Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Blogs  |  Newsletter Store
TENNIS.com - Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   Fitness
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   String Theory
   The Healthy Player
   The Pro Shop
   Backcourt: Framed
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
« Madrid Musings Message from Madrid »
The CE 10: Madrid/Zurich
Posted 10/18/2007 @ 5 :53 PM

NailsFirst I draw your attention to the (admittedly kinda boilerplate) post I wrote at ESPN.com yesterday. The germ for it came when I couldn’t remember whether Zurich was a Tier I event or not. The tournament website didn’t help; I had to go all the way to the WTA media guide to get confirmation of my suspicions (why else would Serena Williams and Justine Henin ever appear in a draw together?). I’m guessing most fans don’t have access to this guide, and might be left clueless as to the importance of Zurich—not that it will matter for long; the city won’t host the tournament next year.

I know the WTA’s 2009 roadmap emphasizes getting the best players to commit to the biggest tournaments. Just as crucial, though, is that the tour commit itself—and some of its future windfall of dollars from the Middle East—to marketing those events as a recognizable series, which is one thing that the ATP has had success doing.

Anyway, the Madrid Masters is what’s on TV here in the States (we’ll get Zurich over the weekend). I’ve been in and out of our conference room checking up on the matches—some great play at times, some dead silence from the crowds at others. Here’s the rundown, along with a word or two about the women.

1. David Nalbandian: Smiling for a couple seconds against Del Potro. That’s the lead story of the event so far in my mind. I hadn’t seen him play in a while; the first shot I caught today was him scrambling back to hit an overhead from the baseline. Scrambling, of course, is the wrong word. Nalbandian doesn’t scramble; it would be beneath him. I’d forgotten how easily he gets around—he seems to materialize at the ball. And there he was again, right under the overhead, no problem.

2. Novak Djokovic: I had lunch earlier this week with Pete Bodo and two regulars from Tennis World, Juan José and AmyLu. We all agreed: Now that Djokovic has established himself as the third-best player in the world, he needs to learn to assert that fact all the time—in other words, to put the hammer down against the guys not named Federer and Nadal. Djoko has improved in every other way, but he can still lose focus in the middle of a match. This isn’t an uncommon problem for young players—Andre Agassi would take whole sets off, just the way Djokovic did this year in the Estoril final against Richard Gasquet.

3. Roger Federer: Djokovic need look no further than the match after hm today to see how a hammer is put down. Federer was all focus as he shredded Guillermo Cañas in two quick sets. Rather play the waiting game during rallies, the way he often does, Federer played basic, aggressive, forward-moving tennis with no goal other than winning points efficiently. I guess there are still matches and players he can get up for.

4. Rafael Nadal: You’d have to call his performance today against Andy Murray vintage Nadal: flawed, less-than-beautiful, gutsy, amazing at just the right times. The running lob he got over Murray’s head on set point in the tiebreaker, and the way he didn’t allow himself to be broken a second time in the second set marks the guy yet again as the consummate pro, from a mental standpoint. He’s also hitting through his backhand well, always the key with him. Looking forward to seeing him play Nalbandian—aka Smiley Joe—next.

5. Juan-Martin Del Potro: He played the most tenacious tennis I’ve seen from him yesterday against Robredo, then looked unfocused, tired, and too loose today against Nalbandian. He’s not quite ready for the grind of a Masters I guess. But you have to love the way he pounces on any backhand left in the middle of the court. Few players move that well—that enthusiastically—to the backhand side. He loves seeing the ball there.

6. Tatiana Golovin: She rolled Ana Ivanovic 3 and 1 and has Bartoli and perhaps Kuznetsova coming up in Zurich—both winnable matches. A little non-parental coaching can go a long way in the WTA: She’s been working with Mats Wilander and has been playing very good tennis for the last few months. She should be a major story coming into the new year.

7. Doug Adler (Tennis Channel commentator): OK, Doug, why don’t you just state at the beginning of the tournament that every player should come to the net more and be done with it. But then what would you say the rest of the week?

8. Andy Murray: Great to have him back and playing well. His drop shot alone adds more to the sport than some players’ entire games (not naming names, cough, cough Feliciano Lopez cough, cough). But he played just well enough to lose today. Going down 7-5 in a breaker, then surrendering a 4-2 lead in the second betrayed just a slight lack of belief against a guy of Nadal’s stature. Otherwise, good show.

9. Fernando Verdasco: How do you think he feels when he gets into a close match with a top player? Is there ever a moment when he believes he won’t blow it this time? Or does he just know it’s coming? That was what was most depressing about his three-set loss to Djokovic: It was 100 percent predictable.

10. Justine Henin/Agnieska Radwanska: I don’t think the teen is a good matchup for Henin, but I would like to see this. A good test of her potential, at least.

11. Bonus track: The best song to namecheck Zurich? That would be “Zurich is Stained,” always my favorite Pavement song. Its slacker tone alone makes me want to hang out in the city. Hopefully there will be a pro tournament there in the future.

See you in a couple days. Enjoy the quarters, and someone fill me in on the women''s matches if you catch them.

| | Send to a Friend
Comments

1 2 3 4 Next »

Steve,
I don't know what you call less-than-beautiful in Nadal's game. Give me a list of the year's best three matches and see if Rafa is not a contender in at least two of them. The way he plays and the excitement he brings to tennis is just a blessing and is more-than-beautiful!

if beautiful means boring one-sided matches of (cough cough ...you know who!), I am not for it!

i guess i just meant it was a struggle. no disrespect, zr!

i've never loved his backhand, though.

Steve,
I came back to write that I know how much you like Rafa. I guess just the terms "beautiful" and "ugly" don't make justice to his game.

You must be kidding. You really don't like his two-handed backhand? cross court? I love that one.

It was a struggle. You are right. But who else (maybe other than federer) could stand that sort of pressure other than Rafa?

btw, I just got Brad Gilbert's "winning ugly" book and watching the match I thought, Oh God, what has Brad thought Murray? I guess in mental toughness Rafa is still the king.

Why anyone would want tennis to end after the US OPen is beyond me. These recent and current events have really been loaded and very enjoyable. You had better bring your game and be ready to play in the first match. That makes for some upsets and good matches. This is far better tennis than that depleted US OPen Series, the greatest road skip in sports. No wind, fast courts, and most of the top players. I prefer outdoor tennis so long as the weather is good, but indoor tennis has its own attraction.

What makes Nadal's efforts here so exemplary is that the guy hasn't played a match of any kind since losing to Ferrer in the US Open Round of 16 over six weeks ago, and then had to overcome the knees. Right about the second set as Vintage Nadal: down a break, and also down 15-40 on his serve, he reeled off 4 straight games to take the match. Combined with his lack of play & injury it makes it even more impressive.

I repeating it again: when he wants Verdasco can play worst tennis than any other pro in this planet. What a brainless joke of a player. And to see Verdasco and Feliciano playing doubles together is almost comical...or maybe a tragedy for tennis lovers. and I remember that Almagro is the worst mannered and unpolite player I have seen in years. What a shame those 3 are for spanish tennis. Thanks god we have Rafa, Ferrer and -sigh- Robredo...

Feliciano Lopez adds his much needed beauty to the tour!

Well said, nyc!!!

"Feliciano Lopez adds his much needed beauty to the tour!"

i second (or third?) that :)

Lopez does have an elegant game. He's tall and powerful, but moves with deceptive grace and speed, and has an incredible serve.

this is from times online:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/tennis/article2689810.ece

...The wonder of Nadal’s play is how he is able to conjure winners from defensive positions, how he can stay in rallies when most other players would give up on them, how he can reach drop shots that others would not dare to dream that they could lay a racket on. And he is supposed to be wondering about how fit he is having missed the past two months with tendinitis in his knees. Heaven help the rest when he is fully fit. ....
---------------

Rafa won Murray in AO and the lost to Gonzo. I hope he has not killed himself tonight and can overcome Nalby tomorrow.

Bob -

Does he really? I didn't notice. That guy is simply too pretty to focus on his tennis much.

Steve,
The WTA will play in Zurich but it will be a Tier II tourney in 2008. I believe that TTC will have tape delayed coverage on Zurich on Sat and Sun due to Madrid(and rightfully so) getting coverage every day.

It is unfortunate that the tournaments conflict. I'm honed in on college football all day Saturday, but will watch the Zurich final on Sunday, and try to watch the Madrid final. Madrid has been full of good matches, and I expect more of them. Zurich will probably be a Henin-Golovin final again, which was a good match in Stuttgart.

Congratulations on your post Steve. I really enjoyed it. The picture is excellent Nalbandian looks really happy. Hope he keeps the smile tomorrow.

Zurich without Hingis is just uninteresting.

== if beautiful means boring one-sided matches of (cough cough ...you know who!), I am not for it! ==

zolarafa, I completely agree! I'll take Nadal's not-beautiful-but-always-exciting tennis over Federer's so-perfect-its-utterly-boring any day of the week. When we look back at all the classic memorable matches we can see that Nadal is responsible for more of them than Federer.

Steve, I have to say that I've found Lopez pretty impressive lately. My earlier opinion of him was Too Much Shot Maker/Not Enough Shots Made, plus little to no backhand. Were he righthanded he might not have been top 100.

But his match v Federer at the Open was very different: controlled, measured, rewardingly consistent and yet explosive at the right times, too.

(Funny, every guy but one is measured by the way in which they play against, and then lose, to Federer.)

Plus, and I could be mistaken here, isn't he coming in a whole lot more than he used to? Against Ferrer today he was downright entertaining in his all court play. And he seriously laid into some backhands.

Drop shots? Ehh, not so much.

Speaking of coming in and Doug Adler, the constant comments he makes about that haven't penetrated the aural fog through which I listen to matches, but for my money it's a legitimate criticism of many players. Even Nadal's been playing the net more often, and Adler was right today in saying that Nadal's adding that to his game will help lengthen his career.

closeted fan,

federer matches can be exciting even without rafa in it. take a look:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVVgTGgL1WE

this coming from a fellow rafanatic. :)

closetfan was the WImbledon final boring as well? i wish people could enjoy Rafa without playing the "boring" card every time against the greatest player of this or probably any era, who offers us jaw dropping points in every match he plays...

boring indeed!

Tim: why do you bother? I thought you were in your happy place for the rest of the year?

skip: ok, will now actually watch federer-lopez tomorrow.

it is a legit criticism, but is it suddenly going to happen in these matches? murray got to net on matfch point today and...had the ball blown by him.

not to say they shouldn't add to their games etc., etc.

thx ncot for the video.

how can anyone watch him play and call it boring? i thought the shot making by both was high quality. it reminded me of the YEC match fed/nadal. if the video had only showed federer from the knees down i would watch. his footwork alone is amazing. add to that the beauty of his ground strokes but it's not just about the forehand and the backhand but the sheer variety of shots he creates from the two. add to that watching him think on court. it always seems as though he is a couple of strokes ahead of his opponent. when watching him play i find myself not even watching the ball most of the time or the other player, my eyes are glued to him.

i say this not because i am a BIIIGGGG KAD but because he is just utterly beautiful to watch. nough said

night all

Federer is the most exciting player in history, all things considered. The shotmaking he displays is often beyond belief. His movement is cat-like. He has every shot in the history of tennis and some which nobody has ever hit except him. His mathes are often blow-outs, so there isn't much suspense; but that's simply another measure of his greatness, against all comers, on every surface except against a single player on clay. I often turn off golf tournaments once Tiger gets a four shot lead with 9 to play, because of the lack of suspense, but his golf is anything but boring.

tim--i just don't get it. are they watching the same player we are? obviously NOT. let's forget about TMF/JETBOY, the KAD'S and the KAD haters and just talk about the tennis. what would truly be BORING would be to have one without the other. all of you should count yourselves blessed to be in this time to watch two such great champions play. i know i do.

night all (this time for reals)

I'm watching a re-play of the Federer match presently. Just breathtaking stuff, so aggressive and brilliant that I'll take it over some tense slug fest between ball-bashing two-handed players any day, no matter how well they are playing. Federer is just on fire. To watch him, and then Henin in the women's game, is really a treat. We'll never see another player like him, and he sure had it all on display against Canas.

1 2 3 4 Next »
The comments to this entry are closed.

« Madrid Musings Message from Madrid »

More from TennisWorld
Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor

More from Concrete Elbow
TENNIS Magazine is published 10 times per year.




Save 75% off of the annual newsstand price.
Categories
2005 Entries
2006 Entries
2007 Entries
2008 Entries
2009 Entries
Recent Entries
The Hot and Sleepy Season
CE 10: Plus One Edition
Playing Ball: Night Game
W: The Rest
W: The Lucky Few
W: Semifinal Preview
W: Sweet 16
W: Totally American
W: At the Crossroads
W: Sunny Afternoon with Roger
Statistics
This blog currently has 591 entries and 39421 comments.