Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Newsletter Subscribe  |  Store
TENNIS.com - Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   College Tennis
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   Champions' Perspective
   Backcourt: Framed
   Ready, Set, Goal: Kellie
   Ready, Set, Goal: Joe
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
« Reading the Sports Guy W: Eyes of the Storm »
Forecasting the Fortnight
Posted 06/20/2008 @ 3 :16 PM

AnaDid I say the high point of the year was the clay season? Well, I may have to adjust that assessment. Bill Simmons aside, I’m feeling a little more anticipation than usual for Wimbledon this year, both from inside and outside the hardcore tennis-fan community.

That anticipation is all coming from the men’s side, where there’s something of a theme emerging: Namely, is the king dead, and if so, who’s going to bury him? As they have with the clay season, Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal, with a little help from their cocky little brother, Novak Djokovic, have managed to elevate the drama and importance of even the most prestigious tournament in the world. I wrote a few years ago that the Nadal-Federer rivalry was likely to last because each one has what the other wants: Nadal has Paris, Federer has Wimbledon. It’s what’s still driving both guys, and what’s driving the sport of tennis overall. Here’s hoping they meet again—an entire era of tennis would come to a head if they play again on Centre Court.

There’s nothing quite so dramatic on the women’s side, just another wide-open draw and questions about each of the top contenders.

I’ll be heading to the tournament myself this weekend and blogging from the site through the first week. For now, the draws are out, so let’s see what we might be seeing over the next fortnight. Yes, I said fortnight—it’s that time of year. Savor it.

And if you're down on sportswriters, try reading a few good ones discussing the tournament here.

The Women
First Quarter

Ana Ivanovic has answered all possible questions, doubts, and criticisms so far in 2008, so why not throw another at her: Is she ready to go back to back, something her predecessor at No. 1, Justine Henin, could never pull off. There are some semi-obstacles in her quarter: Cibulkova, Paszek, Schnyder, Szavay, and Chakvetadze, though I wouldn’t pick any of them over Ivanovic, who made the semis here last year. Still, I think one of the big hitters will expose Ivanovic’s not-fully-formed counterpunching abilities later in the tournament.
Darkhorse: Dominika Cibulkova, who has some sporadically good results this year
Semifinalist: Ana Ivanovic

Second Quarter
Serena Williams and Svetlana Kuznetsova are slotted for the quarters here. Neither is completely predictable or reliable, but there’s no one I can find who qualifies as a threat to them. Bartoli is on Serena’s side; Cornet, Li Na, and Radwanska are on Kuznetsova’s. Of those, only Radwanska seems genuinely dangerous; she beat Kuznetsova at the Aussie Open this year. I thought Williams was ready to roll in Paris, but she misfired for two sets. Grass is more her thing; she’s won here before and is 4-1 against Kuznetsova lifetime. The Russian’s athleticism should help her on grass, but she’s never been past the quarters at Wimbledon. That’s not going to change this year.
Darkhorse: Agnieszka Radwanska, a good player who’s slowly getting better
Semifinalist: Serena Williams

Third Quarter
OK, here we have a floater who's a possible threat. Lindsay Davenport, who sat out of Eastbourne last week with a knee injury, is scheduled to meet 5th seed Elena Dementieva—yes, Elena Dementieva is the 5th seed at Wimbledon—in the third round. The winner of that may get Maria Sharapova, the top seed in the section, in the quarters. That is, if Sharapova gets past Dinara Safina, who beat her in Paris on her run to the final. Is Safina ready for a letdown after her superb clay season? This would be the place: She’s never been past the third round at Wimbledon—maybe her brother’s famous grass-court allergies run in the family.
Darkhorse: Nadia Petrova, who's in the final at Eastbourne this weekend; she’s on Sharapova’s side of this quarter.
Semifinalist: Maria Sharapova

Fourth Quarter
This is Venus Williams’ time to shine, and looking at her draw there’s no reason to think she won’t do it again in 2008. That doesn’t mean it will be easy; last year, Venus survived two early-round scares before she found her game in a big way. Are Sania Mirza, Flavia Pennetta, or Daniela Hantuchova capable of finishing her off if she has a bad day? In theory, yes, but I’m not going to bet against Venus at Wimbledon anymore. Her quarterfinal opponent may be Jelena Jankovic, the No. 2 seed—yes, Jelena Jankovic is the No. 2 seed at Wimbledon—but I don’t think grass is a good surface for the counterpunching Serb against Venus.
Darkhorse: Caroline Wozniacki, who played some good tennis in Eastbourne and is slotted to face Jankovic in the third round, unless of course she’s upset by her Canadian doppleganger, Aleksandra Wozniak, in the second
Semifinalist: Venus Williams

Semifinals: Ivanovic d. S. Williams; V. Williams d. Sharapova
Final: V. Williams d. Ivanovic

FedThe Men
First Quarter
Long live the king, for the moment. His draw isn't easy, but there’s no standout spoiler in there either. Soderling has given him trouble in the past, and he might see him in the round; Monfils, in the third round, should be at his bizarre best on grass; Lleyton Hewitt has won the tournament; and Fernando Gonzalez, a potential fourth-rounder, has beaten Federer within the last year. And those guys are all in his half of this quarter. The bottom half looks pretty barren from here—Ferrer, Berdych, Ancic, Llodra are the most interesting names. Like Sampras before him, Federer is a new man each year on grass, and I expect that once he’s whipped off a couple straight-setters, he’ll have his old confidence back. If he gets Djokovic in the semis, sparks are going to fly. My prediction: Federer shows real anger. And wins.
First-round match to watch: Ancic vs. Llodra
Spoiler: Robin Soderling, who could get Federer before he’s rolling, in the second round.
Semifinalist: Roger Federer

Second Quarter
So, in case you haven’t heard, Novak Djokovic is in Federer’s half this time—don’t you just want to skip ahead to that one right now? First, Djoko’s got to get past a pair of heavy hitters, Berrer and Safin, in the first two rounds, and potentially another, Wawrinka, in the fourth. The bottom half features the lucky 10th seed, Marcos Baghdatis, and that guy again, David Nalbandian—why does that name make everyone smile and shake their heads these days? I wouldn’t be shocked if the quarterfinal pitted Djokovic against a surprisingly tough grass-courter, Feliciano Lopez.
First-round match to watch: Marcos Baghdatis vs. Steve Darcis, two solid ball-strikers
Spoiler: Ivo Karlovic—always annoying, but he lives too dangerously to win a bunch of matches in a row at a Slam.
Semifinalist: Novak Djokovic

Third Quarter
Not getting bumped up in the seedings worked out pretty well for Andy Roddick. He ended up across from Nikolay Davydenko, and in a soft-looking section of that quarter to boot—Roddick's fourth-round opponent might be James Blake. The question is: Who’s coming out of the other side? I refuse to bet on Davydenko, but that leaves, who? Mathieu? Ljubicic? I'm glad I don’t have to pick that one, because I think Roddick will beat whomever it is.
First-round match to watch: For Americans, Donald Young vs. Jesse Levine; for connoisseurs of the sour, Dmitry Tursunov vs. Nicolas Mahut
Spoiler: Jeremy Chardy—because the French can play on grass, and because I hope he doesn’t disappear
Semifinalist: Andy Roddick

Fourth Quarter
The match that must stick out to everyone right away is a potential second-rounder between Rafael Nadal and Ernests Gulbis. The Latvian Lip has to get past a theoretically-dangerous-on-grass John Isner. If he does, this will be a tricky one for Nadal. Gulbis serves big, goes for broke, and won't be intimidated—they must have a class in self-confidence at the Pilic Academy. Grass should hide Gulbis' weakness, the inconsistency of his forehand. Then again, the long swing he uses there is exploitable, if Nadal can get it there with pace. (Which he obviously can.) After that, Rafa has semi-tests against Kiefer and his old friend Youzhny. Not an easy draw, but Nadal is lucky that his potential quarterfinal opponent is Richard Gasquet, who could go down in the first round to Mardy Fish. Either way, Nadal will get stronger as he goes. This is his best chance so far to win the tournament he wants more than any other, and he’s going to start to taste it during the second week. We'll see how he reacts; he's got a pretty good track record of holding up under maximum pressure so far.
First-round match to watch: Fabrice Santoro vs. Andy Murray—this is about as crafty and exasperating as tennis gets. Fabrice, who’s playing his last Wimbledon, should get his wish and be granted a chance to play on Centre Court for the first time.
Spoiler: Sebastien Grosjean—does he have one more run to the quarters in him?
Semifinalist: Rafael Nadal

Semifinals: Federer d. Djokovic; Nadal d. Roddick
Final: Nadal d. Federer

| | Send to a Friend
Comments

Great Predictions!!

I agree with the predictions. Looks like Nadal's year. Although I am a big fan of the Fed, he has a "Nadal" complex and will lose to Nadal in the final. If Fed does NOT see Nadal in the final, then Federer wins wimbledon.

So, if Nadal makes it through the early rounds, he'll win Wimbledon, as Borg had predicted.

Agree with all predictions on the men's side. Except the last one. I still have to back Fed until he loses on the grass at Wimbledon.

Nice to see the finals back on the July 4th weekend again.

Great Predictions!! I hope they come true I would love to see Rafa win Winbledon, so the masses can stop saying he is only a clay king!

Great Predictions!!! I hope they come true, so the masses can stop saying Rafa is only great on clay.

Steve, I'm shocked--you didn't pick Davydenko!

I'm still not sure why you picked him for the FO final...

I agree with Chucklin that Federer has a "Nadal Complex." The destruction at Roland Garros has exacerbated his "Nadal Complex." Against anyone else, inluding Djokovic, Fed is the heavy favorite.

Federer doesn't play well when he's angry (nor has Djokovic given him any reason to be, recently), so I trully hope he goes into the encounter with Djokovic with confidence and calm. If it happens.

I see you've picked Rafa to win...well, if not Federer than I hope it's him. Then if not those too, Roddick would be my pick.

(random: You know, the biggest upset is going to be when Federer, Nadal and Djokovic all lose early in some tournament in the future. It'll probably happen, given time, and it would be crazy.)

Good Predictions! Except the Mens Final.
Federer will be the favourite on grass until he is beaten.
Interesting that other than Pete Sampras none of the former greats and writers think Federer will win this year's Wimbledon.
Last year Federer didnt except Nadal to come out in that
fashion. This year he knows what to do.

crazyone, probably based on Rome 07 against Rafa.

The IHT online blog ??? Why would you link to this? It's pretentious, and who are some of these writers? I doubt any of them have ever lifted a tennis racquet, and just fly in to watch the majors between cricket tests!!!

"Nadal complex" ?!?! On clay maybe, but on hard courts and grass Fed is 5-2 (winning the last three).I agree that Nadal could make it very difficult though if Fed is not 100%.

Nadal defeats Federer uh? Brave of you to say Steve, very daring brave.

Your article in the magazine points Nadal just making it to the SF's and loosing to Roddick. But oh well, I think things can change in a matter of just one tournament (Queens) in which by the way Roddick was not at his best. If Nadal gets easily past Isner/Gulbis or Stepanek/Youzhny only a Fedeer in full flight can stop him I'd say.

But it is all good that you do think Nadal will beat Federer (not that he is not capable of doing it). But for some reason, Federer not being pointed out as the heavy favorite in the eyes of many only makes him super dangerous in my view. Maybe more dangerous than ever and extremely eager to proove he still rules the lawns on the All-England club.

I much rather stay with your previous prediction:

SF's

Federer d. Djokovic
Roddick d. Nadal

F

Federer d. Roddick

I think Roddick will defeat Nadal in the semis and lose to Federer in the final.

Wow, Nadal d. Federer, that one will raise some eyebrows. Then again Steve is right more often then wrong (so Steve please do predict JJ wins, thks :)

Kris-

No one except Pete Sampras' says Federer will win because he knows. He has truly been there before to win a 6th Wimbledon, unlike Borg.

Still
WORLD #1 Roger Federer has
won 59 straight grasscourt matches since 2002,
including 2 against Rafael Nadal, and
Roger Federer has
won 10 straight grasscourt titles and
he's won 5 straight Wimbledons, including
winning the last 2 finals against Rafael.

How can anyone reasonably predict Roger Federer
NOT to win
his 6th straight Wimbledon on GRASS,
NOT CLAY, on July 6?

Nadal beating Fed? Fed's confidence and demeanor changes immediately once he hits the lawn. Fed is unbeatable on this surface and should be the favorite until somebody stops his streak. Hasn't happened yet!

there is no way ivanovic or venus make the finals

Federer vs. Hrbaty in Round 1.
Hmmm... last time I looked, Dominic Hrbaty had winning head-to-head against Federer. This time, though, Roger will dispense with him like a used tissue.

Federer will go all the way, unless Nadal does.

Nadal would have to go through:

1. Beck
2. Kiefer
3. Gulbis or Isner
4. Youzhny or Stepanek
5. Murray or Gasquet
6. Roddick

Youzhny KNOWS how to play Nadal on grass and his shots are much more addept to the surface. Had it not been for the injury he had in his back last year when he was pounding Nadal into submission, the Russian would have dispatched the high spirited Spaniard in 3 straight sets.

I agree. The green lawns of Wimbledon energize Federer to a point where he soars uniquelly high. His game reaches its highest level in this tournament. A level only possibly Sampras could haver reached.

World #1 Roger has been to 16 straight GRAND SLAM SEMIFINALS (Every single one for 4 full years straight now).

Roger has been World #1 for 229 straight weeks (almost 4 and 1/2 years straight already and still counting).

Roger has never once lost to Soderling (Roger's beaten Soderling and Karlovic both every time he has played them, including very recently, the last 3 months).

Roger's only lost once in 11 career matches versus Gonzalez (Roger's beaten Gonzalez all but once, including in the French Open quarterfinals 2 weeks ago).

Roger's beaten Hewitt so many matches straight, and he hasn't lost to him once in so many years, it's impressive.

Roger's beaten Djokovic 6-2 head to head, including 2 months ago in Monte Carlo.

Roger should
win his 6th straight Wimbledon title on July 6,
13th career Grand Slam title won,
66th straight grasscourt match won,
11th straight grasscourt title won,
etc.,
etc.,
etc.,
etc.

Still
World #1 Roger Federer for his 6th career Wimbledon title won
and 13th career Grand Slam title won in 16 days, July 6.

Youzhny knew how to play Nadal last year, but Nadal has improved since then (or simply gained more confidence depending on your POV).

Steve, how many sets do you think Rafa needs to take out Federer?

Personally, I still haven't counted out Federer. I've never been a huge fan of his, but I'll wait until at least the first few rounds before betting against him.

Sorry, that last post was me.

Roger is unbeaten and undefeated versus Rafa on GRASS.
Roger has beaten Rafa in each of the last 2 WIMBLEDON finals
ON GRASS.

Wimbledon is GRASS,
NOT CLAY.

Steve:

I like most of the predictions, but I would also like to see some score lines for the semis and finals.

Federer on grass (like Nadal on clay) should be picked the favorite until beaten. I support that.

"OK, here we have a floater who's a possible threat. Lindsay Davenport, who sat out of Eastbourne last week with a knee injury, is scheduled to meet 5th seed Elena Dementieva—yes, Elena Dementieva is the 5th seed at Wimbledon—in the third round. The winner of that may get Maria Sharapova, the top seed in the section, in the quarters. That is, if Sharapova gets past Dinara Safina, who beat her in Paris on her run to the final. Is Safina ready for a letdown after her superb clay season? This would be the place: She’s never been past the third round at Wimbledon—maybe her brother’s famous grass-court allergies run in the family."

Slight correction here. Safina is actually in the Demetieva/Davenport quarter. Sharapova would not meet any of these three until the QF. Sharapova's stiffist competion would be Petrova or Azarenka prior to quarters. IMO it will be Safina/Sharapova.

Wow, Steve, talk about Wilanders! I agree though, on all of your predictions.

Just as I deride Ferrer about his grass court prowess, he makes it to his first grass court final. Who said the Spaniards were clay courters only? Perhaps Wimbledon has a little more experience than I on draw formulas.

I don't see how Roddick has any better chance on Grass vs. Rafa than on any other surface. Rafa is a better player overall, and will most likely win. For that matter, Rafa should be the favorite against anyone on the surface other than Federer. He's made the final 2x in a row, is arguably the best athlete on tour, and therefore he should be able to handle the slippery surface and tricky bounces better than anyone.

Sure, Roddick's serve will be bigger, but his return game isn't great, and Nadal's serve should get also get a boost from the grass. I don't think Roddick flattens out the forehand enough to really bother Rafa and I think his forays into the net will be a disaster. I won't even get started on the backhand, but who knows, maybe he can start ripping some down the line and create some problems.

ATP: Agree with your predictions for the semifinals and finals but I have not decided on a champion as of now. My nephew, which I posted in Your Call June 19 said Roger will not let Rafael whip him up like he did in Paris.

WTA: Prediction from the quarterfinals
QF 1 - Ana Ivanovic against Samantha Stosur
QF 2 - Agnieszka Radwanska against Serena Williams
QF 3 - Dinara Safina against Maria Sharapova
QF 4 - Venus Williams against Jelena Jankovic

SF 1 - Ana Ivanovic against Serena Williams
SF 2 - Maria Sharapova against Jelena Jankovic

Final - Ana Ivanovic against Maria Sharapova (Rematch of 2008 AO)

Champion - Ana Ivanovic defeats Maria Sharapova 7-5,3-6,6-4. Ana will become the first person to do the French Open/Wimbledon double since Serena Williams in 2002.

I too, feel it will be Nadal's year. He played very well at Queens... nothing you can do once he moves inside the baseline. And he can totally rely on his serve.

And then there's something else... for the first time, we have Nadal-fever here in England. The crowd was absolutely behind him at Queens. He's gone from jet-boy to boy-wonder. Right now, everyone loves him. BBC couldn't stop replaying his smile that he flashed during his match against Karlovic, a match that from then on, gave him total confidence against big servers on grass.

C'mon Rafa!

Hi all,
I'm with you Sher, I been watching Roger a long time. He does not play well when angry and actually had a tendancy to do so when playing Djokovic until the clay season. He has moved on and will be very calm and well prepared for his semi-final. Re the final, I keep saying it but I will say it again, Roger has a way of stepping up when it really matters. This title matters most to him.


Roger is 2-0 in his career versus both Roddick and Nadal ON GRASS.

WIMBLEDON is GRASS,
Not CLAY.

I hear you Sher. Roger does not play well angry and had a tendancy to do when playing Djokovic until the clay season. He has moved on and will be quite calm and well prepared for their semi-final. Regarding the final, Roger has a way of stepping up p when it matters most and Wimbledon is the one title that matters most to him.

CURRENTLY

Sorry about the dbl post.

World #1
Roger Federer
will win
Title #6 in a row at The Championships, WIMBLEDON

14 career Grand Slams WON
Mr. Pete Sampras
KNOWS and SAYS so.

Semi-finals;Federer defeats Djokovic
Roddick defeats Nadal

Finals; Federer defeats Roddick

Could we see another Williams-WIlliams final. Time will tell.

I love the fact Djokovic landed in Federer's half. It means Nadal won't do him any favor this time.

Now, if Djokovic defeats Federer in their semi I think he will definitely carry the momentum in the final and likely win it all. As for Federer, he must defeat both Novak and Nadal to keep the title...

This is going to be awesome tournament.

someone mentioned that federer doesn't play well when he's angry.

agreed, except for the match against djokovic in monte carlo this year.

Don't underestimate Roddick. He wasn't clicking in Queens. Don't forget it was his first tournament after that injury while Rafa was still hot.

In fact, Roddick is very dangerous...

I'm sure Fed is going to be very intimidated in 1/2f if he has Djoker in front of him. Not only Djoker is a threat but also he plays better tennis right now. So I think he's perfect to break (another) fed's streak... as Bodo put it on ESPN "the third wheel"...

Steve
Like your predictions, Venus and Nadal are my favourites to win, But that is the heart speaking. The head is saying something else.
On current form(which is not a ballpark to going by for Venus) It is 50-50 for the Venus/Jelena match. However if she puts away Jelena, I dont think a pumped up Sharapova can stop her!
I agree that if Nadal gets through the semi (Roddick) and Federer his - Nadal should win.
But this is trite, as one player says it would be fun to see Fed, Nadal, Djokvic lose in the 1st round. Wouldnt that be grand (except for Nadal of course)???

Steve-

What made you change your mind from your Wimbledon predictions in the article that was published in the last issue of the TENNIS mazazine and this post today?

This is how good Rafa is getting:

We're picking him over a guy who's won this 5 straight times and hasn't lost on grass in his last 59 matches..and no, picking Rafa to beat him doesn't feel weird or gutsy at all.

These days it feels like a intelligent pick.

I have a feeling Sharapova will take this one.

Sorry, can't back it up. It just feels that way.

karlovic will reach wimbledon semifinals..

Hey Steve, great work. Agree with you on most, except I reckon an all-Williams final with Venus the winner. I'll also bet Djokovic beats Federer then loses to Rafa in the final... This is definitely going to be a great Slam to watch

Steve is more than entitled to his opinion and he is certainly not the only person tipping Nadal; I don't even think he has needed Wilanders to do so. It's surprising to see Nadal such a favourite for so many, but I can see that there are strong arguments on the Rafa side, despite the millions of stats that people want to throw around which should theoretically prove otherwise.

Personally, I think it's too close to call. You can't ignore Fed's grass record, but you simply cannot ignore his season so far in comparison to the other two. To say there has been nothing wrong with him undermines his normal form in my opinion. On the other side, if Nadal can keep this level of play up then his game has just crashed up a notch which could be a determining factor but he still has to actually beat the man in the dodgy white suit! (sorry Fed fans) If Novak had been on Rafa's side I would have gone for Fed. As it stands I'm not calling it either way until we hit round four. Yes I have splinters from the fence I am sitting on, but I'll live with it!!

Any chance Djokovic had for this tournament has gone up in smoke. (His chances were slim in my opinion, as I think it's a little too early for him on this surface) You simply do not give Federer an even bigger reason to beat you. It's just dumb. He was probably going to do everything in his power to whip Novak anyway, as let's face it Fed doesn't like him, but Novak calling Federer "mentally suspect over the past few months" and saying that he is "worried about my presence" is just plain tennis suicide. Yes it might be true, but Novak, saying things out loud about the Fedster is just dangerous and asking for trouble.

(BTW calling Djokovic the cocky younger brother is just perfect IMO!)

As for the women - I don't know what to say, I'm thrown by how open it is. I want to say Ivanovic, but can't really as she's still quite new to grass...oh well, I'm going for her anyway....or Serena.

Poor old Mauresmo, it says something about your form when no one even mentions the fact you'll be playing Serena in the third round. C'mon Amelie, I still have faith in you!! (sort of...ish...well I'm crossing my fingers and hoping for the best) Vive le serve et volley!!

I hope we get to see the underrated Roddick in the semifinals this year. Heck why not go all the way and have him beat Djokovic in the final? ;) Seriously, I have had it up-to-here with the endless Federer/Nadal slam finals. ZZZzz, Enough! I want a new champion. Mr. Roddick better step it up this year or I will be very angry.

Women's side looks good but in the men's the upset is going to be Roddick all the way, beats Nadal and Fed.

I really do see Venus and Serena in the finals this time, but Oracene price and Kamaski Tandon said it correctly: "You can't count them out, but you can't count on them either." Though she said that about Serena, it is perfect right in my mind.

I do agree that for the first time in quite a while in terms of the possible quarterfinals matchups on both the men and women (I mean, the gentlemen and ladies), there isn't a place where you feel especially bad for one of the Top 8 seeds. Ivanovic didn't get bad luck to draw Serena or Venus in the semis. Roddick didn't get Nadal.

wow steve. just wow.

I hope the final will be Djoko vs. Nadal. It will be bored if Fed vs. Roddick

I agree jerell - fantastic and even draws this year.

Sophia, thanks.

I made a slight error however: I meant to say that Ivanovic didn't draw Serena or Venus in the quarters.

I agree with Steve's predictions all the way. TMF remains the man to beat on Sw19. However, I think Nadal has a very good chance this year. In fact I would be surprised if Rafa is not the one with the trophy on July 6th.

The biggest danger for Rafa is the loss of momentum and a slow start to Wimbledon. (What happened during the break ? Can he maintain the flow that he had at Queens). Nadal, being a slow starter, is always vulnerable in the earlier rounds. He finishes strong : he kept getting stronger as the matches progressed with best performances in the SF at F.O and Finals at Queens (both against Nole).

I believe that if Rafael survives Round 1 and Round 2 ( particularly R2 against the big serving dude) , I am sure nothing, except a vintage once in a lifetime performance by Fed, will stop him.

As Steve wrote in his last column : the biggest thing about Rafa is the aura surrounding him right now. You don't just thrash the number 1 player in the world by 1,3 and love. Even if it's clay. That has got to weigh on Roger's mind. Furthermore the last yr's final was so close and Rafa is a much better and confident player right now. The triumph at Queens will convince him that he is up there on grass. He has improved in so many aspects. Federer, in contrast, has never looked more vulnerable in his entire career.

To beat Rafa on the center court would be the biggest test for Roger. I think no one would stop Nadal this Wimbledon. Not even TMF.

idk why everyone is counting roger out
has anyone seen his grass court record
damnn as for nadal everyone is jumping on his bandwagon
acting like his da best der is i will give him da fact dat his great on clayy maybe even da greatest der ever was but i think der is many plyers dat can beat i will go as far as the semis which will probably end up with roddick and maybe youznhy der are many powerful name anything can happen people are acting like he the best i mean come on so wat roger has lost some matches he is human n noe one excepted him to win every single match juss like rafa he will loose eventually at roland garros everybody has to loose sometime what matters is rite now and rite now is wimbledon n i honestly think roger will win it der is just something about him when he plays at wimbledon he plays and acts completelt diff. from the other slams n even Pete Sampras says roger will win wimbledon and us open dis yr and dat he will break da record n dats koming from da greatest player so far n as for bjorn borg the guy just shoots his mouth around telling everyone rafa is goin to win n if he doesnt djokovic will putting federer as his 3rd choice i mean kome one give roger some credit da man has won 5 in a row juss take a look at his record damn believe in him a little but who am i to talk these are just my opinion n time will tell what happens but i believe dat roger is goin to win=]=]

Nice picks and I hope they come to pass.

If Federer and Nadal do meet in the final, I think we may see a nice rematch that will rival last year's final. I don't believe that Federer has a Nadal complex and if he does, then it is limited to clay. If Nadal does win Wimbledon, then it is because he is playing at a great level right now and has learned how to beat the current best grass court player. Federer is not just going to give it to him. It will be good but there is a lot of tennis to be played before then and it will be beyond fun getting there.

Also, I agree that Gulbis a potential threat to Rafa but I he will won't be enough trouble that I will lose sleep over that possible match-up.

I agree that this is great opportunity for Rafa to win it! Vamos Rafito!

Steve, man as much as I enjoy reading your writing sometimes you really make ridiculous and outrageous predictions and claims sometimes. You picked Davydenko to beat Federer at the French and now your picking Nadal. You're just a bandwagon jumper, you idiot.

We'll see on the court

Man, does Wertheim work for IMG or what, he loves Sharapova with every passing minute.

I could see this happening - still hoping Fed pulls it off

Brandon
http://www.thefreshcan.com
Daily Tennis Deal with a Splash of Personality

Sigh. Won't argue with your pick on the men's final, Steve, just hope it doesn't happen.

Here's hoping that Roger wins Wimby and Player of the Year is decided in Queens.

A I am glad to see you and the rest of tennis.com staff defending the honor of tennis vs. Bill Simmons, I don't think he was really trying that hard to make it a personal bash against you.

I think somewhere in his bit he said "when he fell in love with the sport" (which is creepy because he's obviously played twice in his life and has never been to a live tournament) ,BUT! if he at least threw that in there you should give him a little more slack than calling his Dad a dull, adult pamper wearing geiser! Thats a bito harsh A?
At the very least he has drawn his audience to take a look at the game and that is good for tennis and Im condasendingly proud of him for it! (even if they some how think Tella Tequilla will be playing )
it is what it is.
I actually lauphed and sent him a comeback via his page 2 email right after I saw what he wrote.(anyone can do it)
I think it would be great if you Steve or anybody there at tennis.com challenged him to a battle blog during wimbledon ? It of course might hurt your feelings but I think it would be pretty damn funny.
battle!
BATTLE BLOG!
Battle BLOG!!!

I would imagine his attitude toward this would be about exactlly like BritTop from the movie Snatch. When he said " When I throw a dog a bone I don't want to know if it taste good or not! You stop me again whilst Im walking and I'll cut your jaccobs off!" lol. if that makes any sense ?...but... this really smells of an assignment that was forced apon him right before the Celtics where about to win game 6 and another championship . So you have to see where he's coming from because he's been bashing and bashing and bashing his own team and their coaching staff for years. and now they win a title and he has to feel really weirded out right now.because of all his crying..... or not?I don't care. I would just like to see him at least make a comeback to some of this stuff you guys have writen and not apologize for anything he says. That would be awsome.

as for my forecast I have Roddick winning of Safin!
and Venus over Serena!

I think that we'll see the best matches from the top half of the draw, which is stacked with middle tear players who've got good game for grass.

I also wouldn't be surprised to see Roddick come out on fire and take the big W after his whirlwind season. But then again he always finds a way to disappoint.

for the one who said there's no way ana or venus will reach the finals...you're delusional buddy. they are the players with enough weapon and momentum to reach the finals most likely. base your predictions on gut feel, if not on the (historical) records.

I'm excited about this years Wimbledon. Great draw, great potential matchups.

I want to divert the subject somewhat from this year Wimbledon to the overall GOAT rankings. Federer's losing streak against Nadal has got me thinking of how the top GOAT contenders faired against the other best players of their era. To the best of my knowledge, here's what I have:

Pete Sampras:
His top rival was Andre Agassi, and he beat Agassi more often then not. Agassi got his shots in and they had some classic battles, but Pete usually prevailed. Sampras also had strong winning records against Courier and Chang.

Bjorn Borg:
Borg finished dead even in his great rivalry with John McEnroe. McEnroe was starting to get the best of him in 1981, but it's also true that they never played on Borg's best surface, clay. Borg also had a winning record against Jimmy Connors and dominated Guillermo Vilas.

Rod Laver:
This is before my time so I don't have many facts. I do know that Laver played about a million matches against Ken Rosewall, and dominated Arthur Ashe. There is a great chapter in Ashe's book "Portrait in Motion" that describes his elation in beating Laver after a long string of losses. Does anyone else know what Laver's record was against Rosewall, Newcombe, Emerson, or the other greats of his era?

Roger Federer:
He has a losing record against his top opponent, Raphael Nadal. Fed fans will protest that most of their matches have been on clay, and Fed has a winning record on other surfaces. I don't know what Fed's overall record is against the Djoker. Fed has also dominated other top players like Roddick and Blake.

The point I am getting at with this post is that no other contender on the GOAT short list has had a losing record against a top contemporary like Federer has against Nadal. In spite of all the "on clay" disclaimers, the fact is that Fed's record against Nadal is not good. To the best of my knowledge, none of the other GOAT contenders had such a poor record against a top player of their era. Because of this I have to rank Fed #4 behind Laver, Sampras and Borg in the GOAT sweepstakes. I just can't call him the best of all time when he can't beat the best of his era, clay or not.

As I said, I have incomplete information about some of this, so please correct me if I am wrong. So what do the rest of you think -how much do we factor in the record against other top players in the GOAT standings.

I dont see i how you have serena losing on grass to anybody with out an all-court game like justine. Serena did take her to 3 set last year without a two-handed backhand.

I'm all for Nadal defeating Federer!

I'd wish you'd give a bit more credit to other woman players after the title such has Demetriava, Safina, and Jankovic to name a few.

"As they have with the clay season, Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal, with a little help from their cocky little brother, Novak Djokovic, have managed to elevate the drama and importance of even the most prestigious tournament in the world."

It's great to see how Novak has easily gotten under everybody's skin, including "King Cool" Federer and his biggest fan's skin too, Steve Tignor. I hope he annoys everybody even more and wins Wimbledon. Allez, Novak!

Oh, man, Steve. Have a little respect, will ya. "Is the King dead?" That is not a question you should be posing here. Did they say that of Cassius Clay, aka Mohammed Ali? Never. Ya know, when a great writer lays a bomb or two, you don't ask that question, because his/her work stands for itself and you have to be in total awe of the work they produced. Same with Roger.

Tres gauche my friend.

"Youzhny knew how to play Nadal last year, but Nadal has improved since then (or simply gained more confidence depending on your POV)."

Last year? Well, why did Youznhy win the only match they played this year?

What is up with Novak and giving his two cents about the mental state of tennis players? Instead of focusing on how to get Nadal out of his own mind, he's spending his time assessing Roger's. If you ask me, Novak is in denial about Rafa, so he just focuses on Fed instead.
Well at least it seems like he has leucrative a career in psychology once tennis is over for him.

Onthe women's side: Serena d Ivanovic; Venus d Sharapova
Serena d Venus (My heart says its Venus,but the big sister has the heart, the little sister knows no mercy)

On the Mens' side : Of course Federer d Nadal.

I don't think it's a great prediction :Sharapova and Federer will take it all.....

alrite people all we seem to be caring about is the men's side! and yeah thats pretty interesting!! but i mean come on its always just gonna be an ongoing battle between nadal and federer!! and yeah i think nadal is gonna win!! in 5 sets of course!! lol. but thats final!
now lets talk womens side!! of course i do believe ana will pull it off and make it to the semis!! duh! but her opponent on my opinion will be between Serena and Na Li!! yes i said it!! Na Li!! shes gonna do it again!! have a great run at wimbledon!! and i cant wait to see her play some great tennis!! but i do hope she goes to the fourth rnd to really give kuznetsova a rude awakening!! then give serena a run for her money and then lose in a close three setter!! now the rest of the draw to me seems to be easily set!! which means another wimbledon queens rematch form last year!! but this time sharapova will be no pushover!! she seems to be injury free for now and really wants to win!! so its a sharapova and venus showdown!! and well a serena and sharapova finall!!! hell yes my favorite kind of match!! and in a scary match sharapova will prevail once again just like her very first grand slam win!!

oh yeah this is my opinion!! if u dont like it too bad!! lol. j/k!

Steve like so many other sports writers these days is in a great hurry to write Federer's obituary. I am even surprised that he picked Fed to actually make the Final - I thought he would have picked Djoker over Fed. Let's not forget one thing - Federer is the defending champion and until somebody knocks him off, he's still got to be the favorite. He has at least deserved that status for having won 5 Wimbledons in a row. Borg simply does not want to see Federer surpass him by winning 6 in a row which is why he rates Federer 3rd behind Nadal and Djoker.

im so going to say that either ivanovic or sharapova is going to take the title this year...come on look at serena and venus theyre getting older and the competition is only getting better theyre going to get stomped by ivanovic and sharapova...so im going for either one of them 2 on the womens side but im strongly leaning towards ivanovic since she has more confidence after winning the french open...as for the mens side im going for djokovic and nadal to be in the final and leaning more towards djokovic to take his second grand slam

I have reasons to believe this year could be lot closer or vice versa.
-nadal may not have to play 7 matches in 7 days.
-he does not have to play djoker.
-he has won a grass court title.


-federer was probabaly surprised by nadal's tactic last year.
-he got humilated by nadal in french open final.
-federer has mental edge over nadal in wimby.

Sorry FedFans (those who wished Novak to fall on Rafa's draw), Wimbledon organizers may have seen enough of Rafa vs. Novak meeting at every tournaments' semifinals lately. Roger has to take care Novak this time :-). Ohhhh not to add up more worrisome...that AO still vivid and so fresh in my mind haha.

As a solid Rafa fan, there's nothing to worry as Rafa has handled pretty good this tormentor Novak at their several encounters of recent. HE IS MOST WELCOME but boy oh boy ... HE IS YOURS lolz.

Seems Novak the most unwanted player, the PRODIGAL one :-)

i believe ivanovic is prone to an early upset because she just won the french. serena will have a tough second round against the younger radwanska, but she'll get through it and get to the semis. venus and jankovic.....who knows. sharapova is through to the semis. if sharapova gets venus, she loses. if she gets jankovic, she wins. either way serena will be in the finals. (crossing my fingers because i dont trust anyone but sharapova)

Semifinals: Serena d. Ivanovic, Venus d. Sharapova
Finals: Serena d. Venus

Cleo-

Sampras had a losing record against Krajicek.

Fed has a 6-2 lead over Djokovic.

My point is- While Federer's status as GOAT may be arguable, his status as the greatest of his generation cannot be touched.

wow...interesting predictions
as a rafa fan, i'd love to see him win wimbledon...by beating fed of course...but who knows, roger's just as keen to defend his title as rafa is to win it...so...should be interesting.

as long as i see them both in the finals i'm happy :D

Err...let's wait until after Wimbledon before we write Djokovic and Nadal's obituaries shall we?

Bandwagoners.

i think, no i rather know that nadal is going to steamroll federer or djokovic whoever it is in finals and hold the wimbeldon trophy with a pineapple on top very very............. "PROUDLY"

Nice Predictions and I agree with it.
There was a sense of eventuality in FO05 where Rafa was favourite even before he had ever played there. I think he knows this is his best chance to win. He's healthy, confident and is in good form. I'm a lil' worried about Gulbis/Isner in the second round especially because rafa is such a slow starter but I will take him the rest of the way. Kiefer does not have it in him to hang with nadal as for youzhny, Rafa can very well handle him in grass where he is so much more confident than on hard courts and of course youzhny is a head case I doubt he will make it as far as to meet rafa. As for Roddick, he's handles him well in queens' so i'm not that worried either. roddick can serve but cannot return. he does not have it in him to hang with nadal. So after Gulbis I think Rafa's biggest challenge will be Fed/Novak in finals. I firmly believe it is his year.

While Nadal is the hot favourite this year, I will still root for Federer. His record in Wimbledon is too good to ignore. I wonder why we are discounting Roddick, he has pretty record here, just a little strange here though.

I'm not a Fed fan but at the moment he is the favorite.
IF Rafa gets to the second week then he'll be a huge threat and this time if he faces Roger in the final he will beat him in 4 sets.
Vamos Rafa.

I'm not ready to write Roger off. I know Rafa is having a great run and his play at Queen's was outstanding. But grass is Roger's surface. This is the tournament where he excels and he will be smarting over not having won a grand slam this year. Last year he came to Wimbledon having not played at Halle. This year he has that behind him. I expect to see Roger really pull out the stops this year. He won't want this one to get away from him.

Steve, I agree with you that Cibulkova could be a spoiler at the top of the draw. I first saw her in Auckland two years ago. I was impressed. Since then she has moved quietly up the rankings. I don't know if she likes grass but I will be following her progress with interest.

As a New Zealander,I will also be following Marina Erakovic. Marina grew up playing on grass. She likes the surface and knows how to play on it. I'm hoping she can reach the third round at least.

I took the occasion to rewatch the highlights of Wimbledon 2007. Man, what a match. That point at 3-2*, 15-40 where Federer paints the line with his forehand and crushes Nadal's hopes, I could watch it all day. This final was so satisfying, on so many levels ; the Greatest player of all time finding his game in the last set and brushing away the workmanlike beast. It's like tennis's natural order teetered on the brink of chaos, until Federer smashed it back into place. Transiting from the clay season to Wimbledon is like awaking from a bad dream or a slumber ; you watch some breathtaking highlights and wonder how you could muster up the patience to endure those dull, boring encounters on the red stuff. I can barely remember some interesting points of the last months, it's all drowned in a sea of mind-numbing moonballing.

Naturally, in the interest of tennis Federer has to win the title this year. However, Djokovic would be a worthy heir, even if his tennis isn't nearly as beautiful as Fed's. I don't put much stock in Nadal. Luck and favourable draws only get you so far. Should he lose before the final, I warn you, all the flip-floppers praising Nadal to high heavens, you will never hear the end of it, and I won't miss an occasion to put those overconfident predictions in the spotlight ;-). So now, let's kick back, and enjoy at least some beautiful tennis..

Great analysis. I like your picks for the quarters but I'm not so confident about Fed-Nole in the semis. I'm a bit worried by everyone writing off Fed for the final, though I don't really think we can say who will win until we see a couple of rounds to gauge Fed's level of play.

I'm going for Nadal - think he is the form man and can't see ANYONE beating him. That inlcudes Federer. Andy Murray to make to the last 16 - but that will be the end of the road for him I think...at least he isn't injured (yet) this year!

Wow Vincent; your not a Federer fan are you? And i think its interesting that the fact that Steve has put Nadal beating Federer has cause so much controversy.

How anyone could pick Sharapova over Venus at Wimbledon is beyond me. Look at that facts people; Sharapova has had two chances to take out Venus there and was beaten in straight sets both times (the second time worse than the first). And for the person who says Serena will "get stomped" by Ivanovic and Venus will "get stomped" by Sharapova, uh, can I have what sleeping pills you're taking, cause they seem to make you dream while awake too?

Couldn't disagree more with the final outcome - Federer has no complex aagainst Nadal on either grass or hard court (case in point: his demolition of Nadal in The Masters 2007).

I want Djokovic to experience a straight set beatdown if he plays Fed in the semis. Someone needs to silence this punk's outrageous musings/ predictions.

I just don't think this will be Nadal's year on grass - there's too much hype around him and I see him losing in the second round.

Quarter 1:
Ana Ivanovic defeats Samantha Stosur
Quarter 2:
Serena Williams defeats Agnieszka Radwanska
Quarter 3:
Maria Sharapova defeats Lindsay Davenport
Quarter 4:
Jelena Jankovic defeats Venus Williams
Semifinal 1:
Ana Ivanovic defeats Serena Williams
Semifinal 2:
Maria Sharapova defeats Jelena Jankovic
Final:
Maria Sharapova defeats Ana Ivanovic

no way Ana wins this one.

I'm a Federer fan Josh, but above all I'm a tennis fan. Winning is great, but winning with style is better, and none in the Open Era has done it as well as Federer. That's why I had to laugh when I saw in a post someone putting Borg ahead of Federer in the GOAT debate. Borg ? Come on. There's no discussion that his looks his personal aura and his record are Hall of Fame material, but you would have to PAY me to watch one of his matches.

Anyway back to Wimbledon now : I think Nadal has a reasonable shot at it. But I wouldn't bet the house even on him reaching the final. Don't forget he lost two sets to players like Kendrick or Youzhny. Any time Nadal faces a good offensive player he's vulnerable.

On the other hand, after 2007 ended people forgot how Federer was nowhere near his peak level entering into Wimbledon. His forehand was completely AWOL, which was the main reason he couldn't threaten Nadal at the FO. He had skipped Halle and entered Wimbledon without preparation after a minor injury. He lacked match practice. But, it's so cool to bury Federer now, so to spice up the drama we're sold the fairy tale of a Federer cruising through 2007 and contrasting with the supposed wreck of a player he is now. Wake up and watch the matches, boys. The 2007 final went on so long because Federer was too inconsistent and picked it up only in the fifth set (not to talk about the multiple lucky net cords and a Hawk Eye which seemed piloted by Uncle Toni :)).

For me, Federer is playing better now. He's won Halle. Without losing a set. He's got the game to blow Nadal off the court, which he's already done at the Masters last year (Oh yes I forgot, it was the old Nadal, prior to his resurrection). I'm more afraid of Djokovic than from Nadal, to be honest. But Nadal won the Queen's !! You say. Big deal. Sampras lost Queen's countless times to nobodies, only to pick up the Wimbledon trophy three weeks after with ease. We'll see.

Spot on, Ronaldo. Gulbis could threaten Nadal. I don't see it happening though, mainly because Gulbis has not the necessary experience on grass. But it's perfectly possible.

As for the Masters 2007, this is one of those matches that got down the memory hole, very conveniently for those who like to say Nadal always plays Federer close. This match wasn't close at all, after the middle of the second set it was an absolute tennis master class from Federer.

the only way ivanovic is winning wimbledon is if she doesn't face anyone(serena venus sharapova davenport) just like at the french.roland garros just fall in her hands just like every other title she has until now.she never beat a good player in the route to the title,she is damm luck .everyone loses first and then she has to play against jankovic and kuznetsova to win the titles.the day she win a final beating sharapova serena or venus i will consider her a real grandslam champion,just like i don't consider svetlana a grandslam champion.jankovic is a medium player who will never win the big ones because she doesn't have any weapons to do that,she just wait for the errors .because of that she has a good record against venus and serena(they miss to much and has a bad record against henin sharapova ivanovic.

Ok, I'll admit Vincent that Fed did turn it on in the fifth set laast year in Wimbledon, but he wouldnt have got that chance had Nadal not taken the medical timeout, he had broken down mentally and had he not got the necessary amount of time (through the timeout) to gather himself, I think Nadal would have taken the match.

If you want to talk about the Masters at Hamburg in 2007, take into account Nadal's physical state; he had just come from winning Rome (where Federer had been knocked out in the 3rd Round or Quarters), so Fed had more time to prepare and recouperate before Nadal arrived. Now this year when Nadal did have time to prepare, he won and he wasnt even in peak conditioning.

And also, if you want to talk about sublime tennis, lets discuss the FO Final 2008.

Speaking of Halle, Federer's highest ranked player faced was Baghdatis at Rank 18, he faced no grass court specialists. Nadal at Queens, mind, managed to beat Djokovic at Rank 3, and Roddick who is regarded as a grass court specialist, I'll admit the feat of not losing serve all week of a tournament is impressive, but it would have been regarded as special had he faced any real competition.

*Sharapova will will her way to victory unless she has to face one of the Williams girls. They are so merciless when returning Sharapova's serve.

*Regarding Nadal's chances, I'm a little surprised at how little credence is being given to the fact that Wimbledon is played on grass. For example, Steve calls a potential meeting with Youzhny a "semi-test" for Nadal. How can facing the guy who had him down two sets to love the last time they met on grass be just a semi-test? Wouldn't that be a major test?


Roger, in his worst year in 6 years, is still 37-8 so far this year.

Roger is still 37-8 this year so far. Bad for him but good for most.
Roger is still 37-8 this year so far. Bad for him but good for most.

ROGER has WON 59 straight matches and
10 straight titles and
5 straight Wimbledons on GRASS.
NO GRASS loss since 2002, 6 long years ago.
Roger beat
both
Rafa and Andy
2 times each in
last 4 Wimbledon finals.

The draw-Gods continue to smile favorably on Djokovic ! Roddick has a pretty easy draw himself. Being seeded at no.6 turned out to be a stroke of luck for him ! Federer has the toughest draw (yes, I'm not just saying this because I'm a Fed-KAD). He has a few potentially tricky opponents in the initial rounds. Soderling, Monfils/Nishikori, Hewitt/Gonzo ! That's tough ! He should be able to beat all those players and make it through to the semis if he's playing anywhere close to his A level. In the semis, Djokovic awaits, and he should be relatively fresh due to his cup-cake draw.

Nadal's draw is the 2nd toughest after Fed's. However, given his current form (starting from Roland Garros), and given the fact that he has the fear factor going for him right now, I don't see any of the players in his section threatening him.

I agree with Steve's pick of the semifinalists: Federer vs Djokovic, Nadal vs Roddick. But I'm too chicken to go any further with predicting the outcome beyond the semis. I think Nadal is in Fed's head, probably too much to overcome, so I would NOT be looking forward to a Federer-Nadal final.


twist serve, Youzhny form has depreciated considerably since last year. You can't base opinions upon what happened a year ago. It's current form that matters. Youzhny is a player who is struggling to find his winning form. If he runs into Nadal here, it will be a straight-sets crushing defeat !

According to Rafa fans,
Rafa is ALWAYS hurt and injured
whenever he gets BEATEN.

Rafa fans always use his
FAKE injuries as an INaccurate excuse whenever he gets BEATEN.

NOBODY EVER outplays or beats Rafa legitimately.
He has to be hurt every time he loses.

His opponents are
never hurt and
never retire
against him
when they could win or are winning the match against him though,
of course,
according to
very consistent, objective, honest Rafa fans. LOL.

Sorry Josh, I meant the Masters Cup 2007. My point was that, outside of clay, Federer has definitely the tools to comprehensively beat Nadal. He didn't do so at Wimby, for two reasons : Nadal played really on fire, and Federer misfired a lot. Even at the beginning of the 5th set where he gave Nadal many chances and where Nadal, crucially, faltered when he had to put away an easy forehand. I attribute this mainly to a lack of match practice and the fact that Federer's game was not at his usual level from Indian Wells to Roland-Garros included. Too well do I remember those countless forehands in mid-court that he buried in the net...

That's why, for me, the quality of the field in Halle isn't relevant. Contrary to Nadal, Federer doesn't have to prove he can win on grass ; he's done so for the last 6 years. But he needs match practice, he needs to hone his serve, he needs to fine tune his forehand, all things he couldn't do before Wimbledon last year and which cost him dearly. If he's ready, the title is his, I don't see even Nadal wrestling it away from him.

Crazy-for-Rog,

FACTUALLY

Roger is 2-0 versus Rafa at WIMBLEDON on Grass the last 2 years.

Roger is 5-2 versus Rafa on ALL SURFACES but CLAY.

Roger is 5-2 versus Rafa NOT on Clay.

Based on all evidence, he obviously has NO Nadal complex OFF of Clay.

Crazy-for-Rog:

Okay, let's move up to this year. Youzhny won their only meeting this year, too.

Vincent,

Yes
Roger did beat Rafael at Wimbledon in each of the last 2 years.

What are you talking about?

Fed fans except for a few are oblivious to the fact that Rafa is in the best form of the three this year. Winning Queen was a huge deal for Rafa. Now he knows that he's got game to beat anyone. I do not think he is anymore challenged by attacking players on grass coz he himself is playing some brilliant attacking tennis so far. As for Youzhny I do not think he will make it far to meet Rafa. Strange how a few people think that a guy who is struggling to find form will challenge #2 player in the world who is red hot right now. Gulbis is a big test but he does not have big-match experience and will eventually crumble under pressure. Kiefer and Youzhny like Steve said are only semi-challengers. I'm worried about Stepanek but since he is injured Rafa will be the fav. Gasquet=headcase, doubt he will make any significant impact. Murray, can play awesome but then again nothing Rafa in his form cannot handle. Roddick, I'm slightly worried since he can hurt Rafa but then again I think Rafa can take Roddick as well. If Djokovic makes it past Fed I think Rafa will beat him since I think Nadal is in Djoko's head. If it's Federer I'm afraid it will be too close to call. Rafa is in the form of his life right now and Fed has the mental edge in Wimbledon. Whatever happens I will be ready.

I don't put much stock in Nadal. Luck and favourable draws only get you so far
=================================

what do you mean luck and favourable draws!! Rafa had the toughest scheduling and draw last year and he made it to the finals and lost a five-setter. Open your eyes and look. Tennis is based in reality not beauty. I respect your opinion but c'mon FAVOURABLE DRAW!!!!
Perhaps you are still not over the FO final where the world no 1 lost winning just FOUR GAMES! FOUR!

Carlos, disagree with you on Ivanovic, she has a great serve and the forehand is a great weapon. I would agree with you on Jankovic. Also, didn't Ana beat Sharapova at the FO last year? I think she deserves more credit. Let's face it, they are all lucky Justine isn't around.

Okay, let's move up to this year. Youzhny won their only meeting this year, too.

Hmmm..In Hard courts..nadal's weakest surface where he played a match the next day after winning a 4 hr tussle against Moya. Youzhny will not be a factor in grass. Nadal is in the form of his life and he knows it and I do not see him losing in five sets to anyone but Djokovic or Federer.

I agree with Steve:I am taking Rafa over Roger and not b/c I am a Rafa fan but, b/c like Roger himself has put it "it all dependends on the form of the moment"...
Fact is Roger is not in top form (hasn't recovered? hasn't been able to train and find a rhythm?), while Rafa is.

Having said all of that, who knows, someone like the Joker may still win or a big server may knock Rafa out early.

But all the signs and the predictions favour Rafa, imo.