Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Blogs  |  Newsletter Store
TENNIS.com - Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   Fitness
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   String Theory
   The Healthy Player
   The Pro Shop
   Backcourt: Framed
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
« Going Up Swinging DC Wrap »
Answering the Questions
Posted 12/01/2007 @ 10 :47 PM

ArjbIn the third set of Saturday's doubles match, just after the Bryan brothers had broken for the first time and put one hand firmly on the Davis Cup, the big screen at the top of Memorial Coliseum flashed back to the last time the U.S. was in this position, in 1995. That was against the Russians as well, and the screen was full of the man who beat them single-handedly and in dramatic fashion that year, Pete Sampras. I looked toward the sideline to see whether the player he beat to clinch that weekend, Yevgeny Kafelnikov, happened to be watching. Instead, it was Andy Roddick who was standing, his full attention on the screen above. When the clip ended and Sampras was shown saying, "it was one of the greatest accomplishments of my career," Roddick clapped loudly and nodded in satisfaction.

Those well-known pictures of Sampras winning and falling to the clay in agony must have been an inspiration to Roddick for years, but his relationship to them was about to change. After seven years of toiling in Ostrava, Bratislava, Seville, Göteborg, and dozen of other far-flung tennis outposts, he wasn't going to have to live up to those legendary images anymore.

Neither were James Blake and Patrick McEnroe, or Mardy Fish and Robby Ginepri, for that matter. That's because their teammates, the Bryan brothers, after two close sets, had broken the serves and spirits of their Russian opponents Nikolay Davydenko and Igor Andreev. The Bryans would get one more break for good measure, and after Bob popped a volley off the court and into the stands, this generation of American men finally had a team title to call their own.

The third point in the tie was never seriously in doubt Saturday, but for a set and a half it hadn't exactly been easy. One shot-maker can do a lot of damage on a doubles court, even if the format isn't his specialty, and Igor Andreev proved that today. We know he has one of the most explosive forehands around, but watching it up close I was surprised by how viciously he cuts at it. In his practice session in the morning I thought he was swinging as hard as he could just for the hell of it. But as the match began it was clear this was how he hits it all the time—by the end of the match I was half-expecting his arm to fly off.

To warm them up for Andreev, the Bryans had asked Robby Ginepri to hit his forehand "as hard as he could." That's about all you can do to get ready for it, but Andreev still set the bros back on their heels with a few nasty returns and mid-court bullets. More surprising was Andreev's skill around the net. Despite his beyond-extreme forehand grip, he adjusted well up there and knocked off a series of angled backhand volleys, including one that he flicked in the opposite direction at the last second. The Russians stayed back even on their first serves and never poached—returns from the Bryans that would have been mauled by most teams floated down the middle of the court unharmed—but they still matched the Americans hold for hold.

No matter how vicious, you can only rely on ground strokes for so long against a net-crowding team who knows what it's doing. The Russians went up 3-1 in the tiebreaker, but that's when they finally fell back to earth. The turnaround came at 3-3, when Bob outrallied Andreev in a crosscourt forehand exchange. Three points later, Andreev, hero of the first 12 games, double-faulted the set away for the Russians. When Davydenko was broken one game later, the floodgates were open.

At that point, the Bryans appeared to begin moving in fast forward. They walked more quickly between points, knuckle-bumped in a hurry, and snapped off their volleys with more disdain. Each of them foot-faulted at least once—they may have just been in too much of a rush to throw themselves into the court and put the team one point closer to the Cup.

As for the Russians, they kept firing forehands into the Bryans defenses but couldn't find a way through. Three blasts from the baseline would just lead to a fourth that flew long. The Bryans kept moving forward, into the Russian attack—Mike knocked one forehand volley for a winner as he was ducking. The Bryans crowded closer and closer to the net, as if it were the finishing line for the Davis Cup and they were in a neck-and-neck race to pound each ball away. Two points before they reached that finish line, the crowd made them pause for a deafening roar and the big-screen camera panned to Roddick, who had tears in his eyes.

Throughout the week, Roddick said that even after seven years, getting to play Davis Cup for his country remained a "surreal experience." When a reporter told him that his win Friday tied him with Arthur Ashe for Davis Cup victories, Roddick looked dumbstruck. He was silent for a second, then said that hearing his name with Ashe's was "insane."

Unlike the Bryans, Fish, or Blake, Roddick still strikes me as an accidental tennis player, a guy who might have naturally gone to baseball or basketball. He says his parents didn't know anything about tennis when they were younger, but they liked individual sports so they put his older brother, John, in a clinic as a kid. Eventually Andy followed him onto the court.

Roddick is a cocky guy, no question, but he still brings a "do I really deserve to be here?" attitude to representing the U.S. The fact that he's had to live with names like Agassi, Sampras, and Courier ringing in his ears hasn't helped. When he reached No. 1 in 2003, he might have plausibly believed that he was going to succeed them as the next great American champion. It hasn't worked out that way in the Grand Slams, but that's only made the quest to win a Cup—a tradition among top U.S. players—that much more important to Roddick.

Today's win is the culmination of years of team effort from a group of guys who have taken a lot of criticism. But it's Roddick's win more than anyone else's. He's the guy who has played everywhere, played hurt, and made a specialty of clinching ties. His dedication to DC, which has been deeper for a longer period of time than Sampras' or Agassi's was, let people know that the U.S. cared about the event again. For years, the best American players were more committed to winning individual major titles than Davis Cup titles; now the U.S. may be more committed to the team concept than any other country (we'll see what happens now that they've won it, but that's not a question for today). One reason the Americans won this weekend is simply that all of their best players were there, while one of Russia's, Marat Safin, didn't show.

We could hear the boys coming in the press room today. Blake, Roddick, Ginepri, Pat Mac, the Bryans, John Isner, Donald Young, and other assorted hangers-on chanted "U.S.A.!" on the way in. They careened through the door with cups in their hands, their hats on sideways, and what I can only assume was beer all over their shirts. As Roddick sat down, he yelled to the room at large, "I'm not answering sh--!"

When it comes to his place in U.S. Davis Cup history, he doesn't have to anymore.

| | Send to a Friend
Comments

1 2 3 4 Next »

Great post..this really is such a historic match. Andy desreved this. He gets so much critism for not beating Federer and not living up to the American tennis predecesos. He really proved himself.

Great day for Blake..a real class act player..happy he has an important title

awe man Steve - this was a great post! I had to leave right after the US win (thank goodness for good humoured friends who don't mind my being late..) and just got back. I'm still all sorts of psyched for the boys!

I think the dedication to davis cup will remain there - at least for this particular team. Between the long road to the final win, and the fact this team truly seems to be a 'team', i'm seeing them wanting to play and win davis cup for while. I may of course be a cock-eyed optimist, but i'm thinking this it important in a real way to these guys, its not just a notch in their belts.

either way - glad you're there - and thanks for the posts!

Dar Steve T.
This is the most moving and im;ressive tennis article I have read in years. Warmest thanks.
Dan Scarlett
Santa Rosa California

Grrrrreat post Steve! Though I'm not a big Roddick fan, he thoroughly deserved this one. At least he now has this great achievement to his name even more Slams aren't coming (and may not at the rate Fed, Rafa & co are going). Many kudos to him and the team. Ecstatic for Blake too!!

Im very happy for Andy, James the Bryan brothers and Pat McEnroe. They are a team, they've dealt with a lot and this weekend it all paid off.

I think loads of top tennis players are cocky...but at the same time I think Andy is pretty respectful and gives credit to other players when he loses. And with all he has had to deal with (e.g. Federer, the new young guns) I think he has really hung in there and showed a lot of fight and heart.

Congrats to Team USA...I'm really happy for these guys!

go andy!!! do not answer sh*t!!! hahaha. really funny guy. if there's one who deserve it the most, it's really roddick.

i hope he solves federer one day. but one milestone at a time, they say...today is for celebrating their win! congrats USA!

Great article, I was so happy for Andy, standing there with tears in his eyes.

The US team is no fluke winner, between Andy and James and the Bryans, it's amazing it took them so long.

I'm thrilled for the Americans, they were most deserving.

Do you think Roddick punched his ticket for Newport with this win?

I said a few weeks back that Roddick's accomplishments match up very well with any other "one slam wonder" who ever played, and that's especially true now. Before he's finished, he will have accomplished more than Chang or Gerulitis, I believe. Unlike most other uni-slammers, his failure to win more has been the doing of one single opponent, who just happens to be the most gifted to ever pick up a racquet. Is he hall of fame material? I'll let someone else decide, but all American fans ought to be proud of his career.

Steve - Great Post. Reading your take on the matches has been almost as good as watching the USA finally get the monkey off their back. You are correct in giving Roddick his due. When you look at the teams that won in 1995 and 1992, you have to wonder why they did not win more. But the "biggies' did not play that often. Roddick does and endures the clay courts all over the world and finally wins the big one. Thanks for the great coverage.

yup, I agree Steve, and I think other guys on the team wanted to win it for Roddick as well---he seems to be the baby brother on the team, not the annoying one (okay may be sometimes), but more the one that you want to make sure is always doing alright

Thanks for a great read, Steve. Andy, Blake, Mike, Bob, and Patrick deserved this tremendously. Go USA!!!

"One reason the Americans won this weekend is simply that all of their best players were there, while one of Russia's, Marat Safin, didn't show" IMO Marat's absence has nothing to do with the win by the American team. The tie might have been more competitive (depending on which Marat showed up), but I feel confident that the Americans would still be holding the Cup this morning.

Steve, great post.

'After seven years of toiling in Ostrava, Bratislava, Seville, Göteborg, and dozen of other far-flung tennis outposts, he wasn't going to have to live up to those legendary images anymore.'

Patrick McEnroe said something to that effect too after the win. Finally team USA has a win after all these years.

--------------------------------------------------------

Rewinding back to when Pete won the Davis Cup for the U.S. , he was a little dejected when the reaction to the win back home was petty lukewarm. He expected a better recognition, but that did not happen - might have played a little part in pushing Davis Cup lower in his list of priorities. Cannot blame him.

----------------------------------------------------------

The Russians played doubles in an unconventional way. It is not going to work against a top doubles who are great at crowding the net, but this also showed how the power/spin of the groundies has made volleying more dificult.

The Bryans have pretty much all the strong points for a great doubles team - quick reflexes at the net, great volleys, Bob's serve and Mike's return and decent groundies.

In this match, Bob was able to trade forehands with Davydenko and often times coming up on the winning side. He was camping to his right and there was no way Davydenko could have found his backhand - throw in the poaching/volleying/moving abilities of Mike at the net and the Bryans had an upper hand.

Other than the final three sets of Youzhny vs Blake, this tie was bland - this neutral tennis fans perspective. But I understand nationalism, and given the reality of Fed's dominance of tennis, you must revel when you can. Congratulations Team America!

Terrific post, Steve. You vividly evoke the wonderful Davis Cup spirit of the squad, particularly Andy's. On your point about Andy as an "accidental player",however, I would say that such a description truly applies to Blake, and is something that Andy has constructed as a defense mechanism, late in the game.

It strikes me that James has never truly "believed" he deserves to be at the top of world tennis. James' extraordinary sportsmanship towards Roger in all those matches--his over-the-top complimentary comments after all those losses--seem to me to be examples of how James, when confronted with the ultimate challenge, just does not "truly believe" that it is his destiny to reach the top. The top players play those moments as if they were in the zone, oblivious to all other implications. James, and all those other much less talented players who truly should not ever believe in that type of destiny, are unable to get into that zone. At the crucial moments, the magnitude of the possible achievement enters their brains, and, for whatever reason (and that is the real mystery) they freeze up.

In the case of James, who is from the same area of Ct. that I'm from, there is a ready expalnation. He was a top junior player in our region, but our region is much less competitive than Florida or California. It was only until late in his development, the Harvard years, that he began to show true potential. It is reasonable to assume that when he turned pro his greatest, reasonable, expectation was to get a good enough ranking to keep him on the main Tour. It's a long psychic journey from that kind of mind set to beating Federer.

In Andy's case, the story is different and that is the reason why I don't buy the "accidental" tag for him. He was identified as the next big thing by the USTA very early on. Part of his cocky arrogance has always seemed to me to stem from that kind of early favored nurturing. I sense that he was always expected to be Number 1. I believe his "accidental" vibe these days is a defense mechanism to the shellacking, physical and mental, that he was suffered at the hands of two players he never expected to show up at his party: Fed and Rafa. Andy's aside to the cameras in mid-US Open comeback mode in his final with Roger ("I am having so much fun" or something like that), is something I just don't think he would have ever uttered at a similar point in the match as he was beating Ferrero to win the Opne all those years ago. At that time he was exactly in the zone he had occupied throughout his tennis career, and there was no reason for him to expect anything would change in the foreseeable future.

I don't get how people brand andy as cocky. he has a sarcastic streak for sure which too often gets mistaken for being cocky. he understands his place in US tennis history and has a real deep respect for those that have come before him. i would say when it comes to things that matter, he is more humble than cocky.

thank you steve it's a great piece and ajv: your post is one of the most insightful about Roddick and Blake I've read for a long time. I completely agree.

I think there are 2 different things here:

the first one is that yes, perhaps Roddick is an "accidental" tennis player meaning that he'd fell into tennis "by accident" and wasn't really "predestined" for that discipline, as a kid his parents weren't on court breathing down his neck and pushing him like crazy as Agassi or Sharapova were, but that does not make his presence at the highest level surprising or just an act of luck ("ooops I won the USO and just now, the Davis Cup with my buddies, what I am doing here & how come??"). All this is well deserved and despite his, ahem, shortcomings Roddick is a hardworker who takes his craft-tennis very very seriously. I mean he's got a lot of trophies to be proud of and he earned them fair and square.

The second thing is, it's just the way Roddick deals with journalists and the fact that he had to "rewrite" his professional narrative when not living up (completely, let's not forget he won the USO, ok?) to the so-called "hype" a lot of people had put on his shoulders. When I look at his reactions during the week end, I think of him as being a bit self-conscious/aware, courteous and respectful of the moment & of his colleagues (when someone says he's on the same plane as A. Ashe (3/4 slams winner) about Davis Cup what should he say exactly? something like "YOU BET I AM !!!!!"). I mean, come on !

One last comment about this, in L'Equipe someone has written one of the best despiction of what was happening yesterday after the Big Win: that the patriotic pride is immedialtely "trumped" by more personal feelings (which stems from the friendship between the players and all the ups and downs they lived together). I think it's really true and that explains a lot of the subduedness I saw last night which explains some of Roddick's reactions.

------
"La victoire des Etats-Unis en finale de Coupe Davis (3-0) est la concrétisation d'une histoire amicale forgée par le temps, les échecs et la persévérance. En grattant, on touve bien des traces de fierté patriotique, mais celle-ci est tout de suite rattrapée par des sentiments plus intimes et exclusifs. "

http://www.lequipe.fr/Tennis/breves2007/20071202_131129Dev.html


I would say Roddick and Blake are at least as good as Sampras and Agassi, now that they have brought home the most prestigious prize in Tennis, aka DC. Maybe, Roddick and Blake are even better players than Sampras and Agassi, because they have managed to win this most coveted prize in Federer-era, when nobody other than Nadal can win any meaningful thing.
So Roddick > Sampras and Blake > Agassi.

Thank you, Steve, for this insightful post. I have to admit that I'm taken by your writing style. Your "periodic" sentences -- how English class is that!! -- flow smoothly and lead my eyes on and on.

You also put words to something I haven't been able to articulate... Roddick as an "accidental tennis player." It fits. Roddick discovered his massive serve goofing around on court one day. His forehand is a violent action that players seem to have adjusted to in the last few years. And, according to Agassi (from the booth at USO, Roddick vs. Federer) Roddick's back hand will never be a threat because he pushes instead of swings.

However, now, after winning the DC, Andy's tennis techniques and abilities have taken him to the lofty levels of tennis history. He will have to deal with his own private Idaho of "insanity," that of seeing his name alongside Arthur Ashe's.

Maybe team sports is for Roddick. The DC team worked for Andy. He loves his mates. He was the biggest cheerleader on that bench; and, it bolstered his confidence, too.

During the Olympics in Athens, Roddick seemed to be the sole American cheering for Mardy Fish as his game imploded against his Chilean opponent. Instead of a coach, maybe Andy needs a team of coaches. Some mates who'd warm the bench and warm Andy's heart as he begins another year of trying to improve his ranking.

This is a well deserved Davis Cup for the US team. They arne't the best in the world rankings as individuals, but there isn't another country that could outplay Roddick/Blake/Bryans. It's clear that these guys enjoy being on the team together, and they're the best US team since Sampras/Aggasi/Courier/McEnroe. It's important for all these guys...that this year's team won the DC, to dispel the doubts and close the deal. Well done to Patrick McEnroe! He stuck with these guys, and kept them on couse to attain what they certainly had the talent to attain.

ajv, that's a good post and a good point that roddick when he was younger thought of himself as someone who should be no. 1, and was a top prospect, unlike blake; it's no accident that's he's a top pro. i mean that his personality and family background strike me as not typical in tennis for whatever reason. the bryans: those guys are u.s. tennis all the way.

watching roddick react to hearing his name with ashe, you couldn't help but believe that he was amazed—no constructed humility there.

embug: what's a "periodic" sentence?

one thing; tarpischev said he would have gone with andreev sunday. why not use him saturday? he's beaten roddick at least twice

"periodic" sentence: I was wondering the same thing!!!


Congrats to Pat McEnroe! He put the right group of players together, kept them together through good and bad times and didn't give up on James Blake. This winning team and their willingness to play for him year after year is a testament to his skills as a Davis Cup Coach.

Go Patrick!!!!!!!!

As a huge fan of Andy Roddick since 2002, seems the author and everyone else here seems to have forgotten how the USA got to the final. It was the two wins that Andy Roddick had against Sweden that put us in the final. James Blake lost his match in the semis and it was up to Andy to win both his matches and he did, convincingly. He is not an 'accidental player' and his humor in press conferences is refreshing. I had the privilege of meeting Andy several times and he is polite, articulate, loves the game, loves his fans and still has the best serve in the game, past and present. he's been unfairly written off on many occasions by the press and he didn't deserve it. I believe he would have won 2 or 3 more slams if not for some guy named Roger, who beats everyone, not just Roddick/. Andy has been in the top 10 for 5 years now. That's no accident!!!!

Congrats to the frat boys, let the kegger begin! sounds like it already has in the presser,

awww but it saw sweet to see Pat Mac get teary on match point, they deserve the spotlight after so many disappointments...

a blowout was a tad anticlimactic but oh well...

1 2 3 4 Next »
Post a Comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In


  * Only required field   

  (Optional)

  (Optional)

« Going Up Swinging DC Wrap »

More from TennisWorld
Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor

More from Concrete Elbow
TENNIS Magazine is published 10 times per year.




Save 75% off of the annual newsstand price.
Categories
2005 Entries
2006 Entries
2007 Entries
2008 Entries
2009 Entries
Recent Entries
The Hot and Sleepy Season
CE 10: Plus One Edition
Playing Ball: Night Game
W: The Rest
W: The Lucky Few
W: Semifinal Preview
W: Sweet 16
W: Totally American
W: At the Crossroads
W: Sunny Afternoon with Roger
Statistics
This blog currently has 591 entries and 39464 comments.