Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Blogs  |  Newsletter Store
TENNIS.com - Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   Fitness
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   String Theory
   The Healthy Player
   The Pro Shop
   Backcourt: Framed
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
« Playing Ball: Night Game The Hot and Sleepy Season »
CE 10: Plus One Edition
Posted 07/13/2009 @ 4 :19 PM

Hl If there’s a universal truth in tennis today, it is this: The Davis Cup cannot win. In 2009, the big idea was to move the quarterfinal and semifinal ties to the weekends right after Wimbledon and the U.S. Open, so the players could go straight from one to the other. What was the upshot? The team event lost one of its star stalwarts, Andy Roddick, after he surrendered a heartbreaking Wimbledon final and couldn’t face the indoor clay that the Croatian team had waiting for him on Friday.

Still, the event, like a BBC production that casts expert character actors rather than Hollywood stars, continues to produce first-class drama with relatively anonymous talent—do you know the name of the newest DC hero pictured at right? Davis Cup proves that, for 12 days a year, the sport remains bigger than its stars. (Is that what they call damning with faint praise?) Here’s a roundup of what happened in DC and elsewhere this past weekend.

1. Croats Crush

Count me as another casualty of the new DC schedule. Like Roddick, I wasn’t properly prepared to get into the U.S.-Croatia tie; I like to have a week off after Wimbledon to let it sink in. Otherwise, it feels like just one more event on the endlessly churning circuit. I watched what I could on my computer at work on Friday and at my tennis club on Sunday. What I saw more than anything was Marin Cilic pulling at his sweaty,one-size-too big shirt and then hauling off and hitting winners I'd never seen from him before. Davis Cup does funny things to people. Suddenly Marat Safin can focus, and Marin Cilic can show us the passion that lurks somewhere beneath his dour surface. Even at 6-foot-6, he looked much more balanced and comfortable on clay than either James Blake or Mardy Fish. The key to beating the Americans is as clear and simple as ever: dirt. 

2. Israeli Upset

Put their semifinal run together with their bizarre and lonely victory in Sweden in the opening round—see their surreal celebration in Malmo here—and Israel’s DC team may qualify as the biggest story of the 2009 season. This time Dudi Sela, Harel Levy and company swept the Russians in front of 11,000 fans in Tel Aviv. Along the way, they extended Marat Safin’s yearlong farewell tour of pain. Safin and partner Igor Kunitsyn came back from two sets down in the doubles only to lose the match, and the tie, 6-4 in the fifth. Israel’s reward is a trip to Spain for the semis. Doubles player Andy Ram says he finds that prospect “frightening.” Give him points for being honest, but at least his team should be very, very loose.

3. Spain Survives

To get to the semis, a Nadal-less Spanish team had to go the distance to beat Germany for their 16th straight victory at home. This time the hero was JC Ferrero, who picked up the slack after a loss by Fernando Verdasco by winning a straight-set clincher over Andreas Beck—Spain is deep, no doubt about it; they never seem to have the same MVP twice. Ferrero’s turn is especially noteworthy. He led the country to a Cup title early in this decade but had long been relegated to the sidelines. “This competition is amazing and to play for your country also is very special,” Ferrero said afterward. “There’s no words to explain how I feel right now but I’m pretty happy about it.” Pretty happy? After all these years, the proud JC remains a tough man to please.

4. Czech Mating

I spoke too soon at the top of this post. What’s the only thing more snakebitten than Davis Cup? It’s the Argentine team. A year after the Massacre in Mar del Plata, their own star stalwart, David Nalbandian, pulled up lame and left the team exceptionally vulnerable on hard courts in Ostrava. Berdych and Stepanek won all three rubbers in a 3-2 victory. After Stepanek won the clincher, he made one of those statements that only DC seems to inspire. “I had to really dig deep to step on the court,” Stepanek said. “After the doubles [on Saturday] I was like 90 per cent sure that I’m not able to play singles, but I was assured by the doctors that it was not going to damage my knee. I had to lie to myself that it didn’t hurt.”

Kudos to Czech coach Jaroslav Navratil for resting Stepanek in the first singles so he’d be ready for both the doubles and the decider. And kudos in defeat to Juan Martin del Potro, who shrugged off any memories of his key defeat in Mar del Plata and beat both Berdych and Minar in straight sets. That’s what singles stars do.

The Czechs travel to Croatia for the semis, starting September 18.

5. The Loners’ Game

The NY Times pointed out last weekend that it’s been 30 years since the original stereo-for-one, the Walkman, was invented. Did you know why it was created in the first place? Sony co-founder Akio Morita wanted something to listen to while he played tennis. First it was sports agents, then private musical universes. Tennis has certainly done its part to up the self-absorption levels of modern life. As for me, after cranking a white bargain-bin cassette of the Clash’s first album on my Walkman until it broke, my ears would never be the same.

6. The Roid Question

Slate informs us that tennis is ripe for a steroid infestation. The writer, Bill Gifford, claims that there isn’t much out of competition testing. I was under the impression that there was a decent amount done by surprise and during the off season.

7. Ramming Ahead

Like I said last week, tennis is nothing if not utterly unpredictable. Who would have thought that veteran Challenger mainstay Rajeev Ram, 25, was due for a surge? The American was the lucky loser in Newport when Mardy Fish pulled out to play Davis Cup. Ram rode this lucky break all the way to a win over Sam Querrey in the final.

8. Life of Johnson

Also in Newport this weekend, legendary African-American tennis coach Dr. Robert Johnson—he worked with both Althea Gibson and Arthur Ashe, not a bad résumé—was inducted into the tennis Hall of Fame. Tennis.com profiles him here.

9. New Old Blood

New faces have been what the WTA has needed for a while now. It got one at the top of the tour today when Stacey Allaster was named the new chairman, replacing Larry Scott. She had previously been the organization’s president under Scott. Whatever her plans—according to SportsBusinessJournal, she’s not looking to make any big changes—it’s a positive for the sport just to have visible leadership in an important post. The USTA isn’t replacing Arlen Kantarian at the U.S. Open’s director, and ATP chief Adam Helfant, perhaps in reaction to the flashy style that doomed his predecessor, Etienne de Villiers, has been virtually invisible since he took over at the start of 2009.

10. Speaking of Walkmans . . .

Three songs I’ve been spinning—yes, I still think of songs as “records”—in my IPod on my way to the tennis courts.

Luna’s version of the Velvet Underground’s “Ride into the Sun”: weak singing, poetic guitar

Eddie Cochran’s “Lonely.” Perfect for tennis players. As a gravelly voiced musician friend of mine in college told me, “Everyone writes a song with that title.”

Bob Seger’s “Night Moves.” Sue me, it makes me feel like it’s summer.

11. Night Game, Part II

And speaking of such moves, in my last post, which was about the particular vibes that come from playing tennis in the evening, I forgot to mention one of my very best experiences along those lines. In high school I was a counselor for a week in June at a local tennis camp. During the day, we sweated it out in the humid glare while feeding balls and yelling at brats of various ages. In the evening, sans rugrats, we gathered again to practice against each other. The competition was serious, but everyone was looser under the lights. The cooler air and darker sky relaxed us—I could see the ball better under the lights. We were pounding out the annoyances of the day and remembering why we picked up the sport in the first place. There was something luxurious and indulgent about the scene. Nature, in the form of the setting sun, told us that the tennis day should have been over. But the buzzing electric lights had the final say: We could play as long, long, long, long, long as we wanted.

***

I’ll be back this week to preview the U.S. hard-court season, when the sport makes its annual transition from the hallowed grass of Wimbledon to the asphalt parking lots of Indiana. Still, no part of the tennis year looks as good at night.

| | Send to a Friend
Comments

Steve,
Will be interested to see your USO Series previews even though it is dominated by the ATP. WTA stars normally play very little before the USO but with Roadmap in effect, it is going to be interesting to see how the WTA stars schedule. Agree that Israel is the story of the 2009 Davis Cup season for the reasons you listed above. And, finally agree with SportsBusiness Journal on Stacey not making any changes. Was she part of the committee with Larry Scott when Roadmap was being developed?

Yes, Israel's stars were aligned right... until Ferrero's stars started working the right way, too.

I hate to admit it, but I already had fantasies on Germany at home during Rosh Hashana, without Haas, I would have given us the edge.

But, I have the feeling the boys are less greedy than I am, and they're going to get the spanking from spain loviningly now that they've bean Russia.

Pmac is the one I blame for the USA DC fiasco, Sam should have played. IF Sam hasn't proven his worth on the dirt last year vs. Rafa, what more could he do?

*lovingly"

*lovingly"

The Roid Question?

I don't get this issue at all - why would roids be a problem in tennis? Seeems to me that bulking up works against tennis players - they don't need any extra bulk or weight for their sport. Look at Roger and Rafa - they don't lift weights - from the waist up they are practically anorexic - and that's the way their trainers want them.

MrRick: the main issue might not be the steroids used to bulk up but blood doping agents used to increase endurance.

There is nothing like Davis Cup.

The slate article cites stats released by the ITF:

http://www.itftennis.com/antidoping/news/statistics.asp

The anti-doping program really is a joke. But, how do they actually fund a larger scale anti-doping program? I heard that the ATP was strapped for cash...how do the economics of this sorta thing work? Actually, I'm not sure how cycling pays for it, unless the sponsors pay a fee.

I assume that's Levy pictured above? Though, I can't be sure, as I didn't catch any of that tie.

I thought L. Jon made a strong case that tennis players are tested very heavily in "Strokes of Genius" but I don't recall the specifics.

Lots of interesting questions here that go beyond tennis. Obviously it's O.K. for Agassi to get multiple steroid injections in his back during his last U.S. Open, but it wouldn't be all right if he was using the steroids some other way? Lots of gray areas here.

Personally, I think it's pretty unlikely that tennis really does have much of a problem. You don't see the huge improvements in performance that we've seen in baseball (at least beyond what's clearly from equipment). When Harold Solomon decides to come back to the game and starts hitting 160 mph serves, then I'll get suspicious.

Adam Helfant has been nearly invisible since taking over the ATP? Let's hope we're only so lucky with the WTA. The WTA is so irrelevant these days, silence from them wouldn't be deafening, it would be the sweetest sound in the history of the sport!

Hey everyone. :)

Well, I'm kind of hoping that a new WTA chief will help to make the WTA less "irrelevant" rather than non-existent or silent, really.

Christopher - I remember that passage in Strokes of Genius, too.

"Along the way, they extended Marat Safin’s yearlong farewell tour of pain." - ouch, but that's exactly what it is so far.

I still have my cassette-playing Walkman...fie upon MP3 players and the like! LOL. I never have liked listening to music on a Walkman or whatever, so it didn't get much use. :)

I'm sad Argentina are out, even more sad that Nalbandian will be out for so long. Very happy for JCF's hero moment though, and hopefully Rafa will be able to play in the next tie, if he wants to and can play without worsening his knee issues. Fabulous run for Israel, and, miracles do happen, so...it doesn't necessarily end in September.

Steve,

Has the idea of making the Davis cup an alternate year event been ever considered in the men's tour??

Wouldn't making it so obviously lessen the burn of the tour every year. It would make the DC cup more prestigious. This might give the top players more incentives to aim for it(Some already do even now). Maybe we won't have federer and roddick opting out of them after emotionally exhausting themselves in heart-breakers(Aussie open, wimbledon).

DC is won in Nov-Dec and it's defense has to be started soon and this process stretches again for months. The team winning DC don't get to hold the cup for long peacefully before it has to be defended. The prize of winning DC is worth holding about for a greater period. Examples which come to my mind are, FIFA world cup, ICC cricket world cup and the Ashes series(I'm from India and thus the cricket examples).

Thanks Steve,

Yes there is no other like Davis Cup indeed I second that.

So far there have been some major upsets.Way to go Marin really stepped up,isnt that what DC is all about.The minute you put on that shirt in your countrys colours you immediately take on another perspective.

Dosent matter how high or low you are ranked you stand 10 feet tall.

Spain again showed the depth and the passion,well done Ferrero.

Cant wait till September bring it on.

The Roid question : Testing is getting better since the inception of the WADA code. In 2008 there were no blood tests, and almost no out-of-competition testing (see the ITF stats). In-competition urine tests are useless, as doping is done out of competition and dopers arrive clean at the tournaments, and urine tests are very limited. Even if you did 1.000 of them you wouldn't catch anyone, except perhaps a hapless junior stupid enough to take steroids from yesteryear.

I thought tennis had strong testing protocols as well. Nonetheless, sometimes the most accurate look at a program is done by those from the outside, and I don't think the author of the Slate article is a regular tennis writer. He also seems well versed in the testing procedures of other major international sports such as track and cycling, so I guess I will take him at his word that tennis' testing is weak.

I also think a problem is that we compare tennis' testing procedures and penalties to those of the four major North American sports, which are a joke in comparison. Perhaps when compared with other sports who follow WADA protocol, tennis' testing and enforcement are lax.

Finally, tennis really is a perfect sport for the nondiscriminate doper. The sport requires so much varied athletisicm that almost anything would likely be of tangible benefit. Therefore, at the very least, one must admit that the problem could likely be more widespread than thought.

"Finally, tennis really is a perfect sport for the nondiscriminate doper. The sport requires so much varied athletisicm that almost anything would likely be of tangible benefit."

Rudy-- I actually disagree with this. I think speed, endurance, timing, and flexibility matter MUCH more in tennis than does muscle mass. Were this not the case, Federer would be losing to Nadal and Roddick in straights every time. Would Federer be a better tennis player with 20 extra pounds of muscle? I strongly doubt it.

I think there are basically two types of PEDs that would be helpful to a tennis player: those that help endurance and those that promote faster healing and recovery from workouts. For the second type especially, I think the lines between legitimate and illegitimate are getting pretty fuzzy.

And since we're talking about drugs...

FREE REEECHARD!!!

I'm pretty sure on the day the 2008 ITF stats were published Maria Sharapova broke a nail, so that got the front page on tennis.com.

Why did it take the internet to inform tennis fans that the ITF only conducted 20 EPO tests and, according to ATP rules, the ATP gets a three week heads up as to when testing will be conducted?

I actually sent the numbers to some of your co-writers on this site and never heard back, put them on BobdoWorld only to be called a troll, wrote an article on BleacherReport, only to get 4000 less hits on articles about fascinating things like why I must love certain tennis players.

Wertheim has a book to sell and is a glorified ATP/WTA shill. That may be the reason SI constanly passes him over when it comes to writing real tennis news. Wertheim should have been the first person to report the release of the numbers.

Harel Levy is a lucky person- andreev rules!(junitsyn, not so much)

Christopher--I would disagree that endurance is more important than strength in tennis. Yes, it matters greatly, but tennis is as much about explosiveness and raw speed as endurance (i.e. anaerobic v. aerobic). You get faster and you'll get better.

Technique alone can inprove speed, but after that one thing matters-strength. Increased strength means increased power and explosiveness, which means increased speed. Therefore, at the professional level where all of the athletes are elite, if you want to get faster, increasing your strength is the best way to go. And so you hit the squat rack and get more explosive. Strength building PEDs would thus be of benefit.

I also bet Federer is much stronger than people give him credit. Sure, his upper body may not be as ripped as others, but I bet he can squat a pretty good amount and that his power base is loaded. Look how explosive he is--there's a lot of relative strength in his lower body.

Finally, PEDs that let you recover faster and promote healing are the same ones that help build raw strength. Those PEDs let you train harder, longer and more frequently, thus making you stronger. I always found the Bonds and Clemens claims that they never took shortcuts--look how hard they work out every day--as red herrings. The fact that they, at advanced ages, worked out that long and hard could just as likely be evidence of taking something.

"I actually sent the numbers to some of your co-writers on this site and never heard back, put them on BobdoWorld only to be called a troll, wrote an article on BleacherReport, only to get 4000 less hits on articles about fascinating things like why I must love certain tennis players."

NancyDrew,
Now, this is a good place to bring up the steriods and PED issue due to different topics being discussed instead of a place where the topic is over a person winning a Slam or major event. I did read the reports mentioned at the time it was posted and the Slate report linked in this thread. I saw those numbers on tests taken at events where tests were done heavily at Slams. If most of the doping is done when the players are training as written by these reports, do you think WADA or any doping task force would be there requesting sample(s). Rafael and other players have mentioned on a consistent basis on how the doping "police" come at any time and wants to know where the players will be at certain times.However, I will stick to my stance on bring more solid evidence rather than accusations.

I agree with NancyDrew and Rudy, however: would some tennis.com writer do an investigative article on the issue?

A place to start, for instance, would be Operation Puerto. The ITF 'contacted' the Spanish authorities and were 'assured' that no tennis players were involved: despite the fact that the doctor himself said that he had treated tennis players. The Spanish rider who initially broke the story (that he had been coerced into taking drugs by his team) was vilified and ridiculed at the time. Now that everything he said has been proven true, he is living on the unemplyment benefit in Spain. The top five riders in the Tour De France from 2005 did not ride in 2006 because of Operation Puerto. Jan Ullrich's career was ended. Etcetera etcetera.

I love tennis and I hope noone involved is guilty of doping, but I would rather tennis journalists would actually investigate, than sit on their hands.

Who has the lists of names and codenames which were recovered from Dr. Fuentes' office? Has the ITF asked to actually see them? Could they be the subject of a FOI request in whatever country they are now held, presumably Spain? Could Dr. Fuentes be interviewed? What about even getting a tennis journalist to confirm the actual number of out-of-competition tests being done, and the circumstances under which they are done?

This kind of investigation might hurt tennis, but it might also help it, if only by honoring it with high-quality investigative journalism.

Master Ace: The slam testing is a joke. It should like the Tour d' France. Everyone gets blood tested right before the tourny, then the WINNERS of each match get tested.
There was much ado about the AFLD conducting suprise random testing at the French Open this year. Granted the names given by ESPN commentators contained victims of suprising upsets, it turns out the ITF would not allow them to conduct testing. The AFLD could only submit the names of atheletes to be tested, and then it could only be urine tests.
The AFLD busted many cyclists with blood testing. In 08, the AFLD's new blood tests for CERA EPO caught riders. That may be tennis' issue.

Rafa, Murray, and Venus have issues with the drug testing. The players pick the hour in which to be tested. I have no idea about Venus, but Rafa, this year and in past years, and Murray have been tested during the out-of-comp, again with them choosing the hour and during the weeks designated for out-of-comp, because the player is not playing.

I understand what you write about evidence, but I don't think athletes deserve the benefit of the doubt. It's been abused too often. With tennis, it's the same names over and over again for quite a few years. It's like baseball.
I don't want to see the villagers' grabbing their pitchforks, but I'm a little over hearing atheltes complaints.

I am happy that Mr. Tignor approached the subject.
Now I shall step off my soapbox:>

Master Ace: The slam testing is a joke. It should like the Tour d' France. Everyone gets blood tested right before the tourny, then the WINNERS of each match get tested.
There was much ado about the AFLD conducting suprise random testing at the French Open this year. Granted the names given by ESPN commentators contained victims of suprising upsets, it turns out the ITF would not allow them to conduct testing. The AFLD could only submit the names of atheletes to be tested, and then it could only be urine tests.
The AFLD busted many cyclists with blood testing. In 08, the AFLD's new blood tests for CERA EPO caught riders. That may be tennis' issue.

Rafa, Murray, and Venus have issues with the drug testing. The players pick the hour in which to be tested. I have no idea about Venus, but Rafa, this year and in past years, and Murray have been tested during the out-of-comp, again with them choosing the hour and during the weeks designated for out-of-comp, because the player is not playing.

I understand what you write about evidence, but I don't think athletes deserve the benefit of the doubt. It's been abused too often. With tennis, it's the same names over and over again for quite a few years. It's like baseball.
I don't want to see the villagers' grabbing their pitchforks, but I'm a little over hearing atheltes complaints.

I am happy that Mr. Tignor approached the subject.
Now I shall step off my soapbox:>

"I understand what you write about evidence, but I don't think athletes deserve the benefit of the doubt. It's been abused too often. With tennis, it's the same names over and over again for quite a few years. It's like baseball."

NancyDrew,
Understand your point on the athletes. As you know, we had Marion Jones who denied doping for years until last year when she finally admitted it and served her time for it along with giving her medals back to the IOC. And, Manny Ramirez served 50 games for PEDs this year but baseball still has not officially gotten Barry Bonds or Mark McGwire. Alex Rodriguez and Sammy Sosa are part of the 104 names tested positive in 2003 when their joke of a drug program was not official. Wonder if Bonds and McGwire are also on that list. So far, Alex and Sammy has not revealed other names if by chance, they know.


To return, if I may, to the topic Steve mentioned in the first paragraph of this post...

Perhaps, the ITF should have paid more attention to what happened in 2005 when the Fed Cup tie was held the week immediately after Wimbledon. At that time, Lindsay Davenport pulled out of the tie in Moscow, reportedly with a bad back, but also obviously hurting from as dramatic a loss in the Wimby final as Roddick's.

When the decision was made, at different times, by both Tours to have their DC and FC ties right after the Slams, I couldn't believe the reports that the players themselves had voted for such scheduling.

I wondered how so many countries who want or depend on their stars to play for their countries would want to have the competitions so soon after all the hard work and pressure (and the post-Slam activities for winners) that are a part of a major.

I wonder if there will be more of these post-Slam DC ties after Roger's withdrawal from the tourney following the FO citing exhaustion, for example, and Roddick's withdrawal from the Croatia DC tie.

Post a Comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In


  * Only required field   

  (Optional)

  (Optional)

« Playing Ball: Night Game The Hot and Sleepy Season »

More from TennisWorld
Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor

More from Concrete Elbow
TENNIS Magazine is published 10 times per year.




Save 75% off of the annual newsstand price.
Categories
2005 Entries
2006 Entries
2007 Entries
2008 Entries
2009 Entries
Recent Entries
Marat TV: Taking New York
Murray, Basel, and the Beast
The Best at Her Best
UTennis: Andre in '97
The Week in Questions
Who Will Deliver in Doha?
Marat TV: A Teenager in Paris
The Soulful Goof
Nikolay's Challenge
UTennis: The Missing Half
Statistics
This blog currently has 652 entries and 42919 comments.