Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Blogs  |  Newsletter Store
TENNIS.com - Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   Fitness
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   String Theory
   The Healthy Player
   The Pro Shop
   Backcourt: Framed
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
« IW: Dunzo CE 10: Keys to the Key »
KB: Biscayne Brackets
Posted 03/26/2008 @ 12 :22 PM

SerenaThe pro-tennis schedule is just one illogical quirk after another. We start with a Slam, go six weeks with nothing, then play two identical big events over the course of three weeks. Brad Gilbert—remember him?—has said that he thinks winning the Indian Wells-Key Biscayne double is more difficult than winning a major, and it hasn’t been done all that often (with the predictable exception of Roger Federer, who did it twice in a row in 2005-’06). As individual tournaments, these are two of the very best on the calendar and prove that two genders are better than one. But for players and TV viewers, there’s a sameness to them that robs each of some of its status and uniqueness. Pete Bodo has suggested in the past that Key Biscayne become a Har-Tru tournament. This would give it a Pan American flavor and differentiate it from Indian Wells, while utilizing a recognizably U.S.-based surface (which, since the demise of the U.S. summer clay circuit, isn’t used for any big men’s tournaments these days). Not a bad idea, in my opinion.

That’s obviously not what we’re dealing with in 2008. What we are dealing are slow hard courts, high humidity, and draws that look like these. The men’s side is packed again, and the women’s, despite Maria Sharapova’s withdrawal, is stronger than the one that showed for Indian Wells. There are storylines to follow on both sides, as Novak Djokovic continues his assault on the Federer-Nadal hegemony, while IW winner Ana Ivanovic tries to navigate through a field featuring Justine Henin, the Williams sisters, and Anna Chakvetadze.

The Women
First Quarter
The last time we saw Henin she was beaten by Schiavone in Dubai; before that she had won in Antwerp but gotten waxed in a 6-0 second set by Sharapova in Australia. Now the world No. 1 will try to regain the momentum she had at the end of last season. She doesn’t have the easiest section in which to do it. The third round could bring the hard-working Maria Kirilenko, the fourth Agnes Szavay, and the quarters, as usual, defending champion Serena Williams (can we agree that draw-fixing might be in order here, to keep these two apart a little longer?) To reach Henin, Williams will need to get past Patty Schnyder, who she recently beat in straight sets in Bangalore.
Semifinalist: Serena Williams

Second Quarter
Kuznetsova is the top seed, followed by Venus Williams. Intermittently dangerous names like Radwanska, Peer, and Bartoli are floating between them, but I wouldn’t bet on any of them to put together a long run of excellence. Peer did knock off Kuz in three sets here last year, but she hasn’t been at her best lately. As for Kuz vs. Venus, they’re 3-3 lifetime, with Williams winning their last meeting, at Wimbledon in 2007. She’ll be more rested than the Russian, who just reached the final of IW. That could make a difference by the time they play in the deep humidity of South Florida.
Semifinalist: Venus Williams

Third Quarter
Anna Chakvetadze returns to the tour as the No. 5 seed and has been slotted across from No. 4 Jelena Jankovic. Chakvetadze has a slightly deeper minefield to traverse: Mirza, Schiavone, and Dementieva, compared to Petrova, Knapp, and, um, Safarova (?) for Jankovic. The Russian holds a surprising 6-3 edge over the Serb and should be fresher after skipping IW.
Semifinalist: Anna Chakvetadze

Fourth Quarter
The final section of the women’s draw includes a couple of potentially intriguing match-ups. Ivanovic could face Davenport in the third round, while a semi-sinking Vaidisova is in the same half as a semi-rising Hantuchova, though the Czech would have to get past Zvonareva to make that happen. Ivanovic is on a roll and still hungry, and there’s no reason to think she won’t keep it going at least until the semis.
Semifinalist: Ana Ivanovic

Semis: Serena Williams d. Venus Williams; Chakvetadze d. Ivanovic
Final: S. Williams d. Chakvetadze

Djoko

The Men
First Quarter
Federer comes in looking to regain his form after a few uncharacteristic defeats. He’ll start with the winner of Isner-Monfils, move on to his countryman Stanislas Wawrinka, and then perhaps get the winner of Hewitt-Robredo. The bottom half of this section offers a tantalizing round of 16 possibility: Roddick vs. Tsonga, who had a memorable tussle in Melbourne in 2007. I’ll pick a rested Roddick if that match comes to fruition, but I can’t pick him over Federer, even if Rog is off-form, in the quarters.
Semifinalist: Roger Federer

Second Quarter
Davydenko-Murray and Youzhny-Ferrer are the highest-seeded pairs for the round of 16, and you’re guess is as good as mine as to who makes it out the section. Along the way, Davydenko could be tested by Gulbis or Kohlschreiber; Murray by Ancic in the second round; and Youzhny by Safin, a surging Mardy Fish, or Almagro. Ferrer, who plays well in Key Biscayne but may be ready for a slump (he lost to Taik-Lee in IW), has the easiest draw. He’s play the winner of Tipsarevic-Verdasco in the third round. It’s a solid section and ripe with potential upsets.
Semifinalist: David Ferrer

Third Quarter
Djokovic is obviously the man to beat in this quarter, and I’m not going to pick Andreev, the seed closest to him, to pull any upsets again. The other side is headed by Richard Gasquet, which means it’s up for grabs (Gasquet was a big disappointment against Blake at IW, seemingly going through the motions against a guy he’d never lost to before). The other seeds here are Ferrer, Berdych, and Lopez; the other players of note are Del Potro, Tursunov, Nishikori, and Querrey. But you can’t bet against the the defending champion, Djokovic, right now, even if he will be tired.
Semifinalist: Novak Djokovic

Fourth Quarter
Nadal and Nalbandian are the players to beat at the bottom of the draw. James Blake is the most threatening guy between them, and he’s scheduled to face Nalbandian in the round of 16, while Nadal could get Mathieu. Otherwise, the names of note are Haas (who plays Kiefer first in a clash of the testy Germans), Kuerten (he starts his swansong U.S event against Grosjean), Stepanek, Moya and Ljubicic. Nadal showed some good stuff (coming back to beat Tsonga and Blake) and very bad stuff (his loss to Djokovic) in IW, and I would expect some of the same inconsistency. Haas or Niemenin could be a test early, but there’s no reason to think he won’t at least battle his way to a rematch with Djokovic in the semis.
Semifinalist: Rafael Nadal

Semifinals: Federer d. Ferrer; Djokovic d. Nadal
Final: Djokovic d. Federer

I won’t be heading to Key Biscayne this time, but we’ll have your friends Pete Bodo and Tom Perrotta on site, and I’ll be chiming in on the TV coverage. It’s FSN again, so it may be a bit…erratic. CBS takes over on the final weekend.

For now, fans of Ana Ivanovic can have a question answered by the world's hottest—playing, of course—pro at TENNIS.com. Click here to send one

| | Send to a Friend
Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 12 13 Next »

First?

wait a minute steve... picking Djokovic again over Federer even of he WILL BE TIRED? naaa.. haha I'm joking as anything can happen. I agree with most of it, the only difference being I'd take Blake to make the semifinal against Djokovic. He'll beat Nalbandian and will not make the same mistakes against Nadal as he did in IW and of course I say this will be the inflexion point of Federer's season as he will take it the tourney.

something else man, I saw on the Tennis Channel last night they will be showing some matches...

Steve, I might diagree with you. Fed will beat the Djoker in three tight sets. 7-5 6-7 6-4

Blake to defeat Djokovic? You must be joking...

I doubt Federer in this condition can take it from Novak. He must make adjustments in his game... he didn't do this for a long time and as great as Federer is, I still would not expect him to be able to rebound so fast. It's not just Novak, Federer's game deserted him too...

If he starts making adjustments now, maybe in couple of months he gets it... that's not easy as it looks.

Actually I think he must jump Roddick first! Don't forget all streaks come to an end. Now, Andy has a very good chance to beat Fed...

john smith,

Nope. I meant I think Blake will make the semis by beating Nadal but loosing to Djokovic.

Maybe you are right as this could be Federer's turning point year. He could be going from the guy that wins everything to the guy that brings it on and wins the Slams like Steve has said before but I refuse to believe that. I think he is eager to play Djokovic again and take it to him, to proove himself or at least to see where his game is at right now. Djokovic is full on confidence as he is the hottest pla yer in the tour right now but never understimate a champion's heart. Federer has lots of it. He is not only talent but also substance and hardwork so it would not surprise me at all if he beats Djokovic convincingly in the final match.

Right... my bad. I like Blake, on hard courts he is better than Nadal. He has a lot of the firepower but it looks like he doesn't have it in his head. He is consistent but could never manage to get big wins...

I love the breakdown. However I just do not see Novak winning back to back... it is just too tough. I do not think he'll make the final... IF he does, yes he is the favorite.

Yes. I actually think Blake should have beaten Nadal at IW in straight sets. He was a confirmed break up in the first but honestly it might have been Nadal taking so long to play in between points that annoyed him and messed with his rythm, his concentration and his returns...

SwissMaestro,

actually if you look at Roger's game and playing strategy you will notice a long period of stagnation. For last 2 years he has been playing on a "credit" achieved in that dominant 04-06 period, taking maximum approach of poor player's confiendce, they simply didn't believe they could win against him. He commented many times including this year, that his game plan is just to get out and make adjustments on the court.

Now, Djokovic for instance... he never stopped evolving. That makes it difficult for opponents because there is always a new element.

If you don't evolve it's just a matter of time when opponents are going to start reading you game. Once they make it you loose the edge. And that's exactly what happened to Federer with Djokovic. Until Federer accepts this he won't move forward, on contrary the L's will pile up. And if cannot do that, I'm affraid he could have a hard downfall which would seriously compromise his GOAT status... Pete's GS record, and all he achieved. This happened before... just ask Wilander...

That steve even has Federer making the final is satisfying enough, though, this time, I am inclined to disagree with him.

SwissM....so you think Rafa only beat Blake because of time between points?

Now, if Novak manages to win again we might have a new "Federer". I don't claim myself to be fan of nobody, but this kid really has it. I am amazed with the way he handled all this...
He climbed his way with absolutely no steps back at incredibly fast pace. He showed a true champion's hearth, no doubt...

John Smith,

hold on with the Djokovic rise to #1. Let him get to #2 first.

Comparing Federer to Wilander... yeah right, Wilander's serve was a killer!

come on.

Steve,
Agree with your semifinalists except I believe Jelena will win that quarter somehow.
Then, I have Serena facing Ana in the final with Serena repeating KB like she did from 2002-2004.

ATP semifinalists: Federer, Davydenko, Djokovic, Blake. But, I do agree with your finalists and champion. So far in 2008, Novak has been the best player on HC and per ATP site, Novak(43) was only one HC win behind Federer(44) in 2007.

Swiss Maestro,
I am afraid that TC will be showing tape delayed matches but I am hoping that we will see some live action.

I'm liking this Ivanovic...but get the sinking feeling that she's Clistjers II. I've been seeing some pictures of Princess Serena on gossip sites. She is looking mighty, mighty fit. I honestly didn't think her body could get more spectacular. But it has.

Wilander and Federer could, should not be compared. They are definitely not in the same league so I will not even bother talking about that. They are light years apart of each other.

Federer can be compared with Sampras, Laver or Borg but that's about it (until Djokovic wins 11 more slams). I believe his very peak is still to be. It is true however that he will not keep up with the never seen before pace of the last 4 years because as many know, he is not a machine (eventhough at times looked like one) I wonder if we will ever see anyone playing at that level for so long again.

Roger has a thing with players that have given him trouble in the past as he's had them figured out (Hewitt, Nalbandian, Nadal [still in the process]). Maybe it is a slump, I mean he has been due for letdowns at events where he is expected to win, right?

Federer will keep on moving forward when he hires a coach and NOT when he realized anything about Djokovic. Nadal just said it after loosing to Novak in IW: "I don't think he is better than Roger" and to be honest I don't think so either just yet.

Federer is the ultimate evolving player. The very fact that he can adjust his game or startegy in a matter of a couple of games once a match has started speaks for itself. Nadal is an example of a guy that is always willing to evolve but he still has to do so some more. Let's see how much Djokovic has evolved during the clay court season starts. I don't predict huge victories for him (and neither on grass) and to me that is not evolving but being more one-dimensional when most of his success is subjected to hard courts. Nothing against him but I will believe he is the best when he dominated most torunaments convincingly and becomes no.1 and for now these goals are far from being a consistent reality.

Posted by Carrie 03/26/2008 @ 1:53 PM

SwissM....so you think Rafa only beat Blake because of time between points?

------------

No Carrie. I think that when Blake realized Nadal was ready to do ANYTHING (running forever, being out there for as long as it could have taken) his menthal confidence left him. Nadal also beat him with heart and physicality but let's admit it, the kid plays menthal games all the time.

If Federer reaches the finals, he should win it! I don't see anyone who can give him much trouble in the finals except Djoko.

Oh, and, Steve, Djokovic's not beating Federer in the final, because Djokovic's not going to get there. He gets tired and will go down to defeat in an earlier round. He's one terrific player, but uses way more energy to win then Fed -- so he won't be able to rack up the titles week-in and week-out like Fed. Fed barely breaks a sweat because of his sweet footwork. I'm not sure he's in form though -- so Nadal could take this title. Bye, Steve.

I think Venus is going to win in Miami this year. I think after losing to Serena in Bangalore, Vee is ready for a little payback. Hopefully, by some miracle, common folk will be able to view the tournament at some point over the next two weeks on television. ESPN sucks, they show the same sports all the time all year, tennis is so sporadic (in terms of tournaments to showcase in the US) that you would think the USTA, ATP, WTA, and ESPN ( along with ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ) could reach a reasonable agreement where American tennis fans can enjoy the sport they love and the greatest tournaments on earth. (PS ESPN just add Miami to the schedule, leave IWells out of the picture! I just solved a the problem for L. Scott, A. Kantarian, E. Devilliers, and ESPN, can I get a check for that?)

Swiss Maestro,

if you think the following players could not (in their prime, both with the same racquet technology) beat Fed (or be mentioned in the same sentence) then you are just drinking too much cool aid:

Connors
McEnroe
Rosewell
Big Pancho

AND, Nadal has a much better record at age 21 than Fed ever had. Can he match the rest? doubt it, but wouldn't put it past him.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 12 13 Next »
Post a Comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In


  * Only required field   

  (Optional)

  (Optional)

« IW: Dunzo CE 10: Keys to the Key »

More from TennisWorld
Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor

More from Concrete Elbow
TENNIS Magazine is published 10 times per year.




Save 75% off of the annual newsstand price.
Categories
2005 Entries
2006 Entries
2007 Entries
2008 Entries
2009 Entries
Recent Entries
CE 10: Plus One Edition
Playing Ball: Night Game
W: The Rest
W: The Lucky Few
W: Semifinal Preview
W: Sweet 16
W: Totally American
W: At the Crossroads
W: Sunny Afternoon with Roger
W: Keeping Tabs: Moonwalk Edition
Statistics
This blog currently has 590 entries and 39297 comments.