Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Blogs  |  Newsletter Store
TENNIS.com - Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   Fitness
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   String Theory
   The Healthy Player
   The Pro Shop
   Backcourt: Framed
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
« Day 13: The Players' Player A Comeback and a Trainwreck »
Day 14: Final Grades
Posted 09/10/2007 @ 1 :05 AM

RogIt was a smooth-running, hard-fought, entertaining, and ultimately predictable U.S. Open. We saw a lot of great matches, the birth of a Grand Slam contender and professional impersonator, an evening with a French magician, signs of life from the American men, and two champions who made it clear once again that they are players for the ages. CE hands out its report cards.

Roger Federer
He didn’t play his best in the final, but just as he did at Wimbledon, Federer used his many years of winning experience to good end. Battling in the clutch isn’t what he’s most famous for, mainly because he’s won so easily in the past. But after all the talk about his style and “genius” and humility and impending sainthood, it’s Federer’s toughness—his stubbornness—that has been his most impressive asset at the majors this year. Nadal and Djokovic have tightened the race with him, but Federer’s serene belief in his skill and superiority—as well as his basic, inexplicable ability to avoid choking—elevated him once again. Seven set points down; seven saved on Sunday. That alone is worth an A+

Justine Henin
Her seventh major and second of 2007 have brought Henin back to the heights she scaled in 2003, before a virus knocked her off stride. This may have been the finest, most comprehensive win of her career. She became just the second player to beat both Williams sisters in a major, made the final a rout from game one, and reminded fans that women’s tennis at its very best can be about all-court variety and stylish athleticism. A+

Novak Djokovic
Federer walked away with the winner’s trophy, but this was Djokovic’s event. His upbeat and offbeat personality made an impression on the world outside tennis, which is a rarity in the U.S., and virtually unheard of from an Eastern European. On the serious side, he reaffirmed, if it needed to be reaffirmed, that he is firmly in the elite Top 3. In fact, he’s so solid and sure of himself it seems like he’s been up there forever—I was surprised to be reminded that this was his first major final. Djokovic won tight matches against Stepanek and Monaco, and he won going away against Del Potro and Moya; he won with craft and he won with power. In the end, the Serb pressed too hard when he saw that he had a chance against Federer, and he did what he never does: Miss when it counts. Still, Djokovic played Federer as well as anyone has in an Open final, never allowing the world’s best to relax and find his best tennis.

On the less-than-serious side, Djokovic is a valuable new personality for tennis, and something different from what we’ve seen before. He’s got the charisma the game is criticized for lacking, but it doesn’t come from raging outbursts like the famous “personalities” of the past. He’s broad-humored, outgoing, high-energy, and not too cool to be a total ham. Djokovic was born for New York—both Flushing Meadows and Broadway. A

Andre Agassi
I heard only 15 minutes or so of his commentary, but it offered more knowledge about the sport as it’s currently played than you get from all other Open broadcasters combined. His only flaw was that he talked too much, but that’s correctable. Wouldn’t it be nice to hear Agassi splitting time with John McEnroe at the Open in the future? For now, seeing Andre’s dome in Ashe Stadium, and hearing the crowd react when they saw him, was one of the nicer moments of the two weeks. A-

David Ferrer
The Spanish bulldog makes the most of what he’s got—he’s been steadily grinding out wins all season. He’d never made much of an impression at a Slam until he came up with the biggest win of his career, over Rafael Nadal in a wee-hour fourth-rounder here. Nice to see his unrelenting, unspectacular competitive ethic rewarded. A-

Venus Williams
This was the reverse of her Wimbledon performance; at the Open, Venus came out on fire, making Ana Ivanovic look like an amateur, but fell to earth after that. Her final game in the semis was a surprisingly tepid finish coming from such a traditionally strong Slam closer. Still, it was nice to have her back in the mix somewhere outside Centre Court. A-

Carlos Moya
After 10+ years, he seems to enjoy it more than ever. This year Charlie brought a nothing-to-lose sense of enthusiasm to the Open that you don't normally get from the top contenders. Icing on the cake. A-

Svetlana Kuznetsova
She reached her second Open final, which gets her this grade. But Kuzzie was given a free pass in the semis when Anna Chakvetadze melted down, and she was awful—tight and slow—when she got to prime time. Kuznetsova remains a formidable athlete in search of the confidence and consistency that should come with that talent. But the WTA deserved a better Open finalist. B+

Anna Chakvetadze
It’s too bad she came up so small on the biggest stage she’s reached, because the young Russian had her best showing at a major and continued her quiet, year-long ascent into the WTA’s upper echelon. Chakvetadze can play, and her court sense and hands are an antidote to power-girl tennis. Was her choke in the semis a rookie moment, or is stage fright going to be an ongoing problem? Only time will tell. B+

Andy Roddick
He brought it all for two brilliant sets against Federer and made us forget his collapse in Australia. It made for an evening of the highest quality tennis. Afterward, Andy said he wasn’t hanging his head, but he was p----ed off. Seems like the appropriate attitude. B+

John Isner
The happy giant is another question mark. Just how well his serve-reliant game will hold up when players adjust to it is impossible to tell right now. But that’s a bridge to be crossed when he comes to it. For now, Isner is a true U.S.-tennis Cinderella story, an aw-shucks college kid who isn’t too cool to show us how thrilled he is to have come so far. His serve is a crowd-pleaser, at least among Americans, and, hey, he took a set from Federer, something even Djokovic couldn’t pull off. B+

JhDonald Young
At 18, the Chicago native has already had a career’s worth of ups and downs. He’s been overhyped and counted out; now he’s finally given us an idea of how he can perform with the big boys. Even in his loss to Feliciano Lopez, Young was one of the most galvanizing athletes on the grounds, serving, attacking, and scrambling like, well, a pro. Now he needs to professionalize his mental approach and leave the emotional roller coaster behind. B+

Fabrice Santoro
It should be a law at the Open: Even if he retires, the impish magician must play a night match in Ashe for the next 10 years. B+

Agnes Szavay
The WTA’s freshest face is this young, hard-hitting, level-headed Hungarian. May we see more of her soon. B+

Nikolay Davydenko
He did everything on cue, playing with machine-like efficiency until he faced Federer. Then he folded. Did you expect anything less—or more? B

Rafael Nadal
He still hasn’t figured out Flushing, but Rafa stuck it out when he was hurt, played deep into the early morning, and didn’t dwell on his injury after his fourth-round loss. B

Serena Williams
She lost her third straight match to Henin and looked far less than her best in doing it. Then she made the absurd comment that her opponent had hit “lucky” shots. Serena doesn’t owe anyone any compliments, but she does owe herself an honest assessment of where her game is and where she wants to take it. A Slam season that began with a bang ended with familiar questions. C+

Maria Sharapova
Her 2007 trajectory was also disappointing—final in Australia, semis at the French, early loss to Venus at Wimbledon, early loss to Radwanska here. Sharapova uncharacteristically let this one slip away at the end, but she didn’t make excuses for it. C

Tomas Berdych
Another dispiriting loss at a major; this time he couldn’t even finish the match. C-

Sam Querrey
A quick first-round defeat to a good player, Stefan Koubek, sent this U.S. hopeful’s stock falling for the moment. C-

Richard Gasquet
He looked pretty healthy while he was announcing that he couldn’t possibly take the court against Donald Young. D

Ted Robinson
It’s time for Johnny Mac’s publicist to leave the booth. D

The Trophy Presentations
The Open always makes a hash of these. They’re by far the worst of the majors. It’s hardly a crime for Dick Enberg to say “Justine Henin-Hardenne,” but it cheapens the moment when the obscene prize money for the winners is trumpeted through the arena. As Enberg said when he was giving Federer his checks and cars and stuffed animals and who knows what else, “I feel like a game-show host up here.” The U.S. Open has prestige; The Price is Right doesn’t. F

| | Send to a Friend
Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 12 13 Next »

Excellent point about Agassi's commentary during the Federer/Roddick match. His cogent analysis of Federer's 3D hitting zones was the first time in a while that someone has said something _new_ about Federer's game. Here's a thought: Andre coaching Federer somewhere down the line (don't laugh; he'd be the perfect philosophical complement to Fed's intellectual approach to the game). At the least, though, getting Andre in the booth for more big matches would be sweet.

Not only should Ted Robinson go, but so should Dick Enberg. Not because of the JHH reference (entirely forgiveable, though not elegant) but because he talks too much, is really quite boring and occasionally drools a bit too much over the good looking women players. He starts sentences without any thought to how he plans to finish them and then ends up talking for another 5 minutes trying to find some convoluted, yet gramatically correct way to finish them! I think McEnroe and Carillo are quite capable of doing the job without him.

How about a B+ for Radwanska? I wouldn't call her a no-name, though she was not a favourite for the title by any means. Kudos to her for challenging the defending champ and finishing her off...and saving our ears for the rest of the tournament to boot!

ziggy, hah, i really like that idea (re andre coaching roger)

great stuff Steve, u and I know that the USTA made Enberg trumpet the US Opne Series payday, and his little joke about it was appropo, I thought .. as long as we have sponsors, we will have that kind of ceremony..i just wish 60 Minutes could chill a bit and let us not be rushed off the stage so quickly...LOVE Wimbledon where they stay for the whole thing and you can really absorb the post match celebrations...

Great assessments, Steve, although I thought a D for Reeshard was too generous! F for the most head-scratching default by a top male player in a GS in my memory.

Thanks for your coverage these last two weeks. Enjoyed it, as always.

Dick Enberg has ALWAYS been grossly effusive and embarrassing in his announcing. You can actually see some of the players squirm in his presence; and rightly so. He's the biggest dork out there.

Spot on marks


I think serena needs to recognise the quality of the players around her, so she will push her self to a higher level which Im sure shes capable of.

Steve --

I have no knowledge about Sharapova's reasons for being in Djoko's box, but I'd give her a pass on that.

She's a champion who was dumped out early, and then was in the news more for someone's impersonation of her than for her own. Assuming Djoko just called her and invited her to come, she showed some spirit -- and some humility -- in showing up.

Plus, I think it's always nice to see players endorse the game they play by watching other players' matches.

In the end, she's just a young athlete, probably alone more than we know.

probably right, nora, probably right.

a pass for lonely maria

enberg gets the score wrong, mispronounces names, doesn't seem to know what's going on half the time, and he makes how much a year? i'll do it for much less and do a better job. get rid of him.

trophy prsentation is horrible, definitely the worse of all the majors. they have to run to show 60 minutes, you don't get to enjoy any of the champion holding the trophy up. such a letdown, esp when your guy wins.

Andre coach Roger? Not THAT's an idea!

oh, and Maria looked great tonight. (well she always does, but still...) (^_-)

Dick Enberg's jowls make him look like a puppet/marionette...take away from that whatever you wish

And by the way I've gained some respect for Sharapova over this US Open. She did not make any excuses about her loss whatsoever, and she showed up in Djokovic's box. I used to hate the bitch, but I think I've changed my mind.

Federer seemed downright googly-eyed when Dick started going over the prize money deets (another record payday) and mentioned the hot new Lexus. Given his bland/blase carriage, I thought that was kinda refreshing, given the fact that he grew up fairly well off and has won bazillions already.

How many more GS titles could the Fedex win? 6? 8? 12 more? Hard to say! He's still a pup.....

Totaly agree with tournament presentation as an F
especialy disagree with your rating of venus. not A+, but at least A performance. that wasn't a tepid effort at all. both players played great, and Henin won. they were the 2 best players of the tournament. both in a rotten draw. Nadal at B is about right I reckon, but although he showed grace in his presser by not dwelling on his injuries, I don't think how you handle a presser should be part of a player rating

Very nice wrapup Steve. I give you an A for an oustanding two week coverage of the event. I would have given you an A+, your writing and insightful observations were really that good, but you lost it in my mind with your N.Y. centric post of traveling to and from Flushing Meadows on some train or another that was immaterial and boring to anyone not living in N.Y. I guess you felt that you had to do it, so I give you a pass on that one. Overall, really great writing.

Now on to your grades. Pretty spot on except for...

Serena Williams. Everyone knows I'm a detractor, but let's be honest, she didn't beat anybody and looked slow and average doing it. When she faced "the challange," for the third straight time, "didn't play her best game." Well why not? That's what champions are made of right? In her own words she has said so many times. Drop her down to a C.

Agnieszka Radwanska. GS got it right. If you are going to grade Agnes Szavay, which is correct, you have got to grade the women who had scored the biggest upset of the tourament on either side. Furthermore, the 2006 newcomer of the year is NOT a nobody. Far more worthy of a player watch than someone like Isner. She showed up, she brought it, and made a name for herself. B+

That's about it. Keep up the good work Steve. Carry on.

On Roger and Justine: .... amen to that.

Ajde Novak! Someone like him was bound to come along. Roddick was thought to be the man, but already two spirited mustangs have passed him in huge leaps and bounds. However, Roddick did well not disappoint in the quarters.

Ferrer, Lopez, Chela, Gulbis, Tsonga and Lee from Korea - they've all moved up the rankings. Congratulations to them. Nadal lost but showed he has character. Way to go, Rafa!

Gasquet - what is wrong with the guy?

Hewitt - I put some of money on him. I was disappointed he was shown the door by Calleri.

Steve, I am missing your grade on Blake.

I do not see Marat but that's fine.

Agassi - would love for him to go back inside the booth more often one day.

Good grades, teacher.

Um.

Carlos Moyà?

Who else at this present US Open, apart from Roger Federer, shows signs of making hard-court GS quarterfinals at age 31? Especially with the grace, humility, enthusiasm, intelligence and clean tennis that Moyà exhibited? Let us not forget that Moyà is just a few points away from the 8th spot in the ATP Race--we could still see him in Shanghai. A tennis player has a short career--I read one site that considered 28 year olds to be veterans. Moyà is still a few wins ahead of Federer in life-time wins amongst active players. He'll be overtaken soon, but I'm quite shocked that you've overlooked him, while giving Andy Roddick an A-.

How? Yes, e came out with a great attitude against Federer and played his very best, but let's remember that still wasn't good enough to take a set. And believe me, I was hoping he'd get at least one. Any good matches before that? He still bullies around weak-returners with his monster serve. You call David Ferrer's style unattractive and gave him a lower grade than Roddick, but what's there to say of a guy who can't win a point once it's played? And let us not remember how well Ferrer played Roddick two weeks earlier. I more than respect everyone's right to feel pride of and loyalty to their country, but what with the embarassing, jingoistic ceremonial display in the final (if it were me, I'd refuse to play at any sporting event where someone's flag tries to steal the whole show--no matter who), I'm not surprised that national colors are enough to get anyone to rate Roddick higher than Ferrer in this tournament.

As for Fed's future slams, he's definitely going to beat Sampras. He's much better, much more complete than Pete ever was. Any objective fan has simply got to love how complete he is--he's top-notch in just about every department. Djokovic is an A- in just about every aspect of his game; Federer is an A! However, this next year, and especially in 2009, we will see him split GS with Nadal and Djokovic much more. Barring disaster, Nadal will four-peat RG, and either/or Nadal or Djokovic will steal at least one set from Roger at Wimbledon. Perhaps Nadal will finally take it; once again, barring disaster, I truly believe he'll win it one day. Djokovic is a legitimate all-court threat, though I disagree with you about his personality and attitude: he has some very ugly gestures. I like his ability to laugh at mistakes and calls that go against him, but in a forum where everyone talks about Nadal's "gamesmanship", what about Djokovic's (in my opinion) strategically placed injury time outs? He picks the right moments to do them, and you don't see the slightest hint of physical discomfort when he plays. Any one who has played a sport at a level slightly above high school or buddy-buddy knows how difficult it is to perform when your body can't move normally. Frankly, I don't think the world number 3, and a legitimate claim to eventually become world number 1, needs to pull this kind of cheap crap.

Correction; I saw that Ferrer and Roddick got the same grade. I do believe Ferrer was a better man this tournament for qualifying above his abilities, but I realize my comments were factual inaccurate (about grading).

Whoever gave you an A+ was spot on, Steve. Reading you during the Open, along with Bodo (and guests) dramatically increases the enjoyment factor of these big tourneys. Thanks.

Steve,
I would drop Kuzzy and Chaki to B considering that the bottom half of the draw was literally filled with upsets. IMO, Venus played a better tournament than Kuzzy and Chaki. Justine had to play A+ tennis to beat Venus but only A- or B+ to beat Kuzzy in the final. Agree with GS & M-Life, Radwanska should have been mentioned. Also, Moya, Haas, and Chela should have been mentioned on the ATP & Peer and Jankovic on the WTA for making the quarterfinals at the USO.
Moya - B Haas - B Chela - B.
Peer - B Jankovic - B.Jankovic would have been B+ but had to win 2 three set matches against Cornet and Bammer.

Then, again, you could have given everyone a grade. On that note, great job by you during the entire 2 weeks.

This was the most disapointing Open ever, there were no great classics. There are only two matches that stand in my mind - Justine v.s Venus and Djokovic v.s Stepanek.

This years grand slams all lack drama and classics. I hope next year Djokovic will be a better player to challenge Federer and Nadal. On women side Maria needs to get herself together. Serena and Venus need to play more so they can be ready for the big tournaments. Serena needs to get a trainer.

Dick Enberg has to go. He is really bad. I certainly got sick of McEnroe and Serena's commerical - played hundreds of times (WE GOT IT). Glad those are over. I also give Mary and John poor sportmanship awards for all the Andy Roddick put downs. Roddick played brilliant tennis - Roger just a few points better. I also give the tournament an (F) for only giving us a few minutes of the great Billie Jean King in the booth. She has one of the best tennis minds.

Mary Carillo gets a D- for her meaningless chatter. And to say that Novak was inspired by Sampras and Agassi while selectively omitting the fact that he said 'he wanted to serve like Sampras, return like Agassi and volley like Edberg' is to suggest that eastern European kids only have American heroes, when the reality is they have tons of people to looks up to including those of tennis fame. The irony is that Edberg won at the US Open too.
The reality is, despite Carillo, the myth that the superstars worth emulating are all American will die a certain death and sooner than we think. There are great champions everywhere, and it is not always necessary to make other sublime inferences at every opportunity.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 12 13 Next »
Post a Comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In


  * Only required field   

  (Optional)

  (Optional)

« Day 13: The Players' Player A Comeback and a Trainwreck »

More from TennisWorld
Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor

More from Concrete Elbow
TENNIS Magazine is published 10 times per year.




Save 75% off of the annual newsstand price.
Categories
2005 Entries
2006 Entries
2007 Entries
2008 Entries
2009 Entries
Recent Entries
The Hot and Sleepy Season
CE 10: Plus One Edition
Playing Ball: Night Game
W: The Rest
W: The Lucky Few
W: Semifinal Preview
W: Sweet 16
W: Totally American
W: At the Crossroads
W: Sunny Afternoon with Roger
Statistics
This blog currently has 591 entries and 39464 comments.