Live Scores  |  TV Schedule  |  Video  |  Pro Schedule  |  Rankings  |  Players  |  Stats  |  Message Boards  |  Blogs Subscribe  |  Store - Travelling Circus - San Jose: Sampras Holds Court
   Classifieds Blogs
   Concrete Elbow
   String Theory
   The Healthy Player
   The Pro Shop
   Backcourt: Framed
   ATP Fantasy Blog
TENNIS Magazine
   Gift Subscription
   Purchase Back Issues
   Current Issue
   Past Issues
   Customer Care
« AO: Getting Out Of the Pool San Jose: Easy Does It for Querrey »
San Jose: Sampras Holds Court
Posted 02/19/2008 @ 7 :40 AM

2008_02_18_sampras_blog So after the big, swirling tides of the Australian Open, here we are in the quieter waters of San Jose. It's fun to be at a smaller event and do the fan thing a bit, indulge your esoteric curiosities and check out all things that have to be to be ignored for more important happenings during big tournaments. If the Grand Slams and big Masters Series/Tier I events are the meat of the tennis tour, these smaller events are the potatoes, providing the carbs that keep the calendar going month to month.

I've been to this tournament a few times since I have relatives living nearby. Aside from the sunlight deprivation that's an inevitable part of indoor tournaments, the event has some interesting characteristics. Because there's only one court, a determined spectator can theoretically see every ball struck during the week. On the flip side, the single court also means that play has to start at 9:30 am to fit all the matches in -- and the emptiness of the stands at that time indicates that there are in fact very few people determined to actually watch every single point.

The field can be patchy, but is usually sandwiched by a few (usually American) stars and some interesting lower-ranked players. This year, the tournament has billed its star attraction a package deal -- the winning U.S. Davis Cup team of Andy Roddick, James Blake and the Bryan brothers. And as the team members would say, the practice partners are not to be forgotten --  Mardy Fish and Robbie Ginepri. A lineup of promising American hopefuls also dots the field -- Donald Young, John Isner, Sam Querrey, Jessie Levine, etc. There's also Tommy Haas, coming back from yet another shoulder surgery, and new Japanese sensation Kei Nishikori.

By geographic accident, the tournament is remarkably well covered for its size. In fact, as frequent TENNIS magazine writer Joel Drucker likes to joke, the media field is often better than the player field. He's a nearby resident and has been covering the event for 27 years. Also living nearby are Doug Robson of USA Today and the Oakland-based Inside Tennis magazine staff of Matt Cronin, Bill Simons and Richard Osborn. Compare that to say, Las Vegas, which last year had full-time coverage only
from one local reporter, one Reuters reporter and (to stretch a point) me. Others may also drop in, like Bonnie D. Ford of ESPN (if there's cycling going on nearby) and Bruce Jenkins of the San Francisco Chronicle (if there's a marquee match-up). Add to that a fairly large contingent of sports reporters from local papers who cover tennis once a year, and you're guaranteed some eclectic press conferences -- everything from the impossibly mundane to the improbably arcane.

The press box is right beside the court, which provides the rare opportunity to watch an Andre Agassi, Pete Sampras or Andy Roddick from ground level. The first time I was here, four years ago, Roddick was playing against -- Kenneth Carlsen, probably -- and kept glancing over at these seats, specifically the narrow area with Joel Drucker on my left and Matt Cronin on my right. It grew puzzling. Brad Gilbert's father, who bears a striking resemblance to his son, was sitting right behind, but that didn't seem to be it.

Was it because we looked like we were talking instead of watching the match?, I wondered. "It doesn't matter," replied Matt, following with what must be one of the immortal lines in tennis journalism. "He's a tennis player. He'll just think we're talking about him."

It still cracks me up.

As for the mystery, it was finally solved when Roddick hit a backhand winner down the line, looked over at Joel and said, "Looking good, Joel, looking good."

Needless to say, it takes a while to live down getting a shout out from a player during a match.

Another feature of the San Jose tournament is that that it announces its first few night sessions months in advance, something other events could probably think about emulating. This year, the first night match was actually an exhibition, between Pete Sampras and Tommy Haas. I've been a skeptic in the burgeoning Sampras-comeback debate that's  sprung up since he's begun playing the one-off matches and seniors events: after all, he's 36, has been off the tour for over five years, and was struggling to win matches in the run up to his amazing 2002 US Open win. While he might still be able to win matches against current pros on a fast surface, he'd be a dangerous floater rather than a tournament threat.

Still, he looked impressive in his 6-4, 6-2 win over Haas in San Jose on Monday night. The leaping overhead has lost a little of its height but the serve and volleys are still lose to those of yore. Comparing his potential competitiveness on tour from these exhibitions, though, is tricky because the other player isn't playing at full intensity. It was less of a surprise that Sampras defeated Haas than the win he scored over Roger Federer in one of their three Asian exhibitions in the winter, but even then, Sampras told the crowd after the match that "Tommy was pretty nice to me tonight."

Sampras is clearly taking the relevance of these contests a lot less seriously than many of those watching, particularly in terms of what they mean to the players facing him. "Tommy has more important things to do this week than worry about me. It's an opportunity for him to get used to the court. It's tough to get practice time here."

The comeback talk may continue, but his stance makes it unlikely that it'll actually happen. "There's a lot to lose and not a lot to gain," he said firmly. "There's got to be a reason to come out of retirement. Some people miss the limelight, some people want to make more money, some people don't have anything else to do in their lives. And there's no reason for me to come back.

"I don't miss the limelight, I don't need the money, I -- the tricky thing with me is that I stopped not because of injury, it was more of an emotional level. I could still play at a high level, it's just emotionally I was spent."

And with 14 Grand Slams and six year-end No. 1 finishes, he has fulfilled his main goals.

But of course, one of the reasons people are keen to see Sampras take another shot at playing on tour is to see how today's players would react when facing a primarily serve-and-volley game. Sampras ponders the same thing himself -- maybe not enough to step up himself, but enough to quiz Federer on the topic when they hung out during their Asian exo swing. "We didn't talk that much about tennis but... I actually had a curious question. When he beat me at Wimbledon he served and volleyed, and I asked him, 'Why are you staying back now?," said Sampras. "He just said he was more comfortable staying back, that he wasn't comfortable coming in. I said 'Is the court slower and he said, 'No, it's not really slower, I've just figured out how I need to play on grass.'

"I think before he served and volleyed because he felt he had to, now he feels he's better than everyone just staying back. He doesn't need to worry himself about trying to come in. He can come in when he wants to, but nothing where he's trying to force himself to come in.

After all, the game that defeated Sampras also led Federer to lose to Mario Ancic in the first round the following year. "Because I guess after he beat he came back the next year and served and volleyed and lost, so I guess he didn't feel that comfortable coming in and he decided to stay back.

"It was a good decision," concluded Sampras, wryly.

But while he doesn't have much desire to rejoin the new baseline world, he did reveal he wishes he'd paid more attention to its newfangled equipment when he was still out there. Surprisingly or not, his first thought goes to the advantage he might have gained on his weakest surface, clay -- the French Open is the only major he never won.

"I regret it a lot, I do," he said. "Especially on the clay, I would have loved to put the bigger racquet with the sort of string everyone's using, you can get so much power from way beyond the court. The combination is incredible. I used a small racquet with the same specs my whole career, and at the end it started to catch up with me -- I'm playing Roddick with the big Babolat racquet, serving 140.

"If I was going to continue to play, I would have had to change my equipment. But looking back at it now, I would have experimented more, not been so mentally stubborn.

"Actually, [well-known coach Jose] Higueras recommended it... and I said no. I should have taken that advice, at least tried it. But I was too stubborn.

Now, he's armed himself with a bigger Wilson frame and hybrid strings. "I experimented a bit and kind of found of combination that I like -- you can still swing hard and have control," he said. "It's a great combination. It's almost like cheating."

| | Send to a Friend

What-no Comments! It was a well written and interesting article, thanks!

Perhaps in retrospect Pete feels he should have experimented more with new equipment, but one of the things that made him consistently great was his belief in himself and his setup. If he was constantly trying out the latest trends in racquet and string technology, it may have taken a slight edge off of his unshakable belief in himself, which in turn could have taken away some of his results.

For example, in 2002, prior to hooking back up with Annocone in the North American summer swing, Pete was tinkering with his coaches, agent, and his schedule (playing Halle instead of Queens prior to Wimby, etc.). I think these changes in his setup were a tacit admission to himself that he needed something different to be at the top, which up to that point was very un-Pete-like, thus the mediocre 2002. If he was doing the same with racquet head sizes and strings, I think a creature of habit such as Sampras could have suffered slightly, not benefited. Just my two cents.

Which also proves a point made by one of the contributors here (Bodo, Tignor, ...etc) most of the GOTT (greatest of their times) would have fared well in any era, it's just a matter of being the right age, using the right equipment and wanting to put in the work to be a dominating/feared player.
- Sampras would've been that in any era ... and with competitive matches with the current crop of top guys more than proves that.
- And I am pretty sure he's not the only one, however the more unidimensional ones would done well also in the unique ways (like the clay-courters, the S&V=Wimby, or the 1 hit wonders.


Nice article with a personal touch. Look forward to more of these over the next few days. By the way is this tournament being covered on TV?

So the grass courts at Wimbledon are not that much slower huh? Roger just figured out how to play on it, interesting... The funny thing though is commentators and columnists can say whatever they want about the speed of the court, they are still not playing out there to really be able to tell how much slower or faster these courts are compared to those of 15 years ago.

god. i wish sampras would make a comeback and win the french! i would fly to paris to see that!

this is a great article. Thanks so much. I love it when the great tennis player reveal such technical points.....about the string, the racquet, Federer more comfortable staring!

So, Fed's serve got much better from the middle of the last year. Is it mostly his racquet? Did he use the same racquet in French Open or is he going to use it in 2008?

Message to Pete Sampras:

Pete, you are a great champion, the greatest of all time. No regrets!!

Great article..only thing to add is that the Delray Beach winner was Kei Nei Kishikori.

Come back, Pete! IF you can keep Roger from winning Wimbie, he may never pass you record of 14 slams

>and new Japanese sensation Nei Kishikori.

His name is Kei Nishikori.

An all-in-one reply:

No Need to Change -- Sampras did say he'd experimented with a few things during his career, as you mention, but that he always felt that his racquet had to be a constant. It seems he might now feel the racquet would have been a better place to experiment.

But on the other hand, players like Chang did tinker with new racquets and it didn't help, so who knows what the actual effect would have been.

x--I believe it's on local Fox Sports stations during the later stages, but that might be it. It's also available on the internet through B2 networks (try the official tournament site) but the pricing is unrealistic.

Swiss Maestro--that's Sampras' belief, and he says Federer says the same thing. Most players seem convinced it's slower, though.

Zolarafa--I didn't mention this in the post itself, but if you're interested, Sampras said he uses gut on the mains and synthetic on the crosses -- like Federer, but unlike the majority of pros who do it the other way around. He feels it allows him to use the bigger racquet, because it keeps the extra power under control.

Patrick--thanks; twisted fingers. :) Now fixed.

Since Pete is playing with the nCode Tour 90, maybe Wilson will go back and start manufacturing them so we who play with them can still purchase them.

Since Pete is playing with the nCode Tour 90, maybe Wilson will go back and start manufacturing them so we who play with them can still purchase them.

Even though Sampras is emotionally spent, playing Roger Federer, doesn't that give him a reason to come back on the ATP tour? It'd be nice to people like him and Ivanisevic playing again.

Pete, I'm SO glad to see you back in "the ring," or rather the "rectangle." ALSO very happy that you were able to win 1 of the last of 3 Asian exhibitions against Federer and pleased with your results against Tommy Haas here at the SAP. I will be rooting for YOU whole heartedly for the Madison Square Garden expo. This is good for Tennis and fans like me who came on board at about the time you were exiting the sport. This does not mean I would favor a come back. However, it is good for posterity! Keep that competitive spirit alive. YOU GO, PETE! YOU GO! I LOVE IT.

Good article. Nice job on touching on facts and emotional stuff. My name isa Borat. VERY NIIIICE!!!!

"it's almost like cheating."

Too true. I play with a friend who uses a technifibre. I started wondering how he was able to stay in some points he had no business staying in... until I tried his racquet. It's a great racquet, good balance, feel, power and control. I dunno what strings or tension he had, but it was noticeably better than the Prince I've been using for years. Knowing that he was 'cheating', I now feel no guilt when I throw in morbid slices and head-height topspin - seems only fair to me.

kamakshi, thanks for the post. i was wondering where i'd see a news on the sampras-haas exo, and here it is. oh, but definitely much, much better than just a news story. very insightful tidbits from you, pete and even roger. thanks.

thanks a lot!

Posted by jojo 02/19/2008 @ 5:12 PM

Come back, Pete! IF you can keep Roger from winning Wimbie, he may never pass you record of 14 slams


do you believe in unlikelyhood?

Posted by Kamakshi 02/19/2008 @ 5:31 PM

An all-in-one reply:

Swiss Maestro--that's Sampras' belief, and he says Federer says the same thing. Most players seem convinced it's slower, though.



You sure can bring up whatever the non-Wimbledon champions say but I think I'll still go with the opinion of two guys who have won Wimbledon at least 5 times each over the rest of the field who has how many active champions no named Roger Federer?? mmmm one to be precise: Lleyton Hewitt...


Thanks for a great report. Keep 'um coming; I like your style of writing, but your columns are too few and far between. Tell us more about yourself and your relation to The Tennis.


On the grass at Wimbledon the head groundsmen said last year that they increased ratio of rye grass seed before the 2003 championships - the first time Fed won it. He also said that since then the grass hasn't been changed at all.

Its no coincidence that Roger started dominating when he stopped serve and volleying and developed a so called all-round game. He's much better at that then the former and also, still developing technology favours a predominantly baseline game. What makes Roger exceptional is his ability to vary his game, to think (unlike Roddick and Blake who can only blast), and work angles much like Hingis before him. Eventually though Novak and the new generation will do what the Williams did to Hingis simply blast Roger and his precious beautiful game of the court. Eitehr that or if another Sampras turned up. If Nadal had even a half decent serve Roger would not be dominating Tennis today. Nadal hits his serve like he hits his groundstrokes, and for serving thats pretty pathetic

The comments to this entry are closed.

« AO: Getting Out Of the Pool San Jose: Easy Does It for Querrey »

More from TennisWorld
Concrete Elbow by Steve Tignor

More from Concrete Elbow
TENNIS Magazine is published 10 times per year.

Save 75% off of the annual newsstand price.
Australian Open 2007
Australian Open 2008
Davis Cup 2007
French Open 2007
french Open 2008
Indian Wells 2007
Key Biscayne 2007
Las Vegas 2007
San Jose 2007
Toronto 2007
Toronto 2008
Wimbledon 2007
Wimbledon 2008
Recent Entries
Toronto: Rafa Reigns
Toronto: A Tale of Two Tiebreaks
Toronto: Simon Says
Toronto: Rafa's Take
Toronto: Waiting in the Wings Now
Toronto: Roger and the Monster
Toronto: Doubles the Fun
Toronto: Roddick's Resolution
Toronto: The Tournament After the Final Before
Wimbledon: Departure Lounge diary
This blog currently has 114 entries and 2878 comments.