Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Blogs  |  Newsletter Store
TENNIS.com - Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   Fitness
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   String Theory
   The Healthy Player
   The Pro Shop
   Backcourt: Framed
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
« Deep Tennis: Golden Age Change in the Weather »
Opener
Posted 08/21/2008 @ 5 :27 PM

Image_2So I started by taking a quick scan down the men’s draw this afternoon to see where Novak Djokovic had landed. Starting at the top, I looked at the names of each of the major seeds and eventually saw that the Serb was in the bottom half. “One more time with Rafa,” I thought. I kept scrolling and was shocked to see that I had been wrong—Roger Federer was the name at the very bottom of the draw.

This was a little surreal. I had actually read the name at the very top of the draw—"Rafael Nadal"—as "Roger Federer." That’s how big an upheaval the new ATP order is. The old one, with Federer on top and Nadal trailing, has been around for so long that it’s ingrained in my subconscious. It's like going against nature.

As for the women’s side, I was struck by the fact that the top seeds are both from the tiny country of Serbia, something that should continue to amaze us—by the way, why do these things happen in little clusters: two Belgians (Henin and Clijsters), two Germans (Becker and Graf), now three Serbs (Ivanovic, Jankovic, and Djokovic)? Other than that, this looks like a repeat of last year’s women’s event, when most of the heavy artillery was up top—this should quiet conspiracy theorists who speculated that it was done to help Maria Sharapova in 2007; do you think the USTA would go out of its way to put Jelena Jankovic into its prime-time final? In 2007, the result was that Svetlana Kuznetsova was allowed to sneak through in the bottom half. She might do it again.

On the one hand, the Open feels a little like overkill coming on the heels of such a successful Olympic tournament. On the other, how can we complain? This is a reasonable facsimile of what most of us have wanted the schedule to look like for years—compressed, with few lulls, and packed with a high percentage of significant events.

As I said, we have the draws, which means we can at least imagine how they will play out. The fact that they won’t play out the way we think—or anywhere close to what we think—is no reason for us not to be brave and make a few predictions anyway.

The Women
First Quarter

Ana Ivanovic is back at No. 1, which I suppose makes sense; she has won a Slam. But she’s still recovering from a thumb injury and hasn’t done much of anything since losing early at Wimbledon. So we don’t have much to go on when it comes to her form. There are some quasi-names near her—Dellacqua, Kanepi, Dechy, Cornet, plus Mauresmo and Petrova—but I’ll take Ivanovic into the quarters, where she might face Dinara Safina. The trendy pick would be Safina there; she’s been the player of the summer. But it’s hardly a sure thing. She may be a little disappointed, her momentum a little slowed, after coming so close to gold in Beijing, and Ivanovic has also beaten her the last three times they’ve played. But I think Safina's form has been too good for her not to extend it to her second Slam semi. She's made the quarters at Flushing before, and, for what it's worth, her brother has also played some pretty good ball here in the past.
Semifinalist: Safina

Second Quarter
This section is bracketed by the Williams sisters. It’s never clear what you’re going to get from these two, but I don’t see much to keep them from facing off in the quarters. Perhap Szavay on Serena’s side, and a bigger perhaps for Radwanska on Venus’—she upended Sharapova here last year. As for a rematch of the Wimbledon final, I don’t think Serena wants an unpleasant surprise like that twice in a row. What she wants is a Slam of her own in 2008, to match her sister's.
Semifinalist: Serena Williams

Third Quarter
Here’s where it starts to get a little rough, where we start to miss the Henins and Sharapovas of the world. The two top seeds are Elena Dementieva and Kuznetsova. Their primary challengers, at least on paper, are Chakvetadze and Schnyder. Kuznetsova reached the final last year, but Dementieva is on a high after winning a gold medal (on the same surface she’ll see in New York) and has been to an Open final of her own before. I think she’ll continue with her strong play.
Semifinalist: Dementieva

Fourth Quarter
Finally we stagger into the bottom quarter, led by Jankovic and Olympic bronze medalist Vera Zvonareva. This Serb has also been hurt, but she made her Slam breakthrough at the Open a couple years ago. Her draw includes a testy opponent in Caroline Wozniacki, who took her to three sets at Wimbledon, in the fourth round.
Semifinalist: Jankovic

Semifinals: S. Williams d. Safina; Dementieva d. Jankovic
Final: S. Williams d. Dementieva

The Men
First Quarter

Rafael Nadal makes his debut at the top of a major-tournament draw, but it’s not like it benefits him any more than being No. 2. He still might face a tricky opponent like hard-hitting Victor Troicki—tricky Troicky—or a vet like Olivier Rochus, or a clean-swinger like Philipp Kohlschreiber. And it didn’t keep him from drawing the most dreaded name of all, tennis’ prince of darkness, Ivo Karlovic himself. Nadal beat him in a third-set tiebreaker at Queen’s this year, and he’ll see him again if Dr. Ace can survive until the fourth round.

The bottom half features three of the game’s most erratic and frustrating talents: Blake, Monfils, and Nalbandian. None of them, even on hard courts, are likely to beat Nadal over five sets, not with the iron-clad confidence the Spaniard has at the moment. He’s got a big win—the Olympics—on DecoTurf under his belt, which could be the final ingredient he needs to go all the way at Flushing Meadows. He’s going to be the face of the event, of tennis itself, but he’s always made a specialty of blocking every thing out except the little yellow ball.
First-round match to watch: Blake vs. Donald Young
Semifinalist: Nadal

Second Quarter
David Ferrer is the top seed, but three younger names stand out: Del Potro, Murray, and Wawrinka. Del Potro has won four straight tournaments, Murray has pushed his ranking all the way to No. 6 despite a disappointing Olympics, and Wawrinka should get a jolt of confidence from his doubles gold in Beijing. Can any of them translate that into their first Slam semi? I don’t think Del Potro is ready; Wawrinka may be in the Top 10, but his results haven’t been that consistently strong; Murray is a wild card—meltdowns still lurk and his fitness will be tested—but I think if he gets his famous choppers into this he’ll gain confidence with each match. This summer I think he started to believe, at last, that he belonged with the best.
Sleeper: Feliciano Lopez. He's near Murray, and he gave Federer all he could handle in Ashe Stadium in 2007.
Semifinalist: Murray

Third Quarter
Your eyes go immediately to the top of this quarter, where Andy Roddick is scheduled to face Fabrice Santoro in a guaranteed night spectacle. I’m thinking there will be a few dicey moments before Roddick finally hammers the Magician off the court. The other names that stick out here are Tsonga (whoa, he’s back?), Gonzalez (the silver medalist might get an air war with Roddick in the fourth), and Marin Cilic, the latest beanpole monster hitter from Croatia. But the name that counts is Novak Djokovic’s. He may not have beaten Nadal in Beijing, but he played as well as could be expected, and improved his form from earlier in the summer. Plus: He’s a Broadway kind of guy.
Sleeper: Ernests Gulbis, who could face Roddick in the second round
Semifinalist: Djokovic

Fourth Quarter
Oh, the indignity. Federer has to go up the draw this time! It looks so much harder than rafting down it the way he always has. His first test might come against that eternal agitator, Radek Stepanek, in the third round—the Czech beat him on clay in Rome but likes hard courts best. After that, it’s pretty quiet until the quarters, where Federer is slotted to meet Nikolay Davydenko, or perhaps Richard Gasquet, both of whom have generally been cannon-fodder for the world No. 2 (Federer as “world No. 2”; weird thing to say, isn’t it?). Based on No. 2's recent results, there will be some ugly moments along the way, and most likely a serious scare, but being the four-time defending champion has to help a little. Right?
First-round match to watch: Gasquet vs. Haas. Nice backhands
Semifinalist: Federer

Semifinals: Nadal d. Murray; Djokovic d. Federer
Final: Nadal d. Djokovic

See you from Flushing Meadows starting Monday. We'll have all kinds of things to talk about.

| | Send to a Friend
Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 9 10 Next »

FIRST!!!

VAMOS RAFA, CMON MOMMA SERENA!!!!!!!!!

Thanks for this Steve. This is what I most looked forward to during the slams!! I appreciate your work so much!! How long will you be staying in Flushing Meadows?

"But I think Safina's form has been too good for her not to extend it to her first Slam semi."

What are you talking about there? She made the finals of Roland Garros.

first?

meh

yeah.. ivanovic beat safina at the french final..
and she will beat her again at the open.

BTW Steve,

Is there any way you could post some score predictions for at least the finals?

AND! I just have to say that you look so much like Darren Cahill!!

***"But I think Safina's form has been too good for her not to extend it to her first Slam semi."
What are you talking about there? She made the finals of Roland Garros.***

I'm guessing Steve meant first USO semi, although Dinara did reach the quarters a couple years back (falling to then-No 1 Mauresmo).

Steve - intersting picks. I would love for all your semi-finalist to come true but then again, all GSs this year have shown some surprises. Let's see how it all goes. Meanwhile , what about Nalby?

afwu - Have you visited Serena's website recently? she's got some great pics on there! Go momma Serena ;-)

Steve as much as I like Ivanovic to reach the Quarters I dont think she would as she has the toughest quarter amongst ( Petrova , Mauresmo ) all the top women plus the lack of matches since Roland Garros would defintely play its part .

If Nadal and Nalbandian meet that'd be in the quarters, if David makes it that far it means that he's playing good tennis and if he's playing good tennis I think that he could easily beat Nadal (not the same as: beat Nadal with ease) and I don't get the whole "5 set match" thing, Nalbandian has one of the best records in matches decided in 5 sets. The thing is: I don't think Gervasio will get that far :(

"Nice backhands" LOL

Talk about UNDERSTATEMENT!

i have to disagree with the men's final. i believe djokovic will win. my wildcard is federer to win. wow i just picked him as a wildcard. he needs to win at least one slam this year right? totally agree with the women 100%.

Let's go Roddick,,, You are the man. Win it Roddick.

Hey Steve

I'm on vacations and came here to take a look at the draw.

And this is unheard of: for the third Grand Slam in a row, Portugal's Frederico Gil meets former Wimbledon junior champ Jeremy Chardy of France in the first round. After Roland Garros and Wimbledon (and in both those Slam Frederico came out of the qualifying), our portuguese number one is meeting Chardy.

What are the odds on that? Any mathematicians out there?

I can't believe I'm saying this, I'm sorry all Rafa fans...

I want Roger to take the title. Rafa can have it next year, right now we need Roger to win something meaningful on his own.

Need to keep the rivalry alive and interesting!

I actually think Venus over Serena!!

roger is the best, cghuck out the rest

Ubha has the same men's semifinal picks at ESPN.

It's hard to disagree.


Ah the predictions again!
Time and again they go awfully wrong.

My money on Gulbis. Cheap OTM option, good bargain given the odds!

Oh! Steve!...you put it in writing...I have to go do the anti jinxing dance I perfected for Wimbledon.

Vamos Rafa!

Miguel:
I believe the probability of Gil meeting Chardy meeting three times in a row at a Slam in the first round is around 0.00000049% (1/127 x 1/127 x 1/127). This is the probability assuming that they are both in the draw in the first place.

That equals 1/2,048,383, or approx. one in two million.

My picks for the guys:

- Nadal over Murray.
- Federer over Djokovic.

- Federer over Nadal. I'm a Rafa fan but right now tennis needs Roger to send some sort of statement. Him winning the US Open would be good for the sport.

The girls:

- Serena over Safina.
- Chakvetadze over jankovic.

- Serena over Chakvetadze. I wanted to pick Safina over Serena in the semis but that'll probably be a night match at Arthur Ashe, gotta go with Serena.

I agree with everything except Djokovic.....I think that if Roddick can make it that far the home crowd will boost him over Djokovic....it's surviving the first few rounds that will be important.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 9 10 Next »
Post a Comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In


  * Only required field   

  (Optional)

  (Optional)

« Deep Tennis: Golden Age Change in the Weather »

More from TennisWorld
Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor

More from Concrete Elbow
TENNIS Magazine is published 10 times per year.




Save 75% off of the annual newsstand price.
Categories
2005 Entries
2006 Entries
2007 Entries
2008 Entries
2009 Entries
Recent Entries
W: The Rest
W: The Lucky Few
W: Semifinal Preview
W: Sweet 16
W: Totally American
W: At the Crossroads
W: Sunny Afternoon with Roger
W: Keeping Tabs: Moonwalk Edition
W: The Hat is Back(wards), Mate
W Notebook: Sonic Youth Edition
Statistics
This blog currently has 588 entries and 39235 comments.