Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Newsletter Subscribe  |  Store
TENNIS.com - Travelling Circus - Wimbledon: Serb Undercards
   Features
   Backcourt  
   Instruction
   Gear
   College Tennis
   Community
   Travel
   Classifieds
TENNIS.com Blogs
   TennisWorld
   Concrete Elbow
   Champions' Perspective
   Backcourt: Framed
   Ready, Set, Goal: Kellie
   Ready, Set, Goal: Joe
   ATP Fantasy Blog
  
  
  
  
  
  
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
« Wimbledon: Hating Maria Wimbledon: Diagnosing the Upset Bug »
Wimbledon: Serb Undercards
Posted 06/27/2008 @ 6 :21 PM

2008_06_28_tipsarevic_blog A pair of Serbians were expected to outlast the rest of their compatriots at Wimbledon. It's just that few expected that pair to be Janko Tipsarevic and Jelena Jankovic.

But here we are about to head into the middle weekend of the Championships: Ana Ivanovic and Novak Djokovic are gone, while Tipsarevic and Jankovic are alive, kicking and positioned to make a good run into the second week.

Their paths couldn't have been more different - from each other, and from their own personalities.

The low-key Tipsarevic sent a rumble through the men's event here yesterday by knocking out Andy Roddick 6-7(5), 7-5, 6-4, 7-6(4). It was a nail-biting match that just turned at the end when Roddick butchered a series of returns towards the end of the fourth set, including a missed forehand off a very short second serve from Tipsarevic on set point at 5-6. At 4-4 in the tiebreak, Roddick ran awkwardly around a forehand and got passed, and then missed two returns in a row to end the match.

Tattooed, pierced and bespectacled, Tipsarevic is a brooding and bookish figure with a Dostoyevsky tattoo on his arm ("Beauty will save the world" from The Idiot). Unlike the rest of the smiling Serbs, it's hard to recall Tipsarevic cracking too many jokes, but his measured thoughtfulness is just as appealing.

By the time he finished discussing the match, it had taken on an almost hallowed air. "Of course, the best emotion is when you say bye to the crowd and all that stuff," he said. "But the biggest happiness that I feel in myself is when I come to the locker and I talk about the match... the best emotion and the pride that you feel, that you lasted four sets in the top level against the ex-No. 1 is in the locker room when you come back and your emotions are down and your brain starts to work."

His brain had been working during the match too, and he spotted Roddick was on edge. "Apart from his great serving, one of his biggest strengths in my opinion is that he's not making a lot of unforced errors and not making stupid mistakes from the baseline," said Tipsarevic. "But today I could see that he was tight. This is one of the reasons why, especially in the important moments, I made him play. I didn't try to hit great shots like impossible down-the-line shots or something like that, which I'm proud of myself.

"Professional tennis players feel the intensity and see when the other guy is choking. If you can read that, that's a great bonus and benefit for you."

As Roddick frustratedly observed afterwards, he finished 0-8 on break points while Tipsarevic was 2-2. The two were nearly even in points won: 146 for Tipsarevic and 144 for Roddick.

Edging out the win on Centre Court must have been particularly sweet for Tipsarevic given how close he came against Roger Federer at the Australian Open, losing 10-8 in the fifth set of their fourth-round match. For someone just barely staying inside the Top 40, he manages to play the top players very close.

Naturally, Tipsarevic has a theory about this. "Definitely the reason is when I play against big guys - Top 10 players, world No. 1's, ex-world No. 1's - in my head there is this thought knowing that if I don't play good I'm going to get killed on the court. That leaves me with no option and I rise to the occasion.

"When I play with other guys, sometimes for no reason I think that I don't have to play as good to beat them. Then at the end, that costs me the victory."

The stage also makes a difference. "I rise to the occasion when I play on big courts," he said. "But then again, when I play my next match on Court 78, I don't play as good as I played the other day. I don't know why, but hopefully this period in my career is going to pass."

He next plays Dmitry Tursunov, who isn't a pushover, but he isn't Andy Roddick either. The match will be on Court 2, which isn't Court 78, but it's not Centre Court either. If he can avoid the letdown he says he's prone to, Tipsarevic is now in a completely open quarter of the draw and is as good a bet to make the semifinals as anyone in this section.

Incidentally, he thinks the theory behind the rise of Serbia and the rest of Easten Europe is bunk. "I don't believe in Rocky Balboa stories and this. We don't have money when we were kids and now we fight more than the British. This is complete Hollywood story, which I don't believe in."

Meanwhile, all the upsets on the women's side means that the comical, outgoing Jankovic has been flying under the radar. It must be driving her crazy - she's usually the drama queen. But after cruising through her first few matches, she's had little to complain about except her cold, which is now into its 48th week. "I was sick and I had an injury with my arm throughout the French Open, and after that I couldn't also practice for nine days. And now I can finally play without pain, and I'm still not 100% healthy," she said. "I'm still blowing my nose but it's not that bad."

She's got a tough road to the semifinals because it likely goes through Venus Williams in the quarterfinals. But don't count her out, because Jankovic has a good record against both Williamses sisters and likes playing them. She's 4-3 against Venus, beating her here in three tough sets in 2006 before Venus returned last year to make her run to the title.

For the past three Slams, the Serbian flag has been flying during in the final weekend. Completing the quadruple now looks like a tough bet, but it's still a possibility. The flagbearers, however, are a little different this time around.

| | Send to a Friend
Comments

My thoughts on Ivanovic lost:

In just a mere two days, the thoughts that there was no real depth in women’s tennis have been annihilated faster than Maria Sharapova and now, Ana Ivanovic here.

All those years of cupcake first week talk, where the usual quote was “now the real tournament starts for the women” seem now about as antiquated as Bill Simmons tennis brain (if there is any left that is).
For those wishing that people would simply shut up about the women’s game not being as strong in numbers as the men’s game in terms of depth, hope maybe currently unfolding in front of our eyes.

[edited for length]

Didn't Federer win the 5th set 10-8, and not 8-6 as you said?

Jerrell - I have noticed that you are using these blog as a forum to promote your own writing. Although we appreciate that is a difficult to start as a writer- being one myself - please don't encroach on another one's space. Once was bad enough ( Maria's piece) but you seem to have done it again. Comments are always welcome in all of these blogs ( steve's, pete's and kamakshi's) as you may have noticed and people are incredibly polite, but please dont take advantage.

love tennis,

I'm not taking advantage, I'm just giving a feeling about what I saw and trying to convey what I feel. Also, no one complained on the other boards about it yesterday or sent me an email about it, and a few people on the board liked it. And nobody from Tennis.com compained about it and I am respectful to everyone.

Hi Jerell-the last couple have certainly been a bit long. You might want to think about starting your own blog! I've shortened the one above since this is the second time.

crazyone,

10-8 was the final set scoreline in the match.

By the way, I don't know if enough attention was given to this, and I hope I don't get anyone in trouble here. But if Jon Wertheim did it at SI, then it should be more than again.

If anybody read Kamakshi's reponse to Simmons, it was great. Here it is. Kamakshi, for lack of a better phrase, "you kicked ass" here.
http://home.cogeco.ca/~courtcoverage/ESPN.html

cool, i actually in the stages on that blog at the moment

Who knew that my two favorite serbs would still be at Wimbledon? I'm so excited!

I actually thought Jerell's post was interesting. my two cents: i am slightly heartbroken over ana's loss today. however, I am uplifted simply by the grit she DID show against Dechy in the epic match by finally winning it. it's hard to even BEGIN to imagine what pressure she must have felt: a newly crowned no. 1, amped by her recent grand slam (first!) win, trying to adjust to the grass game against a classy veteran, ALL WHILST her game was faltering and coming apart (all ana's dedicatd fans will admit, she was not playing very well, yeah?). With that kind of burden on her, she still pushed on and won.

it actually seems natural then that she would be drained and stiff (as opposed to being "relaxed" with a "nothing to lose attitude") against another doubles specialist whose balls were coming in exceptionally accurate and fast. I am not worried for ana. I feel like as she said in her press conf, this will only be another step in her development as the world's no. 1 player. (Jerell, I am going to respectfully disagree with your emphasis on her tears or the questions regarding how well ana'll respond to pressure. at this point, 3 weeks into being no. 1, it's too soon to say anything objective about her response to the pressure, minus the fact that she's still getting used to it...)


NOW, in regards to the two other serbs... i loveeeee jelena's catty and charismatic personality. almost as much as Ana's powerful yet graceful forehand, and bubbly offcourt mannerisms. however, i just dont see jelena defeating Venus OR *if she does* Serena. While I am actually rooting for Svetlana to get over her incredible (relatively speaking) final-choking streak, I still think Serena or Venus will be the ones to yet again stun the tennis world with their tour-inconsistent, yet slam-consistent brilliance. hey, all kudos to the serb if she DOES pull through. (btw, who here is very unimpressed w/ vaidosova's season thus far?? is love a valid excuse??? hmmmmm)

and in terms of the men's game... sorry, rafa vs roger. and i actually think it's rafa's year! :)

jerrell- I am glad you did not take offence- we like having you on this board and look forward to your comments.

adje ana,

I really appreciate that a lot.

When I talked about her tears, I didn't say that her tears will be an example of how she crumbled under pressure. In fact, I'm one of those that think she just had a little more of a "bad day" than being engulfed under the expectations.

But people still are going to raise the questions about her going down the way she did and how she cried when the match was still there for her to come back and win. She never got any consistent momentum in the match and mixing speeds aganist her on the groundstrokes can really fluster her.

One thing tho I have to say, she was very gracious not only in the press room, but unlike a lot of women (i.e. Sharapova, Serena and yes, even Venus, a spade is a spade) she showed how classy she was by waiting for Jie Zheng.

jerrell - thanks for the link to the Bill Simmons piece - I had heard somewhere about it but was not able to locate it. For all those who are not aware - Kamakshi does a website called court coverage - check it out.

appreciate that love tennis,
didn't mean to cause an annoyance there.

Jerell, you're so right -- I thought Ana showed a lot of class by waiting for Jie Zheng. I think it's easier to see how class someone is when they lose than when they win. I think Venus is actually very gracious in defeat too.

"she's had little to complain about except her cold, which is now into its 48th week."

Love it!

Bobby,

watching Venus over the years, I'm 50/50 on whether she would have waited for Zheng if she lost the way Ivanovic did. To lose in the third round with a match you should win is tough especially in straight sets, and I don't remember her waiting for Jelena Jankovic when she beat V two years ago.

Lol, but on Sharapova and Serena waiting, that's about as likely as Ivan Ljubicic getting braids.

before K.T. goes to bed (oh forget it, its 1:25 AM), I wanted to ask if she thinks Jankovic would beat Venus in the quarters?

I think only those that dismiss Jankovic, no matter how annoying she can be at times, are only fools. Venus' stubbornness and unwillingness to adjust at times make her always gives J-squared the confidence to win.

Tipsy plays with guts and smarts. I love the way he takes on the big boys. I'm not surprised he beat Roddick. Roddick doesn't have the ability to think his way through a match and come up with the answers. Remember what happened against Gasquet last year?

On the women's side I'm warming to Jelena's prospects. She knows how to beat Venus and Serena looked very one dimensional against Mauresmo.

Look out though for some surprises from the young Poles and Russians. They are looking hungry and keen.

Safina will be this years champion

Safina will be this years champion

ana ivanovic losing in the way she did is exactly the reason why i can't jump on to her bandwagon yet. she always seems to have these meltdowns after winning big tournaments (Indian Wells this year and the FO. if you want to be viewed as a serious contender for the big prizes and be viewed as a legit #1 then you'll have to be consistent about your results.
so she's nice and sweet. big deal. last i checked, nice and sweet doesn't win you a Grand Slam. tennis is not a popularity contest.
this is why i don't get the hate about sharapova yesterday. she is what she is but when all is said and done, she delivers and her resume is proof of that. she has a little less than 20 titles to her name with 3 Grand Slams! That's enough to earn my admiration and respect, regardless of what kind of person she is. To date, ana has like 5 (i think) tournament titles and one Grand Slam (which to me counts less as she won it by never having to beat any of the big contenders in the game).

Thanks for giving props to Tipsarevic. He is one of the players I like on and off the court... and this was before the AO match with Federer this year. Very insightful and direct to the point but not in an insulting or off-putting manner. Plus, that bakchand is a beauty.

Time for Jankovic to step up!

I like Tipsy more than the other Serbs. He is so brutally honest, which is great.

Now as for Ana, mmmhh. There's a case where she has benefitted from her era. While she is a solid player, I doubt she would have made it to the upper spheres of tennis had there been more consistency on the tour right now. Don't get me wrong, I believe she has great talent, but she isn't a born champion to me, but rather a made one.
I really wish she had more Wilanders. She would be just awesome. Instead, her coach has to avoid telling her she's number one for fear that she'll crumble. Sigh.

good jOb Kamakshi for truthfully and eloquently shredding Simmon's backward, chauvinistic and lame piece of journalism. ESPN by the way withdrew Simmon's article.

I think the hype and pressure got to Ana; but Zheng Jie is not puff cake too. You got to say also that Ana, Maria are a little one dimensional-- their loss shows a lack of ability to change tactics, cool down, step back, and evaluate the options. Something akin to James Blake and Andy Roddick... big hitter, high octane game lacking nuance.

Jerell, I can't be sure but I think Venus was gracious after her loss to Flavia at the French. You're exactly right about JJ -- dismiss her only at your own risk. I love her spunk (and her game too of course). But sometimes the bandages get tiresome. :)

Nice piece on Jelena and Janko, who I very much admire and believe can be a top ten player if only he can be consistent.

WRT waiting for the winner as being classy, I personally don't read much into it because usually a number of people who win stay behind to do stuff sign autographs etc. If the case were the reverse today and Ana won, I don't see how Jie would have waited for her not because she (Jie) isn't classy but because Ana would probably still be hitting a few balls to the crowd and signing a few autographs before she leaves. So personally I don't read much into waiting or not waiting.

I like your first comment, Jerell - I agree that the women's game has started to evolve recently (it seems to go in cycles.) There have been many exciting matches at Wimbledon and the new players are stepping up and showing what they got. It's fun to like women's tennis again (now if only Justin Gimelstob would shut up!)

Just beautiful article, Kamakashi, beautiful. It made me miss my brooding intellectual Russian(boy)s, the kinds that brag about those really long books they've read. Maybe time to get back to school? Or I can just look forward to more of your writing on Tipsy (much easier solution ;) )

I'm about to read the cc article. Yay.

Agree 100% with "adje ana! 06/27/2008 @ 7:25 PM" up to this point..."I am not worried for ana. I feel like as she said in her press conf, this will only be another step in her development as the " A lot for her to learn. She should play a little doubles when she gets some time. It helped Rafa.

appreciate it freakyfrites.

To everyone, we must remember than Jankovic has a very dangerous matchup aganist Caroline Wozniacki at 8 tomorrow (on the East Coast of the US of course). And the great thing about that is ESPN AND NBC are going to be live TOMORROW. Wow!

Well, sort of live. They will show Jankovic-Wozniacki, but I think they will black out Venus vs Sanchez on ESPN to have an American in their time window to do that typical BS they do.

I think Wozniacki will push this to the limits. Through the match is vastly different form Jankovic battling Tamira Pascek in Melbourne this year, I think that match will have that type of drama and will go down the wire. And I think Jankovic will survive in another thriller. She is really the last chance her to prevent a Williams final.

Tosin,

I agree with her playing doubles. I'm trying to think, wasn't her and Kirlenko doubles partners, or was that someone else?

The verdict? Effing awesome.
(Re: court coverage article)

I do not like Jankovic because she is a drama queen and a points chaser. I also don't think she is that great of a tennis player beyond her defensive skills and atleticism. She is a lousy server (which will not win her slams) and her backhand, in my opinion, is NOT all that. In any case, I think Wozniacki will take her out before she can even make the quarters.

Admit it or not, this Wimbledon is on the racket of the Williams Sisters to either win or lose. They have not won 6 of the last 8 Wimbledons for nothing.

While I am making predictions, I think Kuznetsova will lose to Radwanska as well. Kuzzy is not that great on grass and her head is not often engaged with her superior tennis skills.

Tipsarevic might get to finals, i think his only problem is being in Djokovic's shadow, now that he is not he might just suprise us all. He has so much talent only if he was as good mentaly.

http://thedeftvolleys.blogspot.com/

Through it's in its early hours, here's the blog dedicated to just tennis (and soccer) as well with what I felt about Ivanovic and Sharapova.

One.

To me Tipsarevic is one of the most exciting players in Tennis. His matches in grand slams have been epic this year. My only complaint is that he is a grunter. But he makes up for it with the cool glasses.

its ajde

Will someone start to talk about that what could happen with Janko and Jelena in the next rounds.This blog is boring.I think if Janko will have a good day that he cuold win Rafa in the semis.And Jelena will win Wimbledon.She shoud won RG but she was hurt.That is why she needed to go to Belgrade after semis.It was miracle that she went into semis like that.And one other thing.Why Ana lost?Because she dont know the word DEFENCE.

...48th week.
Bwah ha ha
Kamakshi rawks!

Jerell, i like your comments. and you are as gracious as ana was when told that you are wrong, well keep it up, looking forward to seeing your blogs in the future

Kamakshi,
To not mention that Roger played very badly for his standards in Australia and had a case of mononuclesosis (which should always be mentioned, also in Dubai and Indian Wells and Miami too) and was very bad on breakpoints that day, worse than Roddick was the other day, and he still won, is biased and disrespectful on your part.

The difference is that a sick Roger and bad Roger is still better than a good Tipsarevic.
A relatively healthy Roddick and bad Roddick is not better than a good Tipsarevic, as was proved on Thursday.

The stats prove also that Roger won 5 more games and 29 more points and 2 more breaks than Janko did in Australia, so the 10-8 win in the 5th is misleading because Roger easily could've and should've won that match in 3 or 4 sets both on the court and statistically.

Roger beat Tipsarevic in Australia, like Roger always wins. Janko didn't lose. He played great and did nothing wrong, but he was just outplayed by the much better player normally who on that day played and felt very bad and sick with mono, and still beat him. On a normal day, like when Roger plays and feels well, Roger would crush him, like he should.

I guarantee that the next time Roger plays Janko (presuming that it's when Roger is healthy and not rusty, and also presuming it's before Roger is in major decline in maybe 3-4 years time) on any surface, just to keep him quiet and others quiet, Roger will demolish him and beat him easily in straight sets like he would've if he was healthy and playing normally and should've even in that match with the huge statistical and points advantage in Australia.

Also,
Jankovic is the #2 seed here and #2 ranked player in the world for now and has been to 4 career Grand Slam semis already, so how is it surprising that she's still playing? It would be very surprising if she lost already actually. She should be and almost always is in the 3rd round and by her seed, ranking, etc. she should get to at least the quarterfinals here and everywhere else too where she has been many times before in Grand Slams and at Wimbledon before too.

Yes Earl, the mono should be mentioned for all eternity. So in case Fed ...ups, sorry... Roger, doesn't win another Slam in his career, we should all be reminded why is that the case - for all eternity.

At AO, Tipsy blasted Feds backhand like no other, with consistency and depth. He also took his chances and worked hard to even get there. Much more than Santoro was able to do in Feds previous match, in which he obliterated the poor man, losing like 4 games in total.

Its funny really, that with all that mono Fed had at the time when facing Tipsy, he still mustered enough effort to practice for hours trying to fix what went wrong.

Mono story is turning into exactly what it shouldn't be - everlasting excuse. Incredible, considering it was the mildest of monos ever heard of.

Very nice article btw, Kamakshi. Its interesting that the moment the 'front-runners' get ousted, there are others that stand out. Like a never-dying creature. For example, at Miami or Rome on the womens side JJ went to finals wining one; or Miami only in case of Tipsy, he went to quarters losing to Davy. Its strange phenomenon, hard to say theirs results are completely unrelated. Maybe they somehow share the pressure, so when one loses, other step up to 'vindicate' or something similar.

As for prospect at Wimby, I see that JJ went over Wozniacky but she has a knee issue. If she has enough steam left, she can reach Venus. And than who knows? I'd say she has a semi-solid chance of going to the finals.

As for Tipsy, I'm very happy to notice some kind of serenity about him. He knows his limits and luckily for him those are difficult for others to surpass. In another words, he has enough of the game to trouble most of the field, but what was lacking, that self-belief is there. He took both TBs from Tursunov just moments ago, so he's confident surely. He's not a lock for SFs of course, but as you say, he's good bet as anybody in that quarter.

Earl-The point was that to come so close to beating Federer and lose must have been painful for Tipsarevic. That's true no matter what the form of the respective players. No slight to Roger intended, obviously.

On Jankovic, absolutely she's the No. 2 (and probably No. 1 by the end of this tournament), but there's no denying that she was overshadowed by Ivanovic coming in. I agree there's much less gap between her and Ivnaovic than between Djokovic and Tipsarevic, but in terms of results and expectations, there's nonetheless a gap.

Jerell-on the potential Jankovic-Venus match, I'd put Venus as the favorite, but if Venus is patchy I'd give Jankovic a very good shot for the reasons above. But Jankovic has to play much beter than she did today or she's got little shot.

Now with this slight injury (which I now believe to be more serious than the initial "maybe its gamemanship" thing from Jankovic), I think her chance to win the title here , or at least get to the finals, has diminished.

Especially since that potential match with Venus will be on Centre Court and not on say, Court 2 where she beat her two years ago.

With the way Venus played today, and I really think she played well in terms of her movement and hitting her spots to garner 11 aces, I think she won't lose a set to Jankovic based on current form. Jankovic has to get past Tanasugan in the next round because she has nothing to lose and is comfortable on grass. Plus, that injury will make that match another tough one for her.

AJDE JANKO!

"I'm not surprised he beat Roddick. Roddick doesn't have the ability to think his way through a match and come up with the answers. Remember what happened against Gasquet last year?"

The endless Roddick bashing on tennis.com has become predictable and boring. If Roddick were really as bad a player as so many of you seem to think he is then how exactly has he managed to amass 25 career titles and stay in the top ten so consistently for years? According to people like you, everybody had his serve "figured out" a long time ago, and yet Roddick still keeps on winning, even though he is "nothing but a serve". Maybe Roddick didn't win today, but he will again somewhere down the road. He is much more of a thinker than people like you give him credit for and his post match interviews prove it. Maybe the real problem is your own insecurity and lack of ability? Why else would you keep trying so gosh darn hard to knock Roddick down in order to make you feel better about yourself?

Kamakshi,thank you for very good article.Now,seriously,I'd like to ask you ,something like serb SP(suicide pool),How far can JJ and Janko go?Please,I'd like to hear your opinion.

kamakshi- just read your reply to Bill Simmons on Court Coverage- like someone else said earlier - did you kick ass!! Good for you girl. Someone needed to speak up for the sport. Tennis magazine needs to give you a raise just for this.

Women's tennis really is not a consistent enough like Men's tennis...

i actually re-read the response to the bill simmons article, and enjoyed it all over again...! definate kudos there.

i was out today and came back just when the boards were starting to slam jelena for her 'gamesmanship' re: the request for trainer. I didnt understand what people were yipping about, as hte first thing I saw on my tv was the shot where she hyperextended the knee. My first thought was 'eesh - is she double jointed?'. HOpefully there's no serious damage and she can play well monday, she definately needs her wheels working.

Tipsy plays on Monday, as do all of the remaining 32 players in both draws combined (16 each).

The Roger-Lleyton, Rafa-Mikhail, and Andy M.- Richard G. are probably the 3 best matches on paper (all 3 on men's draw considering that both Williams sisters and Jankovic are all playing unseeded players) in which ever order.

I would say that Roger, based on past and current results on grass and form, is the biggest favorite of all, but Lleyton is no pushover and he always fights his hardest on every point and is playing well too so far.
The best match in terms of competitiveness and similar talent is probably Gasquet-Murray. That should be good with either player capable of winning that match. Richard is probably a slight favorite considering slightly higher seed, ranking and last year's semifinal here, but only slight.

Second week of Wimbledon, here we come.

Voks, what also seems everlasting is how a player in most any sport can play at the highest level for years (Roger is still #1 in the world ... for a record number of weeks, and counting ... last I checked ... not Rafa, not Nole ... Roger Federer), but the moment he/she reveals a chink in the armor (whether caused by sickness, increased level of competition, etc.), their newly crowned 'successors' are hoisted up and paraded around ... while the 'former' #1 is picked apart ... ala Gretzsky/Lemieux.

Wayne Gretzky changed hockey ... perhaps the greatest team sport player of all time in any sport, yet as soon as Super Mario started putting up Gretzky like numbers ... and Gretzky was no longer as productive, everything he had accomplished didn't seem to matter to those looking for the next big thing.

Though I'm a big fan of Rafa and Roger ... even Novak, when he keeps his mouth shut, and let's his racket to the talking, I have not forgotten who is #1 in the world ... and won't forget when he isn't.

Congrats to my childhood friend Tipsa!!!! boy, you deserved it!!!! And also to Jelena "Jellyfish" Jankovic!!!

Vamos guys!!!!:)))))

World #1 Roger Federer plays Lleyton Hewitt tomorrow at 1 pm on Center court in Round 16.

If it doesn't rain tomorrow and there are no delays, Wimbledon will still be right on schedule.

Where is this Bill Simmons article?

The Bill Simmons article was in the Espn Magazine- link
http://sports.espn.go.com/espnmag/story?id=3446552

Kamakshi's reply is on her website Court Coverage right at the top under - the great disappearing ESPN blog entry here- at the top of the page
http://home.cogeco.ca/~courtcoverage/


kwok you, abc, jb - thanks on the Simmons response. Done in the same spirit as the original.

md-Tipsarevi has a shot at the semis if he can keep playing like this because he's in a good section of the draw. That could be anyone's quarter.

The outcome of the Venus-Jankovic match is really in Venus' hands. If Jankovic has a great day she could pull off a win, but that might be tough because of the injury. But either way, the match should be quite close.

interesting sports writing Kamakshi!!

I think Tipsa will crumble the next round. he never did well beyond the 4th round in the past!!

btw, is Vijay in the commentary box and if yes which channel?

crazyone,
jerrel put 10-8 not 8-6!

Vamos Hewitt! Let's have some more big upsets. :D

tipsarevic (hope I got the spelling right, purposefully not scrolling back up just in case I'm wrong) seems like an actual normal guy, not like a lot of the ATP- guys who have been breed since age 10 to be TENNIS MACHINES. boring, self-occupied tennis machines...

Thank you Kamakshi.I hope both of them will play well.

Kamakshi, thanks for your wonderful rebuff of Simmons' lousy tennis piece. I am both a tennis fan, having played many years as a youth, and a Simmons fan. But he does not know tennis. American team sports, yes, tennis no. I only got through about half of his clunker and was irritated by it but couldn't really articulate why. Thanks for doing just that!

And thanks to the commenter who provided the link.

Post a Comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In


  * Only required field   

  (Optional)

  (Optional)

« Wimbledon: Hating Maria Wimbledon: Diagnosing the Upset Bug »

More from TennisWorld
Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor

More from Concrete Elbow
TENNIS Magazine is published 10 times per year.




Save 75% off of the annual newsstand price.
Categories
Australian Open 2007
Australian Open 2008
Davis Cup 2007
French Open 2007
french Open 2008
Indian Wells 2007
Key Biscayne 2007
Las Vegas 2007
San Jose 2007
Toronto 2007
Toronto 2008
Wimbledon 2007
Wimbledon 2008
Recent Entries
Toronto: Rafa Reigns
Toronto: A Tale of Two Tiebreaks
Toronto: Simon Says
Toronto: Rafa's Take
Toronto: Waiting in the Wings Now
Toronto: Roger and the Monster
Toronto: Doubles the Fun
Toronto: Roddick's Resolution
Toronto: The Tournament After the Final Before
Statistics
This blog currently has 114 entries and 2878 comments.