he thinks is not positive (like USO 06': no one wants to see a Kolay-Youzni final--> which that attitude of mind, he is darn right!). He would have to believe that his making it to the SF matters.

Interesting picture of Clijsters and Sharapova--they look like they are about to French kiss (another love-game). Sorry, I couldn't resist that one.

I agree Steve's first two semi-finalist predictions. If Federer and Roddick meet, I see that as the match that determines the eventual winner. My money's on Fed. Roddick has been playing better of late, but I still see one mental hurdle for him. He tends to play down to his opponents. He definitely brings his A-game against Fed, but seems disinterested at times (think back to Shanghai) when he plays other opponents.

In the third quarter, I don't see Nalbandian and his bum knee winning. I'd ride the hot streak of the X-man instead, with Haas and Berdych as possible stand-ins in case X falters.

In the fourth quarter, I'd go with Blake who has also played well in the last 7 months or so. Certainly better than Nadal, though Rebound Ace would seem to favour Nadal, I'd still prefer Blake with the roll he's on now. Nadal would be my second pick and Murray would be my third.


m-life: do you something about poutchkova i don't? is she that good, or are u thinking mauresmo just doesn't have it right now?

clijsters-sharapova: that's a very tough call. while clijsters has been winning, she had some serious dips in play in sydney. i'll take sharapova in three

Titanium, despite the few posts of yours I've seen, I'm liking the analysis.

Poutchkova-Domachowska match stats (all ratios P:D):
Winners: 11:10
Unforced errors: 25:34
Double faults: 0:10
Break point conversions: (7/12):(4/6)
First serve %: 54:69
Net approaches: (3/5):(2/4)
Hmm...

Jie Zheng owes me something. Money, preferably. She served for the match at 5-3 in the second and ended up losing 4-6 in the third! I'm out of the suicide pool on the WTA side already! Ridiculous!

Lol bummer.

Thanx for the props Eddy. I would post more, but with so many tennis matches to watch and so much porn on the net to surf, I really just don't have the time.

On a more serious note, one thing that really sticks out in my mind with the matches played so far is the difference in the level of fitness between the top-tier players vs. the pretenders and the also-rans.

Watching the Tsonga vs. Roddick match, you just felt that if Tsonga didn't win the second set he really had no shot at that match. He couldn't maintain his level of play and a big part of that was he simply wasn't in good enough shape to win a long 4 or 5 set match. Ditto for Kendrick who had a shot at winning the first set against Nadal, but who faded faster than falling fireworks after that. Yes, his first serve percentage went down, but I feel that's mostly due to Kendrick not being anywhere close to top shape.

Conditioning is an area where having the right coach probably makes a big difference. I was reading a 1989 article on Lendl (Obsession - Ivan Lendl's Lonely Quest For Perfection) in the NY Times recently and here's a piece of the article that includes a quote from from his then-coach Roche that caught my eye:

Roche, a fitness freak himself, concurred that Lendl would win more matches simply by being in better shape. For Lendl, the more grueling the workouts, the better. Roche will stand in the morning in one corner of the court and hit balls at him, running Lendl from side to side nonstop for up to two hours. "I challenge myself," says Lendl. "A lot of people don't want to take the pain. I say, 'Okay, I'm hurting, I don't feel like doing it, but I'm just not going to give up.' And afterward, I feel good."

Interesting observation. I've had the same thoughts at one time or another. Also, fitness is more important at the beginning of the season because of a hot Australia and the fact that most players have a rusty game. On that note, I wish Federer was more open about his fitness regimen. We may not find out until he retires as well. Cheers.
p.s. Usually it's watching tennis and playing golf...lol.

Post a Comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In


  * Only required field   

  (Optional)

  (Optional)

« Opening Remarks The Aussie Suicide Pool »

More from TennisWorld
Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor

More from Concrete Elbow
TENNIS Magazine is published 10 times per year.




Save 75% off of the annual newsstand price.
Categories
2005 Entries
2006 Entries
2007 Entries
2008 Entries
Recent Entries
Deep Tennis: Golden Age
Thrills, Agony, Tennis
Olympic Spirits
Kids These Days
Playing Ball: I Smell a Meltdown
"Who's the Pigeon Now?"
Still With the Aura
Picking Up the Story
Glory Days II: Ruling Class Descent?
Glory Days: Passing Us By?
Statistics
This blog currently has 422 entries and 27755 comments.